Asunto(s)
Comités de Ética en Investigación/ética , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/ética , Sujetos de Investigación , Comités de Ética en Investigación/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Sujetos de Investigación/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
The practice of medicine is characterized by routine and typical cases whose management usually goes according to plan. However, the occasional case does arise which involves rare catastrophic emergencies, such as intraoperative malignant hyperthermia (MH), which require a comprehensive, coordinated, and resource-intensive treatment plan. Physicians are expected to provide expert quality care for routine, typical cases, but is it reasonable to expect the same standard of expertise and comprehensive management when the emergency involves a rare entity? Although physicians would like to say yes to this question, the reality is that no physician will ever amass the amount of experience in patient care needed to truly qualify as an expert in the management of a rare emergency entity, such as MH. However, physicians can become expert in the global process of managing emergencies by using the principles of crisis resource management (CRM). In this article, we review the key concepts of CRM, using a real life example of a team who utilized CRM principles to successfully manage an intraoperative MH crisis, despite there being no one on the team who had ever previously encountered a true MH crisis.
Asunto(s)
Hipertermia Maligna/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Médicos/organización & administración , HumanosAsunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Diagnóstico Tardío/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/diagnóstico , Síndromes de Neurotoxicidad/etiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bradicardia/inducido químicamente , Bupivacaína/efectos adversos , Epilepsia Tónico-Clónica/inducido químicamente , Resultado Fatal , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Mepivacaína/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Músculos Psoas , Nervio CiáticoRESUMEN
The quality and safety of health care are under increasing scrutiny. Recent studies suggest that medical errors, practice variability, and guideline noncompliance are common, and that cognitive error contributes significantly to delayed or incorrect diagnoses. These observations have increased interest in understanding decision-making psychology.Many nonrational (i.e., not purely based in statistics) cognitive factors influence medical decisions and may lead to error. The most well-studied include heuristics, preferences for certainty, overconfidence, affective (emotional) influences, memory distortions, bias, and social forces such as fairness or blame.Although the extent to which such cognitive processes play a role in anesthesia practice is unknown, anesthesia care frequently requires rapid, complex decisions that are most susceptible to decision errors. This review will examine current theories of human decision behavior, identify effects of nonrational cognitive processes on decision making, describe characteristic anesthesia decisions in this context, and suggest strategies to improve decision making.