Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 28
Filtrar
1.
Kidney360 ; 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748489
4.
Clin Transplant ; 37(10): e15054, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The websites of US transplant centers may be a source of information about the renal risks of potential living kidney donors. METHODS: To include only likely best practices, we surveyed websites of centers that performed at least 50 living donor kidney transplants per year. We tabulated how risks were conveyed regarding loss of eGFR at donation, the adequacy of long-term ESRD risk data, long-term donor mortality, minority donor ESRD risk, concerns about hyperfiltration injury versus the risk of end-stage kidney diseases, comparisons of ESRD risks in donors to population risks, the increased risks of younger donors, an effect of the donation itself to increase risk, quantifying risks over specific intervals, and a lengthening list of small post-donation medical risks and metabolic changes of uncertain significance. RESULTS: While websites had no formal obligation to address donor risks, many offered abundant information. Some conveyed OPTN-mandated requirements for counseling individual donor candidates. While actual wording often varied, there was general agreement on many issues. We occasionally noted clear-cut differences among websites in risk characterization and other outliers. CONCLUSIONS: The websites of the most active US centers offer insights into how transplant professionals view living kidney donor risk. Website content may merit further study.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Riñón , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Donadores Vivos/psicología
11.
Am J Transplant ; 19(1): 32-36, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30137698

RESUMEN

Short studies that generate lifetime end-stage renal disease (ESRD) risks for young living kidney donors have conflicted with the knowledge and practice of nontransplant specialists. A widely accepted online risk calculator (OLRC) is no exception. It uses 6.4 year observations and an ostensibly empiric methodology to predict low lifetime risks for normal young candidates. But the nonspecific ESRD risk factors identified in this study are likely features of kidney diseases that were already underway at study entry. No practicing nephrologist would use their absence to predict any specific kidney disease that had yet to begin, which is essential for excluding high-risk individuals. The OLRC's risk estimates are particularly low because it also does not assign to young adults about 70% of the lifetime ESRD that they will experience as they age, which is part of their risk. It reinforces traditional concepts of low donor risk, minimizing the potential relevance of recent, sometimes concerning, long-term outcome data. These data suggest many similarities between postdonation ESRD and ESRD in the general population, about which much is already known. Despite our best efforts, the heterogeneity and exponential accumulation of end-stage kidney diseases over time prevent long-term predictions of risk for young kidney donors.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Riñón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrología/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
13.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 156(3): 403-416, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28248602

RESUMEN

The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation has published a supplement to this issue of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery featuring the "Clinical Practice Guideline: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (Update)." To assist in implementing the guideline recommendations, this article summarizes the rationale, purpose, and key action statements. The 14 recommendations developed emphasize diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, reducing the inappropriate use of vestibular suppressant medications, decreasing the inappropriate use of ancillary testing, and increasing the appropriate therapeutic repositioning maneuvers. An updated guideline is needed due to new clinical trials, new systematic reviews, and the lack of consumer participation in the initial guideline development group.


Asunto(s)
Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno/diagnóstico , Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno/terapia , Adulto , Algoritmos , Humanos
14.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 156(3_suppl): S1-S47, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28248609

RESUMEN

Objective This update of a 2008 guideline from the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation provides evidence-based recommendations to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), defined as a disorder of the inner ear characterized by repeated episodes of positional vertigo. Changes from the prior guideline include a consumer advocate added to the update group; new evidence from 2 clinical practice guidelines, 20 systematic reviews, and 27 randomized controlled trials; enhanced emphasis on patient education and shared decision making; a new algorithm to clarify action statement relationships; and new and expanded recommendations for the diagnosis and management of BPPV. Purpose The primary purposes of this guideline are to improve the quality of care and outcomes for BPPV by improving the accurate and efficient diagnosis of BPPV, reducing the inappropriate use of vestibular suppressant medications, decreasing the inappropriate use of ancillary testing such as radiographic imaging, and increasing the use of appropriate therapeutic repositioning maneuvers. The guideline is intended for all clinicians who are likely to diagnose and manage patients with BPPV, and it applies to any setting in which BPPV would be identified, monitored, or managed. The target patient for the guideline is aged ≥18 years with a suspected or potential diagnosis of BPPV. The primary outcome considered in this guideline is the resolution of the symptoms associated with BPPV. Secondary outcomes considered include an increased rate of accurate diagnoses of BPPV, a more efficient return to regular activities and work, decreased use of inappropriate medications and unnecessary diagnostic tests, reduction in recurrence of BPPV, and reduction in adverse events associated with undiagnosed or untreated BPPV. Other outcomes considered include minimizing costs in the diagnosis and treatment of BPPV, minimizing potentially unnecessary return physician visits, and maximizing the health-related quality of life of individuals afflicted with BPPV. Action Statements The update group made strong recommendations that clinicians should (1) diagnose posterior semicircular canal BPPV when vertigo associated with torsional, upbeating nystagmus is provoked by the Dix-Hallpike maneuver, performed by bringing the patient from an upright to supine position with the head turned 45° to one side and neck extended 20° with the affected ear down, and (2) treat, or refer to a clinician who can treat, patients with posterior canal BPPV with a canalith repositioning procedure. The update group made a strong recommendation against postprocedural postural restrictions after canalith repositioning procedure for posterior canal BPPV. The update group made recommendations that the clinician should (1) perform, or refer to a clinician who can perform, a supine roll test to assess for lateral semicircular canal BPPV if the patient has a history compatible with BPPV and the Dix-Hallpike test exhibits horizontal or no nystagmus; (2) differentiate, or refer to a clinician who can differentiate, BPPV from other causes of imbalance, dizziness, and vertigo; (3) assess patients with BPPV for factors that modify management, including impaired mobility or balance, central nervous system disorders, a lack of home support, and/or increased risk for falling; (4) reassess patients within 1 month after an initial period of observation or treatment to document resolution or persistence of symptoms; (5) evaluate, or refer to a clinician who can evaluate, patients with persistent symptoms for unresolved BPPV and/or underlying peripheral vestibular or central nervous system disorders; and (6) educate patients regarding the impact of BPPV on their safety, the potential for disease recurrence, and the importance of follow-up. The update group made recommendations against (1) radiographic imaging for a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV in the absence of additional signs and/or symptoms inconsistent with BPPV that warrant imaging, (2) vestibular testing for a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV in the absence of additional vestibular signs and/or symptoms inconsistent with BPPV that warrant testing, and (3) routinely treating BPPV with vestibular suppressant medications such as antihistamines and/or benzodiazepines. The guideline update group provided the options that clinicians may offer (1) observation with follow-up as initial management for patients with BPPV and (2) vestibular rehabilitation, either self-administered or with a clinician, in the treatment of BPPV.


Asunto(s)
Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno/diagnóstico , Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno/prevención & control , Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos
16.
Clin Transplant ; 30(1): 10-6, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26689427

RESUMEN

Recent studies from the United States and Norway have suggested an unexpected 8- to 11-fold relative risk of ESRD after kidney donation, but a low long-term absolute risk. Abundant renal epidemiologic data predict that these studies have underestimated long-term risk. The 1% lifetime post-donation risk in the US study requires medical screening to predict ESRD in 96 of 100 candidates. This is particularly unlikely in the 30-35% of candidates under age 35, half of whose lifetime ESRD will occur after age 64. Many experts have attributed the increased relative risks in these studies to loss of GFR at donation, which ultimately means that high-normal pre-donation GFRs will reduce absolute post-donation risks. The 8- to 11-fold relative risks predict implausible risks of uninephrectomy in the general population, but lower estimates still result in very high risks for black donors. Young vs. older age, low vs. high-normal pre-donation GFRs, black race, and an increased relative risk of donation all predict highly variable individual risks, not a single "low" or "1%" risk as these studies suggest. A uniform, ethically defensible donor selection protocol would accept older donors with many minor medical abnormalities but protect from donation many currently acceptable younger, black, and/or low GFR candidates.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
17.
Clin Transplant ; 29(9): 738-46, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25918902

RESUMEN

Improved outcomes have been associated with various methods of size matching between expanded criteria (ECD) donors and recipients. A novel method for improved functional based matching was developed utilizing manipulation of Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearances for donor and recipient. We hypothesized that optimal clearance-based matches would have superior outcomes for both immediate graft function and long-term graft survival. For the analysis, recipients of ECD kidneys in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) transplanted between October 1, 1987 and August 31, 2011 were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses predicted the hazard ratio of graft failure and the odds ratio of requiring dialysis within the first week. A total of 25,640 ECD kidney transplants were analyzed. On multivariate analysis, higher creatinine clearance match ratio (CCMR) was associated with increased graft failure and odds of requiring dialysis within the first week (comparing highest ratio quintile versus lowest ratio quintile: HR 1.43, p < 0.001; OR 2.08, p < 0.001). This study suggests that ECD kidneys have improved outcomes when the recipient/donor CCMR is optimized.


Asunto(s)
Creatinina/sangre , Selección de Donante/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Selección de Donante/normas , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Curva ROC , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 10(9): 1670-7, 2015 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25908792

RESUMEN

The Best Practice in Live Kidney Donation Consensus Conference held in June of 2014 included the Best Practices in Living Donor Education Workgroup, whose charge was to identify best practice strategies in education of living donors, community outreach initiatives, commercial media, solicitation, and state registries. The workgroup's goal was to identify critical content to include in living kidney donor education and best methods to deliver educational content. A detailed summary of considerations regarding educational content issues for potential living kidney donors is presented, including the consensus that was reached. Educational topics that may require updating on the basis of emerging studies on living kidney donor health outcomes are also presented. Enhancing the educational process is important for increasing living donor comprehension to optimize informed decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Educación en Salud , Trasplante de Riñón/educación , Donadores Vivos/educación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Receptores de Trasplantes/educación , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Consenso , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Nefrología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Diálisis Renal , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
19.
J Clin Invest ; 125(3): 972-4, 2015 Mar 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25689262

RESUMEN

Almost one-third of transplanted kidneys come from living donors, who sacrifice approximately 30% of their pre-donation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after they experience compensatory hypertrophy and hyperfiltration in their remaining kidney. Although hyperfiltration can cause glomerular injury, many studies have suggested that donor nephrectomy itself does not cause long-term loss of GFR at a higher rate than what is seen in the normal aging population. However, when post-donation kidney diseases occur in an unfortunate few, recent studies suggest that GFR loss at donor nephrectomy increases the risk of eventual end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In this issue of the JCI, Lenihan and colleagues evaluated glomerular dynamics in a cohort of kidney donors prior to, within 1 year of, and several years after kidney donation. Their results suggest that adaptive hyperfiltration in the remaining kidney occurs without glomerular hypertension, furthering our understanding of the relatively benign renal outcomes for most living kidney donors.


Asunto(s)
Glomérulos Renales/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
20.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens ; 21(6): 567-73, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23042028

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Over the past two decades, steroid-free immunosuppression has become more widespread, but improvements in long-term kidney transplant survival have been modest, mandating scrutiny of our chronic regimens. RECENT FINDINGS: Current studies and commentary cautiously conclude that steroid-free regimens in low-risk patients seem acceptable for up to 5 years, although most studies are shorter. Patients who will develop chronic rejection cannot be identified prospectively and usually return to steroids. One center continues to report long-term steroid-free results that are comparable to or better than national Scientific Registry of Renal Transplant Recipients (SRTR) outcomes, even with 'older' drugs cyclosporine and azathioprine, reaffirming the need for well designed prospective studies. Some authorities question whether minimal side effects with current regimens justify steroid elimination. In low-risk populations, 'steroid-type' studies probably would suggest no short-term benefit of tacrolimus over cyclosporine, or mycophenolate over azathioprine. SUMMARY: The data justifying steroid-free immunosuppression continue to be suboptimal. A larger question is whether to treat an entire population at medical risk or just the higher-risk subgroup that declares itself in the short term. 'Subgroup therapy' might well produce the same quandaries if applied to other accepted transplant immunosuppression.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Quimioterapia Combinada , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Esteroides/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA