X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets and nephrocalcinosis: clinical characteristics of a single-center pediatric cohort in North America before and after burosumab.

Background: X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH) is a rare genetic disease characterized by inappropriately elevated circulating fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) and subsequent urinary phosphate wasting. The primary clinical manifestations of XLH include short stature, lower extremity bowing, dental abscesses, and rickets. Historical treatment includes phosphate and vitamin D supplementation, but recently, targeted therapy with burosumab has gained widespread acceptance. Burosumab is an FGF-23 blocking antibody. Conventional therapy options have been associated with the development of nephrocalcinosis (NC), with reported rates varying between 33% and 80% in XLH patients. Previous studies have noted that the phosphate supplementation dose correlates with the presence of NC, although this finding is not consistent across studies. It remains unclear whether nephrocalcinosis occurs in patients now treated with burosumab. Our aim was to identify XLH-associated nephrocalcinosis risk factors in our cohort of children with XLH and provide an updated analysis in the era of burosumab. Methods: We identified 13 children with XLH who received routine medical care for XLH at our institution between 2015 and 2023. All were initially treated with conventional therapy and were transitioned to burosumab either upon its US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2018 or at 6 months of age if this occurred after 2018. All patients were routinely monitored and this included laboratory tests and renal ultrasonography. Phosphate and calcitriol dosages were regularly adjusted to minimize serum and urinary laboratory abnormalities. Burosumab was administered according to its FDA package insert directions. Medication doses and laboratory values were analyzed between the group with NC and the group without NC. Results: Three patients were noted to have evidence of NC within the study timeline. Two children developed NC while receiving conventional therapy and one while prescribed burosumab. None of the variables, including a positive family history of XLH, average age at diagnosis of XLH, duration or dosage of treatment with conventional therapy, average age at the initiation of burosumab, and all measured laboratory values, were significantly different between the groups with and without NC. Female sex was the only identified significant risk factor for a diagnosis of XLH-associated NC. Conclusion: XLH-associated NC remains a clinical concern even with modern treatment, although the traditional risk factors (dose of phosphate supplements and degree of urinary phosphate excretion) may not always correlate with the onset of nephrocalcinosis. XLH patients receiving burosumab, which has been hypothesized to eliminate the risk factors for NC, can still develop NC. It is important to continue screening patients treated with burosumab for nephrocalcinosis. In addition, more research is needed to better understand the risk factors that cause XLH-associated NC and determine whether children with XLH never exposed to conventional therapy will develop NC.

It is Time to Screen for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the United States.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an ultra-rare inherited condition that affects approximately one in 300,000 people. The disorder is characterized by extremely high, life-threatening levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from birth, leading to significant premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, if left untreated. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is severely underdiagnosed and undertreated in the United States (US), despite guidelines recommendations for universal pediatric lipid screening in children aged 9-11. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment are critical in averting premature cardiovascular disease in individuals affected by HoFH. Yet, an unacceptably high number of people living with HoFH remain undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, and/or receive a late diagnosis, often after a major cardiovascular event. The emergence of novel lipid-lowering therapies, along with the realization that diagnosis is too often delayed, have highlighted an urgency to implement policies that ensure timely detection of HoFH in the US. Evidence from around the world suggests that a combination of universal pediatric screening and cascade screening strategies constitutes an effective approach to identifying heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Nevertheless, HoFH and its complications manifest much earlier in life compared to HeFH. To date, little focus has been placed on the detection of HoFH in very young children and/or infants. The 2023 Updated European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Statement on HoFH has recommended, for the first time, broadening pediatric guidelines to include lipid screening of newborn infants. Some unique aspects of HoFH need to be considered before implementing newborn screening. As such, insights from pilot studies conducted in Europe may provide some preliminary guidance. Our paper proposes a set of actionable measures that states can implement to reduce the burden of HoFH. It also outlines key research and policy gaps that need to be addressed in order to pave the way for universal newborn screening of HoFH in the US.

Implementing evidence-based assertions of clinical actionability in the context of secondary findings: Updates from the ClinGen Actionability Working Group.

PURPOSE: The ClinGen Actionability Working Group (AWG) developed an evidence-based framework to generate actionability reports and scores of gene-condition pairs in the context of secondary findings from genome sequencing. Here we describe the expansion of the framework to include actionability assertions. METHODS: Initial development of the actionability rubric was based on previously scored adult gene-condition pairs and individual expert evaluation. Rubric refinement was iterative and based on evaluation, feedback, and discussion. The final rubric was pragmatically evaluated via integration into actionability assessments for 27 gene-condition pairs. RESULTS: The resulting rubric has a 4-point scale (limited, moderate, strong, and definitive) and uses the highest-scoring outcome-intervention pair of each gene-condition pair to generate a preliminary assertion. During AWG discussions, predefined criteria and factors guide discussion to produce a consensus assertion for a gene-condition pair, which may differ from the preliminary assertion. The AWG has retrospectively generated assertions for all previously scored gene-condition pairs and are prospectively asserting on gene-condition pairs under assessment, having completed over 170 adult and 188 pediatric gene-condition pairs. CONCLUSION: The AWG expanded its framework to provide actionability assertions to enhance the clinical value of their resources and increase their utility as decision aids regarding return of secondary findings.

Quantifying preferences for urea cycle disorder treatments using a discrete choice experiment.

AIMS: Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) can cause ammonia accumulation and central nervous system toxicity. Nitrogen-binding medications can be efficacious, but certain attributes may negatively impact adherence. This study sought to quantify the administration-related attributes influencing overall prescription selection and patient adherence. METHODS: A web-based, quantitative survey including discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology captured responses from health care providers for patients with UCDs. A series of hypothetical treatment profile sets with attributes such as route of administration, taste/odor, preparation instructions, packaging, dose measurement, and weight use restrictions were presented. From 16 sets of 3 hypothetical product profiles, respondents evaluated attributes most preferred for prescription selection or patient adherence. Attributes assumed a higher overall preference if relative importance (RI) scores were >16.67% (the value if all attributes were of equal importance). Preference weight scores were assessed. A nine-point Likert scale assessed respondent attitudes, such as satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 51 respondents completed the survey. Respondents reported dissatisfaction with current treatments (mean [SD] = 5.4 [1.7]). For prescription selection, four attributes achieved RI >16.67%: taste/odor (24%), weight restrictions (21%), preparation instructions (18%), and route of administration (17%). For adherence, three attributes related to administration achieved RI >16.67%: taste/odor (28%), preparation instructions (21%), and route of administration (17%). Preference weights for "taste/odor masked" were higher than "not taste/odor masked" for prescription selection (mean [SD]; 1.52 [1.10] vs -1.52 [1.10]) and treatment adherence (73.8 [55.2] vs -73.8 [55.2]). LIMITATIONS: This study contained a relatively small sample size. Survey respondent selection, the use of hypothetical product profiles, and exclusion of non-pharmacologic treatment options could have contributed to potential biases. CONCLUSIONS: Among attributes tested, taste/odor was the most important attribute influencing overall preference for both prescribing and patient adherence, with taste/odor masking preferred. Optimizing nitrogen-binding medications through masking taste/odor may support improved patient adherence and outcomes in UCDs.

Identification of pathogenic genetic variants in patients with acquired early-onset bilateral cataracts using next-generation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Acquired early-onset bilateral cataracts can result from systemic etiologies or genetic disorders. METHODS: In this observational study, we analyzed individuals 18 months to 35 years of age with acquired bilateral cataracts via a next-generation sequencing panel of 66 genes to identify disease-causing genetic variants. RESULTS: Of 347 patients enrolled, 313 (90.2%) were <19 years (median, 8 years). We identified 74 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 69 patients. Of the variants, we observed 64 single nucleotide variants (SNV) in 24 genes and 10 copy number variants (CNV) of varying size and genomic location. SNVs in crystallin genes were most common, accounting for 27.0% of all variants (20 of 74). Of those, recurrent variants included known cataract-causing variants CRYBA1 c.215+1G>A, observed in 3 patients, and CRYBA1 c.272_274delGAG, CRYBB2 c.463C>T and c.562C>T, and CRYAA c.62G>A, each observed in 2 patients. In 5 patients, we identified CNV deletions ranging from 1.32-2.41 Mb in size associated with 1q21.1 microdeletion syndrome. Biallelic variants in CYP27A1 were identified in two siblings, one as part of targeted follow-up family testing, who were subsequently diagnosed with cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis, a rare but treatable autosomal recessive disease that often presents with acquired early-onset bilateral cataracts. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of genetic testing in individuals with acquired early-onset bilateral cataracts to help clarify etiology. Identification of causative genetic variants can inform patient management and facilitate genetic counseling by identifying genetic conditions with risk of recurrence in families.

Living with Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis: Patient, Caregiver, and Expert Perspectives.

In this article, patients with cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX) and caregivers detail their experience with lifelong symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and efficacy, and ongoing disease management. One patient and four caregivers describe the challenges associated with pursuing a correct diagnosis for years before testing confirmed a CTX diagnosis. They also detail their ongoing struggles and desire for greater access to physicians with CTX knowledge and to reliable online resources to continue their education about the disease and strategies for symptom management. The expert perspective is a direct response by three CTX researchers, including physicians who are treating patients with CTX in the United States and experts whose laboratories provide genetic and biochemical testing for CTX. They respond to many of the patient and caregiver concerns, including steps that are being taken to identify CTX earlier and provide access to confirmatory diagnostic testing sooner, and suggest the best online resources for CTX-related information and access to webinars and support groups. While the expert perspective is a direct response to the patient and caregiver authors' CTX journeys, it should be beneficial to any patient with CTX or their caregivers.