Impact of Retained Cystoscopy Fluid after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of retained cystoscopy fluid after laparoscopic hysterectomy on time to spontaneous void, time to discharge, urinary retention, bladder discomfort, and patient satisfaction. DESIGN: Single-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: An academic medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred and twenty patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy with universal cystoscopy for benign indications, excluding pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence indications. INTERVENTIONS: From October 10, 2018, to October 17, 2019, we compared 200 mL retained cystoscopy fluid and complete bladder emptying after laparoscopic hysterectomy with universal cystoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were enrolled and randomized (59 in the retained cystoscopy fluid group and 61 in the emptied fluid group). The primary outcome was time to first spontaneous void. The secondary outcomes were time to discharge, urinary retention rates, bladder discomfort, and patient satisfaction. A sample size of 120 was calculated to detect a 57-minute difference in time to spontaneous void. There were minimal differences in baseline demographics and surgical characteristics between the groups. There was an apparent, although not significant, difference in time to void of 25 minutes (143 minutes vs 168 minutes, p = .20). Time to discharge and urinary retention rates did not differ (199 minutes vs 214 minutes, p = .40, and 13.6% vs 8.2%, p = .51, respectively). There was no difference in postoperative bladder discomfort and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Retained cystoscopy fluid after laparoscopic hysterectomy did not significantly affect time to first spontaneous void, time to discharge, urinary retention, bladder discomfort, or patient satisfaction.

Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing cephalad migration in robotic gynecologic surgery using egg-crate foam versus the Pink Pad®.

The objectives of the study were to compare the cephalad migration of two patient positioning pads used in robotic gynecologic surgery and to determine if any correlation exists between cephalad movement and time in Trendelenburg position or body mass index. This was a prospective randomized controlled open-label trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Sixty women undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery were randomized to the Pink Pad® system or egg-crate foam pre-operatively. Patients were placed under general anesthesia and then positioned in dorsal lithotomy. The locations of the iliac crest, acromion process, and buttock were marked on the table before and after surgery to calculate cephalad migration during surgery. The primary outcome was centimeters of cephalad migration at the three anatomic landmarks. Comparing the Pink Pad® (n = 24) to the egg-crate group (n = 26) revealed similar mean cephalad migration at the iliac crest (4.8 cm vs 4.3 cm, p = 0.56) and the shoulder (4.6 cm vs 3.9 cm, p = 0.39), and less cephalad migration at the buttock (median 3.0 cm vs 2.0 cm, p = 0.041). The total time in Trendelenburg was not correlated with cephalad migration at any anatomic landmark. Body mass index was positively correlated with cephalad migration only at the iliac crest (p = 0.032) regardless of pad type. The egg-crate foam resulted in less cephalad migration at all anatomic sites and significantly less migration at the buttocks compared to the Pink Pad®. This suggests that the less-costly egg-crate foam is noninferior to the Pink Pad® system and trends at superiority.

Surgical Equipment Price Awareness Amongst Obstetrician-Gynecologists.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Physicians typically have little information of surgical device pricing, although this trend has not been studied in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. We therefore aimed to determine how accurately obstetrician-gynecologists estimate surgical device prices, and to identify factors associated with accuracy. METHODS: An anonymous survey was emailed to all obstetrician-gynecologist attendings, fellows, and residents at 3 teaching hospitals in a single healthcare system in Arizona. We obtained demographic data, perceptions of price transparency and self-rated price knowledge, and price estimates for 31 surgical devices. RESULTS: After participants provided consent and demographics, they then estimated the purchasing price of 31 devices. We defined price accuracy as being within ±10% of the hospital's purchasing price. Fifty-six of the 170 (32.9%) invitees completed the survey and 48 (28.2%) provided price estimates. On average, participants identified 1.9 items correctly (6.1%; range, 0-7 items) out of 31 with no difference in accuracy based on seniority, surgical volume, physician reimbursement structure, nor subspecialty practice-focus. All (100%) respondents felt pricing should be transparent, and only 1.8% felt it is at least somewhat transparent. CONCLUSION: We found that price-estimate accuracy was very low and had no association with any of the demographics. Also notable was the perception that pricing is not transparent despite a unanimous desire for transparency. Although physicians reported a preference for using less-expensive surgical devices, we conclude that physicians are unequipped to make cost-conscious decisions highlighting a large potential for education.