Elbow Biomechanics, Radiocapitellar Joint Pressure, and Interosseous Membrane Strain Before and After Radial Head Arthroplasty.

Complex radial head fracture and elbow instability can be treated with radial head arthroplasty. Good clinical results have been described after this surgical treatment. However, the revision and complication rate reported in the literature is concerning. This might be due to altered kinematics after radial head arthroplasty. Eight human native elbows were examined with dynamic radiostereometric analysis and compared with a radial head arthroplasty. Translations of the radial head in the x-, y-, and z-directions relative to the humerus and the ulna were measured. The radiocapitellar joint pressure was measured using a pressure sensor. The tension within the interosseous membrane was measured using a custom-made strain gauge. After radial head arthroplasty, the radial head was displaced approximately 1.8 mm medially and 1.4 mm distally at the starting point. During unloaded flexion motion the difference in all translations between the native radial head and the radial head arthroplasty was less than 1 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] ± 0.5 mm) (p = 0.001). With loading the difference was less than 1.5 mm (95% CI ± 1.5 mm) (p = 0.001). The mean difference in radiocapitellar joint contact pressure was less than 0.30 MPa (95% CI ± 0.40 MPa) (p = 0.001) during unloaded flexion motion. There were only submillimetre kinematic changes and small changes in joint pressure and interosseous membrane tension after the insertion of a radial head arthroplasty in an experimental setting. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:510-522, 2020.

Leg power, pelvic movement and physical activity after periacetabular osteotomy. A prospective cohort study.

To investigate changes in leg power, pelvic movement and patient-reported outcome in patients with hip dysplasia one year after periacetabular osteotomy. Forty-one patients (7 males) with a mean age of 28.8 years scheduled for periacetabular osteotomy were tested before surgery, and 4 and 12 months after. Leg power, pelvic range of motion and the Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) was collected. One year after surgery, power in the operated leg had improved (p = 0.004) and there was no significant difference between power in the operated leg and contralateral leg (p = 0.22). In the frontal plane, pelvic range of motion decreased significant during stair-climbing and stepping down. The same pattern was seen in the sagittal plane but the changes were non-significant. All subscales on the HAGOS improved significantly over time (p < 0.001). Leg power and pelvic range of motion in patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia improved 12 months after periacetabular.

Influence of the Anterolateral Ligament on Knee Laxity: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study Measuring Knee Kinematics in 6 Degrees of Freedom Using Dynamic Radiostereometric Analysis.

BACKGROUND: An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture often occurs during rotational trauma to the knee and may be associated with damage to extracapsular knee rotation-stabilizing structures such as the anterolateral ligament (ALL). PURPOSE: To investigate ex vivo knee laxity in 6 degrees of freedom with and without ALL reconstruction as a supplement to ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Cadaveric knees (N = 8) were analyzed using dynamic radiostereometry during a controlled pivotlike dynamic movement simulated by motorized knee flexion (0° to 60°) with 4-N·m internal rotation torque. We tested the cadaveric specimens in 5 successive ligament situations: intact, ACL lesion, ACL + ALL lesion, ACL reconstruction, and ACL + ALL reconstruction. Anatomic single-bundle reconstruction methods were used for both the ACL and the ALL, with a bone-tendon quadriceps autograft and gracilis tendon autograft, respectively. Three-dimensional kinematics and articular surface interactions were used to determine knee laxity. RESULTS: For the entire knee flexion motion, an ACL + ALL lesion increased the mean knee laxity (P < .005) for internal rotation (2.54°), anterior translation (1.68 mm), and varus rotation (0.53°). Augmented ALL reconstruction reduced knee laxity for anterior translation (P = .003) and varus rotation (P = .047) compared with ACL + ALL-deficient knees. Knees with ACL + ALL lesions had more internal rotation (P < .001) and anterior translation (P < .045) at knee flexion angles below 40° and 30°, respectively, compared with healthy knees. Combined ACL + ALL reconstruction did not completely restore native kinematics/laxity at flexion angles below 10° for anterior translation and below 20° for internal rotation (P < .035). ACL + ALL reconstruction was not found to overconstrain the knee joint. CONCLUSION: Augmented ALL reconstruction with ACL reconstruction in a cadaveric setting reduces internal rotation, varus rotation, and anterior translation knee laxity similar to knee kinematics with intact ligaments, except at knee flexion angles between 0° and 20°. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients with ACL injuries can potentially achieve better results with augmented ALL reconstruction along with ACL reconstruction than with stand-alone ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, dynamic radiostereometry provides the opportunity to examine clinical patients and compare the recontructed knee with the contralateral knee in 6 degrees of freedom.

Reconstructing the anterolateral ligament does not decrease rotational knee laxity in ACL-reconstructed knees.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the anterolateral ligament's (ALL) influence on knee laxity. The purpose of this study was to investigate rotational knee laxity against a pure axial rotational stress using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) after cutting and reconstructing both the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the ALL. METHODS: Eight human donor legs were positioned and stereoradiographically recorded at 0°, 30° and 60° of knee flexion using a motorised fixture, while an internally rotating force of 4 Nm was applied to the foot. Anterior-posterior and rotational laxity were investigated for knees with intact ligaments and compared with those observed after successive ACL and ALL resection and reconstruction. RESULTS: After cutting the ALL in ACL-deficient knees, the internal rotation was increased in all three knee flexion angles, 0° (p = 0.04), 30° (p = 0.03) and 60° (p < 0.01) by 1.0°, 1.6° and 2.5°, respectively. However, no decrease in laxity was found after reconstructing the ALL in ACL-reconstructed knees. CONCLUSIONS: The ALL was confirmed as a stabiliser of internal rotation in ACL-deficient knees. However, reconstructing the ALL using a gracilis autograft tendon did not decrease the internal rotation laxity in the ACL-reconstructed knee. Based on the results of this study, we do not recommend reconstructing the ALL in ACL-reconstructed knees to decrease internal knee laxity.