Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 253: 22-28, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37142172

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the gender trends in ophthalmology primary practice areas using the American Board of Ophthalmology (ABO) diplomates. DESIGN: A trend study plus a cross-sectional study of the ABO's database. METHODS: The de-identified records of all (N = 12,844) ABO-certified ophthalmologists between 1992 and 2020 were obtained. The year of certification, gender, and self-reported primary practice for each ophthalmologist was recorded. Subspecialty was defined as the self-reported primary practice emphasis. Practice trends of the entire population and the subpopulation of subspecialists were explored based on gender and were then visualized using tables and graphs and analyzed using the χ2 or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: A total of 12,844 board-certified ophthalmologists were included. Nearly half (47%) reported a subspecialty as their primary practice area (n = 6042), of whom the majority were male (65%, n = 3940). In the first decade, men outnumbered women reporting subspecialty practices by more than 2:1. Over time, the number of women subspecialists increased whereas the number of men remained stable, such that by 2020 women comprised almost half of new ABO diplomates reporting subspecialty practice. When all subspecialists were compared within gender, there was not a significant difference (P = .15) between the percentage of male (46%) and female (48%) ophthalmologist reporting a subspecialty practice. However, a significantly greater proportion of women than men reported primary practice in pediatrics (20.1% vs 7.9%, P < .001) and glaucoma (21.8% vs 16.0%, P < .0001). Alternatively, a significantly greater proportion of men reported primary practice in vitreoretinal surgery (47.2% vs 22.0%, P < .0001). There was no significant difference between the proportion of men and women reporting cornea (P = .15) or oculoplastics (P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: The number of women in ophthalmology subspecialty practice has increased steadily over the past 30 years. Men and women subspecialize at the same rate, but significant differences exist between the types of ophthalmology practiced by each gender.


Asunto(s)
Oftalmólogos , Oftalmología , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Certificación , Autoinforme
3.
J Voice ; 2022 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35817623

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Laryngotracheal trauma is poorly studied and associated with serious morbidity and mortality. This study reports features associated with laryngotracheal fractures, and factors associated with laryngeal fracture repair. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database study SETTING: American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP®) METHODS: ACS-TQIP® 2014-2015 participant user data files were queried for laryngotracheal fractures using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th edition encodings. Demographic, diagnostic and procedure characteristics were analyzed with univariate chi-squared analysis and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: We extracted 635 cases of laryngotracheal injury, with a median Injury Severity Score of 16 (IQR: 10 - 25). Most were caused unintentionally (65.7%), followed by assault (28.8%). Blunt trauma (79.5%) was more common than penetrating trauma (20.0%). These trends were upheld in the subgroup of repaired fractures, which made up 12.6% (80/635) of cases. The median length of hospital stay was 6 days (IQR: 3 - 13) in all fractures and 10 days (IQR: 6 - 14) in the subgroup of repaired fractures, while the median length of ICU stay was 4 days (IQR: 2 - 9) in all fractures and 4.5 (IQR: 6 - 14.3) in the subgroup of repaired fractures. Cut/pierce injuries (OR: 4.7, P < 0.001) and ISS (OR: 0.97, pP = 0.026) significantly affected rate of laryngeal fracture repair. CONCLUSION: Laryngotracheal fractures are uncommon but serious injuries. Our results show that penetrating causes of injuries have the shortest time to repair, and that a higher ISS score is negatively associated with repair.

4.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 38(5): 496-502, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35502804

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To review the demographics, clinical features, and response of orbital squamous cell carcinoma treated with cemiplimab. METHODS: This is a retrospective multi-institutional series. Patient characteristics, drug dosing, duration, and response to treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 11 patients from 5 institutions. All patients received a regimen of 350 mg q 3 weeks and an average of 11.2 cycles (SD 5.8). No patient experienced significant side effects requiring treatment or cessation of cemiplimab. Complete response was achieved in 9 patients (82%) treated with cemiplimab. CONCLUSIONS: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as cemiplimab provide a globe-sparing option for the treatment of orbital squamous cell carcinoma. It is important to consider these agents especially when orbital exenteration is the alternative.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Orbitales , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Orbitales/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 37(1): 36-41, 2022 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33825672

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the experiences and preferences of ophthalmology residency applicants and program directors (PDs), with emphasis on the effect of COVID-19 as well as recent changes on the application process. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, online survey. PARTICIPANTS: All applicants to the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute ophthalmology residency program, and all United States ophthalmology residency PDs, during the 2020-2021 application cycle. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to applicants and program directors of the 2020-2021 ophthalmology residency application cycle.Main Outcome Measures: Applicant demographics, application submissions, interview experiences, financial considerations, match results, and suggestions for improvement of the application process. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 205 applicants (34.9% response rate) and 37 PDs (30.3%). A successful match into an ophthalmology residency was achieved by 144 (83.7%) applicants. Applicants applied to (mean ± SD) 79.7 ± 22.8 ophthalmology residency programs, received 13.1 ± 8.9 invitations to interview, and attended 11.1 ± 5.8 interviews. Most applicants (N = 126; 71.2%) and PDs (N = 22; 78.6%) expressed a preference for in-person interviews over virtual interviews. If given a choice regarding the future direction for interviews, most applicants were unsure (N = 68; 38.4%) or would prefer to hold interviews virtually (N = 62; 35.0%); PDs felt that interviews should go back to being in-person (39.3%) or were unsure (28.6%). Most PDs (N = 21; 72.4%) reported an increased number of applications received by their respective programs this year compared to previous years. While applicants (N = 108; 61.0%) mostly felt that there should not be a cap on the number of applications, 19 (67.9%) PDs supported a limit on application numbers. Applicants spent an average (SD) of $2320.96 ($1172.86) on the application process this year, which is significantly less than 2018-2019 data. CONCLUSIONS: The ophthalmology residency application process was especially complex during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although many applicants and PDs were glad that interviews were held virtually this year, they were less certain regarding future years. The virtual format led to a significantly lower financial burden for applicants and may lead some to prefer this format in the future; if a hybrid model is offered for virtual/in-person interviews, these two interview modes should be compared equally.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Internado y Residencia , Oftalmología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
8.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(4): 1618-1621, 2021 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33741887

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Sports-related injuries contribute to a considerable proportion of pediatric and adolescent craniofacial trauma, which can have severe and longstanding consequences on physical and mental health. The growing popularity of sports within this at-risk group warrants further characterization of such injuries in order to enhance management and prevention strategies. In this study, the authors summarized key trends in 1452 sports-related injuries among individuals aged 16 to 19 using the American College of Surgeon's Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2014 to 2016. The authors observed a preponderance of injuries associated with skateboarding, snowboarding, and skiing, with significantly higher percentages of traumatic brain injuries among skateboarding-related traumas. Notably, we observed that traumatic brain injurie rates were slightly higher among subjects who wore helmets. Intensive care unit durations and hospital stays appeared to vary by sport and craniofacial fracture. Altogether, this study contributes to the adolescent sports-related injuries and craniofacial trauma literature.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas , Esquí , Deportes Juveniles , Adolescente , Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/prevención & control , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados Unidos
9.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 139(3): 344-347, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33443550

RESUMEN

Importance: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic illustrates the increasingly important role of telemedicine as a method of clinician-patient interaction. However, electronic applications (apps) for the testing of ophthalmology vital signs, such as visual acuity, can be published and used without any verification of accuracy, validity, or reliability. Objective: To reassess the accuracy of visual acuity-testing apps and assess their viability for telehealth. Design, Setting, and Participants: The US Apple App Store was queried for apps for visual acuity testing. Anticipated optotype size for various visual acuity lines were calculated and compared against the actual measured optotype size on 4 different Apple hardware devices. No human participants were part of this study. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean (SD) errors were calculated per device and across multiple devices. Results: On iPhones, 10 apps met inclusion criteria, with mean errors ranging from 0.2% to 109.9%. On the iPads, 9 apps met inclusion criteria, with mean errors ranging from 0.2% to 398.1%. Six apps met criteria and worked on both iPhone and iPad, with mean errors from 0.2% to 249.5%. Of the 6 apps that worked across devices, the top 3 most accurate apps were Visual Acuity Charts (mean [SD] error, 0.2% [0.0%]), Kay iSight Test Professional (mean [SD] error, 3.5% [0.7%]), and Smart Optometry (mean [SD] error, 15.9% [4.3%]). None of the apps tested were ideal for telemedicine, because some apps displayed accurate optotype size, while others displayed the same letters on separate devices; no apps exhibited both characteristics. Conclusions and Relevance: Both Visual Acuity Charts and Kay iSight Test Professional had low mean (SD) errors and functionality across all tested devices, but no apps were suitable for telemedicine. This suggests that new and/or improved visual acuity-testing apps are necessary for optimal telemedicine use.


Asunto(s)
Aplicaciones Móviles , Optometría/instrumentación , Teléfono Inteligente , Telemedicina/instrumentación , Agudeza Visual , COVID-19 , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
10.
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017) ; 13(1): e73-e77, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37389165

RESUMEN

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a profound impact on medical education, particularly for those applying to residency programs in 2020 to 2021. This study describes the challenges for potential ophthalmology residency applicants so that residency leadership can make informed decisions about changes to the process. Methods A survey was distributed electronically via social media and medical school ophthalmology interest groups from June 18, 2020 to July 2, 2020 to individuals interested in applying to ophthalmology residency in the United States. Survey questions included demographics and perceived impacts of COVID-19 on ability, confidence, intention to apply, and perceptions toward changes in the application process for the 2020 to 2021 ophthalmology residency application cycle. Results One-hundred sixteen total responses were received. Eighty-six responses (74%) were from individuals intending to apply in the 2020 to 2021 application cycle. Most respondents (86%) felt that their application would be affected by COVID-19 with 51% feeling less confident. Only four (5%) felt that they could adequately compile a rank list following a video interview, and over half (51%) anticipated applying to more programs than they originally intended. Academic plans of seven (8%) respondents were significantly altered via deferral of application or cancellation of a research year. Thirty-nine (45%) students reported delayed ophthalmology electives, with less than half (41%) feeling that they had adequate clinical exposure to be prepared for residency. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on the 2020 to 2021 ophthalmology residency application cycle. As stakeholders begin to approach this cycle, these findings will help them make effective and informed decisions to create the best overall experience for all involved.

11.
J Surg Res ; 245: 81-88, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31404894

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delayed emergency department (ED) LOS has been associated with increased mortality and increased hospital length of stay (LOS) for various patient populations. Trauma patients often require significant effort in evaluation, workup, and disposition; however, patient and hospital characteristics associated with increased LOS in the ED for trauma patients remain unclear. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Project database (2014-2016) was queried for all adult blunt trauma patients. Patients discharged from the ED to the operating room were excluded. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of ED LOS, controlling for patient characteristics (age, gender, race, insurance status), hospital characteristics (teaching status, ACS trauma verification level, geographic region), abbreviated injury scale and comorbid status. RESULTS: 412,000 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. When controlling for covariates, an increase in age by 1 y resulted in 0.63 increased minutes in the ED (P < 0.001). In multivariable linear regression controlling for injury severity and comorbid conditions, non-white race groups, university status, and northeast region were associated with increased ED LOS. Black and Hispanic patients spent on average 41 and 42 more minutes, respectively, in the ED room when compared with white patients (P < 0.001). Patients seen at University hospitals spent 52 more minutes in the ED when compared with community hospitals, whereas patients at nonteaching hospitals spent 31 fewer minutes (P < 0.001). Patients seen in the Midwest spent the least amount of time in the ED, with patients in the South, West, and Northeast spending 45, 36, and 89 more minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). Non-Medicaid patients at level 1 trauma centers and those requiring intensive care admission had significantly decreased ED LOS. Medicaid patients took the longest to move through the ED with Medicare, BlueCross, and Private insurance outpacing them by 17, 23, and 23 min, respectively (P < 0.001). ACS level 1 trauma centers moved patients through the ED fastest, whereas ACS level II trauma centers and level III trauma centers moved patients through 50 and 130 min slower when compared with ACS level 1 trauma centers (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ED LOS varied significantly by patient and hospital characteristics. Medicaid patients and those patients at university hospitals were associated with significantly higher ED LOS, whereas ACS trauma verification level status had strong correlation with ED LOS. These results may allow targeted quality improvement programs to enhance ED LOS.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitales Comunitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...