Randomized controlled trial on the performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in patients with severe tooth wear.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate survival and failure behavior of Direct Composite Restorations (DRC) and Indirect Composite Restorations (ICR) on molars and anterior teeth, in a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). METHODS: Patients with generalized severe tooth wear were included, and randomly assigned to one of 2 protocols: (1) DCR: All teeth were restored with directly applied micro-hybrid composite restorations (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray) for load bearing areas and nano-hybrid composite restorations (IPS Empress Direct, Ivoclar Vivadent) for buccal veneers; (2) ICR: First molars were restored with indirect composite 'tabletop' restorations and maxillary anterior teeth were restored with indirect palatal veneer restorations (Clearfil Estenia C&B, cemented with Panavia F, Kuraray). Remaining teeth were restored directly. Restorations were evaluated after 3 years, focusing on clinical acceptability. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier curves, Annual Failure Rates (AFRs), and univariate Cox regression analyses (p < 0.05). RESULTS: 41 patients (age: 36.6 ± 6.6y) were evaluated after 3 years (40.0 ± 2.2 m). 408 restorations on first molars and palatal veneers on maxillary anterior teeth were part of this RCT, with 220 DCRs and 188 ICRs. No differences in survival between treatment modality for palatal veneers for any failure criteria were found. Tabletop restorations on first molars showed a considerable higher failure rate for ICR compared to DCR (p = 0.026, HR: 3.37, 95%CI = 1.16-9.81). SIGNIFICANCE: In this RCT, directly applied composite restorations showed superior behavior compared to the indirect composite restorations, when used in the molar region.

Clinical performance of full rehabilitations with direct composite in severe tooth wear patients: 3.5 Years results.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the mid-term clinical performance of direct composite restorations placed in patients with pathological tooth wear needing full rehabilitation with an increase of vertical dimension of occlusion. METHODS: In a prospective trial 34 patients (34.0 ±â€¯8.4 years; 25 males, 9 females) were treated with a minimal invasive additive technique using composite restorations. The restorative treatment protocol was to provide all teeth with composite build-up restorations in an increased vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) using the DSO-technique. Recall appointments were planned after 1 month, 1 and 3 years after treatment. Restorations were scored for clinically acceptability (FDI-criteria) and scores 4 and 5 were recorded as clinically unacceptable. Frequencies of failures and Kaplan Meier survival curves are presented and effect of relevant variables was calculated with a multifactorial Cox regression (p < 0.05). RESULTS: 1256 Restorations were placed, 687 anterior, 324 premolar, and 245 molar restorations. After a mean observation time of 39.7 months a total of 69 failures were observed, of which 61 restorations were repaired (score 4) and 8 were replaced (score 5). Most common reasons for failure were (chip) fractures (n = 43) and caries (n = 11). Placement of anterior restorations in two sessions led to significant 4.6 times more failures then placed in one session. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe tooth wear a full rehabilitation, in an increased vertical dimension of occlusion, direct composite resin restorations show a 94.8% success and 99.3% survival rate after a period of 3.5 years.