Lack of Influence by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 Genotypes on Pain Relief by Hydrocodone in Postoperative Cesarean Section Pain Management.

BACKGROUND: Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 are contributors to variability in individual response to drugs. Within the P450 family, CYP2D6 is responsible for metabolizing hydrocodone, a widely prescribed opioid for pain management. Alternatively, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 can form norhydrocodone and dihydrocodeine. We have previously found that in a postcesarean section cohort, the rate of hydromorphone formation was dependent on the genotype of CYP2D6 and that plasma hydromorphone, not hydrocodone, was predictive of pain relief. METHOD: Blood was obtained from a postcesarean cohort that were surveyed for pain response and common side effects. Plasma samples were genotyped for CYP3A4/5, and their hydrocodone concentrations were measured by LC-MS. R statistical software was used to check for differences in the outcomes due to CYP3A4/5 and CYP2D6, and a multivariate regression model was fit to determine factors associated with pain score. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA between CYP3A4/A5 and CYP2D6 phenotypes revealed that the former variants did not have a statistical significance on the outcomes, and only CYP2D6 phenotypes had a significant effect on total dosage (P = 0.041). Furthermore, a 3-way ANOVA analysis showed that CYP2D6 (P = 0.036) had a predictive effect on plasma hydromorphone concentrations, and CYP3A4/A5 did not have any effect on the measured outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to total dosages in a cesarean section population, these results confirm that CYP2D6 phenotypes are predictors for plasma hydromorphone concentration and pain relief, but CYP3A4/A5 phenotypes have no influence on pain relief or on side effects.

Hydrocodone in postoperative personalized pain management: pro-drug or drug?

BACKGROUND: Genetic variations in enzymes that produce active metabolites from pro-drugs are well known. Such variability could account for some of the clinically observed differences in analgesia and side effects seen in postoperative patients. Using genotyping and quantitation of serum concentrations of hydrocodone and its metabolites, we sought to demonstrate the clinical effects of the metabolites of hydrocodone on pain relief. The objective of the current study was to determine whether CYP2D6 genotype and serum hydromorphone levels account for some of the variability in pain relief seen with hydrocodone in a cohort of women post-Cesarean section. METHODS: In 156 post-Cesarean section patients who received hydrocodone, we assessed serum opioid concentrations and CYP2D6 genotypes. Blood samples were collected at that time for genotyping and determination of concentrations of hydrocodone and metabolites by LC-MS/MS. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the relationship between CYP2D6 genotypes, pain relief, side effects, and serum concentrations of hydrocodone and hydromorphone. RESULTS: The CYP2D6 genotyping results indicated that 60% of subjects were extensive, 30% intermediate, 3% poor, and 7% ultra-rapid metabolizers. In the poor metabolizers, the mean plasma hydromorphone concentration was 8-fold lower when compared to that of ultra-rapid metabolizers. Hydromorphone, and not hydrocodone concentrations correlated with pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that hydromorphone is generated at substantially different rates, dependent on CYP2D6 genotype. Pain relief correlated with plasma concentrations of hydromorphone, and not with hydrocodone. This suggests that pain relief will vary with CYP2D6 genotype. Inability to metabolize hydrocodone to hydromorphone as seen in the poor metabolizers should alert the clinician to consider alternative medications for managing pain postoperatively.

Testing of gastric contents for peanut proteins in a 13-year old anaphylaxis victim.

BACKGROUND: We report the case of a 13-y female who went into anaphylactic shock following the ingestion of a meal suspected to be contaminated by peanuts. The teenager had a known sensitivity to peanuts, however, the restaurant claimed that no peanut products were used in the preparation of her meal. The gastric contents of the decedent were retained and tested for peanut proteins due to the possible legal liability of the proprietor. METHOD: Using antibodies against peanut proteins (roasted and unroasted), we optimized a method to detect total soluble peanut proteins by Western-blot analysis in gastric contents. In addition, we validated two commercially available tests which were originally intended for detection of peanut proteins in food matrices to examine the same gastric sample. One was an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that utilized polyclonal antibodies against Ara h 1 (Tepnel Life Sciences). The other was a laminar-flow assay directed against Ara h 1, Ara h 2 and Ara h 3 (R-Biopharm). A positive food-based control was created by reducing bread and peanuts (1:1, w/w) with water (1:1, w/v) using a mortar and pestle. A food-based negative food control was created similar to the positive control, except the peanuts were omitted and the amount of bread was doubled. RESULTS: The Western-blot assay was sensitive down to 2.5ng/ml of total peanut protein. The laminar flow was the most rapid and least complex. The ELISA was the most analytically sensitive with a cut-off of 1ng/ml of Ara h 1 protein compared to the laminar flow which had a cut-off of 4ng/ml Ara h 1 equivalent. Both ELISA and laminar flow assays were able to detect peanut proteins in the food matrices and positive controls, and not in negative controls. No peanut related proteins were detected in the decedent's gastric sample. The gastric sample spiked with peanuts was reliably detectable. CONCLUSION: The anaphylaxis patient had no peanut allergens detected in her gastric contents by any of the three methods employed. Both commercially available assays are easily adaptable for testing peanut allergens in the gastric contents as judged by the results of the immunoassays as well as the Western blot analysis. Due to the rising need for detecting peanut proteins in various heterogeneous and complex matrices, the use of appropriate controls should be also considered in these unique investigations.

The role of hydromorphone and OPRM1 in postoperative pain relief with hydrocodone.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management remains a challenge for clinicians due to unpredictable patient responses to opioid therapy. Some of this variability may result from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the human opioid mu-1 receptor (OPRM1) that modify receptor binding or signal transduction. The OPRM1 variant with the highest frequency is the A118G SNP. However, previous studies have produced inconsistent results regarding the clinical effects of A118G on opioid response. We hypothesized that measurement of serum opioid concentrations, in addition to determining total opioid consumption, may provide a more precise method of assessing the effects of A118G on analgesic response. The current study evaluated the relationship of analgesia, side effects, total hydrocodone consumption, quantitative serum hydrocodone and hydromorphone concentrations, and A118G SNP in postoperative patients following Cesarean section. METHODS: 158 women scheduled for Cesarean section were enrolled prospectively in the study. The patients had bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for surgery and received intrathcal morphine with the spinal anesthetic or parenteral morphine for the first 24 hours after surgery. Thereafter, patients received hydrocodone/acetaminophen for postoperative pain control. On postoperative day 3, venous blood samples were obtained for OPRM1 A118G genotyping and serum opioid concentrations. RESULTS: 131 (82.9%) of the subjects were homozygous for the 118A allele of OPRM1 (AA) and 27 (17.1%) carried the G allele (AG/GG). By regression analysis, pain relief was significantly associated with total hydrocodone dose in the AA group (P = 0.01), but not in the AG/GG group (P = 0.554). In contrast, there was no association between pain relief and serum hydrocodone concentration in either group. However, pain relief was significantly associated with serum hydromorphone concentration (a metabolite of hydrocodone) in the AA group (P = 0.004), but not in the AG/GG group (P = 0.724). Conversely, side effects were significantly higher (P < 0.04) in the AG/GG group (mean = 6.4) than in the AA group (mean = 4.4), regardless of adjustment for BMI, pain level, or total dose of hydrocodone. CONCLUSION: This study found a correlation between pain relief and total hydrocodone dose in patients homozygous for the 118A allele (AA) of the OPRM1 gene, but not in patients with the 118G allele (AG/GG). However, pain relief in 118A patients did not correlate with serum hydrocodone concentrations, but rather with serum hydromorphone levels, the active metabolite of hydrocodone. This suggests that pain relief with hydrocodone may be due primarily to hydromorphone. Although pain relief did not correlate with opioid dose in AG/GG patients, they had a higher incidence of opioid side effects. The correlations identified in this study may reflect the fact that serum opioid concentrations were measured directly, avoiding the inherent imprecision associated with relying solely on total opioid consumption as a determinant of opioid effectiveness. Thus, measurement of serum opioid concentrations is recommended when assessing the role of OPRM1 variants in pain relief. This study supports pharmacogenetic analysis of OPRM1 in conjunction with serum opioid concentrations when evaluating patient responses to opioid therapy.

Therapeutic monitoring of opioids: a sensitive LC-MS/MS method for quantitation of several opioids including hydrocodone and its metabolites.

For pain management, opioid therapy is a mainstay for treating acute pain and relieving moderate to severe chronic pain. Quantitative measurement of opioids and their metabolites in urine is used mainly for confirmation of screened results obtained for clinical and forensic purposes. Due to limitations in interpretation of urine results for pain management testing purposes, the use of blood or serum to assess opioids and their metabolites may be of benefit. This report describes a sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection of hydrocodone and its metabolites hydromorphone, norhydrocodone, and dihydrocodeine, and other common opiates that patients may be taking, including morphine, codeine, oxycodone, and oxymorphone in a single extraction. The method uses solid-phase extraction of 500 µL of sample with quantitation by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The assay is linear from 1.0 to 100 ng/mL and has a between-day coefficient of variation of <10%. The major advantage of this method is that a single extraction can detect hydrocodone and its metabolites and other opiates or opioids that patients frequently use simultaneously with hydrocodone.