Suppression of Neovascularization by Topical and Subconjunctival Bevacizumab After High-Risk Corneal Transplantation.

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of topical and subconjunctival bevacizumab in suppressing vascularization in graft and host bed after high-risk corneal transplantation. Design: Secondary analysis of prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentric clinical trial. Participants: The study includes patients aged > 18 years who underwent high-risk penetrating keratoplasty, which was defined as corneal vascularization in ≥ 1 quadrants of the corneal graft and host bed, excluding the limbus. Methods: Patients were randomized to treatment and control groups. The patients in the treatment group received subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) on the day of the procedure, followed by topical bevacizumab (10 mg/ml) 4 times per day for 4 weeks. The patients in control group received injection of vehicle (0.9% sodium chloride) on the day of procedure, followed by topical vehicle (carboxymethylcellulose sodium 1%) 4 times a day for 4 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Vessel and invasion area of vessels in the corneal graft and host beds. Results: This study included 56 eyes of 56 patients who underwent high-risk corneal transplantation, with equal numbers in the bevacizumab and vehicle (control) treatment groups. The mean age of patients who received bevacizumab was 61.2 ± 15.9 years, and the mean age of those treated with vehicle was 60.0 ± 16.1 years. The vessel area at baseline was comparable in the bevacizumab (16.72% ± 3.19%) and control groups (15.48% ± 3.12%; P = 0.72). Similarly, the invasion areas were also similar in the treatment (35.60% ± 2.47%) and control (34.23% ± 2.64%; P = 0.9) groups at baseline. The reduction in vessel area was significantly higher in the bevacizumab-treated group (83.7%) over a period of 52 weeks compared with the control group (61.5%; P < 0.0001). In the bevacizumab-treated group, invasion area was reduced by 75.8% as compared with 46.5% in the control group. The vessel area was similar at 52 weeks postprocedure in cases of first (3.54% ± 1.21%) and repeat (3.80% ± 0.40%) corneal transplantation in patients who received bevacizumab treatment. In the vehicle-treated patients, the vessel area was significantly higher in repeat (9.76% ± 0.32%) compared with first (8.06% ± 1.02%; P < 0.0001) penetrating keratoplasty. In the bevacizumab treatment group, invasion areas at week 52 were comparable in first (11.70% ± 3.38%) and repeat (11.64% ± 1.74%) procedures, whereas invasion area was significantly higher in repeat (27.87% ± 2.57%) as compared with first (24.11% ± 2.17%) penetrating keratoplasty in vehicle-treated patients. Conclusions: In patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation, bevacizumab is efficacious in reducing vascularization of corneal graft and host bed, thereby reducing the risk of corneal graft rejection in vascularized host beds. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Bevacizumab in High-Risk Corneal Transplantation: A Pilot Multicenter Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of local (subconjunctival and topical) bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment in patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation. DESIGN: Pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 5 clinical centers in the United States, India, and Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged > 18 years undergoing high-risk penetrating keratoplasty, defined as corneal neovascularization (NV) in 1 or more quadrants ≥2 mm from the limbus or extension of corneal NV to the graft-host junction in a previously failed graft. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive subconjunctival bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) or placebo at the time of surgery, followed by topical bevacizumab (10 mg/ml) or topical placebo, administered 4 times per day for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The 52-week endothelial immune rejection rate. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were randomized to receive bevacizumab (n = 48) or control (n = 44). The 52-week endothelial rejection rate was 10% in the bevacizumab group and 19% in the control group (P = 0.20). Post hoc, extended follow-up at the lead study site showed an endothelial rejection rate of 3% in the bevacizumab group and 38% in the control group (P = 0.003). Treatment with bevacizumab was found to have a hazard ratio of 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.65, P = 0.01) in a post hoc Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of endothelial rejection at 1 year in the bevacizumab treatment group compared with the control group. This study may have been underpowered to detect a difference between treatment groups, and taken together, our data suggest that, in the current trial design, bevacizumab has a positive but not (yet) significant effect on endothelial rejection.

Acanthamoeba keratitis in patients wearing scleral contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To report a series of cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) in scleral lens wearers with keratoconus to determine whether this type of contact lens presents a greater risk for development of infection. METHODS: This study reports three patients who wore scleral contact lenses to correct keratoconus and developed AK. The diagnoses of AK were established based on cultures of the cornea, scleral contact lenses, and contact lens paraphernalia. This study investigated the risk factors for infections. RESULTS: The possible risks for AK in scleral contact lens wearers are hypoxic changes in the corneal epithelium because of the large diameter and minimal tear exchange, use of large amounts of saline solution necessary for scleral lens fitting, storing the scleral lens overnight in saline solution rather than contact lens multipurpose solutions, not rubbing the contact lens during cleaning, and the space between the cornea and the back surface of the scleral lens that might serve as a fluid reservoir and environment for Acanthamoeba multiplication. Two patients responded well to medical treatment of AK; one is still being treated. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations for use and care of scleral contact lenses should be emphasized, especially regarding use of sterile saline (preferably single use), attention to rubbing the lens during cleaning, cleaning of the plunger, and overnight storage in fresh contact lens multipurpose solutions without topping off the lens solution in the case.