What is the real cost of an overnight stay after an ambulatory general surgical procedure?

INTRODUCTION: Outpatient surgery is performed widely throughout the Army Medical Command (MEDCOM). It is common practice throughout Medical Command to admit barracks dwelling active duty service members (ADSMs) undergoing ambulatory surgical procedures for overnight observation. We hypothesized that overnight observation of these individuals has not prevented adverse outcomes that would have otherwise occurred if the patient had been discharged to the barracks. METHODS: We reviewed the postoperative course of all ADSMs undergoing ambulatory surgery with subsequent overnight hospital stay because of primary barracks residence. Procedures included hernia repair, lipoma excisions, and pilonidal cystectomies. Inclusion criteria were ADSMs who stayed overnight purely on the basis of their military barracks residence. RESULTS: 145 patients met our inclusion criteria. Their mean age was 23 ± 3.2, 90.9% were males. The mean hospital length of stay was 24 ± 11.4 hours. There were four (2.78%) postoperative complications, three patients with postoperative urinary retention, and one patient with mild bleeding from a pilonidal excision site, all within 8 hours postoperatively. No adverse outcomes were noted during the period of their hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Barracks dwelling ADSMs do not have adverse outcomes during their inpatient observational hospitalization. An outpatient escort would be sufficient to ensure adequate observation.

Laparoscopy impacts outcomes favorably following colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a critical analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) often involves complex operations. We investigated the outcome of patients who underwent surgery for UC by analyzing a nationwide database. METHODS: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS-NSQIP, 2005-2008) for all UC patients who underwent colectomy. To analyze by operation, groupings included: partial colectomy (PC; n = 265), total abdominal colectomy (TAC; n = 232), total proctocolectomy with ileostomy (TPC-I; n = 134), and total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA; n = 446) to analyze 30-day outcomes. RESULTS: From 1,077 patients (mean age, 44 years; 45 % female; 7 % emergent), a laparoscopic approach was used in 29.2 %, with rates increasing 8.5 % each year (18.5 % in 2005 to 41.3 % in 2008, P < 0.001). Complications occurred in 29 %, and laparoscopy was associated with a lower complication rate (21 vs. 32 % open, P < 0.001). On multivariate regression, postoperative complications increased when patients were not functionally independent [odds ratio (OR) = 3.2], had preoperative sepsis (OR = 2.0), or prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR = 2.8). A laparoscopic approach was associated with a lower complication rate (OR = 0.63). When stratified by specific complications, laparoscopy was associated with lower complications, including superficial surgical site infections (11.4 vs. 6.7 %, P = 0.0011), pneumonia (2.9 vs. 0.6 %, P = 0.023), prolonged mechanical ventilation (3.9 vs. 1.3 %, P = 0.023), need for transfusions postoperatively (1.6 vs. 0 %, P = 0.016), and severe sepsis (2.9 vs. 1.0 %, P = 0.039). Laparoscopy was also was associated with a lower complication rate in TACs (41.7 vs. 18.8 %, P < 0.0001) and IPAA (29.9 vs. 18.2 %, P = 0.005) and had an overall lower mortality rate (0.2 vs. 1.7 %, P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Results from a large nationwide database demonstrate that a laparoscopic approach was utilized in an increasing number of UC patients undergoing colectomy and was associated with lower morbidity and mortality, even in more complex procedures, such as TAC and IPAA.