Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(41): e27515, 2021 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34731139

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Retrospective cohort studyTo characterize the learning curve of a spine surgeon during the first 2 years of independent practice by comparing to an experienced colleague. To stratify learning curves based on procedure to evaluate the effect of experience on surgical complexity.The learning curve for spine surgery is difficult to quantify, but is useful information for hospital administrators/surgical programs/new graduates, so appropriate expectations and accommodations are considered.Data from a retrospective cohort (2014-2016) were analyzed at a quaternary academic institution servicing a geographically-isolated, mostly rural area. Procedures included anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical decompression and stabilization, single and 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion, lumbar discectomy, and laminectomy. Data related to patient demographics, after-hours surgery, and revision surgery were collected. Operative time was the primary outcome measure, with secondary measures including cerebrospinal fluid leak and early re-operation. Time periods were stratified into 6 month quarters (quarter [Q] 1-Q4), with STATA software used for statistical analysis.There were 626 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The senior surgeon had similar operative times throughout the study. The new surgeon demonstrated a decrease in operative time from Q1 to Q4 (158 minutes-119 minutes, P < .05); however, the mean operative time was shorter for the senior surgeon at 2 years (91 minutes, P < .05). The senior surgeon performed more revision surgeries (odds ratio [OR] 2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-3.6]; P < .001). Posterior interbody fusion times remained longer for the new surgeon, while laminectomy surgery was similar to the senior surgeon by 2 years. There were no differences in rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak (OR 1.2 [95% CI 0.6-2.5]; P > .05), nor reoperation (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.7-1.9]; P > .05) between surgeons.A significant learning curve exists starting spine practice and likely extends beyond the first 2 years for elective operations.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/epidemiología , Asociaciones de Práctica Independiente/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Discectomía/métodos , Discectomía/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Asociaciones de Práctica Independiente/tendencias , Laminectomía/métodos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Rural , Fusión Vertebral/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...