RESUMEN
CONTEXT: California is the only state that does not regulate the athletic training profession, allowing unqualified personnel to be hired and call themselves athletic trainers. The benefits of employing a certified athletic trainer in the secondary school setting are numerous but efforts to push regulation legislation continue to fail in California. OBJECTIVE: To describe the availability of certified athletic trainers in California secondary schools and explore factors influencing athletic trainer employment. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Study. SETTING: Online survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Participants from 1538 California Secondary Schools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Officials from member schools completed the 2022-2023 California Interscholastic Federation Participation Census. Participants provided information specific to enrollment, sport participation, access to AEDs, and whether the school had athletic trainers on staff. The athletic trainer's certification status was independently verified. Enrollment data specific to ethnicity, race, and percentage of students eligible for free meals was obtained through the California Department of Education Statistics. RESULTS: More than half (51.6%) of California secondary schools did not employ a certified athletic trainer and 8.3% employed unqualified personnel as athletic trainers. Nearly half (43%) of student athlete participants were enrolled at schools with no certified athletic trainer. Schools that employed certified athletic trainers had a lower proportion of students eligible to receive free and reduced-price meals. The average percentage of Hispanic or Latino students was greater in schools with no certified athletic trainer and schools that employed unqualified personnel as athletic trainers than schools that employed certified athletic trainers. CONCLUSIONS: Data indicates that in a five-year period, access to athletic training services in California secondary schools has not improved. There are large gaps in access to athletic training services and there are clear socioeconomic and racial and ethnic disparities. Efforts to educate stakeholders on the importance of athletic training regulation in California should continue.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is an important determinant of endurance performance. Heat acclimation/acclimatization (HA/HAz) elicits improvements in endurance performance. Upon heat exposure reduction, intermittent heat training (IHT) may alleviate HA/HAz adaptation decay; however, corresponding VO2max responses are unknown. HYPOTHESIS: VO2max is maintained after HAz/HA; IHT mitigates decrements in aerobic power after HAz/HA. STUDY DESIGN: Interventional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: A total of 27 male endurance runners (mean ± SD; age, 36 ± 12 years; body mass, 73.03 ± 8.97 kg; height, 178.81 ± 6.39 cm) completed VO2max testing at 5 timepoints; baseline, post-HAz, post-HA, and weeks 4 and 8 of IHT (IHT4, IHT8). After baseline testing, participants completed HAz, preceded by 5 days of HA involving exercise to induce hyperthermia for 60 minutes in the heat (ambient temperature, 39.13 ± 1.37°C; relative humidity, 51.08 ± 8.42%). Participants were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 IHT groups: once-weekly, twice-weekly, or no IHT. Differences in VO2max, velocity at VO2max (vVO2), and maximal heart rate (HRmax) at all 5 timepoints were analyzed using repeated-measure analyses of variance with Bonferroni corrections post hoc. RESULTS: No significant VO2max or vVO2 differences were observed between baseline, post-HAz, or post-HA (P = 0.36 and P = 0.09, respectively). No significant group or time effects were identified for VO2max or vVO2 at post-HA, IHT4, and IHT8 (P = 0.67 and P = 0.21, respectively). Significant HRmax differences were observed between baseline and post-HA tests (P < 0.01). No significant group or time HRmax differences shown for post-HA, IHT4, and IHT8 (P = 0.59). CONCLUSION: VO2max was not reduced among endurance runners after HA/HAz and IHT potentially due to participants' similar aerobic training status and high aerobic fitness levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: HAz/HA and IHT maintain aerobic power in endurance runners, with HAz/HA procuring reductions in HRmax.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Little information exists regarding what exertional heatstroke (EHS) survivors know and believe about EHS best practices. Understanding this would help clinicians focus educational efforts to ensure survival and safe return-to-play following EHS. OBJECTIVE: We sought to better understand what EHS survivors knew about EHS seriousness (e.g., lethality, short- and long-term effects), diagnosis and treatment procedures, and recovery. Design: Multi-year, cross-sectional, descriptive design. SETTING: An 11.3-km road race located in the Northeastern United States in August 2022 and 2023. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two of 62 runners with EHS (15 women, 27 men; age: 33±15 y; pre-treatment rectal temperature [TREC]: 41.5±0.9°C). INTERVENTIONS: Medical professionals evaluated runners requiring medical attention at the finish line. If they observed TREC ≥40°C with concomitant central nervous system dysfunction (CNS) EHS was diagnosed and patients were immersed in a 189.3-L tub filled with ice-water. Before medical discharge, we asked EHS survivors 15 questions about their experience and knowledge of select EHS best practices. Survey items were piloted and validated by experts and laypersons a priori (content validity index ≥0.88 for items and scale). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey responses. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent (28/42) of patients identified EHS as potentially fatal and 76% (32/42) indicated it negatively affected health. Seventy-nine percent (33/42) correctly identified TREC as the best temperature site to diagnose EHS. Most patients (74%, 31/42) anticipated returning to normal exercise within 1 week post-EHS; 69% (29/42) stated EHS would not impact future race participation. Patients (69%, 29/42) indicated it was important to tell their primary care physician about their EHS. CONCLUSIONS: Our patients were knowledgeable on the potential seriousness and adverse health effects of EHS and the necessity of TREC for diagnosis. However, educational efforts should be directed towards helping patients understand safe recovery and return-to-play timelines following EHS.