Clinical Focus: Findings and Clinical Implications for Thickening Formula With Infant Cereal Using the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Flow Test.

PURPOSE: The International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) framework was established to provide standardized terminology and objective measures to assess foods and liquids for persons with swallowing difficulties. This clinical focus article reports the findings and clinical implications of the flow testing of infant formulas thickened with infant cereal completed as part of the transition process to IDDSI for one large pediatric quaternary care hospital. METHOD: To determine a common recipe that could be used to thicken formulas with infant cereal to the appropriate IDDSI levels, three clinicians completed flow testing on 94 infant formulas. To examine intra- and interclinician variability in the process, they repeated flow testing with three commonly used formulas and infant cereal. RESULTS: Clinicians were unable to identify a standard recipe (infant formula + infant cereal combination) that consistently thickened different formula brands to a desired IDDSI thickness level, as there was pronounced variability across and within infant formulas. Reliability testing revealed that, overall, clinician mixers were consistent in replicating similar results to themselves and to each other and that, instead, greater variability lies within the formula (and infant formula + infant cereal combination). CONCLUSIONS: Based on findings of pronounced variability within and across infant formulas, our institution determined that the creation of a standard recipe for achieving IDDSI thickness levels of formula mixed with infant cereal was not feasible or clinically appropriate. We offer recommendations for similar institutions for advancing clinical management of infant dysphagia using the IDDSI flow test and directions for future research.

Tolerance of one-way in-line speaking valve trials in ventilator dependent children.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advantages of tracheostomy placement in children requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, vocalization and verbal communication remains limited in this population of children. The lack of these essential elements during a critical period of development can have a negative impact on overall development. In ventilator dependent children, in-line speaking valves (ISV) provide an opportunity for initiating speech and communication. The objective of this study is to examine patient characteristics and risk factors associated with tolerance and success of ISV trials performed with mechanically ventilated children. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large, tertiary care children's hospital to evaluate the outcomes of ISV trials in ventilator-dependent children with tracheostomies, from 2009 to 2019. The primary endpoints were tolerance of the initial ISV assessment, and successful completion of a trial. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics among children that had a successful ISV trial to those that did not. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included, 56 (62%) were male and 33 (38%) were female. Overall, 76 (85%) patients completed an ISV assessment and trial successfully during their hospitalization. The number of attempts before completing a successful trial varied with 41 (46%) patients succeeding on the first attempt. Children that underwent a tracheostomy for airway obstruction were more likely to fail. CONCLUSIONS: Ventilator-dependent children with complex comorbidities demonstrate excellent tolerance of in-line speaking valves. Patients should be selected for ISV trials in a multidisciplinary setting. Airway obstruction as an indication for tracheostomy placement is a significant predictor of failure for ISV trials.