Optimizing O red blood cell concentrate usage in the emergency department in the era of patient blood management.

BACKGROUND: Emergency transfusion may require the availability of O-negative red blood cell concentrates without pre-transfusion testing. At the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, the emergency department was used to having access to two decentralized O-negative red blood cell concentrates. This study aims to analyze the consumption of O-negative red blood cell concentrates in emergency situations both before and after the implementation of a novel strategy aiming at optimizing stocks. This strategy provides a combined allocation of one unit of O-positive red blood cell concentrate and one unit of O-negative red blood cell concentrate decentralized in the emergency department and reserve the transfusion of the negative unit only to under 45-year-old women and under 20-year-old men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of the transfusion and medical records of all patients who received immediate transfusions in the emergency department without pre-transfusion testing between 2008 and 2022. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients received O red blood cell concentrates without pre-transfusion testing in emergency situations between 2008 and 2022. During the first 24 h of hospitalization, 354 O-negative units were transfused. Mean ratios of number of O-negative bags between 2008 and 2020 was 1.98 unit/patient. After implementation of the new strategy, the ratio in 2021 was 1.46 unit/patient and drastically decreased in 2022 to 0.79 unit/patient. CONCLUSION: In situations of emergency, allocating O-negative units only for women younger than 45 years and men younger than 20 years could have saved 85% of O-negative red blood cell concentrates transfused (303/354) yet balancing the immunological risk. Limiting the number of delocalized units of O-negative red blood cell concentrates in the emergency department seems to lower O-negative consumption. With this strategy, the units spared could have been transfused to patients with greater needs (e.g., sickle cell patients or chronically transfused patients).

There is an urgent need to adopt a pull-flow logic for the supply of RBCs to meet patients' needs: A single center study.

BACKGROUND: Despite major demographic changes, several decisions and initiatives, among which Patient Blood Management, have led to a significant reduction in the transfusion of packed red blood cells (RBCs) in Belgium, as it has been observed in many countries. Unfortunately, not all blood groups were proportionately impacted and shortage in O D-negative RBCs is regularly or chronically observed. The goal of this study was to examine how to optimize the use and the supply of O D-negative blood in our academic hospital. METHODOLOGY: All blood transfusions performed at Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2021 were reviewed. The blood group of the patients was compared with the blood group of the RBCs actually supplied and transfused. RESULTS: 49.823 RBCs transfusions were analyzed. The patients' needs didn't reflect those of a Caucasian population, with an increase of O (47.9%) and B (10.3%) for the ABO blood group, and a quite high proportion of R0r (8.6%) for the Rh blood group. Only two thirds of O D-negative RBCs were transfused to O rr or R0r patients. CONCLUSION: The application of PBM and the ethnic imbalance between blood donor and patient populations are two important risk factors for chronic shortages of O D-negative blood. To adapt blood component resources, it is essential to have a complete picture of the real needs of patients according to their blood group profile. Blood donor centers must adapt to the evolving needs of hospitals in order to plan future supplies in a "pull-flow" approach.

O-negative blood shortage management in a university hospital: Impact of transfusing RhD-positive red blood cells to RhD-negative patients.

BACKGROUND: Shortages of O-negative red blood cells are becoming increasingly common, forcing hospitals' blood transfusion services to find solutions to conserve this blood group for patients who need it most. The present study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the practice of transfusing selected RhD-negative patients with RhD-positive red blood cells and to assess the impact of this measure on patients and blood transfusion service management. METHODOLOGY: Transfusion data of 1199 RhD-negative patients hospitalised at Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc between 2019 and 2022 were analysed. For patients who received RhD-positive red blood cells, age, gender, reason for hospital admission, indication for transfusion, and immunohematology analyses were recorded. These data enabled an assessment of transfusion practices over the years, characterisation of patients who received RhD-mismatched transfusions, determination of the alloimmunisation rate, and calculation of the total number of RhD-negative red blood cells saved. RESULTS: During the study period, 141 RhD-negative patients received 604 RhD-positive red blood cells. A change in transfusion practices was observed over the years, with a greater proportion of RhD-negative patients being transfused with RhD-positive red blood cells in 2022 (28%) compared to 2019 (2%). The overall alloimmunisation rate was at least 20%, and 416 red blood cells were saved without any consequences. Patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery received the highest number of RhD-positive red blood cells. CONCLUSION: The transfusion of selected RhD-negative patients with RhD-positive red blood cells is a low-risk practice that helps conserve RhD-negative red blood cells. However, there is a minimum 20% risk of alloimmunisation, which could have clinical and transfusion-related consequences in the future.

Biological investigations of transfusion reactions: Contribution of symptom-based decisional algorithms.

OBJECTIVES: While transfusion is a common and safe therapeutic procedure in health care facilities, transfusion reactions can occur, whether acute or delayed, mild or life-threatening. In face of these reactions, the biological analysis laboratory plays a central role in their diagnosis. The objective of this article is to develop decisional algorithms for laboratory tests to be performed according to the clinical symptoms developed by the patient during or after transfusion. METHODS: Based on the information collected by reviewing the literature and the procedures used in our hospital, we then developed biological investigation algorithms according to the symptoms presented by the patient, rather than the presumed reaction. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We have developed symptom-based algorithms for acute transfusion reactions management that streamline laboratory testing and simplify the differential diagnosis.

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation.

BACKGROUND: A bacteremia diagnosis with speeded-up identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is mandatory to adjust empirical broad-spectrum antibiotherapy and avoid the emergence of multi-resistant bacteria. Alfred 60AST (Alifax, Polverara, PD, Italy) is an innovative automated system based on light scattering measurements allowing direct AST from positive blood cultures with rapid results. In this study we aimed to evaluate the system's performances and turnaround time (TAT) compared to routine AST. METHODS: The study was conducted during 2 non-consecutive 3-month periods at the microbiology laboratory of the Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc. All blood cultures detected positive in the 0 AM-10 AM time frame with a pure Gram-positive cocci or Gram-negative bacilli stain were included for Alfred 60AST testing. Two customized EUCAST antibiotic panels were set up composed of 1) a "Gram-negative" panel including cefuroxime, ceftazidime Enterobacteriaceae, piperacillin-tazobactam Enterobacteriaceae, ciprofloxacine, and ceftazidime Pseudomonas 2) a "Gram-positive" panel including cefoxitin Staphylococcus aureus, cefoxitin coagulase-negative (CNS) Staphylococci and ampicillin Enterococci. Categorical agreement (CA), very major errors (VME), major errors (ME), minor errors (mE) and TAT to Alfred 60AST results were calculated in comparison with AST results obtained from direct testing on positive blood cultures with the Phoenix system (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). RESULTS: Five hundred seventy and one hundred nine antibiotics were evaluated on respectively 166 Gram-negative bacilli and 109 Gram-positive cocci included in the studied population. During the first study period regarding Gram-negative strains a CA of 89.5% was obtained with a high rate of VME (19 and 15.4% respectively) for cefuroxime and piperacillin-tazobactam Enterobacteriaceae. Considering this, Alifax reviewed these antibiotics' formulations improving Gram-negative bacilli total CA to 92.2% with no VME during the second study period. For Gram-positive cocci, total CA was 88.1% with 2.3% VME, 13.8% ME (mainly cefoxitin CNS) and 12% mE rates both study periods combined. Median TAT to AST results was 5 h with Alfred versus 12 h34 with Phoenix. CONCLUSION: The Alfred 60AST system shows correct yet improvable microbiological performances and a major TAT reduction compared to direct automated AST testing. Clinical studies measuring the impact of the approach on antibiotic management of patients with bacteremia are recommended.