Inflammatory phenotyping predicts clinical outcome in COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to more than 760,000 deaths worldwide (correct as of 16th August 2020). Studies suggest a hyperinflammatory response is a major cause of disease severity and death. Identitfying COVID-19 patients with hyperinflammation may identify subgroups who could benefit from targeted immunomodulatory treatments. Analysis of cytokine levels at the point of diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection can identify patients at risk of deterioration. METHODS: We used a multiplex cytokine assay to measure serum IL-6, IL-8, TNF, IL-1ß, GM-CSF, IL-10, IL-33 and IFN-γ in 100 hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 at admission to University Hospital Southampton (UK). Demographic, clinical and outcome data were collected for analysis. RESULTS: Age > 70 years was the strongest predictor of death (OR 28, 95% CI 5.94, 139.45). IL-6, IL-8, TNF, IL-1ß and IL-33 were significantly associated with adverse outcome. Clinical parameters were predictive of poor outcome (AUROC 0.71), addition of a combined cytokine panel significantly improved the predictability (AUROC 0.85). In those ≤70 years, IL-33 and TNF were predictive of poor outcome (AUROC 0.83 and 0.84), addition of a combined cytokine panel demonstrated greater predictability of poor outcome than clinical parameters alone (AUROC 0.92 vs 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: A combined cytokine panel improves the accuracy of the predictive value for adverse outcome beyond standard clinical data alone. Identification of specific cytokines may help to stratify patients towards trials of specific immunomodulatory treatments to improve outcomes in COVID-19.

Acquired immune responses to the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccination in COPD.

Epidemiological data suggest that influenza vaccination protects against all-cause mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. However, recent work has suggested there is a defect in the ability of some COPD patients to mount an adequate humoral response to influenza vaccination. The aim of our study was to investigate humoral and cell-mediated vaccine responses to the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccination (TIV) in COPD subjects and healthy controls. Forty-seven subjects were enrolled into the study; 23 COPD patients, 13 age-matched healthy controls (HC ≥ 50) and 11 young healthy control subjects (YC ≤ 40). Serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated pre-TIV vaccination and at days 7 and 28 and 6 months post-vaccine for haemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) titre, antigen-specific T cell and antibody-secreting cell analysis. The kinetics of the vaccine response were similar between YC, HC and COPD patients and there was no significant difference in antibody titres between these groups at 28 days post-vaccine. As we observed no disease-dependent differences in either humoral or cellular responses, we investigated if there was any association of these measures with age. H1N1 (r = -0·4253, P = 0·0036) and influenza B (r = -0·344, P = 0·0192) antibody titre at 28 days negatively correlated with age, as did H1N1-specific CD4+ T helper cells (r = -0·4276, P = 0·0034). These results suggest that age is the primary determinant of response to trivalent vaccine and that COPD is not a driver of deficient responses per se. These data support the continued use of the yearly trivalent vaccine as an adjunct to COPD disease management.

GM-CSF expression in pulmonary epithelial cells is regulated negatively by posttranscriptional mechanisms.

Incubation of pulmonary A549 cells with D609, a phosphatidyl-choline specific phospholipase C (PC-PLC)-inhibitor, or the anti-oxidant, pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PTDC), markedly increased IL-1beta-induced GM-CSF elaboration. This effect was observed at the mRNA level and could be partially reproduced by the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide. Following the peak in GM-CSF mRNA, the mRNA half-life (t(1/2)) was 0.5-1 h. This was increased to around 3 h by cycloheximide, whilst following D609 or PDTC treatment there was essentially no degradation. These data suggest the existence of inhibitory pathways that posttranscriptionally regulate GM-CSF expression via new protein synthesis and D609- and PDTC-sensitive steps. These observations may have important clinical implications. First, drugs that target gene induction may also knock out these inhibitory pathways to lessen their effect. Second, defects in such pathways could lead to overexpression of cytokines or growth factors and contribute to the pathogenesis of inflammatory or proliferative diseases.

Adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent inhibition of IL-5 from human T lymphocytes is not mediated by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A.

IL-5 is implicated in the pathogenesis of asthma and is predominantly released from T lymphocytes of the Th2 phenotype. In anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28-stimulated PBMC, albuterol, isoproterenol, rolipram, PGE2, forskolin, cholera toxin, and the cAMP analog, 8-bromoadenosine cAMP (8-Br-cAMP) all inhibited the release of IL-5 and lymphocyte proliferation. Although all of the above compounds share the ability to increase intracellular cAMP levels and activate protein kinase (PK) A, the PKA inhibitor H-89 failed to ablate the inhibition of IL-5 production mediated by 8-Br-cAMP, rolipram, forskolin, or PGE2. Similarly, H-89 had no effect on the cAMP-mediated inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation. Significantly, these observations occurred at a concentration of H-89 (3 microM) that inhibited both PKA activity and CREB phosphorylation in intact cells. Additional studies showed that the PKA inhibitors H-8, 8-(4-chlorophenylthio) adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate Rp isomer, and a myristolated PKA inhibitor peptide also failed to block the 8-Br-cAMP-mediated inhibition of IL-5 release from PBMC. Likewise, a role for PKG was considered unlikely because both activators and inhibitors of this enzyme had no effect on IL-5 release. Western blotting identified Rap1, a downstream target of the cAMP-binding proteins, exchange protein directly activated by cAMP/cAMP-guanine nucleotide exchange factors 1 and 2, in PBMC. However, Rap1 activation assays revealed that this pathway is also unlikely to be involved in the cAMP-mediated inhibition of IL-5. Taken together, these results indicate that cAMP-elevating agents inhibit IL-5 release from PBMC by a novel cAMP-dependent mechanism that does not involve the activation of PKA.

Transcription factors and inflammatory gene regulation : strategic approaches.

In chronic inflammatory diseases, the expression of multiple genes, including those for cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, receptors, and inflammatory enzymes, is often upregulated. The problem for many academic or industrial scientists is to elucidate the mechanisms behind this upregulation to further the understanding of inflammation or to explore possible means of therapeutic intervention. Common research problems faced by investigators would be to analyze the regulation of a novel gene in response to various inflammatory stimuli or alternatively to investigate the mechanisms of induction of an established gene in response to novel stimuli. Whereas the induction of many inflammatory genes is thought to occur, at least partly, at the level of increased transcription, it is important to address the possible role of posttranscriptional, translational, or even posttranslational control. For example, release or synthesis of the protein of interest from suitably stimulated cells could be examined in the presence or absence of transcriptional inhibitors, such as actinomycin D, or translational inhibitors, such as cycloheximide. Thus, a dependence on de novo transcription and/or translation may be demonstrated. Therefore, whether the protein of interest is simply released from preformed cellular stores or is synthesized from preformed mRNA can be elucidated. Northern blot analysis, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), or ribonuclease protection assays can be used to examine steady-state mRNA levels, which if elevated gives rise to a presumption of transcriptional control.

Stimulus-specific inhibition of IL-5 by cAMP-elevating agents and IL-10 reveals differential mechanisms of action.

Interleukin-5 (IL-5) is a Th2 cytokine, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic diseases such as asthma. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), costimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) plus phytohemagglutinin (PHA) or activating antibodies to the CD3 and CD28 T-lymphocyte surface markers, produced similar patterns of IL-5 expression. However, in PMA + PHA-treated cells, 8-bromo-cAMP and PGE(2) did not affect IL-5 expression, whereas in CD3 + CD28-stimulated cells, almost total repression was observed. IL-10 failed to inhibit IL-5 mRNA from PMA + PHA-treated cells, yet reduced release by 40%. By contrast, IL-10 totally inhibited CD3 + CD28-induced IL-5 release and inhibited mRNA by 50-60%. These results highlight important biological differences in the induction of IL-5 by the nonspecific stimulus PMA + PHA and the more physiological CD3 + CD28 costimulation. Finally, the potential for downregulating Th2 responses by cAMP-elevating agents or IL-10 is demonstrated and a significant role for posttranscriptional mechanisms in the inhibition by IL-10 is suggested.