Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dis ; 184(6): 665-70, 2001 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11517426

RESUMEN

This study developed methods and determined the impact of influenza vaccination on elderly persons in 3 large health plans: Kaiser Permanente Northwest, HealthPartners, and Oxford Health Plans. Data for the 1996-1997 and 1997-1998 seasons were extracted from administrative databases. Subjects were health plan members > or = 65 years old. Comorbid conditions collected from the preceding year were used for risk adjustment with logistic regression. The virus-vaccine match was excellent for year 1 and fair for year 2. Both years, during peak and total periods, vaccination reduced all causes of death and hospitalization for pneumonia and influenza: hospitalizations were reduced by 19%-20% and 18%-24% for years 1 and 2, respectively, and deaths were reduced by 60%-61% and 35%-39% for the same periods. These results show that all elderly persons should be immunized annually for influenza. The methods used in this study are an efficient cost-effective way to study vaccine impact and similar questions.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas Prepagos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Humanos , Gripe Humana/mortalidad , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Minnesota , New York , Oregon , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Phys Sportsmed ; 29(10): 33-48, 2001 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20086549

RESUMEN

Although childhood vaccination rates are at an all-time high, those for adolescents and adults are suboptimal. All adolescents and adults should be immunized against measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, tetanus, and diphtheria, and many should also receive hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines. In addition, active patients who engage in outdoor activities may benefit from vaccination against Lyme and meningococcal disease. Regular, strenuous exercise and foreign travel may increase the risk of some infectious diseases. Athletes often see a physician only for sports physical exams and injuries, so it is important for providers to take the opportunity to vaccinate patients during these visits.

4.
Am J Infect Control ; 28(5): 327-32, 2000 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11029130

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recommendations by most national advisory committees on immunization include evaluating all pregnant women for chronic hepatitis B virus infection and immunity to rubella. It is recommended that all pregnant women be screened for hepatitis B surface antigen during an early prenatal visit and that rubella vaccine be administered in the postpartum period to women not known to be immune. This study determined the extent to which hospitals with labor and delivery services adhere to these recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a mail survey of a stratified random sample of all US medical-surgical hospitals to (1) determine the proportion of hospitals with hepatitis B screening policies and rubella immunization programs and (2) identify significant factors associated with the presence of these policies and programs. Hospitals were stratified by number of beds (<100, 100-499, and > or =500) and affiliation with a medical school. RESULTS: Of 986 institutions surveyed, 858 (87%) responded. Of these, 635 (74%) were labor and delivery hospitals. Approximately half of these (51%) had hospital policies related to screening pregnant women for the hepatitis B surface antigen. Twenty-one percent had rubella immunization programs for postpartum women. Only 14% of labor and delivery hospitals were in full compliance with published recommendations for hepatitis B surface antigen screening and rubella postpartum vaccination. Hospitals were more likely to be compliant if they had more than 100 beds, were private rather than public institutions, were affiliated with a medical school, and were in states with laws regarding hepatitis B surface antigen screening of pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half, and more than three quarters, of hospitals were not in compliance with hepatitis B screening and rubella postpartum immunization recommendations, respectively. Hospitals should develop and implement policies for these preventive services.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis B/diagnóstico , Hospitales/normas , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/inmunología , Vacuna contra la Rubéola , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Femenino , Política de Salud , Hepatitis B/inmunología , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/inmunología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
5.
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ ; 49(9): 39-62, 2000 Sep 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11016877

RESUMEN

PROBLEM/CONDITION: An increasing proportion of adults have received recommended vaccinations against influenza, pneumococcal infection, and tetanus. However, in 1995, fewer than 60% of adults were vaccinated as recommended. REPORTING PERIOD COVERED: 1993-1997. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: Data were obtained from the state-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for 1993, 1995, and 1997 and from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for 1995 to describe national, regional, and state-specific patterns of use of influenza and pneumococcal vaccines and tetanus toxoid among noninstitutionalized adults aged > or = 18 years. RESULTS: Among adults aged > or = 65 years in 1995, 58% reported receiving an influenza vaccination during the previous 12 months, and 34% reported ever receiving a pneumococcal vaccination. In this age group, non-Hispanic whites were more likely to report receipt of influenza (61%) and pneumococcal vaccines (36%) than non-Hispanic blacks (40% and 22%, respectively) and Hispanics (50% and 23%, respectively). Among the 50 states and the District of Columbia, the median vaccination level among older adults (i.e., persons aged > or = 65 years) increased from 51% in 1993 to 66% in 1997 for influenza vaccine, and from 28% in 1993 to 46% in 1997 for pneumococcal vaccine. Adults with chronic medical conditions had low vaccination levels. Those aged 50-64 years were more likely than those aged 18-49 years to report influenza (38% versus 20%) and pneumococcal vaccination (20% versus 12%). In 1995, the proportion of adults who reported receiving a tetanus vaccination during the previous 10 years decreased with age, from 65% among those aged 18-49 years to 54% among those aged 50-64 years and to 40% among those aged > or = 65 years. In each age group, women were less likely than men to report receiving tetanus toxoid; and among adults aged > or = 65 years, Hispanics and Asians/Pacific Islanders were least likely among all racial/ethnic groups to report receiving tetanus toxoid. INTERPRETATION: By 1995, the Healthy People 2000 objective to increase to at least 60% the proportion of persons aged > or = 65 years who had received annual influenza vaccination had been achieved among non-Hispanic whites (objective 20.11). However, substantial improvement is needed among non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and adults aged < 65 years with high-risk medical conditions. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS: Continued surveillance of vaccine coverage among adults will direct attention to undervaccinated populations that may be disproportionately affected by vaccine-preventable diseases. Vaccination coverage data can be used to guide efforts to increase awareness among health-care providers and the public about the benefits of vaccination, establish systems to ensure that every contact with the health-care system is used to update vaccinations, and further support financial mechanisms to increase vaccine delivery.


Asunto(s)
Vigilancia de la Población , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Vacunas Bacterianas/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Toxoide Tetánico/administración & dosificación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
Semin Dial ; 13(2): 101-7, 2000.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10795113

RESUMEN

Pediatric patients on dialysis should receive all the vaccines currently recommended by the ACIP and the AAP for healthy children, except the oral polio vaccine (34, 35). Adult patients should receive the hepatitis B vaccine series, pneumococcal vaccine, yearly influenza vaccinations, tetanus-diphtheria toxoids, and varicella vaccine, if they are susceptible (33, 48, 69). Vaccines are well tolerated by these patients (33), but higher doses and/or additional boosters may be required periodically to adequately protect dialysis patients from vaccine-preventable diseases (33, 36, 37, 82, 83). Following vaccination, antibody concentrations for hepatitis B vaccine should be measured annually and booster doses administered when antibody concentrations fall below protective levels (33, 38). Although both children and adults on dialysis may show an impaired and/or delayed immunologic response to certain antigens, particularly hepatitis B virus and S. pneumoniae, appropriate immunizations can significantly reduce the risk of serious complications from vaccine-preventable diseases (11, 84). Because the protection these vaccines provide may be incomplete or transient, infection control strategies at hospitals and other health care facilities should be implemented simultaneously. Health care providers are encouraged to assess each patients need for vaccinations individually and formulate immunization strategies early in the course of progressive renal disease, ideally before the patient requires dialysis.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Bacterianas , Diálisis Renal , Vacunas Virales , Vacuna contra la Varicela , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Vacunas contra Hepatitis Viral
7.
Am J Prev Med ; 18(1 Suppl): 97-140, 2000 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10806982

RESUMEN

This paper presents the results of systematic reviews of the effectiveness, applicability, other effects, economic impact, and barriers to use of selected population-based interventions intended to improve vaccination coverage. The related systematic reviews are linked by a common conceptual approach. These reviews form the basis for recommendations by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (the Task Force) regarding the use of these selected interventions. The Task Force recommendations are presented on pp. 92-96 of this issue.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Objetivos Organizacionales , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos
8.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 49(RR-1): 15-6, 2000 Mar 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15580727

RESUMEN

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recognizes the need for evidence-based policy to improve the delivery and receipt of immunization services recommended for adults (i.e., persons aged > or = 18 years). Two recent, systematic reviews of the health services research literature recommended standing orders programs as an effective organizational intervention to improve vaccination coverage rates among adults. This report briefly reviews the evidence on the effectiveness of standing orders programs, describes standards for program implementation, and recommends initiating these programs to improve immunization coverage in several traditional and nontraditional settings.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Inmunización , Vacunación/normas , Adulto , Atención a la Salud/normas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
MMWR Recomm Rep ; 49(RR-3): 1-38; quiz CE1-7, 2000 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15580733

RESUMEN

This report updates 1999 recommendations by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on the use of influenza vaccine and antiviral agents (MMWR 1999;48[No. RR-4]: 1-29). These recommendations include five principal changes: a) the age for universal vaccination has been lowered to 50 years from 65 years; b) scheduling of large, organized vaccination campaigns after mid-October may be considered because the availability of vaccine in any location cannot be assured consistently in the early fall; c) 2000-2001 trivalent vaccine virus strains are A/Moscow/10/99 (H3N2)-like, A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1)-like, and B/Beijing/184/93-like strains; d) information on neuraminidase-inhibitor antiviral drugs has been added; and e) a list of other influenza-related infection control documents for special populations has been added. This report and other information on influenza can be accessed at the website for the Influenza Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC at .


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunación/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Virus de la Influenza A , Virus de la Influenza B , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Vacunación Masiva , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ ; 48(8): 51-88, 1999 Dec 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10634271

RESUMEN

PROBLEM/CONDITION: In 1995, a total of 55 million persons aged > or =55 years lived in the United States. The members of this large and growing segment of the population are major consumers of health care. Their access to medical and dental preventive services contributes to their likelihood of healthy later years and influences their long-term impact on the health-care delivery system. REPORTING PERIOD: 1995-1997. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS: This report summarizes data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), the state-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and the Medicare Current Beneficiary Study (MCBS) to describe national, regional, and state-specific patterns of access to and use of preventive services among persons aged > or =55 years. RESULTS: During 1995-1997, approximately 90% of persons aged > or =55 years living in the United States reported having a regular source of health-care services. However, only 75%-80% reported receiving a routine checkup during the preceding 2 years. The estimated percentage of persons who reported not being able to receive medical care because of cost was highest for those aged 55-64 years. Within this age group, the percentage was highest among Hispanics (4%) and persons without a high school diploma. Approximately 11% of Medicare beneficiaries reported delaying care be cause of cost or because they had no particular source of care. Percentage estimates varied according to age, race/ethnicity, and sociodemographic status. Approximately 95% of persons aged > or =55 years reported having their blood pressure checked during the preceding 2 years, but only 85%-88% had received a cholesterol evaluation during the preceding 5 years. The percentage of women receiving breast and cervical cancer screening decreased with increasing age, and the percentage of persons aged > or =55 years who had received some form of screening for colorectal cancer was low approximately 25% for fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and 45% for endoscopy. State-specific rates of compliance with vaccination recommendations among persons aged > or =65 years were higher for influenza vaccine (range: 54%-74%) than for pneumococcal vaccine (range: 32%-59%), and compliance increased with advancing age. State-specific estimates of the percentage of annual dental visits varied 40%-75%, and 41%-88% of persons aged > or =65 years reported not having dental insurance. INTERPRETATION: Access to medical services among adults living in the United States is greater for persons aged > or =65 years, compared with those aged <65 years, presumably because of Medicare coverage. In contrast, use of dental services decreased, despite increased need for preventive and restorative dental care. Although Medicare covers many medical services for older adults, financial, personal, and physical barriers to both medical and dental care create racial, regional, and sociodemographic disparities in health status and use of health services in the United States. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: Continued surveillance of access to and use of health services among older adults (i.e., persons aged > or =65 years), as well as among persons aged 55-64 years, will help health-care providers target underserved groups, make Medicare coverage decisions, and develop public health programs to ensure equitable access to services and improve the health of older adults.


Asunto(s)
Geriatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Vigilancia de la Población , Servicios Preventivos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Atención Odontológica , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación
14.
Vaccine ; 15(14): 1506-11, 1997 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9330460

RESUMEN

This study expands and updates through 1995 our earlier report on influenza vaccine use in 18 developed countries. Five of the six countries with high levels of vaccine use in 1992 (> or = 130 doses/1000 population) showed little change or slight declines over the subsequent 3 years. The exception was the United States, where a new federal program for vaccination reimbursement for the elderly helped to increase vaccine distribution from 144 to 239 doses/1000 population. The six countries with medium levels of vaccine use in 1992 (76-96 doses/1000 population) increased to > or = 100 doses/1000 population by 1995. Among the six low-use countries in 1992 (< or = 65 doses/1000 population), only Finland showed substantial improvement (96 doses/1000 population) in 1995. Four new countries were added to the study. In Germany, vaccine use increased to 80 doses/1000 population in 1995, but in Ireland it remained at a low level (48 doses/1000 population). In Korea, vaccine use increased from 17 to 95 doses/ 1000 population during the period 1987-1995. In Japan, very high levels of vaccine use (approximately 280 doses/1000 population) in the early 1980s were associated with vaccination programs for school children. However, vaccine use fell precipitously when these programs were discontinued, and only 2 and 8 doses/1000 population were used in 1994 and 1995, respectively. In all 22 countries, higher levels of vaccine use were associated with vaccination reimbursement programs under national or social health insurance and were not correlated with different levels of economic development. Excluding Japan, in 1995 there was still a greater than fourfold difference between the highest and lowest levels of vaccine use among the other 21 countries in the study. Given its well established clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, none of these countries has yet achieved the full benefits of its programs for influenza vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunación , Países Desarrollados , Humanos
15.
JAMA ; 278(9): 705-11, 1997 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9286828

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Vaccines are underused in the United States, resulting in needless morbidity. Many experts have concluded that clinician education is critical to increasing the nation's vaccination rates. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate case-based curricular materials on immunizations that promote preventive medicine skills. DESIGN: Before-and-after trial of an educational intervention. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Medical schools and primary care residency programs from 20 institutions across the United States participated in the Teaching Immunization for Medical Education (TIME) project. INTERVENTION: A multidisciplinary team developed learning objectives, abstracted clinical cases, and created case-based modules that use contextual learning and small-group interaction to solve clinical and public health problems. The case-based methods are multistation clinical teaching scenarios (MCTS) and problem-based learning (PBL). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge gained by learners from pretest to posttest and the overall ratings of the sessions by learners and facilitators based on evaluation questionnaires. RESULTS: Pretest and posttest results were obtained on a total of 1122 learners for all modules combined. For the MCTS method, mean scores increased from the 10-item pretest to the posttest by 3.1 items for measles, 3.8 for influenza, 1.8 for hepatitis B, 3.9 for pertussis, 1.9 for adult vaccination, 1.9 for childhood vaccination, and 2.6 for Haemophilus influenzae type b (P<.01 for each). For the PBL method, mean scores increased by 3.4 items for measles, 3.3 for influenza, 2.6 for hepatitis B, and 2.5 for pertussis (P<.01 for each). Most learners (MCTS, 98%; PBL, 89%) and most facilitators (MCTS, 97%; PBL, 100%) rated the sessions overall as very good or good. CONCLUSIONS: Use of TIME modules increases knowledge about immunizations, an essential step to improving vaccination practices of future clinicians. Given the realities of decreased faculty time and budgets, educators face major challenges in developing case-based curricula that prepare learners for the 21st century. Nationally tested libraries of cases such as the TIME modules address this dilemma.


Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/educación , Inmunización , Salud Pública/educación , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia , Estudiantes de Medicina , Estados Unidos
16.
Ann Intern Med ; 124(1 Pt 1): 35-40, 1996 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7503476

RESUMEN

New vaccines have been licensed for hepatitis A, varicella, and typhoid. This paper reviews these vaccines and their recommended uses in adults. Special attention is given to a new national policy establishing age 50 years as a time for review of preventive health measures with emphasis on evaluating risk factors that indicate a need for pneumococcal vaccine and the initiation of annual influenza immunization.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Bacterianas , Varicela/prevención & control , Hepatitis A/prevención & control , Fiebre Tifoidea/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Hepatitis Viral , Vacunas Virales , Adulto , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Seguridad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Vacunas Virales/efectos adversos
18.
Am Fam Physician ; 51(5): 1050, 1052, 1995 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7709880
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA