A Retrospective Quality Improvement Study to Describe Operational Management Strategies in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The delivery of care in the inpatient rehabilitation setting was disrupted during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. As a 150-bed freestanding inpatient rehabilitation facility in the epicenter of the pandemic, Burke Rehabilitation Hospital was required to increase overall bed capacity for regional overflow needs and still maintain our mission to provide inpatient rehabilitation for patients with and without COVID-19. During the period between March and September 2020, Burke Rehabilitation Hospital treated over 300 rehabilitation patients who were COVID-19 positive and at one point had a census that was >50% COVID-19 positive. A model grounded in 5 priorities-communication, personal protective equipment, clinical service delivery, discharge planning, and patient/staff support-was implemented to reprioritize daily operations and ensure patient and staff safety while providing valuable rehabilitation services. The delivery of physical, occupational, speech, and recreational therapy services transformed, and a number of innovative clinical practices were developed. During the study period, 100% of our patients continued to be scheduled to receive therapy services. Patient length of stay values did increase during the pandemic (from 16.38d to 19.93d), and slightly more patients were discharged to home (68.7% compared with 68.3%). Despite modifications to rehabilitation care delivery, patients continued to make functional gains in the areas of self-care, mobility, and walking. Flexible leadership was pivotal in the development and implementation of new processes and procedures to meet the evolving needs of patients, staff, and the organization as a whole.

Exploring the Relationship Between Timed Up and Go Test Times and Fall History in an Inpatient Geriatric Psychiatry Unit: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inpatient geriatric psychiatry units have the highest fall rates in the acute care setting and most falls in this population occur during the mobility tasks of transfers and ambulation. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test includes these 2 specific functional tasks and has been used to predict falls in other geriatric populations but has never been tested in an inpatient geriatric psychiatry unit. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the TUG time measurements of inpatient geriatric psychiatry patients were associated with falling. METHODS: The study was a retrospective chart review using a case-control design. The sample was obtained from patients admitted to 1 inpatient geriatric psychiatry unit during the 4-month study period. RESULTS: The total sample size was N = 62 and included older adults with (N = 29; "fallers") and without (N = 33; "nonfallers") a history of falls in the 6 months prior to admission. The mean age of fallers (M = 75.8, SD = 9.6) was not significantly different from the age of nonfallers (M = 74.0, SD = 7.6), P = .424. Both groups had higher proportions of female subjects; nonfallers were 75.8% (n = 25) female and fallers were 69.0% (n = 20) female. Most nonfallers (84.8%) completed the TUG testing without an assistive device, while most fallers (48.3%) used a walker. A significant difference was found between the TUG times of nonfallers and fallers, U = 737.00, z = 3.65, P < .001, r = 0.46. Fallers took longer to complete the TUG test (median = 26.5) than nonfallers (median = 13.6). The TUG time explanatory variable was statistically significant, P = .002. Increasing TUG times were associated with an increased likelihood of patient falls (odds ratio = 1.10). The optimal TUG cutoff score was 16.5 seconds, with 79.3% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The TUG time measurement was found to be associated with falling. A cutoff time of 16.5 seconds is recommended to identify nonfallers from fallers in the inpatient geriatric psychiatry setting.