Progress of Hepatitis C elimination in Viennese people living with HIV after two decades of increasing cure rates.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Interferon(IFN)-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy has been replaced by direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). We assessed temporal trends in patient characteristics, transmission risks, treatment initiation, and cure rates in eras of IFN, restricted DAA-access, and unrestricted DAA-access in Viennese HCV/HIV-coinfected patients (HIV/HCV). METHODS: Consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients starting HCV treatment at the Vienna General Hospital between 2002 and 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. RESULTS: Of all N = 508 HIV/HCV, 78% (398/508) were male and the mean age was 41.8 ± 9.5 years. 'People-who-inject-drugs' (PWID) accounted for 61% (311/508), while 31% (156/508) were 'men who have sex with men' (MSM). In the IFN-era, restricted DAA-era and unrestricted DAA-era, N = 152, N = 129, and N = 227 HCV treatments were started and 49% (74/152), 95% (122/129), and 88% (200/227) achieved sustained virologic response, respectively. Treatment during the IFN-era was a strong predictor for virologic non-response (aOR 12.69; 6.93-23.24) and loss-to-follow-up (aOR 6.12; 2.99-12.54), while virologic non-response was less common in 'MSM' (aOR 0.28; 0.13-0.62). Ninety three percent (50/54) of the observed HCV reinfections occurred in the unrestricted DAA-era. A substantial increase in 'MSM' transmission was observed since 2010 with 66% (107/161) in the DAA-era versus 15% (49/330) prior to the DAA-era. CONCLUSIONS: HCV cure rates in Viennese HIV patients increased from 49% in the IFN-era to 88-95% in the DAA-era. MSM-related risk behaviour and reinfections became the key challenges towards HCV elimination in HIV-coinfected patients.

HCV hotline facilitates Hepatitis C elimination during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitates healthcare restrictions that also affected ongoing hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination efforts. We assessed the value of a physician-operated HCV hotline on treatment and cure rates throughout the pandemic. All HCV patients undergoing HCV therapy at the Vienna General Hospital from 2019 to 2021 were included. An HCV hotline was established in 2019 and provided services including phone calls, text messages and voicemails. Patients were stratified by date of HCV therapy: 2019 (pre-COVID) vs. 2020/2021 (during-COVID) and use of the HCV hotline: users vs. non-users. Overall, 220 patients were included (pre-COVID: n = 91 vs. during-COVID: n = 129). The prevalence of intravenous drug use (60.5%) and alcohol abuse (24.8%) was high during COVID. During COVID, the number of DAA treatment starts declined by 24.2% (n = 69) in 2020 and by 34.1% (n = 60) in 2021 vs. pre-COVID (n = 91, 100%). Significantly more patients used the HCV hotline during-COVID (95.3%) vs. pre-COVID (65.9%; p < .001). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was 84.6% pre-COVID and 86.0% during-COVID. HCV hotline users achieved higher SVR rates during-COVID (88.2% vs. 33.3%, p = .004), but also pre-COVID (96.7% vs. 61.3%, p < .001) compared with non-users. Considering only patients with completed DAA treatments, SVR rates remained similarly high during-COVID (96.9%) versus pre-COVID (98.1%). HCV treatment initiations decreased during-COVID but importantly, nearly all DAA-treated HCV patients used the HCV hotline during the COVID pandemic. Overall, the SVR rate remained at 88.2% during COVID and was particularly high in HCV phone users-most likely due to facilitation of adherence.

Recent outbreaks of severe hepatitis A virus infections in Vienna.

To explore the epidemiology and clinical course of hepatitis A virus (HAV) infections at the Vienna General Hospital. We retrospectively identified patients who were tested positive for HAV-IgM at the Vienna General Hospital form Q1/2008 to Q3/2018. Our definition of severe HAV infection was AST and/or ALT > 5 × above the upper limit of normal (ULN); and liver dysfunction as (i) hepatic encephalopathy or ammonia > 100 µmol/L, (ii) coagulopathy with INR > 1.5, or (iii) jaundice with bilirubin > 5 mg/dL. A total of 578 HAV-IgM (+) were identified, including 31 (5.4%) and 38 (6.6%) without and with liver dysfunction, respectively. A proportional increase in severe HAV cases with and without liver dysfunction occurred in 2016/2017 with (21.5% (vs. 8.0% in the years before; p < 0.001). Thirty-seven (53.6%) patients with severe HAV were hospitalized, 6 (9%) required ICU support, and one patient received liver transplantation within 30 days. Patients with severe HAV and liver dysfunction were more often male (60.5 vs. 43.1%, p = 0.055) and younger (31.5 vs. 63 years, p < 0.001) as compared with other HAV-IgM (+) cases. The observed increase of severe HAV infections in Vienna in 2017 among young males, coincided with a multinational HAV outbreak among MSM. Our data suggests a higher likelihood of severe courses of hepatitis A in MSM. Vaccination against HAV should be recommended for risk groups.

Direct patient-physician communication via a hepatitis C hotline facilitates treatment initiation in patients with poor adherence.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of effective and well-tolerated direct acting antivirals (DAAs) against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, a substantial number of HCV patients remain untreated. Novel strategies targeting HCV patients with poor adherence are urgently needed to enable HCV elimination. METHODS: We implemented a physician-operated HCV hotline (HCV-Phone) that was promoted within the patient community and referral networks. Previously diagnosed HCV patients were contacted via the HCV-Phone and offered low-barrier access to DAA therapy. Patients/referring physicians could directly call or send messages to the HCV-Phone. The HCV-Phone related and unrelated visits as well as DAA treatment initiations throughout 2019 were documented. Patients were followed until October 2020. This study analyzed treatment initiation, adherence to scheduled visits and outcomes in patients in whom management was assisted by the HCV-Phone. RESULTS: Out of 98 patient contacts via the HCV-Phone 74 attended treatment assessment at our clinic. While 15 (20%) patients were HCV-RNA negative and 1 (1%) patient did not initiate therapy, 58 patients were recruited for DAA therapy via the HCV-Phone. A total of 21 additional patients who started DAAs without HCV-Phone assistance required the use of the HCV-Phone infrastructure later on during treatment, resulting in a total of 79 HCV-Phone related DAA therapies. The poor adherence of patients previously diagnosed with HCV at our clinic is underlined by the long duration from HCV diagnosis to DAA therapy of median 37.0 months (IQR 2.7-181.1 months). A total of 55 (70%) HCV patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR), 5 (6%) discontinued therapy, 1 (1%) had a reinfection, while 10 (13%) and 8 (10%) patients were lost during DAA therapy or follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a physician-operated phone hotline for patients with HCV infection facilitated treatment initiation in an HCV population with poor adherence. Mainly due to losses to follow-up, the SVR rate remained suboptimal with 70%.

Controlled attenuation parameter does not predict hepatic decompensation in patients with advanced chronic liver disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Assessment of hepatic steatosis by transient elastography (TE)-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) might predict hepatic decompensation. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of CAP in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). METHODS: A total of 430 patients who underwent TE (liver stiffness ≥10 kPa) and CAP measurements were included in this retrospective analysis. Half of patients (n = 189) underwent simultaneous HVPG measurement. In cACLD patients, first hepatic decompensation was defined by new onset of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy or variceal bleeding. In patients with DC, the following events were considered as further hepatic decompensation: requirement of paracentesis, admission for/development of grade 3/4 hepatic encephalopathy, variceal (re-)bleeding or liver-related death. RESULTS: First hepatic decompensation occurred in 25 of 292 (9%) cACLD patients, while 46 of 138 (33%) DC patients developed further hepatic decompensation during a median follow-up of 22 and 12 months respectively. CAP was not predictive of first (cACLD; per 10 dB/m; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.91-1.03, P = 0.321) or further hepatic decompensation (DC; HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.94-1.03, P = 0.554) in adjusted analysis. Using the well-established CAP cut-off of ≥248 dB/m for hepatic steatosis, the incidence of first (cACLD; P = 0.065) and further hepatic decompensation (DC; P = 0.578) was similar in patients with hepatic steatosis or without. Serum albumin levels (per mg/dL; HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89, P < 0.001) and MELD-Na (per point; HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.28, P = 0.006) in cACLD and MELD-Na (per point; HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.19, P < 0.0001) in DC patients were the only parameters independently associated with first and further hepatic decompensation, respectively. CONCLUSION: Controlled attenuation parameter does not predict the development of first (cACLD)/further (DC) hepatic decompensation, while serum albumin levels and MELD-Na are of prognostic value.