Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
PLoS Med ; 6(4): e1000070, 2009 Apr 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19399156

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for Plasmodium falciparum malaria is being suggested to improve diagnostic efficiency in peripheral health care settings in Africa. Such improved diagnostics are critical to minimize overuse and thereby delay development of resistance to artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs). Our objective was to study the influence of RDT-aided malaria diagnosis on drug prescriptions, health outcomes, and costs in primary health care settings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a cross-over validation clinical trial in four primary health care units in Zanzibar. Patients of all ages with reported fever in the previous 48 hours were eligible and allocated alternate weeks to RDT-aided malaria diagnosis or symptom-based clinical diagnosis (CD) alone. Follow-up was 14 days. ACT was to be prescribed to patients diagnosed with malaria in both groups. Statistical analyses with multilevel modelling were performed. A total of 1,887 patients were enrolled February through August 2005. RDT was associated with lower prescription rates of antimalarial treatment than CD alone, 361/1005 (36%) compared with 752/882 (85%) (odds ratio [OR] 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.05, p<0.001). Prescriptions of antibiotics were higher after RDT than CD alone, i.e., 372/1005 (37%) and 235/882 (27%) (OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.5-2.2, p<0.001), respectively. Reattendance due to perceived unsuccessful clinical cure was lower after RDT 25/1005 (2.5%), than CD alone 43/882 (4.9%) (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.005). Total average cost per patient was similar: USD 2.47 and 2.37 after RDT and CD alone, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RDTs resulted in improved adequate treatment and health outcomes without increased cost per patient. RDTs may represent a tool for improved management of patients with fever in peripheral health care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (Clinicaltrials.gov) NCT00549003.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina , Fiebre/etiología , Malaria Falciparum/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Cruzados , Quimioterapia Combinada , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Oportunidad Relativa , Prescripciones , Tanzanía , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn ; 34(5): 669-86, 2007 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17620000

RESUMEN

The study aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of amodiaquine (AQ) and its major metabolite N-desethylamodiaquine (N-DEAQ), and to assess the correlation between exposure to N-DEAQ and treatment outcome. Blood samples from children in two studies in Zanzibar and one in Papua New Guinea were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis (n = 86). The children had been treated with AQ in combination with artesunate or sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. The population pharmacokinetics of AQ and N-DEAQ were modeled using the non-linear mixed effects approach as implemented in NONMEM. Bayesian post-hoc estimates of individual pharmacokinetic parameters were used to generate individual profiles of N-DEAQ exposure. The correlation between N-DEAQ exposure and effect was studied in 212 patients and modeled with logistic regression in NONMEM. The pharmacokinetics of AQ and N-DEAQ were best described by two parallel two-compartment models with a central and a peripheral compartment for each compound. The systemic exposure to AQ was low in comparison to N-DEAQ. The t(1/2 lambda) of N-DEAQ ranged from 3 days to 12 days. There was a statistically significant, yet weak, association between N-DEAQ concentration on day 7 and treatment outcome. The age-based dosing schedule currently recommended in Zanzibar appeared to result in inadequate exposure to N-DEAQ in many patients.


Asunto(s)
Amodiaquina/análogos & derivados , Amodiaquina/farmacocinética , Antimaláricos/farmacocinética , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Biológicos
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 41(8): 1079-86, 2005 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16163624

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This is the first clinical trial comparing the efficacy of artesunate plus amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL)--the major artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) candidates for treatment of malaria in Africa--that involved an extended, 42-day follow-up period, polymerase chain reaction-adjusted parasitological cure rates (PCR APCRs), and systematic analyses of genetic markers related to quinoline resistance. METHODS. A total of 408 children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zanzibar, Tanzania, were enrolled. Children who were 6-8 months of age and/or who weighed 6-8 kg were assigned to receive ASAQ for 3 days. Children who were 9-59 months of age and who weighted > or =9 kg were randomly assigned to receive either ASAQ or AL for 3 days in standard doses. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. RESULTS: Age- and weight-adjusted PCR-APCRs by follow-up day 42 were 91% (188 of 206 patients) in the ASAQ group and 94% (185 of 197 patients) in the AL group (odds ratio [OR] for the likelihood of cure, 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-5.10; P=.115). A total of 5 and 7 recrudescences occurred after day 28 in the ASAQ and AL groups, respectively. On the assumption that 10 malaria episodes with uncertain PCR results were recrudescences, PCR-APCRs decreased to 88% in the ASAQ group and to 92% in the AL group. Unadjusted cure rates by day 42 were 56% (116 of 206 patients) in the ASAQ group versus 77% (151 of 197 patients) in the AL group (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.66-3.91; P<.001). Rates of reinfection by day 42 were 36% (65 of 181 patients) in the ASAQ arm versus 17% (31 of 182 patients) in the AL arm (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.60; P<.001). A significant selection of P. falciparum multidrug resistance gene 1 allele 86N was found in isolates associated with reinfection after AL treatment, compared with isolates at baseline (2.2-fold increase; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were highly efficacious, but AL provided stronger prevention against reinfection. The high proportion of recrudescences found after day 28 and the genetic selection by the long-acting partner drug underlines the importance of long follow-up periods in clinical trials. A long follow-up duration and performance of PCR genotyping should be implemented in programmatic surveillance of antimalarial drugs.


Asunto(s)
Amodiaquina/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Etanolaminas/uso terapéutico , Fluorenos/uso terapéutico , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Sesquiterpenos/uso terapéutico , Amodiaquina/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antimaláricos/administración & dosificación , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Arteméter , Artemisininas/administración & dosificación , Artesunato , Niño , Preescolar , Combinación de Medicamentos , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etanolaminas/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Fluorenos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Lactante , Lumefantrina , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Sesquiterpenos/administración & dosificación , Tanzanía/epidemiología
5.
J Infect Dis ; 191(6): 1014-7, 2005 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15717281

RESUMEN

Artemisinin derivative-based combination therapy is expected to suppress the development of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in Africa. We have performed an artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem; Novartis) follow-up clinical trial in Zanzibar, in which pfcrt K76T and pfmdr1 N86Y frequencies were determined before drug administration and in all recurrent parasites during a follow-up period of 42 days. A significant increase in pfmdr1 86N was observed after exposure to the drug. This points to 86N as a potential marker of lumefantrine resistance in vivo, while suggesting that Coartem is not robust enough to avoid selection of resistance-associated mutations in some malarial settings.


Asunto(s)
Transportadoras de Casetes de Unión a ATP/genética , Antimaláricos/farmacología , Artemisininas/farmacología , Etanolaminas/farmacología , Fluorenos/farmacología , Plasmodium falciparum/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas Protozoarias/genética , Selección Genética , Sesquiterpenos/farmacología , Alelos , Animales , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Arteméter , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Niño , Resistencia a Medicamentos/genética , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etanolaminas/uso terapéutico , Fluorenos/uso terapéutico , Genes MDR , Humanos , Lactante , Lumefantrina , Malaria Falciparum/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Plasmodium falciparum/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Sesquiterpenos/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA