The Serendipitous Story of Sildenafil: An Unexpected Oral Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: The serendipitous discovery of sildenafil (Viagra [sildenafil citrate]) as a treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most fascinating drug development stories of our time. When sildenafil was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1998, it revolutionized the treatment protocol for men with ED, once considered a psychological issue or an inevitable part of aging. AIM: To review the discovery of sildenafil and its role in changing the field of sexual medicine in the context of the epidemiology and history of treatment for ED. METHODS: For this narrative review, a literature search was conducted to identify essential articles and was supplemented by author observations from a historical perspective. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A broad overview of ED and its past, current, and future treatments. RESULTS: ED is a prevalent condition for which medical treatment had been limited to genitally localized interventions, including surgery, vacuum pumps, injectable therapies, and intraurethral suppositories. The discovery of sildenafil provided a safe, oral pharmacotherapy for the treatment of ED, sparking greater understanding of the science behind ED and its role in men's overall health. CONCLUSION: The approval of sildenafil initiated a global conversation about ED that had profound implications for patients, methods of clinical practice, and academic sexual medicine. These changes will catalyze continued advances in ED treatment. Goldstein I, Burnett AL, Rosen RC, et al. The serendipitous story of sildenafil: an unexpected oral therapy for erectile dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:115-128.

Clinically important difference on the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction questionnaire in patients with erectile dysfunction.

AIM: To determine what constitutes a clinically important difference (CID) on the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), an 11-item validated questionnaire assessing treatment satisfaction used in clinical trials for patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction data were evaluated from a double-blind, fixed-dose trial of 279 men aged 18-65 years with ED who were treated with sildenafil 50 or 100 mg or placebo. The primary anchor measure was the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), which has a 4-point minimal CID. The CID on the EDITS index score was determined using a regression analysis comparing EDITS and IIEF EF scores at the end of the 8-week treatment. A similar analysis was performed for EDITS and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) instrument, a single-item questionnaire measuring hardness, which was used as a secondary anchor measure. RESULTS: Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and IIEF EF domain scores were highly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.75). EDITS total scores across treatments at week 8 averaged (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) 67.5 ± 21.6 (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate greater treatment satisfaction); IIEF EF domain scores averaged 22.2 ± 6.9 (range, 1-30; higher scores indicate higher erectile functioning). The calculated CID for EDITS scores was 9.5 (95% CI, 8.5-10.4; 0.44 SD units), corresponding to a medium effect size. EDITS and EHS instrument scores also correlated highly (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.64). Placebo-adjusted EDITS mean scores were more than twice the CID, at 23 (95% CI, 17-28) and 28 (95% CI, 23-33) for the 50- and 100-mg doses, respectively. CONCLUSION: Approximately 10 points on the EDITS index score is considered a CID. Serving as a benchmark, this finding aids interpretation of the clinical relevance of a difference in mean EDITS index scores between treatments for patients with ED.

Efficacy and Safety of Sildenafil in Men With Sexual Dysfunction and Spinal Cord Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is estimated to affect approximately 276,000 individuals in the United States. Since 2010, the mean age of individuals at the time of the SCI has been 42 years, with nearly 80% of cases involving men. This means that individuals with SCI generally are young men who typically place a great deal of importance on normal sexual and reproductive function. AIM: To assess the effect of sildenafil treatment on erectile function and the frequency of ejaculation in men with SCI. METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose, crossover sildenafil trials conducted in Europe, Australia, and Turkey. Two hundred forty-eight men at least 18 years old with traumatic SCI of at least 6 months' duration, with erectile dysfunction solely attributed to SCI, and in a stable heterosexual relationship were treated sequentially with sildenafil and placebo. Exclusion criteria included taking nitrate therapy, severe cardiac failure, and recent stroke or myocardial infarction. The starting sildenafil dose was 50 mg, taken approximately 1 hour before sexual activity, with subsequent dose adjustment to 100 or 25 mg based on efficacy and safety during treatment. There was a 2-week washout between 6-week treatments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change from baseline in International Index of Erectile Function question 3 (frequency of penetration), question 4 (maintaining erection after penetration), question 9 (frequency of ejaculation), and erectile function domain scores; intercourse success; and treatment preference. RESULTS: All International Index of Erectile Function outcomes, including achieving and maintaining erections and ejaculation frequency, were statistically significantly greater with sildenafil vs placebo, including the subgroup with complete SCI (P < .01 for all comparisons). The percentage of successful intercourse attempts with sildenafil (53% vs 12%) and preference for sildenafil (96% vs 4%) vs placebo were significant (P < .001), including the subgroup with complete SCI. The most common all-cause adverse events with sildenafil were headache (16.1%) and urinary tract infection (11.6%). CONCLUSION: Sildenafil significantly improves erections, intercourse success, and ejaculation frequency vs placebo, including in men with complete SCI. Sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for sexual dysfunction in men with SCI. The increase in frequency of ejaculation could allow the possibility of having children without medical intervention in this patient population. Ohl DA, Carlsson M, Stecher VJ, Rippon GA. Efficacy and Safety of Sildenafil in Men With Sexual Dysfunction and Spinal Cord Injury. Sex Med Rev 2017;5:521-528.

Further Understanding of the International Index of Erectile Function at 15+ Years: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling.

The objective of this study was to describe confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multidimensional scaling (MDS) on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) to confirm the structure and to enrich understanding of the IIEF, thereby heightening appreciation of the factors and responses underlying sexual functioning for men with erectile dysfunction. Baseline, end of double-blind, and end of open-label data sets were derived from all data from 2 previously published sildenafil trials. For the CFA model, an acceptable fit of the data was shown for each data set, as indicated by a Bentler comparative fit index >0.9, statistically significant path coefficients ( t values >1.96), and (except for IIEF item 6 at baseline) statistically significant standardized path coefficients ≥0.4. For MDS modeling, the distance matrix created for each data set, based on polychoric correlations, interpreted relationships between the IIEF items in 2-dimensional space across the "sexual intercourse interference" dimension (horizontal axis) and the "sexual satisfaction" dimension (vertical axis). The 5-factor structure of the IIEF was confirmed by CFA and enriched with visual interpretation by MDS.

Improvement in erection hardness and intercourse success with first dose of sildenafil citrate 100 mg.

PURPOSE: To determine, in men with erectile dysfunction (ED), the extent of improvement in erection hardness and in the rate of successful sexual intercourse (SSI) during the final intercourse attempt using sildenafil 50 mg compared with the subsequent initial attempt after a dose increase to 100 mg. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This post hoc analysis used data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of flexible-dose sildenafil for the treatment of men with ED, who were given sildenafil 50 mg or matching placebo, to be taken as needed before sexual intercourse. After 2 weeks, those with no tolerability concerns were titrated up to 100 mg, forming the subgroup of this analysis. The main outcome measures were event log data, including an Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and a question on SSI ("Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful sexual intercourse?"), for each attempt at sexual intercourse, analyzed by study and treatment group (sildenafil or placebo). Statistical comparisons were conducted by using the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In both studies, the sildenafil group had a larger proportion of EHS4 (completely hard and fully rigid) erections (P < 0.001) and SSI (P < 0.005) compared with the placebo group, both before and after the dose increase. Between the final 50 mg sildenafil dose and the initial 100 mg sildenafil dose, the outcomes improved and significantly so in the larger study. CONCLUSION: The improved efficacy with sildenafil 100 mg versus 50 mg, which occurs rapidly, suggests that patients should be encouraged to use 100 mg if they are unable to achieve completely hard and fully rigid erections or SSI with the 50 mg dose.

Adulteration of purported herbal and natural sexual performance enhancement dietary supplements with synthetic phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Many products labeled "herbal" or "all natural" (herbal/natural) that claim to enhance sexual performance and imply use for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) are marketed as over-the-counter (OTC) dietary supplements. However, adulteration with undeclared phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors appears widespread. AIM: To assess the availability, cost, origin, categorical content, and adulteration with PDE5 inhibitors of purported herbal/natural OTC dietary supplements claiming to naturally enhance sexual performance. METHODS: Pfizer Global Security coordinated sample collection (all from convenience stores and filling stations in two U.S. metropolitan areas except for seven from U.S. Customs seizures) and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adulteration with synthetic PDE5 inhibitors. RESULTS: Ninety-one samples labeled as 58 distinct products and priced from $2.99 to $17.99 were evaluated. Origin/manufacture was claimed as United States (n = 62), apparently Asian (n = 15), and not clearly identified (n = 14). Although no sample claimed to include synthetic substances, 74 (81%) contained PDE5-inhibitor pharmaceutical ingredients, including tadalafil and/or sildenafil (n = 40, of which 18 contained >110% of the highest approved drug product strength) or PDE5-inhibitor analogs (n = 34). Pronounced heterogeneity of contents between samples within individual products indicated minimal quality control during manufacture. Labeling was inadequate (e.g., lacking lot number and/or expiry date) for 17 products (23 samples) and inconsistent between samples within a given product (e.g., in manufacturer, lot number, and/or expiry date) for seven of 17 products having multiple samples. Only 14 samples warned against concomitant nitrate use. CONCLUSIONS: Ethical pharmaceutical companies are concerned for an unsuspecting public when their products are counterfeited, mislabeled, and illegally offered for sale in an unsafe manner. Because of the dangers of adulteration with synthetic PDE5 inhibitors, absent safety warnings, and lack of quality or consistent manufacture, men with ED unknowingly risk their health by using OTC herbal/natural products that claim to enhance sexual performance.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors improve endothelial function and may benefit cardiovascular conditions.

The effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors on vasodilation mediated via nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate are well described. Less is known about other mechanisms through which phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors benefit endothelial function, including normalization of serum biomarkers, increased levels of endothelial progenitor cells, ischemia-reperfusion protection mechanisms, and other actions specific to patients with diabetes. These various mechanisms are reviewed. Their impact on several cardiovascular diseases, including erectile dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, high-altitude pulmonary edema, Raynaud's phenomenon, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and atherosclerosis, is presented.

Multi-domain Longitudinal Modeling: An Application to the International Index of Erectile Function.

Individual domains of multi-domain, patient-reported outcome instruments are typically analyzed independently, without considering inherent interdependency. The authors assessed correlations across time (longitudinal) and across domains of a multi-domain instrument, simultaneously, in a single, unified, and cohesive integrated model. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) data from a trial of sildenafil in erectile dysfunction were used. For the multi-domain longitudinal modeling, covariance of response was constructed using (1) the Kronecker product of an unstructured covariance matrix to model across domains, with an unstructured covariance matrix to model across time, and (2) a completely general, unstructured covariance matrix. Treatment effects for all IIEF domain scores calculated using individual or multi-domain modeling were similar, reflecting the robust application of the integrated model to these data. In conclusion, modeling correlations simultaneously across domains and across time more rigorously address the natural interrelationship between domains and can provide a more accurate representation of treatment effects.

Erectile dysfunction diagnosis and treatment as a means to improve medication adherence and optimize comorbidity management.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal pharmacologic management of diseases comorbid with erectile dysfunction (ED), such as cardiovascular disease, depression, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS), is dependent upon long-term treatment compliance and may be complicated by poor adherence to medication use. ED may contribute to poor adherence to medication use because poor quality erectile function may be an unwanted adverse effect of antihypertensives, antidepressants, and 5-α reductase inhibitors for treatment of BPH/LUTS. Diminished erectile spontaneity, rigidity, and/or sustaining capability also negatively affects mood, self-esteem, and confidence, which compromise motivation to be compliant with medications that treat diseases comorbid with ED. AIM: Literature review was performed to explore the role of ED diagnosis and effective treatment in enhancing overall management of selected ED comorbidities, highlighting the role of medication adherence. METHODS: Several PubMed searches were performed. RESULTS: Diagnosis and successful treatment of concomitant ED may promote improved adherence and management of comorbid diseases. Concomitant ED management may improve treatment outcome, decrease healthcare costs, and possibly prevent or even improve deterioration in medical conditions comorbid with ED. Because ED is a silent marker and predictor of comorbidities, especially cardiovascular disease, earlier diagnosis of ED may provide an opportunity to prevent future cardiovascular events. In men presenting with complaints of ED, screening for, monitoring, and appropriately treating diseases that are comorbid with ED is essential. Screening for and appropriately treating ED is important for enhanced life quality and improved motivation in men with existing ED comorbidities or risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate management of ED and its risk factors may have beneficial effects on diseases that are comorbid with ED, and vice versa, most likely via shared pathophysiological pathways. Clinicians may need to consider men's health overall, of which sexual health is a central component, in order to provide optimal disease management.

Internet-ordered viagra (sildenafil citrate) is rarely genuine.

INTRODUCTION: Counterfeit medication is a growing problem. This study assessed the requirement for prescription, cost, origin, and content of medications sold via the Internet and purporting to be the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor Viagra (sildenafil citrate). METHODS: Pfizer monitored top search results for the query "buy Viagra" on the two leading Internet search engines in March 2011. Orders were placed from 22 unique Web sites claiming to sell Viagra manufactured by Pfizer. Tablets received were assessed for chemical composition. RESULTS: No Web site examined required a prescription for purchase or a health screening survey; 90% offered illegal "generic Viagra." Cost per tablet ranged from $3.28-$33.00. Shipment origins of purchases were Hong Kong (N = 11), the United States (N = 6), and the United Kingdom (N = 2) as well as Canada, China, and India (N = 1 each). Notably, the four Internet pharmacies claiming to be Canadian did not ship medication from a Canadian address. Of 22 sample tablets examined, 17 (77%) were counterfeit, 4 (18%) were authentic, and 1 (5%) was an illegal generic. Counterfeit tablets were analyzed for sildenafil citrate, the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of Viagra, and contents varied between 30% and 50% of the label claim. Counterfeits lacked product information leaflets, including appropriate safety warnings, and genuine Viagra formulations. CONCLUSION: Internet sites claiming to sell authentic Viagra shipped counterfeit medication 77% of the time; counterfeits usually came from non-U.S. addresses and had 30% to 50% of the labeled API claim. Caution is warranted when purchasing Viagra via the Internet.

Cardiac uses of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.

Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) improve erectile function by enhancing nitric oxide availability in the penis and its supplying vasculature, resulting in vasodilation and increased blood flow. PDE5Is might benefit cardiovascular diseases because phosphodiesterase-5 is also located elsewhere in the body, including the pulmonary and systemic vasculature and in hypertrophied myocardium. PDE5Is are approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension, given that they improved several hemodynamic and clinical parameters in large randomized trials. Initial evidence suggests that PDE5Is benefit patients with congestive heart failure and secondary pulmonary hypertension. PDE5Is seem to improve hemodynamic and clinical parameters in patients with high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE) and high-altitude pulmonary hypertension. In climbers with prior episodes of HAPE, PDE5Is prevented HAPE in 2 small randomized trials. In small randomized trials of PDE5Is, patients with Raynaud's phenomenon demonstrated improved blood flow, fewer symptoms and frequency of attacks, and resolution of digital ulcers. In addition to enhancing vasodilation, PDE5Is seem to protect the myocardium through complex pathways that involve nitric oxide, cyclic guanosine monophosphate, protein kinase G, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase, B-cell lymphoma protein-2, and Rho kinase inhibition. In animal models of acute myocardial infarction, PDE5Is consistently reduced infarct size indicating cardioprotection and PDE5Is also promote reverse remodeling and reduce myocardial apoptosis, fibrosis, and hypertrophy. PDE5Is might also benefit patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, preeclampsia, or peripheral arterial disease. This review presents the pathophysiology and trial data with regard to the use of PDE5Is for cardiac diseases.

Investigational noncardiovascular uses of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: At the present time, inhibitors of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) have Food and Drug Administration approval only for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and pulmonary artery hypertension, for which their mechanism of action is vasodilation and augmentation of blood flow by impeding PDE5-mediated breakdown of cyclic guanosine monophosphate. However, these agents are also being investigated in a wide range of other potential medical and surgical applications for which current treatment options are limited and in which their mechanism of action may be the same as or different from their effects in the two approved indications. Even if only some of these potential applications prove useful, the effect on clinical practice could be far reaching. AREAS COVERED: This literature review summarizes potential noncardiovascular uses of PDE5 inhibitors, with emphasis on clinical research. Topics include a variety of male genitourinary disorders other than erectile dysfunction: cutaneous ulcerations, tissue protection, neurological conditions, diabetes, cancer, transplant and reconstructive surgery, female sexual dysfunction and disorders of pregnancy. EXPERT OPINION: The exceptionally wide range of research taking place with PDE5 inhibitors holds promise not only for improved therapeutic options but also for an improved understanding of the basic biological mechanisms that underlie scientific medicine.

Analysis of dyadic data: a guideline applied to erectile dysfunction.

RATIONALE: Research on relationships often does not refer to a single person but rather to two persons. Nonetheless, such data has been often analysed by examining individuals in isolation, which falls short of capturing their truly interpersonal and non-independent nature. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This paper highlights and illustrates some analytic tools for such dyadic data that are essential for theories about dyadic relationships to be tested adequately. METHODS: The methodology is applied to clinical trial data from male patients treated for their erectile dysfunction and data from their partners with respect to treatment satisfaction. Multi-level modelling was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: The approaches outlined allow researchers to assess both individual effects and companion effects (e.g. of baseline intercourse satisfaction on subsequent treatment satisfaction), role of participant (e.g. patient or partner) or treatment condition (e.g. test or placebo) on outcome (e.g. treatment satisfaction), and differences on individual and companion effects when couples differ on important variables (e.g. differences on the individual and companion effects of baseline intercourse satisfaction on treatment satisfaction when couples differ with respect to treatment condition). CONCLUSION: Researchers are encouraged to consider implementing dyadic data analysis in their own work.

Sildenafil citrate 100 mg starting dose in men with erectile dysfunction in an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled study: effect on the sexual experience and reducing feelings of anxiety about the next intercourse attempt.

INTRODUCTION: Sildenafil citrate 50 mg is the recommended starting dose for men with erectile dysfunction (ED); however, most men are later titrated to sildenafil 100 mg for improved efficacy. AIM: Assess the tolerability and efficacy of sildenafil initiated at the 100-mg dose in men with ED. METHODS: Men with ED (score < or =25 on the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function) who had received < or =6 total doses of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor and none within 4 weeks were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC), fixed-dose treatment (50 or 100 mg sildenafil or placebo) followed by 4 weeks of open-label flexible-dose sildenafil (50 or 100 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy, tolerability, treatment satisfaction, and other end points were measured at baseline and/or the end of the double-blind and open-label phases and compared between placebo and sildenafil initiated at doses of 50 and 100 mg. RESULTS: Improvements in DBPC patient-reported outcomes from baseline were statistically significant for both sildenafil 50 and 100 mg compared with placebo. At the end of DBPC treatment, 56% of men on the 100-mg dose felt no anxiety about the next intercourse attempt compared with 39% in the 50-mg group (odds ratio 2.03; P = 0.0197). Changes in functional scores from baseline were not statistically significant with the 100-mg dose compared with the 50-mg dose in the DBPC. Measures of treatment satisfaction and sexual experience significantly favored the 100-mg dose compared with the 50-mg dose in the DBPC. There was no increase in adverse events with the higher dose. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil at 50 mg or 100 mg significantly improved erection quality, treatment satisfaction, anxiety levels, and the sexual experience compared with placebo during DBPC. Sildenafil 100 mg improved the sexual experience and treatment satisfaction, and reduced feelings of anxiety compared with the 50-mg dose.

In men with erectile dysfunction, satisfaction with quality of erections correlates with erection hardness, treatment satisfaction, and emotional well-being.

INTRODUCTION: The validated Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ) evaluates satisfaction with erection quality. AIM: To collate QEQ data, including correlations between QEQ outcomes and outcomes assessing emotional well-being, treatment satisfaction, and erection hardness after sildenafil citrate treatment. METHODS: In four trials, men older than 18 years and with erectile dysfunction, a stable sexual partner, and no recent phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use were randomized to double-blind flexible-dose sildenafil or placebo (1:1 ratio) for 6 or 10 weeks (two trials), fixed-dose 50 mg, 100 mg, and placebo (1:1:1 ratio) for 8 weeks (one trial), and 50 mg and 100 mg (1:1 ratio) for 4 weeks after 4 weeks of single-blind sildenafil 50 mg. Exclusion criteria included recent significant cardiovascular disease, use of nitrates, nitric oxide donors, cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors, or other erectile dysfunction treatment, and sildenafil hypersensitivity or previous severe or serious treatment-related adverse event. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Scores on the QEQ, QEQ Question 5 (satisfaction with erection hardness), the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire, and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction; the percentage of occasions with Erection Hardness Score 3 (EHS 3, hard enough for penetration but not completely hard) and/or EHS 4 (completely hard and fully rigid); and Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: 1,296 men (18-80 years) were randomized. Except for the percentage of occasions with EHS 3, all outcomes improved in men treated with sildenafil and correlated positively with the change in QEQ scores in all trials. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with the quality of erections, which is easily monitored with the QEQ, correlated positively with measures of emotional well-being and treatment satisfaction and with the change in percentage of erections that were completely hard and fully rigid, but not with the change in percentage of erections that were hard enough for penetration but not completely hard.

Effect of sildenafil citrate on the male sexual experience assessed with the Sexual Experience Questionnaire: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with open-label extension.

INTRODUCTION: The Sexual Experience Questionnaire (SEX-Q) enables quick and easy assessment of functional, emotional, and satisfaction-related aspects of the sexual experience in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: To assess correlations between improvement on the SEX-Q and outcomes on other validated questionnaires. METHODS. Men with ED (score < or =25 on the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]) who had used less than or equal to six doses of any phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (none within 6 months) were randomized to 10 weeks of double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) flexible-dose sildenafil citrate (50 or 100 mg, as needed), followed by 6 weeks of open-label (OL) sildenafil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SEX-Q, IIEF, Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ), Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) Questionnaire, Erection Hardness Score (EHS), successful intercourse attempts (SIAs), Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), and global efficacy questions (GEQs). RESULTS: Compared with the placebo group (N = 105), the sildenafil group (N = 104) at DBPC end of treatment (EOT) had significantly more improvement (P < 0.05) on all SEX-Q, IIEF (except the Sexual Desire domain), QEQ, and SEAR outcomes, more frequent SIAs and EHS 3 (hard enough for penetration but not completely hard) or EHS 4 (completely hard) erections (odds ratio [OR], 2.52 and 3.46, respectively), EHS 4 erections four times as often (OR, 6.41), more men satisfied with treatment (EDITS; OR, 2.6), approximately twice as many men with improved erections (GEQ1; OR, 5.8) and ability to have sexual intercourse (GEQ2; OR, 5.4), and GEQ3 scores that indicated better sex (P < 0.0001). SEX-Q score improvements correlated positively with all other outcomes. At OL EOT, most outcomes were >60% (and approximately half were > or =80%) of the maximum positive result. CONCLUSIONS: SEX-Q change scores correlate with several other functional, emotional, and satisfaction-related outcomes in men treated with sildenafil for ED, allowing a simple and focused evaluation of the sexual experience.

Clinically meaningful improvement on the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in men with erectile dysfunction.

PURPOSE: To estimate the minimal clinically meaningful improvement (MCMI) on the Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire. METHODS: Using combined data from the 2 pivotal SEAR trials of men treated with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction (ED), MCMIs were estimated as the lower limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence intervals of SEAR mean change scores (from baseline to end of study) for 2 anchor groups: (1) men who improved 1 ED severity category on the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, and (2) men who improved 5-60% (inclusive) on these erectile function scores. RESULTS: Both anchors gave comparable results. A 10-point MCMI was proposed because the estimates of 95% lower bounds centered on around 10 points for most SEAR components (Sexual Relationship, Confidence, Self-Esteem, Overall Score). An exception was the Overall Relationship whose 95% lower bounds were too low to recommend them as an MCMI. CONCLUSIONS: Two anchor-based approaches suggest that a change of about 10 points represents an MCMI on most components of the SEAR questionnaire.

Sildenafil citrate improves self-esteem, confidence, and relationships in men with erectile dysfunction: Results from an international, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) can significantly impact a man's relationships and well-being. AIM: We assessed changes in self-esteem, confidence, sexual relationship satisfaction, and overall relationship satisfaction in men with ED using the validated Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire (SEAR). METHODS: This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose (25, 50, 100 mg, as needed) international study of sildenafil in men > or =18 years of age in Mexico, Brazil, Australia, and Japan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary study outcome was change in self-esteem from baseline to the end of treatment. Secondary study measures were changes in other SEAR components, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) domains, percentage of intercourse attempts that were successful, and the response to a global efficacy question at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Patients were well balanced for age and duration of ED (placebo = 149 and sildenafil = 151). Compared with placebo, sildenafil significantly improved self-esteem, confidence, sexual relationship satisfaction, and overall relationship satisfaction (P < 0.0001). The psychosocial measures of well-being assessed with the SEAR were positively correlated (range 0.60-0.86, P < 0.0001) with erectile function, the frequency of achieving erections that allowed satisfactory sexual intercourse, the percentage of successful sexual intercourse attempts, and global treatment efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in self-esteem, confidence, sexual relationship satisfaction, and overall relationship satisfaction after treatment of ED with sildenafil were consistent among countries. These data suggest a substantial cross-cultural improvement in well-being after successful treatment of ED with sildenafil.

Correlation of improved erectile function and rate of successful intercourse with improved emotional well-being assessed with the Self-Esteem And Relationship questionnaire in men treated with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction and stratified by age.

BACKGROUND: The quality of life consequences of erectile dysfunction (ED) include depression, anxiety, and loss of self-esteem. The Self-Esteem And Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire is a validated, patient-administered, psychometric instrument specific to ED. OBJECTIVE: To determine correlations between erectile function (EF), intercourse success, and emotional well-being measured with the SEAR questionnaire in men treated with sildenafil citrate for ED and stratified by age (< 50 years, 50-65 years, and > 65 years). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an open-label, flexible-dose trial of sildenafil (25, 50 and 100 mg) administered for 10 weeks to 382 men with ED (mean +/- SD age, 55 +/- 13 years; mean ED duration, 4 years), which was conducted at 62 centers in the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis (by intent-to-treat, n = 368) of the change from baseline to the week-10 endpoint in the SEAR questionnaire Self-Esteem subscale, the intercourse success rate (percent of occasions at which an erection that lasted long enough for successful intercourse was achieved), and their correlation. RESULTS: For the overall population, there was mean +/- SD improvement (p < 0.0001, paired t-tests) in the Self-Esteem subscale (56 +/- 25 to 79 +/- 22) and intercourse success rate (21 +/- 30% to 70 +/- 36%), which showed positive correlation (p < 0.0001). Secondary outcomes (i.e., EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function; event log frequency of erection hard enough for sexual intercourse and of ejaculation/orgasm) also improved (p < 0.0001) and correlated positively with the SEAR Self-Esteem subscale and Sexual Relationship domain (p < 0.05 for all correlations). All 10 correlations were positive (p < 0.05) in men aged 50 to 65 years, eight were positive in men aged > 65 years, and six were positive in men aged < 50 years. The most common treatment-related adverse events were mild-to-moderate headache (12% of patients), vasodilatation (7%), and rhinitis (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Men treated with sildenafil for ED demonstrated improved erectile function and an increased intercourse success rate, which correlated positively with improvement in SEAR measures of self-esteem and sexual relationship.

Efficacy and safety of sildenafil in men with serotonergic antidepressant-associated erectile dysfunction: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of short-term treatment with sildenafil citrate in men with serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI)-associated erectile dysfunction (ED). METHOD: Men (aged>or=18 years) with major depressive disorder (MDD; DSM-IV criteria) in remission and taking SRIs who experienced SRI-associated ED were enrolled in this multicenter, 6-week, randomized, flexible-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The primary study measures were questions 3 (Q3: frequency of penetration) and 4 (Q4: frequency of maintained erections after penetration) of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. Secondary study measures were all other questions and domains of the IIEF, the Erectile Dysfunction Index of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), a global efficacy questionnaire (GEQ), and a patient-maintained event log of sexual activity. RESULTS: Patients receiving sildenafil (N=71) versus placebo (N=71) reported significantly higher mean+/-SE scores on Q3 (3.9+/-0.2 vs. 3.1+/-0.2, p=.003) and Q4 (3.7+/-0.2 vs. 2.8+/-0.2, p<.001) of the IIEF and significantly higher scores on all domains of the IIEF. Patients receiving sildenafil also reported significantly improved scores on all questions of the EDITS questionnaire (p<.02) and the GEQ (p<.0001) and an increased number of successful sexual intercourse attempts per week (p<.0001) compared with patients receiving placebo. All patients remained in MDD remission (score