Distinguishing activated T regulatory cell and T conventional cells by single-cell technologies.

Resting conventional T cells (Tconv) can be distinguished from T regulatory cells (Treg) by the canonical markers FOXP3, CD25 and CD127. However, the expression of these proteins alters after T-cell activation leading to overlap between Tconv and Treg. The objective of this study was to distinguish resting and antigen-responsive T effector (Tconv) and Treg using single-cell technologies. CD4+ Treg and Tconv cells were stimulated with antigen and responsive and non-responsive populations processed for targeted and non-targeted single-cell RNAseq. Machine learning was used to generate a limited set of genes that could distinguish responding and non-responding Treg and Tconv cells and which was used for single-cell multiplex qPCR and to design a flow cytometry panel. Targeted scRNAseq clearly distinguished the four-cell populations. A minimal set of 27 genes was identified by machine learning algorithms to provide discrimination of the four populations at >95% accuracy. In all, 15 of the genes were validated to be differentially expressed by single-cell multiplex qPCR. Discrimination of responding Treg from responding Tconv could be achieved by a flow cytometry strategy that included staining for CD25, CD127, FOXP3, IKZF2, ITGA4, and the novel marker TRIM which was strongly expressed in Tconv and weakly expressed in both responding and non-responding Treg. A minimal set of genes was identified that discriminates responding and non-responding CD4+ Treg and Tconv cells and, which have identified TRIM as a marker to distinguish Treg by flow cytometry.

Beneficial Effect of U-74389 G and Sildenafil in An Experimental Model of Flap Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Swine. Histological and Biochemical Evaluation of the Model.

Purpose of the study: Tissue reconstruction after burns, tumor excisions, infections or injuries is a frequent surgical challenge to avoid Ischemia-reperfusion injury. Lazaroids and sildenafil, through their mechanisms of action, have been studied for their protective effects on various organs subjected to IRI. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of U-74389G and sildenafil in a swine model of ischemia and reperfusion injury of latissimus dorsi flap. Materials and methods: Forty-two Landrace male pigs, weighing 28-35 kg, were equally (n = 6) randomized into the following groups: (a) Group I: control, (b) Group II: administration of U-74389G after ischemia, (c) Group III: administration of sildenafil after ischemia, (d) Group IV: administration of U-74389G and sildenafil after ischemia, (e) Group V: administration of U-74389G prior to ischemia, (f) Group VI: administration of sildenafil prior to ischemia, and (g) Group VII: administration of U-74389G and sildenafil prior to ischemia. Blood and tissue sampling was conducted before ischemia, 15 and 30 min after occlusion, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after reperfusion. Results: Statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) was detected in lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes concentrations as well as in the appearance of edema after histopathologic evaluation of the ischemic tissue, especially in the groups of combined treatment. Measurements of malondialdeyde and tumour necrosis factor alpha in tissues revealed a significant decrease (p < 0.001) of these markers in the treatment groups when compared to the control, particularly in the latest estimated timepoints. Conclusions: The synergistic action of U-74389G and sildenafil seems protective and promising in cases of flap IRI during tissue reconstruction surgery.