Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 126
Filtrar
1.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 30(3): 406-417, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091249

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Existing literature describing differences in survival following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by patient sex, race-ethnicity and the role of socioeconomic characteristics (SEC) is limited. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Evaluate differences in 1-year survival after PCI by sex and race-ethnicity, and explore the contribution of SEC to observed differences. METHODS: Using a 20% sample of Medicare claims data for beneficiaries aged 65+, we identified fee-for-service patients who received PCI from 2007 to 2015. We performed logistic regression to assess how sex and race-ethnicity relate to procedural indication, inpatient versus outpatient setting, and 1-year mortality. We evaluated whether these relationships are moderated by sequentially controlling for factors including age, comorbidities, presence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), county SEC, medical resource availability and inpatient versus outpatient procedural status. RESULTS: We identified 300,491 PCI procedures, of which 94,863 (31.6%) were outpatient. There was a significant transition to outpatient PCI during the study period, especially for men compared with women and White patients compared with Black patients. Black patients were 3.50 percentage points (p < 0.001) and women were 3.41 percentage points (p < 0.001) more likely than White and male patients to undergo PCI at the time of AMI, which typically occurs in the inpatient setting. Controlling for age and calendar year, Black patients were 2.87 percentage points more likely than non-Hispanic White patients to die within 1 year after PCI. After controlling for Black-White differences in comorbidities, the differences in 1-year mortality decreased to 0.95 percentage points, which then became nonsignificant when further controlling for county resources and state of residence. CONCLUSION: Women were more likely to experience PCI in the setting of AMI and had less transition to outpatient care during the period. Black patients experienced higher 1-year mortality following PCI, which is explained by differences in baseline comorbidities, county medical resources, and state of residence.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Medicare , Etnicidad , Caracteres Sexuales , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía
2.
PLoS One ; 18(10): e0292276, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788248

RESUMEN

In 2014, Mexico implemented a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) equivalent to one Mexican peso (MP) per liter to address the high obesity prevalence. This tax has effectively reduced SSB purchases and yielded healthcare savings; however, it remains unknown whether SSB taxes lead to net benefits at the societal level in Mexico. Moreover, public health experts recommend increasing the tax. The objective of this study is to estimate the net benefits of SSB taxes compared to a scenario of no tax in urban Mexico. Taxes include the one-MP tax and alternative higher taxes (two and three MP per SSB liter). Thus, we conducted a cost-benefit analysis from the perspective of the government, producers, and consumers for a simulated closed cohort of adults in a life-table model. We defined net benefits as the difference between economic benefits (the value of statistical life, healthcare savings, and tax revenue) and costs (consumer surplus and profit losses). We found that, at the societal level, all simulated taxes will eventually generate benefits that surpass costs within ten years. Overall net benefits can reach USD 7.1 billion and 15.3 billion for the one-MP and the three-MP tax, respectively. Hence, these benefits increased at a declining rate compared to taxes. The government and consumers will experience overall positive net benefits among society's members. Policymakers should consider time horizons and tradeoffs between health gains and economic outcomes across different society members.


Asunto(s)
Bebidas Azucaradas , Adulto , Humanos , Bebidas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , México , Impuestos , Políticas
3.
Med Care Res Rev ; : 10775587231198903, 2023 Sep 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37767861

RESUMEN

Improvements in treatment have made HIV a manageable chronic condition, leading to increased life expectancy and a growing share of people with HIV who are older. Older people with HIV have higher rates of many chronic conditions, yet little is known about differences in health care utilization and spending. This study compared health care utilization and spending for Medicare beneficiaries with and without HIV, accounting for differential mortality. The data included demographic characteristics and claims-based information. Estimated cumulative spending for beneficiaries with HIV aged 67 to 77 years was 26% higher for Medicare Part A and 39% higher for Medicare Part B compared with beneficiaries without HIV; most of these differences would be larger if not for greater mortality risk among people with HIV (and therefore fewer years to receive care). Future research should disentangle underlying causes for this increased need and describe potential responses by policymakers and health care providers.

4.
Inquiry ; 60: 469580231182512, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37329296

RESUMEN

The Affordable Care Act aimed to increase use of preventive services by eliminating cost-sharing to consumers. However, patients may be unaware of this benefit or they may not seek preventive services if they anticipate that the cost of potential diagnostic or treatment services will be too high, both more likely among those in high deductible health plans. We used nationally representative private health insurance claims (100% sample of IBM® MarketScan®) for the United States from 2006 to 2018, restricting the data to enrollment and claims for non-elderly adults who were enrolled for the full plan year. The cross-sectional sample (185 million person-years) is used to describe trends in preventive service use and costs from 2008 through 2016. The cohort sample (9 million people) focuses on the elimination of cost-sharing for certain high-value preventive services in late 2010, requiring continuous enrollment across 2010 and 2011. We examine whether HDHP enrollment is associated with use of eligible preventive services using semi-parametric difference-in-differences to account for endogenous plan selection. Our preferred model implies that HDHP enrollment was associated with a reduction of the post-ACA change in any use of eligible preventive services by 0.2 percentage points or 12.5%. Cancer screenings were unaffected but HDHP enrollment was associated with smaller increases in wellness visits, immunizations, and screening for chronic conditions and sexually transmitted infections. We also find that the policy was ineffective at reducing out-of-pocket costs for the eligible preventive services, likely due to implementation issues.


Asunto(s)
Deducibles y Coseguros , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Seguro de Costos Compartidos , Servicios Preventivos de Salud
5.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 29(6): 955-963, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36807665

RESUMEN

AIM: To examine the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) and postacute care (PAC) locations on the association between hospital safety-net status and 30-day postdischarge outcomes (readmission, hospice use, or death). METHOD: Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) participants during 2006-2011 who were Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries aged 65.5 years or older were included. The associations between hospital safety-net status and 30-day post-discharge outcomes were evaluated by comparing the models with and without PAC and SES adjustments. Safety-net hospital status was defined as being in the top 20% of hospitals ranked by hospital-level percent of total Medicare patient days. SES was measured using individual-level SES (dual eligibility, income, and education) and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). RESULTS: This study identified 13,173 index hospitalizations for 6,825 patients; 1,428 hospitalizations (11.8%) were in safety-net hospitals. The average unadjusted 30-day hospital readmission rate was 22.6% in safety-net hospitals versus 18.8% in nonsafety-net hospitals. Regardless of whether patient SES status was controlled or not, safety-net hospitals had higher estimated probabilities of 30-day readmission (ranging from 0.217 to 0.222 vs. 0.184 to 0.189), and lower probabilities for having neither readmission nor hospice/death (0.750-0.763 vs. 0.780-0.785); for models additionally adjusted for PAC types, safety-net patients had lower rates of hospice use or death (0.019-0.027 vs. 0.030-0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that safety-net hospitals had lower hospice/death rates but higher readmission rates relative to outcomes at nonsafety-net hospitals. Readmission rate differences were similar regardless of patients' SES status. However, the rate of hospice referral or death rate was related to SES, which suggested that the outcomes were affected by SES and PAC types.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores , Medicare , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Atención Subaguda , Alta del Paciente , Hospitales , Clase Social , Readmisión del Paciente
6.
Am J Emerg Med ; 64: 174-183, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36565662

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) crowding has been shown to increase throughput measures of length of stay (LOS), wait time, and boarding time. Psychiatric utilization of the ED has increased, particularly among younger patients. This investigation quantifies the effect of ED demand on throughput times and discharge disposition for pediatric psychiatric patients in the ED. METHODS: Using electronic medical record data from 1,151,396 ED visits in eight North Carolina EDs from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2020, we identified 14,092 pediatric psychiatric visits. Measures of ED daily demand rates included overall occupancy as well as daily proportion of non-psychiatric pediatric patients, adult psychiatric patients, and pediatric psychiatric patients. Controlling for patient-level factors such as age, sex, race, insurance, and triage acuity, we used linear regression to predict throughput times and logistic regression to predict disposition status. We estimated effects of ED demand by academic versus community hospital status due to ED and inpatient resource differences. RESULTS: Most ED demand measures had insignificant or only very small associations with throughput measures for pediatric psychiatric patients. Notable exceptions were that a one percentage point increase in the proportion of non-psychiatric pediatric ED visits increased boarding times at community sites by 1.06 hours (95% CI: 0.20-1.92), while a one percentage point increase in the proportion of pediatric psychiatric ED visits increased LOS by 3.64 hours (95% CI: 2.04-5.23) at the academic site. We found that ED demand had a minimal effect on disposition status, with small increases in demand rates favoring <1 percentage point increases in the likelihood of discharge. Instead, patient-level factors played a much stronger role in predicting discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS: ED demand has a meaningful effect on throughput times, but a minimal effect on disposition status. Further research is needed to validate these findings across other state and healthcare systems.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Pacientes Internos , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Tiempo de Internación , Factores de Tiempo , North Carolina , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Health Serv Res ; 58(1): 140-153, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35848763

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) implemented in 2011 with caregiver health and health care use. DATA SOURCES: VHA claims and electronic health records from May 2009 to May 2018. STUDY DESIGN: Using a retrospective, pre-post study design with inverse probability of treatment weights to address selection into treatment, we examine the association of PCAFC on caregivers who are veterans: (1) outpatient primary, specialty, and mental health care visits; (2) probability of uncontrolled hypertension and anxiety/depression; and (3) VHA health care costs. We compare outcomes for caregivers approved for PCAFC (treatment) to caregivers denied PCAFC (comparison). DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In the year pre-application, we observe similar probabilities of having any VHA primary care (~36%), VHA specialty care (~24%), and VHA or VHA-purchased mental health care (~22%) for treatment and comparison caregivers. In the year post-application, treated caregivers had a 5.89 percentage point larger probability of any outpatient VHA primary care (p = 0.002) and 4.34 percentage points larger probability of any outpatient mental health care use (p = 0.014). Post-application, probabilities of having uncontrolled hypertension or diagnosed anxiety/depression were higher for both treated and comparison groups. In the second year post-application, treated caregivers had a 1.88 percentage point larger probability of uncontrolled hypertension (p = 0.019) and 4.68 percentage points larger probability of diagnosed anxiety/depression (predicted probabilities: treated = 0.30; comparison = 0.25; p = 0.005). We find no evidence of differences in VHA total costs by PCAFC status. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings that PCAFC enrollment is associated with increased health care diagnosis and service use may reflect improved access for previously unmet needs in the population of veteran caregivers for veterans in PCAFC. The costs and value of these increases can be weighed against other effects of the program to inform national policies supporting caregivers.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Veteranos , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Cuidadores/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Veteranos/psicología
8.
Trials ; 23(1): 400, 2022 May 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35550175

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This update describes changes to the Brief Educational Tool to Enhance Recovery (BETTER) trial in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS/DESIGN: The original protocol was published in Trials. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the BETTER trial converted to remote recruitment in April 2020. All recruitment, consent, enrollment, and randomization now occur by phone within 24 h of the acute care visit. Other changes to the original protocol include an expansion of inclusion criteria and addition of new recruitment sites. To increase recruitment numbers, eligibility criteria were expanded to include individuals with chronic pain, non-daily opioid use within 2 weeks of enrollment, presenting musculoskeletal pain (MSP) symptoms for more than 1 week, hospitalization in past 30 days, and not the first time seeking medical treatment for presenting MSP pain. In addition, recruitment sites were expanded to other emergency departments and an orthopedic urgent care clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiting from an orthopedic urgent care clinic and transitioning to remote operations not only allowed for continued participant enrollment during the pandemic but also resulted in some favorable outcomes, including operational efficiencies, increased enrollment, and broader generalizability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04118595 . Registered on October 8, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , COVID-19 , Dolor Musculoesquelético , Dolor Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Dolor Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Pandemias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Milbank Q ; 100(3): 854-878, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35579187

RESUMEN

Policy Points In the absence of federal policy, states adopted policies to support family caregivers, but availability and level of support varies. We describe, compare, and rank state policies to support family caregivers as aligned with National Academy of Medicine recommendations. Although the landscape of state policies supporting caregivers has improved over time, few states provide financial supports as recommended, and benefit restrictions hinder accessibility for all types of family caregivers. Implementing policies supporting family caregivers will become more critical over time, as the reliance on family caregivers as essential providers of long-term care is only expected to grow as the population ages. CONTEXT: In the United States in 2020, approximately 26 million individuals provided unpaid care to a family member or friend. On average, 60% of caregivers were employed, and they provided 20.4 hours of care per week on top of employment. Although a handful of patchwork laws exist to aid family caregivers, systematic supports, including comprehensive training, respite, and financial support, remain limited. In the absence of federal supports, states have adopted policies to provide assistance, but they vary in availability and level of support provided. Our objectives were to describe, compare, and rank state policies to support family caregivers over time. METHODS: We used publicly available data from the AARP Long-Term Services and Supports State Scorecard, the National Academy for State Health Policy, and Tax Credits for Workers and Families for all 50 states and the District of Columbia (2015-2019). FINDINGS: We found that states had increased supports to family caregivers over this five-year period, although significant variability in adoption and implementation of policies persists. Approximately 20% of states had enacted policies that exceed the federal Family and Medical Leave Act requirements, and 18% offered paid family leave. However, most states had not improved spousal impoverishment protections for Medicaid beneficiaries. For example, from 2016 to 2019, 24% of states provided fewer or no protections, while 71% of states did not improve spousal impoverishment protections over time. Access to training for caregivers varied based on eligibility criteria (e.g., select populations and/or only co-residing caregivers). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, state approaches to support family caregivers vary by eligibility and scope of services. Substantial gaps in support of caregivers, particularly economic supports, persist. Although the landscape of state policies supporting caregivers has improved over time, few states provide financial supports as recommended by the National Academy of Medicine, and benefit restrictions hinder accessibility for all family caregivers.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Medicaid , Política de Salud , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Estados Unidos
10.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 28(4): 569-580, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34940987

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare the associations between socioeconomic status (SES) measures from two sources (claims vs. survey data) and the type of post-acute care (PAC) locations following hospital discharge. METHODS: This observational study included Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries age 65.5 years or older who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) and were hospitalized in 2006-2011. Multiple data sets were used including: Area Deprivation Index; Medicare Cost Reports, Provider of Services files, and Area Health Resource File. Multinomial regression models estimated associations between beneficiary's SES and PAC type. SES measures came from surveys (income and education) and administrative records (dual enrollment and area deprivation). PAC types included home with self-care, home health agency, skilled nursing facility (SNF), or inpatient rehabilitation facility. RESULTS: Low income and dual enrollment were associated with higher SNF use while living in a deprived area was associated with lower SNF use and higher use of home with self-care. Dual enrollment and area deprivation were associated with the largest differences. CONCLUSIONS: If policies to modify payment based on SES are considered, administrative measures (dual enrollment and area deprivation) rather than survey measures (education and income) may be sufficient.


Asunto(s)
Medicare , Atención Subaguda , Anciano , Hospitalización , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Clase Social , Estados Unidos
11.
Clin Cardiol ; 44(5): 627-635, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33755210

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Observational analyses comparing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among elderly or frail patients are likely biased by treatment selection. PCI is typically chosen for frail patients, while CABG is more common for patients with good recovery potential. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that skilled nursing facility (SNF) use after revascularization is a measure of relative frailty associated with outcomes following coronary revascularization. METHODS: We used a 20 percent sample of Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who received inpatient PCI or CABG between 2007-2014. Key explanatory variables were the revascularization strategy and SNF use after revascularization. We used Cox regression to evaluate death and repeat revascularization within one year and logistic regression to evaluate SNF use and 30-day readmissions/death. RESULTS: CABG patients were 25.1 percentage points [95% confidence interval: 24.7, 25.5] more likely to use SNF following revascularization than inpatient PCI patients. SNF use was associated with a higher death rate (hazard ratio (HR): 3.19 [3.02, 3.37]) and a 16.2 percentage point (15.5, 16.9) increase in 30-day readmissions/death. Among patients with SNF use, CABG was associated with a decrease in 30-day readmissions/death compared to PCI. CONCLUSIONS: While CABG was associated with higher rates of SNF use and 30-day readmission/death overall, CABG was associated with significantly lower rates of 30-day readmissions/death among patients with SNF use. The findings suggest that caution is needed in treatment selection for patients at high-risk for SNF use and that selection of inpatient PCI over CABG may be associated with frailty and worse outcomes for some patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Alta del Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Am J Med Qual ; 36(2): 90-98, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32686484

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/Clostridioides difficile and quality and clinical outcomes in US acute care hospitals. The population was all Medicare-certified US acute care hospitals with MRSA/C difficile standardized infection ratio (SIR) data available from 2013 to 2017. Hospital-level data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services were used to estimate hospital and time fixed effects models for 30-day hospital readmissions, length of stay, 30-day mortality, and days in the intensive care unit. The key explanatory variables were SIR for MRSA and C difficile. No association was found between MRSA or C difficile rates and any of the 4 outcomes. The null results add to the mixed evidence in the field, but there are likely residual confounding factors. Future research should use larger samples of patient-level data and appropriate methods to provide evidence to guide efforts to tackle antimicrobial resistance.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Anciano , Clostridioides , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Medicare , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(3): 298-304, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32998788

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of California's antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) mandate on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) rates in acute-care hospitals. POPULATION: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-certified acute-care hospitals in the United States. DATA SOURCES: 2013-2017 data from the CMS Hospital Compare, Provider of Service File and Medicare Cost Reports. METHODS: Difference-in-difference model with hospital fixed effects to compare California with all other states before and after the ASP mandate. We considered were standardized infection ratios (SIRs) for MRSA and CDI as the outcomes. We analyzed the following time-variant covariates: medical school affiliation, bed count, quality accreditation, number of changes in ownership, compliance with CMS requirements, % intensive care unit beds, average length of stay, patient safety index, and 30-day readmission rate. RESULTS: In 2013, California hospitals had an average MRSA SIR of 0.79 versus 0.94 in other states, and an average CDI SIR of 1.01 versus 0.77 in other states. California hospitals had increases (P < .05) of 23%, 30%, and 20% in their MRSA SIRs in 2015, 2016, and 2017, respectively. California hospitals were associated with a 20% (P < .001) decrease in the CDI SIR only in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: The mandate was associated with a decrease in CDI SIR and an increase in MRSA SIR.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infección Hospitalaria , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Anciano , California/epidemiología , Clostridioides , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Medicare , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
14.
PLoS One ; 15(9): e0238100, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32886675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act led to improvements in reporting a usual source of care, but it is unclear whether patients are changing their usual source of care in response to coverage gains. We assess whether prior insurance instability is associated with changes in use of emergency and office-based care after the Marketplace and Medicaid expansion were introduced. METHODS: Our study draws from the 2013-14 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, identifying a cohort of non-elderly adults with full-year health insurance coverage in 2014. We use linear and multinomial logistic regression to assess the relationship between insurance instability prior to 2014 (uninsured for 1-11 months, ≥12 months) and person-level changes in use of health care after gaining coverage (change in ED and office visits from 2013 to 2014) with continuously insured individuals serving as a comparison group. RESULTS: Being uninsured for at least one year prior to gaining full-year coverage in 2014 was associated with a 33% increase in ED visits (0.06 visits, p<0.01) and a 47% increase in office visits (1.10 visits, p<0.01), driven by those gaining public coverage. We found no evidence of substitution across settings in the short term, often a stated goal of expansion. CONCLUSION: The long-term uninsured may have substantial health needs and pent-up demand for health care, seeing more physicians across multiple settings in the year after gaining coverage as they seek to get unmanaged conditions under control. Closing the gap in primary care use between the previously uninsured and those with health insurance coverage may help improve long-term health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Adulto Joven
15.
Trials ; 21(1): 615, 2020 Jul 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32631400

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (MSP) affects more than 40% of adults aged 50 years and older and is the leading cause of disability in the USA. Older adults with chronic MSP are at risk for analgesic-related side effects, long-term opioid use, and functional decline. Recognizing the burden of chronic MSP, reducing the transition from acute to chronic pain is a public health priority. In this paper, we report the protocol for the Brief EducaTional Tool to Enhance Recovery (BETTER) trial. This trial compares two versions of an intervention to usual care for preventing the transition from acute to chronic MSP among older adults in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Three hundred sixty patients from the ED will be randomized to one of three arms: full intervention (an interactive educational video about pain medications and recovery-promoting behaviors, a telecare phone call from a nurse 48 to 72 h after discharge from the ED, and an electronic communication containing clinical information to the patient's primary care provider); video-only intervention (the interactive educational video but no telecare or primary care provider communication); or usual care. Data collection will occur at baseline and at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after study enrollment. The primary outcome is a composite measure of pain severity and interference. Secondary outcomes include physical function, overall health, opioid use, healthcare utilization, and an assessment of the economic value of the intervention. DISCUSSION: This trial is the first patient-facing ED-based intervention aimed at helping older adults to better manage their MSP and reduce their risk of developing chronic pain. If effective, future studies will examine the effectiveness of implementation strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04118595 . Registered on 8 October 2019.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Telemedicina/métodos , Grabación en Video , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Dolor Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico , Dolor Musculoesquelético/fisiopatología , Dimensión del Dolor , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Teléfono , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
16.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(6): e204321, 2020 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32558913

RESUMEN

Importance: Pneumonia affects more than 250 000 nursing home (NH) residents annually. A strategy to reduce pneumonia is to provide daily mouth care, especially to residents with dementia. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Mouth Care Without a Battle, a program that increases staff knowledge and attitudes regarding oral hygiene, changes mouth care, and improves oral hygiene, in reducing the incidence of pneumonia among NH residents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pragmatic cluster randomized trial observing 2152 NH residents for up to 2 years was conducted from September 2014 to May 2017. Data collectors were masked to study group. The study included 14 NHs from regions of North Carolina that evidenced proportionately high rehospitalization rates for pneumonia and long-term care residents. Nursing homes were pair matched and randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. Intervention: Mouth Care Without a Battle is a standardized program that teaches that mouth care is health care, provides instruction on individualized techniques and products for mouth care, and trains caregivers to provide care to residents who are resistant and in special situations. The control condition was standard mouth care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pneumonia incidence (primary) and hospitalization and mortality (secondary), obtained from medical records. Results: Overall, the study enrolled 2152 residents (mean [SD] age, 79.4 [12.4] years; 1281 [66.2%] women; 1180 [62.2%] white residents). Participants included 1219 residents (56.6%) in 7 intervention NHs and 933 residents (43.4%) in 7 control NHs. During the 2-year study period, the incidence rate of pneumonia per 1000 resident-days was 0.67 and 0.72 in the intervention and control NHs, respectively. Neither the primary (unadjusted) nor secondary (covariate-adjusted) analyses found a significant reduction in pneumonia due to Mouth Care Without a Battle during 2 years (unadjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.90; upper bound of 1-sided 95% CI, 1.24; P = .27; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.92; upper bound of 1-sided 95% CI, 1.27; P = .30). In the second year, the rate of pneumonia was nonsignificantly higher in intervention NHs. Adjusted post hoc analyses limited to the first year found a significant reduction in pneumonia incidence in intervention NHs (IRR, 0.69; upper bound of 1-sided 95% CI, 0.94; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: This matched-pairs cluster randomized trial of a mouth care program compared with standard care was not effective in reducing pneumonia incidence at 2 years, although reduction was found during the first year. The lack of significant results in the second year may be associated with sustainability. Improving mouth care in US NHs may require the presence and support of dedicated oral care aides. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03817450.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/educación , Higiene Bucal/métodos , Neumonía/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiología , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía/prevención & control
17.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 26(6): 1711-1721, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31994280

RESUMEN

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical studies show equivalent health outcomes from interventional procedures and treatment with medication only for stable angina patients. However, patients may be subject to overuse or access barriers for interventional procedures and may exhibit suboptimal adherence to medications. Our objective is to evaluate whether community-level health literacy is associated with treatment selection and medication adherence patterns. METHOD: The sample included Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (20% random sample) with stable angina in 2007-2013. We used an area-level health literacy variable because of the lack of an individual measure in claims. We measured the association between (a) area-based health literacy with treatment selection (medication only, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery) and (b) area-based health literacy with medication adherence. We controlled for other factors including demographics, co-morbidity burden, dual eligibility, and area deprivation index. RESULTS: We identified 8300 patients of whom 8.7% lived in a low health literacy area. Overall, 56% of patients received medication only, 28% received PCI, and 15% received CABG. Patients in low health literacy areas were less likely to receive CABG (-3.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.8 to -0.3) than were patients in high health literacy areas, but the significance was sensitive to specification. Overall, 81.5% and 71.5% of patients were adherent to antianginals and statins, respectively. Living in low health literacy areas was associated with lower adherence to antianginals (-3.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -6.1 to -0.6) but not statins. CONCLUSIONS: Low area-based health literacy was associated with being less likely to receive CABG and lower adherence, but the differences between low and high health literacy areas were small and sensitive to model specification. Individual factors such as dual eligibility status and race/ethnicity had stronger associations with outcomes than had area-based health literacy, suggesting that this area-based measure was inadequate to account for social determinants in this study.


Asunto(s)
Angina Estable , Alfabetización en Salud , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Angina Estable/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Estados Unidos
18.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(4): 847-851, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31880309

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Administrative records such as Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims provide accurate information on services paid for by Medicare. However, the increasing availability of electronic health records means many researchers may be inclined to rely on data coded in hospital information systems rather than claims. The current quality and accuracy of hospital reports on the use of post-acute care (PAC) services are not known. DESIGN: This study examined differences in the PAC use between hospital discharge status recorded on Medicare Provider and Analysis Review inpatient hospital records and claims for PAC services. SETTING: In addition to assessments of the three types of Medicare-reimbursed PAC (home health agency [HHA], skilled nursing facility [SNF], and inpatient rehabilitation facility [IRF]), the analysis also considered home without PAC services as a default discharge location. PARTICIPANTS: The analysis was conducted using data for FFS beneficiaries who participated in the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey and had one or more inpatient hospitalizations from 2006 to 2011. MEASUREMENTS: This study measured discrepancies between hospital-reported discharges to PAC and PAC use based on Medicare claims. RESULTS: The study found that, on average, 27.9% of hospital reports of discharging to Medicare-covered PAC services were not substantiated by Medicare PAC claims. Among all the discharge pathways, discharging to HHAs had the highest discrepancy rate (29.6%), followed by IRFs (14.7%) and SNFs (13.8%). CONCLUSION: The study results call for cautions about the extent to which the reported discharge locations on hospital claims may differ from actual PAC services used. Assuming that Medicare FFS claims were complete and accurate, researchers using the discharge status reported on Medicare hospital claims should be aware of possible measurement errors when using hospital-reported discharge locations. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:847-851, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Resumen del Alta del Paciente/normas , Atención Subaguda/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicare , Resumen del Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Subaguda/economía , Estados Unidos
19.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 41(4): 430-437, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31858919

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To measure the association between statewide adoption of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Core Elements for Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (Core Elements) and hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) rates in the United States. We hypothesized that states with a higher percentage of reported compliance with the Core Elements have significantly lower MRSA and CDI rates. PARTICIPANTS: All US states. DESIGN: Observational longitudinal study. METHODS: We used 2014-2016 data from Hospital Compare, Provider of Service files, Medicare cost reports, and the CDC's Patient Safety Atlas website. Outcomes were MRSA standardized infection ratio (SIR) and CDI SIR. The key explanatory variable was the percentage of hospitals that meet the Core Elements in each state. We estimated state and time fixed-effects models with time-variant controls, and we weighted our analyses for the number of hospitals in the state. RESULTS: The percentage of hospitals reporting compliance with the Core Elements between 2014 and 2016 increased in all states. A 1% increase in reported ASP compliance was associated with a 0.3% decrease (P < .01) in CDIs in 2016 relative to 2014. We did not find an association for MRSA infections. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing documentation of the Core Elements may be associated with decreases in the CDI SIR. We did not find evidence of such an association for the MRSA SIR, probably due to the short length of the study and variety of stewardship strategies that ASPs may encompass.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Clostridioides difficile , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
EGEMS (Wash DC) ; 7(1): 42, 2019 Aug 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31406699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stable angina patients have difficulty understanding the tradeoffs between treatment alternatives. In this analysis, we assessed treatment planning conversations for stable angina to determine whether inadequate health literacy acts as a barrier to communication that may partially explain this difficulty. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive analysis of patient questionnaire data from the PCI Choice Trial. The main outcomes were the responses to the Decisional Conflict Scale and the proportion of correct responses to knowledge questions about stable angina. We also conducted a qualitative analysis on recordings of patient-clinician discussions about treatment planning. The recordings were coded with the OPTION12 instrument for shared decision-making. Two analysts independently assessed the number and types of patient questions and expressions of preferences. RESULTS: Patient engagement did not differ by health literacy level and was generally low for all patients with respect to OPTION12 scores and the number of questions related to clinical aspects of treatment. Patients with inadequate health literacy had significantly higher decisional conflict. However, the proportion of knowledge questions answered correctly did not differ significantly by health literacy level. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with inadequate health literacy had greater decisional conflict but no difference in knowledge compared to patients with adequate health literacy. Inadequate health literacy may act as a barrier to communication, but gaps were found in patient engagement and knowledge for patients of all health literacy levels. The recorded patient-clinician encounters and the health literacy measure were valuable resources for conducting research on care delivery.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...