Assessing performance of Geriatric Surgery Verification Program preoperative communication standards in spine surgery.

BACKGROUND: To assess performance of the American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification (GSV) Program preoperative communication standards in older patients undergoing high risk spine surgery. METHODS: We performed an external validation of a natural language processing (NLP) method for identifying documentation meeting GSV communication standards. We then applied this method to a retrospective cohort of patients aged 65 and older who underwent spinal fusion procedures between January 2018-December 2020 in a large healthcare system in Massachusetts. Our primary outcome of interest was fulfillment of GSV communication domains: overall health goals, treatment goals, and patient-centered outcomes. Factors associated with the fulfillment of at least one domain were assessed using Poisson regression to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: External validation of the NLP method had a sensitivity of 88.6% and specificity of 99.0%. Our study population included 1294 patients, of whom only 0.8% (n = 10) patients contained documentation of all three GSV domains, and 33.7% (n = 436) had documentation fulfilling at least one GSV domain. The GSV domain with lowest frequency of documentation was overall health goals, with only 35 (2.7%) of patients meeting this requirement. Adjusted analysis suggested that patients with a Charlson comorbidity score of one or more had higher fulfillment of GSV criteria (CCI 1-3: prevalence rate ratio (PRR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-2.1; CCI >3: PRR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9). CONCLUSION: A paucity of geriatric patients undergoing spine surgery had preoperative documentation consistent with GSV standards. Given that spine surgery is one of the highest risk surgeries in older adults and GSV standards are relevant to all surgical specialties, wider promulgation of these standards is warranted.

A Call to Action: Using Curriculum Mapping at Four Medical Schools in Massachusetts to Advance Serious Illness Communication Training in Undergraduate Medical Education.

Background: Practicing physicians require serious illness communication (SIC) skills to ensure high-quality, humanistic care for patients and families as they face life-changing medical decisions. However, a majority of U.S. medical schools do not require formal training in SIC and fail to provide students deliberate practice before graduation. The Massachusetts Medical Schools' Collaborative was created to ensure that students receive foundational SIC training in undergraduate medical education. This Collaborative developed a curriculum-mapping tool to assess SIC at four medical schools. Objective: We aimed to understand existing educational activities across four medical schools and identify opportunities to build longitudinal, developmentally based curricular threads in SIC. Design: From July 2019 to April 2021, faculty, staff, and medical students assessed current educational activities related to five core competencies in SIC, adapted for students from national competencies for palliative medicine fellows, using a curriculum mapping tool. Measurements: The group selected 23 keywords and collected metrics to describe the timing, instruction and assessment for each school's educational activities. Results: On average, there were only 40 hours of required curricula in SIC over four years. Over 80% of relevant SIC hours occurred as elective experiences, mostly during the postclerkship phase, with limited capacity in these elective experiences. Only one school had SIC educational activities during the clerkship phase when students are developing clinical competencies. Assessment methods focused on student participation, and no school-assessed clinical performance in the clerkship or postclerkship phase. Conclusions: Medical schools are failing to consistently train and ensure basic competency in effective, compassionate SIC. Curriculum mapping allows schools to evaluate their current state on a particular topic such as SIC, ensure proper assessment, and evaluate curricular changes over time. Through the deliberate inclusion of SIC competencies in longitudinal curriculum design, we can fill this training gap and create best practices in undergraduate medical education.

Shared Decision Making in the Geriatric Surgery Verification Program: Assessing Baseline Performance.

CONTEXT: As part of the launch of the Geriatric Surgery Verification program in 2019, the American College of Surgeons issued care standards for older patients, including requirements for preoperative documentation of patients' goals. Hospital performance on these standards prior to the Geriatric Surgery Verification program is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess baseline performance of the Geriatric Surgery Verification (GSV) standard for documentation of preoperative goals for older patients, and to determine factors associated with standard adherence. METHODS: Using natural language processing, this study examines the electronic health records of patients aged 65 years or older who underwent coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) or colectomies in 2017 or 2018 at three hospitals. The primary outcome was adherence to at least one of the three components of GSV Standard 5.1, which requires preoperative documentation of overall health goals, treatment goals, and patient-centered outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2630 operations and 2563 patients were included. At least one component of the standard was met in 307 (11.7%) operations and all three components were met in 5 (0.2%). Higher likelihood of meeting the standard was demonstrated for patients who were female (odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% CI 1.00-1.68), undergoing colectomy (OR 2.82; 95% CI 2.15-3.72), or with more comorbidities (Charlson scores >3 [OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.14-2.09]). CONCLUSION: Before GSV program implementation, clinicians for two major operations almost never met the GSV standard for preoperative discussion of patient goals. Interdisciplinary teams will need to adjust clinical practice to meet best-practice communication standards for older patients.

Prevalence, Management, and Outcomes Related to Preoperative Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) in an Adult Surgical Population: Preoperative MOLST and Code Status Discussions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine prevalence of documented preoperative code status discussions and postoperative outcomes (specifically mortality, readmission, and discharge disposition) of patients with completed MOLST forms before surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A MOLST form documents patient care preference regarding treatment limitations. When considering surgery in these patients, preoperative discussion is necessary to ensure concordance of care. Little is known about prevalence of these discussions and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted consisting of all patients having surgery during a 1-year period at a tertiary care academic center in Boston, Massachusetts. RESULTS: Among 21,787 surgical patients meeting inclusion criteria, 402 (1.8%) patients had preoperative MOLST. Within the MOLST, 224 (55.7%) patients had chosen to limit cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 214 (53.2%) had chosen to limit intubation and mechanical ventilation. Code status discussion was documented presurgery in 169 (42.0%) patients with MOLST. Surgery was elective or nonurgent for 362 (90%), and median length of stay (Q1, Q3) was 5.1 days (1.9, 9.9). The minority of patients with preoperative MOLST were discharged home [169 (42%), and 103 (25.6%) patients were readmitted within 30 days. Patients with preoperative MOLST had a 30-day mortality of 9.2% (37 patients) and cumulative 90-day mortality of 14.9% (60 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than half of surgical patients with preoperative MOLST have documented code status discussions before surgery. Given their high risk of postoperative mortality and the diversity of preferences found in MOLST, thoughtful discussion before surgery is critical to ensure concordant perioperative care.

Paving the way for universal medical student training in serious illness communication: the Massachusetts Medical Schools' Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Patients with serious illness look to their clinicians for discussion and guidance on high-stakes treatment decisions, which are complex, emotional and value-laden. However, required training in serious illness communication is rare in U.S. medical schools, with efforts at curricular reform stymied by competing institutional demands, lack of resources and accreditation requirements. We describe an approach to building and scaling medical student training in serious illness communication through the creation of a statewide collaborative of medical schools. METHODS: The Massachusetts Medical Schools' Collaborative is a first-of-its-kind group that promotes longitudinal, developmentally-based curricula in serious illness communication for all students. Convened externally by the Massachusetts Coalition for Serious Illness Care, the collaborative includes faculty, staff, and students from four medical schools. RESULTS: The collaborative started with listening to member's perspectives and collectively developed core competencies in serious illness communication for implementation at each school. We share early lessons on the opportunities, challenges and sustainability of our statewide collective action to influence curricular reform, which can be replicated in other topic areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our next steps include curriculum mapping, student focus groups and faculty development to guide successful and enduring implementation of the competencies to impact undergraduate medical education in Massachusetts and beyond.

Quality Indicators in Surgical Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Defining high quality palliative care in seriously ill surgical patients is essential to provide patient-centered surgical care. Quality indicators specifically for seriously ill surgical patients are necessary in order to integrate palliative care into existing surgical quality improvement programs. OBJECTIVES: To identify existing quality indicators that measure palliative care delivery in seriously ill surgical patients, characterize their development, and assess their methodological quality. METHODS: A PRISMA-guided systematic review included studies that reported on the development process and characteristics of palliative care quality indicators and guidelines in adult surgical patients. Relevant measures were categorized into the previously defined National Consensus Project domains of palliative care and the Donabedian quality framework, and assessed for methodological quality. RESULTS: There were 263 unique measures identified from 26 studies, of which 70% were process measures. Indicators addressing Care of the Patient Near the End of Life (31.5%) and Physical Aspects of Care (20.8%) were the most common. Indicators addressing Spiritual (2.6%) and Cultural Aspects of Care (1.2%) were the least common. Methodological quality varied widely across studies. Although most studies defined a purpose for the indicators and used scientific evidence, many studies lacked input from target populations and few had discussed the practical application of indicators. CONCLUSION: This review was a key step that informed efforts to develop quality indicators for seriously ill surgical patients. Few indicators addressed non-physical aspects of suffering and no indicators were identified addressing palliative surgery. Future attention is needed toward the development and practical application of palliative care quality indicators in surgical patients.

Preoperative Frailty Status and Intensity of End-of-Life Care Among Older Adults After Emergency Surgery.

CONTEXT: Emergency general surgery (EGS) is common and highly morbid for older adults, particularly for those who are frail. However, there are little data on the quality of end-of-life care (EOLC) for this population. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the association of frailty with intensity of EOLC for older adults with and without frailty who undergo EGS but die within one year. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 100% Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, ≥66 years, who underwent one of five EGS procedures with the highest mortality (partial colectomy, small bowel resection, peptic ulcer disease repair, adhesiolysis, or laparotomy) between 2008 and 2014 and died within one year. A validated claims-based frailty index (CFI) identified patients who were not frail (CFI < 0.15), prefrail (0.15 ≤ CFI < 0.25), mildly frail (0.25 ≤ CFI < 0.35), and moderately to severe frail (CFI ≥ 0.35). Multivariable adjusted logistic or Poisson regression compared post-discharge and EOL healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Among 138,916 older EGS adults who died within one year, 32.2% were not frail, 31.7% were prefrail, 29.8% had mild frailty and 6.3% had moderate-to-severe frailty. Decedents with any degree of frailty experienced high-intensity EOLC (P < 0.01), low rates of hospice use (P < 0.01), and fewer days at home. Of those who survived the index hospitalization but died within one year, moderate-to-severely frail decedents had the highest odds of visiting an emergency department (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19, CI = 1.13-1.27), rehospitalization (OR = 1.23, CI = 1.16-1.31), or an intensive care unit admission (OR = 1.22, CI = 1.13-1.30) in the last 30 days of life compared to nonfrail decedents. CONCLUSION: While all older patients undergoing EGS have poor end-of-life outcomes, frail EGS patients receive the highest intensity EOLC and represent a vulnerable population for whom targeted interventions could limit burdensome treatment.

The Impact of Frailty on Long-Term Patient-Oriented Outcomes after Emergency General Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies examine the impact of frailty on long-term patient-oriented outcomes after emergency general surgery (EGS). We measured the prevalence of frailty among older EGS patients and examined the impact of frailty on 1-year outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using 2008 to 2014 Medicare claims. SETTING: Acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 65 years or older who received one of the five EGS procedures with the highest mortality burden (partial colectomy, small bowel resection, peptic ulcer disease repair, adhesiolysis, or laparotomy). MEASUREMENTS: A validated claims-based frailty index (CFI) identified patients who were not frail (CFI < .15), pre-frail (.15 ≤ CFI < .25), mildly frail (.25 ≤ CFI < .35), and moderately to severely frail (CFI ≥ .35). Multivariable Cox regression compared 1-year mortality. Multivariable Poisson regression compared rates of post-discharge hospital encounters (hospitalizations, intensive care unit stay, emergency department visit) and home time over 1 year after discharge. All regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, admission from facility, procedure, sepsis, inpatient palliative care delivery, trauma center designation, hospital bed size, and teaching status, and they were clustered by patient and hospital referral region. RESULTS: Among 468 459 older EGS adults, 37.4% were pre-frail, 12.4% were mildly frail, and 3.6% were moderately to severely frail. Patients with mild frailty experienced a higher risk of 1-year mortality compared with non-frail patients (hazard ratio = 1.97; confidence interval [CI] = 1.94-2.01). In the year after discharge, patients with mild and moderate to severe frailty had more hospital encounters compared with non-frail patients (7.8 and 11.5 vs 2.0 per person-year; incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 4.01; CI = 3.93-4.08 vs IRR = 5.89; CI = 5.70-6.09, respectively). Patients with mild and moderate to severe frailty also had fewer days at home in the year after discharge compared with non-frail patients (256 and 203 vs 302 mean days; IRR = .97; CI = .96-.97 vs IRR = .95; CI = .94-.95, respectively). CONCLUSION: Older EGS patients with frailty are at increased risk for poor 1-year outcomes and decreased home time. Targeted interventions for older EGS patients with frailty during the index EGS hospitalization are urgently needed to improve long-term outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1037-1043, 2020.

Natural Language Processing Accurately Measures Adherence to Best Practice Guidelines for Palliative Care in Trauma.

CONTEXT: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program Best Practice Guidelines recommend palliative care (PC) concurrent with restorative treatment for patients with life-threatening injuries. Measuring PC delivery is challenging: administrative data are nonspecific, and manual review is time intensive. OBJECTIVES: To identify PC delivery to patients with life-threatening trauma and compare the performance of natural language processing (NLP), a form of computer-assisted data abstraction, to administrative coding and gold standard manual review. METHODS: Patients 18 years and older admitted with life-threatening trauma were identified from two Level I trauma centers (July 2016-June 2017). Four PC process measures were examined during the trauma admission: code status clarification, goals-of-care discussion, PC consult, and hospice assessment. The performance of NLP and administrative coding were compared with manual review. Multivariable regression was used to determine patient and admission factors associated with PC delivery. RESULTS: There were 76,791 notes associated with 2093 admissions. NLP identified PC delivery in 33% of admissions compared with 8% using administrative coding. Using NLP, code status clarification was most commonly documented (27%), followed by goals-of-care discussion (18%), PC consult (4%), and hospice assessment (4%). Compared with manual review, NLP performed more than 50 times faster and had a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 96%, and an accuracy of 95%. Administrative coding had a sensitivity of 21%, a specificity of 92%, and an accuracy of 68%. Factors associated with PC delivery included older age, increased comorbidities, and longer intensive care unit stay. CONCLUSION: NLP performs with similar accuracy with manual review but with improved efficiency. NLP has the potential to accurately identify PC delivery and benchmark performance of best practice guidelines.

Provider Misinterpretation, Documentation, and Follow-Up of Definitive Urine Drug Testing Results.

BACKGROUND: Urine drug testing (UDT) is an essential tool to monitor opioid misuse among patients on chronic opioid therapy. Inaccurate interpretation of UDT can have deleterious consequences. Providers' ability to accurately interpret and document UDT, particularly definitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) results, has not been widely studied. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether providers correctly interpret, document, and communicate LC-MS/MS UDT results. DESIGN: This is a retrospective chart review of 160 UDT results (80 aberrant; 80 non-aberrant) between August 2017 and February 2018 from 5 ambulatory clinics (3 primary care, 1 oncology, 1 pain management). Aberrant results were classified into one or more of the following categories: illicit drug use, simulated compliance, not taking prescribed medication, and taking a medication not prescribed. Accurate result interpretation was defined as concordance between the provider's documented interpretation and an expert laboratory toxicologist's interpretation. Outcome measures were concordance between provider and laboratory interpretation of UDT results, documentation of UDT results, results acknowledgement in the electronic health record, communication of results to the patient, and rate of prescription refills. KEY RESULTS: Aberrant results were most frequently due to illicit drug use. Overall, only 88 of the 160 (55%) had any documented provider interpretations of which 25/88 (28%) were discordant with the laboratory toxicologist's interpretation. Thirty-six of the 160 (23%) documented communication of the results to the patient. Communicating results was more likely to be documented if the results were aberrant compared with non-aberrant (33/80 [41%] vs. 3/80 [4%], p < 0.001). In all cases where provider interpretations were discordant with the laboratory interpretation, prescriptions were refilled. CONCLUSIONS: Erroneous provider interpretation of UDT results, infrequent documentation of interpretation, lack of communication of results to patients, and prescription refills despite inaccurate interpretations are common. Expert assistance with urine toxicology interpretations may be needed to improve provider accuracy when interpreting toxicology results.

Stressors and resources of caregivers of patients with incurable progressive illness in sub-Saharan Africa.

Family caregivers are central to palliative care in sub-Saharan Africa. Yet although supporting caregivers requires a comprehensive understanding of caregiver burden, there has been little research into this topic in Africa. Using the Stress Process Model to investigate the burden experienced by caregivers in South Africa and Uganda, we interviewed 37 caregivers and analyzed the data thematically. Caregivers' primary stressors related to day-to-day patient care and emotional support; secondary stressors included financial hardship, family responsibilities, and social isolation. Caregivers' social, relational, spiritual, and psychological resources mediated the effects of these stressors. Strengthening one resource strengthened others, but the failure of one resource hindered other resources, exacerbating burden. In providing caregiver support, policymakers and service providers should focus on enhancing caregivers' resources as well as alleviating their stressors.