RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Activating mutations in the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) gene have been detected often in solid tumors. Targeted therapy for mutant PIK3CA is now available in the clinic, making molecular diagnostics pivotal. Our aim was to design a multiplex digital PCR (dPCR) assay to evaluate the 4 most common PIK3CA hotspot mutations simultaneously to characterize and quantify these in liquid biopsies. METHODS: A multiplex assay was developed to detect exon 9 p.E542K and p.E545K mutations, and exon 20 p.H1047L and p.H1047R mutations using the Stilla 3-color dPCR Naica system. The assay was evaluated on stock and pre-amplified DNA from cell lines with the above mutations as single and pooled samples, and on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from healthy blood donors (HBDs) and breast cancer patients, to determine detection thresholds and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: The assay distinguished all 4 PIK3CA mutations in (cf)DNA, and also when dual mutations were present. Detection thresholds of stock and pre-amplified cfDNA samples were 0.11 and 0.40 copies/uL (cp/uL) for mutant copies concentration, and 0.003% and 0.68% for variant allele frequencies (VAFs), respectively. The assay confirmed the PIK3CA (mutation) status as defined by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 82 out of 96 patients that were mutant for PIK3CA, and in 11 out of 12 patients with wild-type PIK3CA. CONCLUSIONS: Our designed multiplex dPCR assay detected PIK3CA mutations with high accuracy in stock and pre-amplified cfDNA. Furthermore, it is affordable and demands less cfDNA input when compared to available uniplex dPCR assays and NGS analyses.
RESUMEN
Germline BRCA1/2 alteration has been linked to an increased risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes. As a result, genetic testing, based on NGS, allows us to identify a high number of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) or conflicting interpretation of pathogenicity (CIP) variants. The identification of CIP/VUS is often considered inconclusive and clinically not actionable for the patients' and unaffected carriers' management. In this context, their assessment and classification remain a significant challenge. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the in silico prediction tools (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, Mutation Taster and PROVEAN) could predict the potential clinical impact and significance of BRCA1/2 CIP/VUS alterations, eventually impacting the clinical management of Breast Cancer subjects. In a cohort of 860 BC patients, 10.6% harbored BRCA1 or BRCA2 CIP/VUS alterations, mostly observed in BRCA2 sequences (85%). Among them, forty-two out of fifty-five alterations were predicted as damaging, with at least one in silico that used tools. Prediction agreement of the four tools was achieved in 45.5% of patients. Moreover, the highest consensus was obtained in twelve out of forty-two (28.6%) mutations by considering three out of four in silico algorithms. The use of prediction tools may help to identify variants with a potentially damaging effect. The lack of substantial agreement between the different algorithms suggests that the bioinformatic approaches should be combined with the personal and family history of the cancer patients.