Routine Axillary Ultrasound for Patients with T1-T2 Breast Cancer Does Not Increase the Rate of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Based on Predictive Modeling.

BACKGROUND: Since publication of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial results, demonstrating that many patients with nonpalpable axillary lymph nodes and one or two positive sentinel nodes do not require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), preoperative axillary ultrasound (AUS) has become controversial. Clinicians are concerned that AUS may lead to unnecessary ALND. The authors developed an algorithm (Algorithm 1) in which the number of AUS-suspicious nodes and tumor biology direct management. For estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer with a single AUS-suspicious node and a positive lymph node needle biopsy (LNNB), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed with a specimen X-ray documenting retrieval of the clipped node. Other patients with positive LNNB receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The authors hypothesized that routine AUS and this algorithm could decrease ALND compared with a strategy of no preoperative AUS. METHODS: Decision-tree analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were used to assess the expected number of ALNDs under two strategies (routine AUS vs no AUS). Probabilities were drawn from a literature review and an institutional database. The authors assumed nodal pathologic complete response rates as reported in the literature. Four additional algorithms were created to assess whether any other treatment model could decrease the rate of ALND. RESULTS: Using the routine AUS and the authors' algorithm, the predicted ALND rate was 9%, versus 10% for a strategy of no AUS, with overlapping uncertainty intervals. The remaining treatment algorithms showed similar results. DISCUSSION: Use of AUS may help to tailor patient care without leading to overutilization of ALND, as long as neoadjuvant chemotherapy is administered when appropriate.

Radioactive Seed Localization Versus Wire Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Two-Year Initial Experience at a Large Community Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Radioactive seed localization (RSL) is a safe and effective alternative to wire localization (WL) for nonpalpable breast lesions. While several large academic institutions currently utilize RSL, few community hospitals have adopted this technique. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the experience of RSL versus WL at a large community hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent RSL or WL for breast-conserving surgery from 1 November 2013 to 31 November 2015. RESULTS: The total number of lesions examined was 382. RSL was utilized in 205 (54%) lesions, with 187 undergoing single RSL, while WL was used in 155 (40%) lesions, with 109 undergoing single WL; both techniques were used in 22 (6%) lesions. Pathology was benign in 142 (48%) lesions, with 93 RSLs and 49 WLs. For malignant lesions, mean specimen size was 36.3 g for single RSL and 35.9 g for single WL (p = 0.904). Re-excision for margin clearance was required for 16 (17%) malignant lesions in the RSL group and 10 (17%) in the WL group (p = 0.954). For malignant lesions, mean operating room time was 86 min for single RSL versus 70 min for single WL (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The use of RSL is a viable option in the community setting, with several benefits over WL. While operative times were slightly longer with RSL, there was no difference in specimen size or re-excision rate for malignant lesions.

Sex differences in procedure selection and outcomes of patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on sex differences in procedure selection and outcomes of patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: The National Inpatient Sample database from 2005 to 2008 was searched to identify patients ≥30 years of age who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement (ICD-9-CM codes 35.12, 35.23, and 35.24). Women constituted 51.6% of the patients, and they were older, were less affluent, had higher values for the Charlson comorbidity index, and more often presented on an urgent/emergent basis. Women underwent repair less often than men (37.9% versus 55.9%, P < .001) and more often underwent concomitant tricuspid surgery or a Maze procedure. After adjustment for propensity scores, women were more likely to undergo replacement (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-1.93; P = .0001), they had longer lengths of stay, and less favorable disposition. Among the patients who underwent mitral valve repair, women had a higher hospital mortality (2.06% versus 1.36%, P = .0328). After adjustment for propensity scores and concomitant procedures, this relationship was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Women are less likely than men to receive mitral valve repair. Although the higher hospital mortality of women presenting for mitral valve surgery was accounted for by their worse preoperative profiles, this sex disparity reflects the current reality in surgical practice and identifies an important area for future improvement in the care of patients with valvular heart disease.

Is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease an independent risk factor for transfusion in coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

OBJECTIVE: The literature is inconsistent regarding the role of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as a risk factor for blood product transfusion during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). One reason may be lack of objective criteria to define COPD in previously published reports. We examined the role of COPD as a risk factor for transfusion using a strict definition based on objective pulmonary function test (PFT) data. METHODS: We identified 180 patients, who underwent primary isolated non-emergent CABG and had PFTs performed preoperatively. COPD was defined as forced expiratory volume in 1s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) <70% and further stratified into mild/moderate/severe/very severe based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines. Patients with and without COPD were compared with respect to preoperative and postoperative characteristics and transfusion requirements. RESULTS: The overall transfusion rate was 59.4% (107/180). COPD patients (31.1%, 56/180) were older (66.6 ± 11.4 vs 62.3 ± 10.3 years, p = 0.01), had lower body mass index (BMI) (28.5 ± 5.8 vs 31.7 ± 6.0 kg/m(2), p=0.001), and were more often smokers (51.8% vs 36.3%, p = 0.05). COPD patients had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times (99.4 ± 27.9 vs 110.9 ± 32.4 min, p = 0.02), but left internal mammary artery (LIMA) use, number of bypass grafts, mortality, and postoperative complications were similar (p > 0.05). Transfusion rates were similar for patients with and without COPD. Further stratification into mild/moderate/severe/very severe COPD failed to identify COPD as a predictor of blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Using objective PFT data, our study clarifies the disagreement in the literature with respect to the role of COPD as a risk factor for transfusion in CABG. Decreased pulmonary function does not appear to increase risk of transfusion during CABG, even for patients with severe COPD.