Autologous fat graft injections for the treatment of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's perianal fistulas are often refractory to standard management. Fat graft injections are hypothesised to improve fistula healing rates. We evaluated the treatment efficacy of fat graft injections for Crohn's perianal fistulas in a systematic review (PRISMA). METHODS: We completed database searches of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, and PubMed. All studies published in English in full text or abstract, from January 2001 to August 2021, evaluating fat graft injections for Crohn's perianal fistulas were selected. Included randomized controlled trials, single-arm intervention trials, cohort studies, and case series; excluded single case reports. Primary outcome was pooled clinical healing, defined as non-draining treated fistulas, or closure, defined as closure of treated fistulas. Secondary outcomes were clinical healing, clinical closure, radiologic response, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 1258 publications identified, 891 articles were assessed for eligibility, and 107 relevant for manuscript review. Forty-nine patients received fat graft injections for Crohn's perianal fistulas across four single-arm intervention trials. Clinical healing or closure was achieved in 74% in a pooled single-arm meta-analysis (95% confidence interval: 57%, 85%), with moderate heterogeneity between studies. Clinical healing was achieved in 20% and 60% at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Clinical closure was achieved in 83% at 6 months. Variable parameters were used to define radiologic response, with success rates from 20% to 67%. Minimal adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Fat graft injections show promise as a novel treatment for Crohn's perianal fistulas in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Assessment in controlled matched studies is warranted.

Knotless seton for perianal fistulas: feasibility and effect on perianal disease activity.

Patients with perianal fistulas are frequently treated by a knotted seton which is well-known for causing complaints. We aimed to assess the feasibility of the knotless SuperSeton and advantages with respect to perianal disease activity. In a prospective cohort study, we included all consecutive adult patients with a knotted seton in situ or a perianal fistula requiring new seton drainage. Primary endpoint was seton feasibility (maintenance of the connection for minimally three months). Secondary endpoints included improvement of the Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI), complications and re-interventions within three months of follow-up. PDAI scores of patients with a knotted seton were crossover compared to PDAI scores after knotless seton replacement. Sixty patients (42% male, mean age 42 (SD 13.15), 41 with Crohn's disease) were included between August 2016 and April 2018. Of 79 knotless setons, 69 (87.3%) stayed connected for ≥ 3 months. Overall, the knotless seton significantly decreased discharge (P = 0.001), pain (P < 0.001) and induration (P < 0.001) measured by the PDAI when compared to baseline. In patients with a knotted seton, replacement by the knotless seton significantly decreased discharge (P = 0.005) and pain (P < 0.001) measured by the PDAI. Furthermore, 71% of patients reported fewer cleaning problems compared to the knotted seton. Ten patients developed a perianal abscess, and five patients required a re-intervention. This study supports the feasibility of the knotless seton with promising short-term results. The knotless seton might be preferred over the knotted seton in terms of perianal disease activity.

Management of Rectal Stump During Laparoscopic Subtotal Colectomy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparative Cohort Study from Six Referral Centres.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is no consensus on the best management of the rectum after subtotal colectomy for refractory colitis complicating inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. The objective was to evaluate the impact of rectal stump management during laparoscopic subtotal colectomy [LSTC] for IBD. METHODS: Patients who underwent LSTC with double-end ileo-sigmoidostomy [Gr.A] or end ileostomy with closed rectal stump [Gr.B] for IBD were included from a retrospective database of six European referral centres. RESULTS: In total, 314 patients underwent LSTC and were allocated to Gr.A [n = 102] and B [n = 212]. After LSTC, stoma-related complications occurred more frequently in Gr.A [12%] than in Gr.B [4%, p = 0.01]. Completion proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] was performed as a three-stage procedure in all patients from Gr.A, and in 88 patients from Gr.B [42%; Gr.B1]. The other 124 patients from Gr.B underwent a modified two-stage procedure [58%; Gr.B2]. The second stage was performed laparoscopically in all patients from Gr.A compared with 73% of Gr.B1 [p < 0.0001] and 65% of Gr.B2 patients [p < 0.0001]. When laparoscopy was intended for 2nd stage IPAA, conversion to laparotomy occurred less frequently in Gr.A when compared with B1 [0 vs 5%, p = 0.06] or B2 [10%, p = 0.001]. When all surgical stages were included [LSCT and IPAA], cumulative stoma-related complications occurred more frequently in Gr.A [n = 19] than in Gr.B1 [n = 6, p = 0.02] and Gr.B2 [n = 6, p = 0.001]. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that both techniques of double-end ileosigmoidostomy and end ileostomy with closed rectal stump are safe and effective for rectal stump management after laparoscopic subtotal colectomy.

Treatment of Perianal Fistulas in Crohn's Disease, Seton Versus Anti-TNF Versus Surgical Closure Following Anti-TNF [PISA]: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most patients with perianal Crohn's fistula receive medical treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF], but the results of anti-TNF treatment have not been directly compared with chronic seton drainage or surgical closure. The aim of this study was to assess if chronic seton drainage for patients with perianal Crohn's disease fistulas would result in less re-interventions, compared with anti-TNF and compared with surgical closure. METHODS: This randomised trial was performed in 19 European centres. Patients with high perianal Crohn's fistulas with a single internal opening were randomly assigned to: i] chronic seton drainage for 1 year; ii] anti-TNF therapy for 1 year; and iii] surgical closure after 2 months under a short course anti-TNF. The primary outcome was the cumulative number of patients with fistula-related re-intervention[s] at 1.5 years. Patients declining randomisation due to a specific treatment preference were included in a parallel prospective PISA registry cohort. RESULTS: Between September 14, 2013 and November 20, 2017, 44 of the 126 planned patients were randomised. The study was stopped by the data safety monitoring board because of futility. Seton treatment was associated with the highest re-intervention rate [10/15, versus 6/15 anti-TNF and 3/14 surgical closure patients, p = 0.02]. No substantial differences in perianal disease activity and quality of life between the three treatment groups were observed. Interestingly, in the PISA prospective registry, inferiority of chronic seton treatment was not observed for any outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that chronic seton treatment should not be recommended as the sole treatment for perianal Crohn's fistulas.

Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract and Endorectal Advancement Flap for High Perianal Fistulas in Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract [LIFT] and advancement flap [AF] procedures are well-established, sphincter-preserving procedures for closure of high perianal fistulas. As surgical fistula closure is not commonly offered in Crohn's disease patients, long-term data are limited. This study aims to evaluate outcomes after LIFT and AF in Crohn's high perianal fistulas. METHODS: All consecutive Crohn's disease patients ≥18 years old treated with LIFT or AF between January 2007 and February 2018 were included. The primary outcome was clinical healing and secondary outcomes included radiological healing, recurrence, postoperative incontinence and Vaizey Incontinence Score. RESULTS: Forty procedures in 37 patients [LIFT: 19, AF: 21, 35.1% male] were included. A non-significant trend was seen towards higher clinical healing percentages after LIFT compared to AF [89.5% vs 60.0%; p = 0.065]. Overall radiological healing rates were lower for both approaches [LIFT 52.6% and AF 47.6%]. Recurrence rates were comparable: 21.1% and 19.0%, respectively. In AF a trend was seen towards higher clinical healing percentages when treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor/immunomodulators [75.0% vs 37.5%; p = 0.104]. Newly developed postoperative incontinence occurred in 15.8% after LIFT and 21.4% after AF. Interestingly, 47.4% of patients had a postoperatively improved Vaizey Score [LIFT: 52.9% and AF: 42.9%]. The mean Vaizey Score decreased from 6.8 [SD 4.8] preoperatively to 5.3 [SD 5.0] postoperatively [p = 0.067]. CONCLUSIONS: Both LIFT and AF resulted in satisfactory closure rates in Crohn's high perianal fistulas. However, a discrepancy between clinical and radiological healing rates was found. Furthermore, almost half of the patients benefitted from surgical intervention with respect to continence.

Endo-sponge Assisted Early Surgical Closure of Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomotic Leakage Preserves Long-term Function: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endo-sponge [Braun Medical] assisted early surgical closure [ESC] is an effective treatment to control pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] leakage, and became standard treatment in our centre from 2010 onwards. The aim of this cohort study was to assess the long-term pouch function of ulcerative colitis [UC] patients treated with ESC or conventional management [CM] for anastomotic leakage after IPAA. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent an IPAA for UC between 2002 and 2017 were included. Patients treated with ESC [2010-2017] or CM [2002-2009] for anastomotic leakage were compared with control patients without anastomotic leakage of the corresponding time period. Main endpoints were long-term pouch function on a 3-point scale and pouch failure, as measured with the validated pouch dysfunction score questionnaire. RESULTS: Some 280 of 334 patients [84%] returned the pouch dysfunction questionnaire, of whom 18 were treated with ESC and 22 with CM for anastomotic leakage. Control cohorts included 133 [2010-2017] and 107 patients [2002-2009]. Between ESC-treated patients and control patients, pouch function [p = 0.647] and pouch failure rates [0/18 versus 5/133, p >0.99] were similar. CM resulted in worse pouch function [p = 0.016] and a higher pouch failure rate [5/22 versus 5/107, p = 0.013] compared with control patients. CONCLUSIONS: ESC, in contrast to CM, for IPAA leakage in UC patients is associated with preservation of pouch function and preclusion of pouch failure, probably due to early and effective treatment of pelvic sepsis.

The Risk of Colectomy and Colorectal Cancer After Appendectomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy decreases the risk of developing ulcerative colitis [UC], and is suggested to have a beneficial effect on the clinical course of established UC. However, recent studies showed no significantly decreased colectomy rate, and moreover an apparently increased risk of colorectal cancer [CRC]. We aimed to investigate the suggested correlation in a meta-analysis and to analyse possible confounding factors. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Data from studies describing the influence of appendectomy on colectomy and CRC were extracted from published reports. Exclusion criteria were patients aged <18 years, non-UC, and animal studies. RESULTS: From 891 studies, 13 studies evaluating 73323 UC patients [appendectomy n = 2859] were included. All studies, except one, were rated as poor quality. Overall, colectomy rate in appendectomised and non-appendectomised patients was not significantly different (odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.77, I2 = 53%). The proportion of colectomies undertaken for CRC or high-grade dysplasia [HGD] was significantly higher after appendectomy [OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.40-5.78, I2 = 32%], with 50% of the colectomies indicated for CRC/HGD compared with 9.4% in non-appendectomised patients. Possible additional confounding factors were a longer UC disease duration, less medication use, and a higher prevalence of primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC] in appendectomised patients. CONCLUSIONS: Appendectomy in established UC is associated with apparently higher rates of subsequent CRC/HGD, but this appears to be due to inequalities in at-risk exposure between groups, presumably secondary to positive clinical effects of appendectomy on disease symptoms. This finding emphasises the importance of regular endoscopic surveillance in this patient group.