RESUMEN
BackgroundInformation on the safety and immunogenicity of the omicron BA.4/BA.5-containing bivalent booster mRNA-1273.222 are needed. MethodsIn this ongoing, phase 2/3 trial, 50-g mRNA-1273.222 (25-g each ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 and omicron BA.4/BA.5 spike mRNAs) is compared to 50-g mRNA-1273, administered as second boosters in adults who previously received a 2-injection (100-g) primary series and first booster (50-g) dose of mRNA-1273. The primary objectives were safety and immunogenicity 28 days post-boost. ResultsParticipants received 50-g of mRNA-1273 (n=376) or mRNA-1273.222 (n=511) as second booster doses. Omicron BA.4/BA.5 and ancestral SARS-CoV-2 D614G neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs [95% confidence interval]) after mRNA-1273.222 (2324.6 [1921.2-2812.7] and 7322.4 [6386.2-8395.7]) were significantly higher than mRNA-1273 (488.5 [427.4-558.4] and 5651.4 (5055.7-6317.3) respectively, at day 29 post-boost in participants with no prior SARS-CoV-2-infection. A randomly selected subgroup (N=60) of participants in the mRNA-1273.222 group also exhibited cross-neutralization against the emerging omicron variants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1. No new safety concerns were identified with mRNA-1273.222. Vaccine effectiveness was not assessed in this study; in an exploratory analysis 1.6% (8/511) of mRNA-1273.222 recipients had Covid-19 post-boost. ConclusionThe bivalent omicron BA.4/BA.5-containing vaccine mRNA-1273.222 elicited superior neutralizing antibody responses against BA.4/BA.5 compared to mRNA-1273, with no safety concerns identified. (Supported by Moderna; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04927065)
RESUMEN
Background COVID-19 vaccines with alternative strain compositions are needed to provide broad protection against newly emergent SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Methods We conducted a global Phase 3, multi-stage efficacy study (NCT04904549) among adults aged [≥]18 years. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive two intramuscular injections 21 days apart of a bivalent SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03-adjuvant (5 g of ancestral (D614) and 5 g of B.1.351 [beta] variant spike protein) or placebo. Symptomatic COVID-19 was defined as laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 with COVID-19-like illness (CLI) symptoms. The primary efficacy endpoint was the prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 [≥]14 days after the second injection. Results Between 19 Oct 2021 and 15 Feb 2022, 12,924 participants received [≥]1 study injection. 75% of participants were SARS-CoV-2 non-naive. 11,416 participants received both study injections (efficacy-evaluable population [vaccine, n=5,736; placebo, n=5,680]). Up to 15 March 2022, 121 symptomatic COVID-19 cases were reported (32 in the vaccine group and 89 in the placebo group) [≥]14 days after the second injection with a vaccine efficacy (VE) of 64.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 46.6; 77.2%). VE was 75.1% (95% CI 56.3; 86.6%) in non-naive and 30.9% (95% CI -39.3; 66.7%) in naive participants. Viral genome sequencing identified the infecting strain in 68 cases (Omicron [BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants]: 63; Delta: 4; Omicron and Delta: 1). The vaccine was well-tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile. Conclusions A bivalent vaccine conferred heterologous protection against symptomatic infection with newly emergent Omicron (BA.1 and BA.2) in non-naive adults 18-59 years of age. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04904549
RESUMEN
BackgroundProtection from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines wanes over time and is compounded by emerging variants including Omicron subvariants. This study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccines. MethodsThis phase 2 open-label, randomized trial enrolled healthy adults previously vaccinated with a SARS-CoV-2 primary series and a single boost. Eligible participants were randomized to one of six Moderna COVID19 mRNA vaccine arms (50{micro}g dose): Prototype (mRNA-1273), Omicron BA.1+Beta (1 or 2 doses), Omicron BA.1+Delta, Omicron BA.1 monovalent, and Omicron BA.1+Prototype. Neutralization antibody titers (ID50) were assessed for D614G, Delta, Beta and Omicron BA.1 variants and Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5 subvariants 15 days after vaccination. ResultsFrom March 30 to May 6, 2022, 597 participants were randomized and vaccinated. Median age was 53 years, and 20% had a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. All vaccines were safe and well-tolerated. Day 15 geometric mean titers (GMT) against D614G were similar across arms and ages, and higher with prior infection. For uninfected participants, Day 15 Omicron BA.1 GMTs were similar across Omicron-containing vaccine arms (3724-4561) and higher than Prototype (1,997 [95%CI:1,482-2,692]). The Omicron BA.1 monovalent and Omicron BA.1+Prototype vaccines induced a geometric mean ratio (GMR) to Prototype for Omicron BA.1 of 2.03 (97.5%CI:1.37-3.00) and 1.56 (97.5%CI:1.06-2.31), respectively. A subset of samples from uninfected participants in four arms were also tested in a different laboratory at Day 15 for neutralizing antibody titers to D614G and Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2.12.2 and BA.4/BA.5. Omicron BA.4/BA.5 GMTs were approximately one third BA.1 GMTs (Prototype 517 [95%CI:324-826] vs. 1503 [95%CI:949-2381]; Omicron BA.1+Beta 628 [95%CI:367-1,074] vs. 2125 [95%CI:1139-3965]; Omicron BA.1+Delta 765 [95%CI:443-1,322] vs. 2242 [95%CI:1218-4128] and Omicron BA.1+Prototype 635 [95%CI:447-903] vs. 1972 [95%CI:1337-2907). ConclusionsHigher Omicron BA.1 titers were observed with Omicron-containing vaccines compared to Prototype vaccine and titers against Omicron BA.4/BA.5 were lower than against BA.1 for all candidate vaccines. Clinicaltrials.govNCT05289037
RESUMEN
BackgroundUpdated vaccination strategies against acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern are needed. Interim results of the safety and immunogenicity of the bivalent omicron-containing mRNA-1273.214 booster candidate are presented. MethodsIn this ongoing, phase 2/3 trial, the 50-g bivalent vaccine mRNA-1273.214 (25-g each ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 and omicron B.1.1.529 spike SARS-CoV-2 mRNAs) was compared to the authorized 50-g mRNA-1273 booster in adults who previously received 2-dose primary series of 100-g mRNA-1273 and a first booster dose of 50-g mRNA-1273 at least 3 months prior. Primary objectives were safety and reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of 50-g mRNA-1273.214 compared with 50-g mRNA-1273. Immunogenicity data 28 days after the booster dose are presented. ResultsFour hundred thirty-seven and 377 participants received 50-g of mRNA-1273.214, or mRNA-1273, respectively. Median time between first and second booster doses of mRNA-1273.214 and mRNA-1273 were similar (136 and 134 days, respectively). In participants with no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, observed omicron neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs [95% confidence interval]) after the mRNA-1273.214 and mRNA-1273 booster doses, were 2372.4 (2070.6-2718.2) and 1473.5 (1270.8-1708.4) respectively and the model-based GMT ratio (97.5% confidence interval) was 1.75 (1.49-2.04). All pre-specified non-inferiority (ancestral SARS-CoV-2 with D614G mutation [D614G] GMT ratio; ancestral SARS-CoV-2 [D614G] and omicron seroresponse rates difference) and superiority primary objectives (omicron GMT ratio) for mRNA-1273.214 compared to mRNA-1273 were met. Additionally, mRNA-1273.214 50-g induced a potent neutralizing antibody response against omicron subvariants BA.4/BA.5 and higher binding antibody responses against alpha, beta, gamma, delta and omicron variants. Safety and reactogenicity profiles were similar and well-tolerated for both vaccines groups. ConclusionThe bivalent vaccine mRNA-1273.214 50-g was well-tolerated and elicited a superior neutralizing antibody response against omicron, compared to mRNA-1273 50-g, and a non-inferior neutralizing antibody response against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (D614G), 28 days after immunization, creating a new tool as we respond to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
RESUMEN
BackgroundThis study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of an AS03-adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein candidate vaccine, CoV2 preS dTM. MethodsThis Phase 2, modified double-blind, parallel-group study (NCT04762680) was conducted in adults, including those at increased risk of severe COVID-19. Participants were randomised 1:1:1, stratified by age (18-59/[≥]60 years), rapid serodiagnostic test (positive/negative) and high-risk medical conditions (yes/no), to receive two injections (day [D]1 and D22) of 5g, 10g or 15g of CoV2 preS dTM antigen with fixed AS03 content. Interim safety and reactogenicity results (to D43) and neutralising antibodies (NAbs) against the D614G variant are presented (primary objectives). FindingsOf 722 participants enrolled and randomised between 24 February and 8 March 2021, 721 received [≥]1 injections (5g, n=240; 10g, n=239; 15g, n=242). Four participants reported unsolicited immediate adverse events (AEs), two were vaccine-related (investigator assessment). Five participants reported seven vaccine-related medically-attended AEs. No vaccine-related serious AEs and no AEs of special interest were reported. Solicited reactions (local and systemic) were reported at similar frequencies between study groups; these were mostly mild to moderate and transient, with higher frequency and intensity post-injection 2 than post-injection 1. In SARS-CoV-2 naive participants at D36, 96{middle dot}9%, 97.0% and 97{middle dot}6% of participants had [≥]4-fold-rise in NAb titres from baseline in the 5g-, 10g- and 15g-dose groups, respectively. NAb titres increased with antigen dose in younger (GMTs: 2954, 3951 and 5142 for 5g-, 10g- and 15g-dose groups) but not older adults (GMTs: 1628, 1393 and 1736, respectively). NAb titres in non-naive adults after one injection were higher than titres after two injections in naive adults. InterpretationTwo injections of CoV2 preS dTM-AS03 demonstrated acceptable safety and reactogenicity, and robust immunogenicity in SARS-CoV-2 naive and non-naive adults. These results informed antigen dose selection for progression to Phase 3 evaluation of primary and booster vaccination.
RESUMEN
Substantial COVID-19 research investment has been allocated to randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, which currently face recruitment challenges or early discontinuation. We aimed to estimate the effects of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine on survival in COVID-19 from all currently available RCT evidence, published and unpublished. We conducted a rapid meta-analysis of ongoing, completed, or discontinued RCTs on hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine treatment for any COVID-19 patients (protocol: https://osf.io/QESV4/). We systematically identified unpublished RCTs (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Cochrane COVID-registry up to June 11, 2020), and published RCTs (PubMed, medRxiv and bioRxiv up to October 16, 2020). All-cause mortality was extracted (publications/preprints) or requested from investigators and combined in random-effects meta-analyses, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), separately for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. Prespecified subgroup analyses included patient setting, diagnostic confirmation, control type, and publication status. Sixty-three trials were potentially eligible. We included 14 unpublished trials (1308 patients) and 14 publications/preprints (9011 patients). Results for hydroxychloroquine are dominated by RECOVERY and WHO SOLIDARITY, two highly pragmatic trials, which employed relatively high doses and included 4716 and 1853 patients, respectively (67% of the total sample size). The combined OR on all-cause mortality for hydroxychloroquine was 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.20; I2=0%; 26 trials; 10,012 patients) and for chloroquine 1.77 (95%CI: 0.15, 21.13, I2=0%; 4 trials; 307 patients). We identified no subgroup effects. We found that treatment with hydroxychloroquine was associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients, and there was no benefit of chloroquine. Findings have unclear generalizability to outpatients, children, pregnant women, and people with comorbidities.