Synthetic Interbody Devices and Traditional Bone Graft Are Associated With a Similar Rate of Surgical Complications After 1-2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of all-cause surgical complications of synthetic interbody devices versus allograft or autograft in patients undergoing 1-2 levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical degenerative disorders affect up to 60% of older adults in the United States. Both traditional allograft or autograft and synthetic interbody devices (polyetheretherketone or titanium) are used for decompression and arthrodesis, with increasing utilization of the latter. However, the differences in their postsurgical complication profiles are not well-characterized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDFs for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy between 2010 and 2022 were identified using the PearlDiver Mariner all-claims insurance database. Patients undergoing surgery for nondegenerative pathologies, such as tumors, trauma, or infection, were excluded. 1:1 exact matching was performed based on factors that were significant predictors of all-cause surgical complications in a linear regression model. The primary outcome measure was the development of all-cause surgical complications after 1-2 level ACDFs. The secondary outcome was all-cause medical complications. RESULTS: 1:1 exact matching resulted in two equal groups of 11,430 patients who received treatment with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autograft. No statistically significant difference in all-cause surgical complications was found between the synthetic cohort and the allograft or autograft cohort after 1-2 level ACDFs (Relative Risk: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.730-1.014, P = 0.079). No significant differences were observed regarding any specific surgical complications except for pseudoarthrosis (Relative Risk: 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.554-0.974, P = 0.037), which was higher in the allograft/autograft cohort. CONCLUSION: After 1:1 exact matching to control for confounding variables, the findings of this study suggest that all-cause surgical complications are similar in patients undergoing ACDFs with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autographs. However, the rate of pseudarthrosis appears to be higher in patients with allograft/autographs. Future prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Cannabis Use is Associated With Higher Rates of Pseudarthrosis Following TLIF: A Multi-Institutional Matched-Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of pseudarthrosis in patients undergoing 1 to 3 level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures between cannabis users and noncannabis users. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recreational use of cannabis is common, though it remains poorly studied and legally ambiguous in the United States. Patients with back pain may turn to adjunctive use of cannabis to manage their pain. However, the implications of cannabis use on the achievement of bony fusion are not well-characterized. METHODS: Patients who underwent 1 to 3 level TLIF for degenerative disc disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2010 and 2022 were identified using the PearlDiver Mariner all-claims insurance database. Cannabis users were identified with ICD 10 code F12.90. Patients undergoing surgery for nondegenerative pathologies such as tumors, trauma, or infection were excluded. 1:1 exact matching was performed using demographic factors, medical comorbidities, and surgical factors which were significantly associated with pseudarthrosis in a linear regression model. The primary outcome measure was development of pseudarthrosis within 24 months after 1 to 3 level TLIF. The secondary outcomes were the development of all-cause surgical complications as well as all-cause medical complications. RESULTS: A 1:1 exact matching resulted in two equal groups of 1593 patients who did or did not use cannabis and underwent 1 to 3 level TLIF. Patients who used cannabis were 80% more likely to experience pseudarthrosis compared with patients who do not [relative risk (RR): 1.816, 95% CI: 1.291-2.556, P <0.001]. Similarly, cannabis use was associated with significantly higher rates of all-cause surgical complications (RR: 2.350, 95% CI: 1.399-3.947, P =0.001) and all-cause medical complications (RR: 1.934, 95% CI: 1.516-2.467, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: After 1:1 exact matching to control for confounding variables, the findings of this study suggest that cannabis use is associated with higher rates of pseudarthrosis, as well as higher rates of all-cause surgical and all-cause medical complications. Further studies are needed to corroborate our findings.

Correlation Between Rod Fracture and Shear Stress: A Novel Parameter.

BACKGROUND: We sought to assess the accuracy of a novel parameter proportional to the rod shear stress (RSS) in identifying patients at risk of rod fracture (RF) after surgery for correction of adult spinal deformity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective medical record review of patients aged ≥18 years treated for adult spinal deformity between 2004 and 2014 with ≥24 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was RFs identified radiographically. Patient weight (w), number of instrumented levels (N), and minimum rod diameter (d) were recorded and used to calculate the RSS parameter (RSS=Nwd2). Receiver operating characteristic curves were produced and the area under the curve (AUC ± 95% confidence interval [CI]) was calculated to compare this parameter's discriminative accuracy to that of its constituent variables. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 28 RF-positive and 154 RF-negative patients were included. The average age was 59.2 ± 9.6 years, and 93.4% were women. The RSS parameter produced the greatest AUC (0.73 ± 0.11). At an RSS cutoff of 30.1, it achieved a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 71.4% (LR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5). The number of instrumented levels produced the next-greatest AUC (0.65 ± 0.12), with a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 50.0% at a cutoff of 15 (LR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0). CONCLUSIONS: The RSS is calculated using easily obtainable information and shows potential as a tool for predicting patient-specific risk of RF after spinal fusion. The number of instrumented levels also correlates strongly with the occurrence of RFs and is not significantly less accurate than the RSS. A larger sample size and prospective validation would be useful in determining with greater confidence which parameter is superior for predicting RFs after spinal fusion.

No Difference in Surgical Outcomes between Stand-Alone Devices and Anterior Plating for 1-2 level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A 1:1 Exact Matched Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: Compare rates of all-cause surgical and medical complications between zero-profile (stand-alone) implants versus any graft type with anterior plate in patients undergoing 1-2 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for treatment of degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy is increasingly prevalent in older adults. ACDF is a common surgical procedure for decompression of neural structures and stabilization and has been shown to have excellent outcomes. While ACDFs performed with a graft and plate has been the gold standard, more recently, zero-profile implants were developed to decrease implant related complications, such as severe postoperative dysphagia. However, there is a paucity of papers comparing the surgical and medical complications profile of zero-profile (stand-alone) implants to grafts with plating systems. METHODS: Data was extracted from the PearlDiver Mariner Database using CPT codes to classify patients into 1-level, 2-levels, and total 1-2 level ACDFs. Patients undergoing surgery for non-degenerative pathologies such as tumors, trauma, or infection were excluded. RESULTS: 1:1 exact matching created two equal groups of 7,284 patients that underwent 1-2 level ACDF with either grafting with a plate or zero-profile (standalone) implant. There were no statistically significant difference in all-cause surgical complications, pseudarthrosis rate, dysphagia or need for revision surgery between both cohorts (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.21, P = 0.95). Additionally, all-cause medical complications were similar between both cohorts (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.862-1.330, P = 0.573) or any specific surgical or medical complication included in this study. CONCLUSION: After 1:1 exact matching, the results of this study suggest that zero-profile (stand-alone) implants have similar outcomes compared to grafts with plating systems, with no observed differences in all-cause surgical or medical complications profile.

Surgeon Experience Matters: An Exact Matched Analysis of TLIF Outcomes Demonstrates No Difference in Surgical Outcomes Between Experienced Neurosurgeons and Orthopedic Surgeons.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical and medical complications profile between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures. BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the impact of spine surgeon specialty (neurosurgery vs. orthopedic spine) on TLIF outcomes have been inconclusive and failed to control for operative learning curves and surgical maturity. Orthopedic spine surgeons perform fewer spine procedures in residency, although these differences may be attenuated by mandatory fellowship before starting practice. Any observed differences are likely attenuated with increasing surgeon experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an all-payer claims database, PearlDiver Mariner, 120 million patient records were analyzed between 2010 and 2022, to identify individuals with lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis who underwent index one- to three-level TLIF procedures. International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Edition (ICD-9), International Classification of Diseases-10th Edition (ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to query the database. Only Neurosurgeons and Orthopedic spine surgeons who had performed at least 250 procedures were included in the study. Patients undergoing surgery for tumor, trauma, or infection were excluded. 1:1 exact matching was performed using demographic factors, medical comorbidities, and surgical factors which were significantly associated with all-cause surgical or medical complications in a linear regression model. RESULTS: 1:1 exact matching created two equal groups of 18,195 patients without baseline differences who underwent TLIF procedures by neurosurgeons or orthopedic surgeons. There was no difference in all-cause surgical complications between neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons (relative risk=1.008, 95% CI: 0.850-1.195, P =0.965). All-cause medical complication rate was higher in the neurosurgery cohort (relative risk=1.144, 95% CI: 1.042-1.258, P =0.005). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that after accounting for surgical maturity, neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons have similar surgical outcomes. However, neurosurgeons have higher all-cause medical complication rates compared with orthopedic spine surgeons. Further research is warranted to validate this relationship in other spine procedures and for other outcomes.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting for the treatment of basilar artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Basilar artery stenosis (BAS) carries high morbidity and mortality, with variable outcomes after endovascular treatments. We systematically reviewed the literature on percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and/or stenting (PTAS) for BAS. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were searched upon the PRISMA guidelines to include prospective/retrospective cohort studies describing PTAS for BAS. Pooled rates of intervention-related complications and outcomes were analyzed with random-effect model meta-analyses. RESULTS: We included 25 retrospective cohort studies comprising 1016 patients. All patients were symptomatic, presenting with transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke. BAS frequently involved the middle basilar artery (51.4%), mostly classified as Mori-B (57.4%). PTAS for BAS was indicated in severe (≥ 50-70%), symptomatic BAS refractory to dual antiplatelet therapy. Patients underwent angioplasty (95.5%) and/or stenting (92.2%), preferably using Wingspan or Apollo stents. Median baseline BAS was 81% (range, 53-99%), while median post-intervention BAS was 13% (0-75%). Actuarial rates of successful intervention and "good" final outcome were 100% (95% CI: 100-100%) and 89% (95% CI: 85-93%). Intervention-related recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 85 patients (8.3%) with actuarial rates of 5% (95% CI: 4-7%), differentiated into perforator (5.4%), in-stent (2.6%), and embolic (0.4%). Actuarial rates of intervention-related dissection, restenosis, and death were 0% (95% CI: 0-0%), 1% (95% CI: 0-1%), and 0% (95% CI: 0-2%). CONCLUSION: Elective PTAS appears to be safe and effective in selected patients with medically refractory, severe, symptomatic, and non-acute BAS. Different stent types and angioplasty-assisted procedures should be considered based on specific clinico-radiological characteristics of the lesions. Future randomized controlled trials are required to corroborate these findings.