[Secondary fracture prevention/Update osteoporosis guidelines 2023 of the Umbrella Organization Osteology]. / Sekundäre Frakturprävention/Update Leitlinie Osteoporose 2023 des Dachverbandes Osteologie.

The S3 guidelines on the prophylaxis, diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis 2023 were completely revised and updated between 2021 and 2023 in accordance with the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies of Germany (AWMF) regulations. The guideline committee consisted of delegates from the 20 specialist societies of the Umbrella Organization Osteology (Dachverband Osteologie, DVO) as well as delegates from the German Society of General Medicine and Family Medicine (DEGAM), the German Society for Nephrology (DGfN) and the Federal Self-help Association for Osteoporosis (BfO).The guidelines focus on preventive measures, diagnostic procedures and treatment approaches for osteoporosis in men aged 50 years and over and postmenopausal women. The main aim is the optimization of care processes, reduction of fracture incidences and maintenance or improvement of the quality of life and functional capacity of patients affected by fractures. A major update to the guidelines includes the introduction of a new risk calculator that can take more risk factors (n = 33) into account and that can estimate the risk of vertebral body and proximal femoral fractures for a 3-year period (previously 10 years). This results in new thresholds for diagnostics and treatment. The programmed app is currently not yet certified as a medical product and a paper version is therefore currently available for patient care with the planned integration of a web-based version of the risk calculator. From the perspective of trauma surgery, the recommendations and innovations for manifest osteoporosis are of particular clinical importance. The focus of the DVO guidelines update is therefore on the implementation of secondary fracture prevention in trauma surgery, orthopedic and geriatric traumatology in the clinical and practical daily routine.

Development of a Machine Learning-Based Model to Predict Timed-Up-and-Go Test in Older Adults.

INTRODUCTION: The measurement of physical frailty in elderly patients with orthopedic impairments remains a challenge due to its subjectivity, unreliability, time-consuming nature, and limited applicability to uninjured individuals. Our study aims to address this gap by developing objective, multifactorial machine models that do not rely on mobility data and subsequently validating their predictive capacity concerning the Timed-up-and-Go test (TUG test) in orthogeriatric patients. METHODS: We utilized 67 multifactorial non-mobility parameters in a pre-processing phase, employing six feature selection algorithms. Subsequently, these parameters were used to train four distinct machine learning algorithms, including a generalized linear model, a support vector machine, a random forest algorithm, and an extreme gradient boost algorithm. The primary goal was to predict the time required for the TUG test without relying on mobility data. RESULTS: The random forest algorithm yielded the most accurate estimations of the TUG test time. The best-performing algorithm demonstrated a mean absolute error of 2.7 s, while the worst-performing algorithm exhibited an error of 7.8 s. The methodology used for variable selection appeared to exert minimal influence on the overall performance. It is essential to highlight that all the employed algorithms tended to overestimate the time for quick patients and underestimate it for slower patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of predicting the TUG test time using a machine learning model that does not depend on mobility data. This establishes a basis for identifying patients at risk automatically and objectively assessing the physical capacity of currently immobilized patients. Such advancements could significantly contribute to enhancing patient care and treatment planning in orthogeriatric settings.

[Osteoporosis: diagnostics and treatment]. / Osteoporose: Diagnostik und Behandlung.

Osteoporosis is the most common systemic skeletal disease worldwide. Its consequences have a substantial impact on the quality of life of patients and increases the overall morbidity and mortality. Standardized diagnostic procedures and treatment recommendations have been available for years as German and international (S3) guidelines. Nevertheless, there is a considerable gap in the diagnosis and adequate treatment of osteoporosis, especially in Germany. The aim is to detect the disease at an early stage and to establish a specific and consistent treatment of osteoporosis. In this way the quality of life and independence of those affected can be maintained over a long period. In the acute and permanent treatment of manifest osteoporosis, surgeons, orthopedic and trauma surgeons play a key role.

Reduced Awareness for Osteoporosis in Hip Fracture Patients Compared to Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Hip Replacement.

Background: Osteoporotic fractures are associated with a loss of quality of life, but only few patients receive an appropriate therapy. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the awareness of musculoskeletal patients to participate in osteoporosis assessment and to evaluate whether there are significant differences between acute care patients treated for major fractures of the hip compared to elective patients treated for hip joint replacement.; Methods: From May 2015 to December 2016 patients who were undergoing surgical treatment for proximal femur fracture or total hip replacement due to osteoarthritis and were at risk for an underlying osteoporosis (female > 60 and male > 70 years) were included in the study and asked to complete a questionnaire assessing the awareness for an underlying osteoporosis. ASA Score, FRAX Score, and demographic information have also been examined. Results: In total 268 patients (female = 194 (72.0%)/male = 74 (28%)), mean age 77.7 years (±7.7) undergoing hip surgery were included. Of these, 118 were treated for fracture-related etiology and 150 underwent total hip arthroplasty in an elective care setting. Patients were interviewed about their need for osteoporosis examination during hospitalization. Overall, 76 of 150 patients receiving elective care (50.7%) considered that an examination was necessary, whereas in proximal femur fracture patients the awareness was lower, and the disease osteoporosis was assessed as threatening by significantly fewer newly fractured patients. By comparison, patients undergoing trauma surgery had a considerably greater risk of developing another osteoporotic fracture than patients undergoing elective surgery determined by the FRAX® Score (p ≤ 0.001).; Conclusions: The patients' motivation to endure additional osteoporosis diagnostic testing is notoriously low and needs to be increased. Patients who underwent acute care surgery for a fragility proximal femur fracture, although acutely affected by the potential consequences of underlying osteoporosis, showed lower awareness than the elective comparison population that was also on average 6.1 years younger. Although elective patients were younger and at a lower risk, they seemed to be much more willing to undergo further osteoporosis assessment. In order to better identify and care for patients at risk, interventions such as effective screening, early initiation of osteoporosis therapy in the inpatient setting and a fracture liaison service are important measures.

[Osteoporosis: diagnostics and treatment]. / Osteoporose: Diagnostik und Behandlung.

Osteoporosis is the most common systemic skeletal disease worldwide. Its consequences have a substantial impact on the quality of life of patients and increases the overall morbidity and mortality. Standardized diagnostic procedures and treatment recommendations have been available for years as German and international (S3) guidelines. Nevertheless, there is a considerable gap in the diagnosis and adequate treatment of osteoporosis, especially in Germany. The aim is to detect the disease at an early stage and to establish a specific and consistent treatment of osteoporosis. In this way the quality of life and independence of those affected can be maintained over a long period. In the acute and permanent treatment of manifest osteoporosis, surgeons, orthopedic and trauma surgeons play a key role.

[Osteoporosis: diagnostics and treatment]. / Osteoporose: Diagnostik und Behandlung.

Osteoporosis is the most common systemic skeletal disease worldwide. Its consequences have a substantial impact on the quality of life of patients and increases the overall morbidity and mortality. Standardized diagnostic procedures and treatment recommendations have been available for years as German and international (S3) guidelines. Nevertheless, there is a considerable gap in the diagnosis and adequate treatment of osteoporosis, especially in Germany. The aim is to detect the disease at an early stage and to establish a specific and consistent treatment of osteoporosis. In this way the quality of life and independence of those affected can be maintained over a long period. In the acute and permanent treatment of manifest osteoporosis, surgeons, orthopedic and trauma surgeons play a key role.

Prediction of Physical Frailty in Orthogeriatric Patients Using Sensor Insole-Based Gait Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms: Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the physical frailty of older patients is of great importance in many medical disciplines to be able to implement individualized therapies. For physical tests, time is usually used as the only objective measure. To record other objective factors, modern wearables offer great potential for generating valid data and integrating the data into medical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of insole data, which were collected during the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test, to the benchmark standard questionnaire for sarcopenia (SARC-F: strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls) and physical assessment (TUG test) for evaluating physical frailty, defined by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), using machine learning algorithms. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients aged >60 years with independent ambulation and no mental or neurological impairment. A comprehensive set of parameters associated with physical frailty were assessed, including body composition, questionnaires (European Quality of Life 5-dimension [EQ 5D 5L], SARC-F), and physical performance tests (SPPB, TUG), along with digital sensor insole gait parameters collected during the TUG test. Physical frailty was defined as an SPPB score≤8. Advanced statistics, including random forest (RF) feature selection and machine learning algorithms (K-nearest neighbor [KNN] and RF) were used to compare the diagnostic value of these parameters to identify patients with physical frailty. RESULTS: Classified by the SPPB, 23 of the 57 eligible patients were defined as having physical frailty. Several gait parameters were significantly different between the two groups (with and without physical frailty). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the TUG test was superior to that of the SARC-F (0.862 vs 0.639). The recursive feature elimination algorithm identified 9 parameters, 8 of which were digital insole gait parameters. Both the KNN and RF algorithms trained with these parameters resulted in excellent results (AUROC of 0.801 and 0.919, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A gait analysis based on machine learning algorithms using sensor soles is superior to the SARC-F and the TUG test to identify physical frailty in orthogeriatric patients.

[Teamwork and stress in routine interventions: an observational study of multiprofessional OR teams]. / Teamarbeit und Stress bei Routineeingriffen: eine Beobachtungsstudie multiprofessioneller OP-Teams.

BACKGROUND: Effective interprofessional teamwork and stress are important factors for quality of care and patient safety in the operating room (OR); however, there are just a few systematic investigations into the relationship of OR teamwork and occupational stress. OBJECTIVE: Determination of the relationship between interdisciplinary OR teamwork and stress in routine procedures, for the whole OR team as well as individual professions. METHODS: Multimethod study with expert observations using a standardized observation tool (OTAS-D) and systematic self-reports of the entire OR team. A total of 64 elective interventions across different surgical departments were observed. Relationships were calculated using mixed-effects regression models with control of procedural and provider characteristics. RESULTS: The quality of the intraoperative teamwork was at a medium level. Reported stress during interventions was at comparatively low levels, with significant differences between the professions of surgery, nursing and anesthesiology. Members of the surgical team reported the highest stress levels. An association between teamwork and perceived stress could not be determined for the entire OR team; however, within the surgical sub-team there were significant positive correlations for the quality of teamwork and stress (as well as for the teamwork dimensions of collaboration and leadership). For the nursing sub-team, we observed significant negative correlations with overall teamwork as well as with the dimension team monitoring. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a profession-specific relationship between OR teamwork and occupational stress. Further research is necessary to investigate to what extent successful OR teamwork during routine procedures contributes to intraoperative stress.

Reduced Awareness for Osteoporosis in Distal Radius Fracture Patients Compared to Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures.

PURPOSE: The present study is aiming to evaluate patients' awareness to participate in further diagnostics for osteoporosis and to find out if there are significant differences with regards to fracture site. METHODS: Patients at risk for underlying osteoporosis (female >60 and male >70 years) undergoing surgical treatment for a distal radius fracture (DRF) or a proximal femur fracture (PFF) were asked to complete a questionnaire assessing the awareness for underlying osteoporosis. Furthermore, dual-X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 150 patients (w = 122/m = 28, mean age 79.9 years (±8.6)) were included, of these, 36 patients suffered a DRF and 114 patients a PFF. Of these, 68 out of the 150 patients (45.3%) considered that an examination was necessary, whereas in PFF patients the awareness was higher than in the DRF Group (41% vs. 32%). CONCLUSIONS: The patients' willingness to undergo further diagnostics for osteoporosis was generally poor. DRFs are frequently accompanied by a lower limitation of quality of life compared to PFF, which might be causative for even poorer awareness in these patients. Especially younger patients (age 60-70 years) with a distal radius fracture seemed to underestimate osteoporosis.

Screw-Tip Augmented Locked Plating Versus Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 39 Months.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of screw-tip augmented locking plate osteosynthesis (STA) vs primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in elderly patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: 60 patients (age >65 years) with a displaced proximal humeral fracture underwent open reduction and internal fixation with locking plate and fluoroscopy controlled screw-tip augmentation. Sixty matched individuals (age, gender, fracture pattern, and mean follow-up) treated by RSA for fractures were identified from the institutional database and outcomes as well as occurring complications and need for revision surgery were compared. RESULTS: At 39 months' follow-up, 25 patients in the STA group (mean age 74.5 ± 12 years, 76.7% woman) showed a mean Constant Score (CS) of 68 ± 18.8 points. Mean %CS compared to the contralateral side was 81.6 ± 19.8%. Of 60 matched individuals in the RSA group, 22 patients (mean age 78.9 ± 8.2 years, 76.7% woman) showed a mean CS of 60.6 ± 21.2 points (P = .33), and the mean %CS compared to the contralateral side was 81.6 (74.7 ± 18.6)% (P = .14). The overall complication rate in STA group was 32% (secondary varus or valgus displacement >10°, n = 4, avascular necrosis, n = 4). In RSA group, the overall complication rate was 4.5% (P = <.05). We observed one early onset infection. Revision surgery with removal of the prosthesis and PMMA spacer implantation for two-stage revision was necessary. The follow-up rate was 41.7 vs 36.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Screw-tip augmented locked plating and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty result in comparable satisfying functional outcome 3 years following a displaced proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients. However, we noted a higher complication and revision rate in the STA group. In contrast, primary reversed shoulder arthroplasty resulted in a lower rate of complications and revisions, which may be beneficial in elderly patients.

Influence of chemotherapy and endocrine treatment on fractures in postmenopausal women with breast cancer - a retrospective cohort study.

Due to a significant increase in the overall survival of women with breast cancer (BC), preventing the long-term consequences of BC treatments is of the utmost importance. Treatments such as aromatase inhibitors (AI), chemotherapy (CHT), and tamoxifen (TAM) may lead to accelerated bone loss and increased fracture risk. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the treatment-induced fracture risk in a large cohort of postmenopausal women with or without BC. It included 4,115 women with BC and 4,115 healthy women from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA). Women with breast cancer were matched 1:1 to women without BC with regard to age, index year, and physician. Within 5 years of the index date, 25.3% of women with BC and 14.6% of healthy women sustained fractures. In this study, aromatase inhibitor therapy was significantly associated with a higher incidence of fractures compared to healthy women who had not undergone such therapy (HR: 3.36, p<0.001). In conclusion, postmenopausal women with BC who receive AI treatment exhibited an increased incidence of fractures when compared to the healthy cohort, while treatment with TAM or CHT showed no such association.

How We Manage Bone Marrow Edema-An Interdisciplinary Approach.

Bone marrow edema (BME) is a descriptive term for a common finding in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although pain is the major symptom, BME differs in terms of its causal mechanisms, underlying disease, as well as treatment and prognosis. This complexity together with the lack of evidence-based guidelines, frequently makes the identification of underlying conditions and its management a major challenge. Unnecessary multiple consultations and delays in diagnosis as well as therapy indicate a need for interdisciplinary clinical recommendations. Therefore, an interdisciplinary task force was set up within our large osteology center consisting of specialists from internal medicine, endocrinology/diabetology, hematology/oncology, orthopedics, pediatrics, physical medicine, radiology, rheumatology, and trauma surgery to develop a consenus paper. After review of literature, review of practical experiences (expert opinion), and determination of consensus findings, an overview and an algorithm were developed with concise summaries of relevant aspects of the respective underlying disease including diagnostic measures, clinical features, differential diagnosis and treatment of BME. Together, our single-center consensus review on the management of BME may help improve the quality of care for these patients.

What is a reasonable rate for specific osteoporosis drug therapy in older fragility fracture patients?

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is the most common condition contributing to 95% of fractures in older patients hospitalized for fracture treatment. Despite the significant impact of fragility fractures on patient morbidity and mortality, efforts in optimizing osteoporotic treatment and prevention remain inadequate. In contrast, in patients with limited life expectancy, withholding specific osteoporosis drug treatment appears reasonable. The threshold between under- and overtreatment is still unclear. METHODS: In 2016, we implemented a fracture liaison service (FLS) for 18 months to improve the quality of osteoporosis care. We collected prospectively the patient's history, current treatment for osteoporosis, and risk factors for fragility fractures using a standardized protocol. Recommendations for drug therapy are discussed during the interdisciplinary ward round. The primary outcome parameter was a recommendation for specific osteoporosis drug treatment. We included 681 patients (mean age 82.5 years, 502 (73.7%) females). The inclusion criteria were the following: age of 70 years or older, admission to geriatric fracture center between April 2016 and December 2018. RESULTS: Based on our data, specific osteoporosis drug therapy was recommended in 467 (68.6%) patients. Six hundred fifty-one (95.6%) patients received vitamin D3, and 546 (80.2%) calcium. After adjustment, only age (every 5 years, OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.45-0.72; p < 0.0001), cognitive impairment (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23-0.74; p = 0.003), pre-fracture mobility (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.34-1.75; p < 0.0001), and living in a nursing home (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.27-0.99; p = 0.049) remained as independent predictors for an indication of specific osteoporosis drug therapy. CONCLUSION: We found a higher rate of recommendations for specific osteoporosis drug therapy compared with usual treatment rates in literature. Though in some cases withholding of specific osteoporosis drug therapy seems reasonable, the main proportion of fragility fracture patients is undertreated. Our results could be a benchmark for the quality of osteoporosis care in older fragility fracture patients treated in a geriatric fracture center.

Incidence of fractures in young women with breast cancer - a retrospective cohort study.

In recent years, cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and increased risk of fracture has become an emerging problem as breast cancer (BC) survival has increased due to early diagnosis and improved treatments. In premenopausal women with BC, chemotherapy and tamoxifen are the treatments of choice in hormone receptor-negative and hormone receptor-positive BC respectively. Their effect on fracture risk has only been investigated in a few small-scale studies. Therefore, we investigated the fracture risk in a cohort study based on data from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA) and included 1761 individuals with BC and 1761 healthy women for comparison. After applying similar inclusion criteria, patients with BC were matched 1:1 to those without BC with regard to age, index year, and physician. Within 10 years of the index date, 6.4% of healthy women and 14.2% with BC sustained a fracture (log-rank p-value < 0.001), showing a positive association between breast cancer and fractures (adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=2.39, p < 0.001). When analyzing women with BC with and without tamoxifen treatment, 14.7% with and 12.9% without tamoxifen sustained a fracture. However, after adjustment, the HR was 2.58 (p < 0.001) for women on tamoxifen versus healthy women and 1.63 (p = 0.181) for women with BC without tamoxifen treatment versus healthy women. In conclusion, premenopausal women with BC with or without tamoxifen treatment had an increased incidence of fractures compared to healthy women, but this difference was only significant when comparing tamoxifen users versus healthy women. More studies are needed to identify the specific risk factors of women at high risk.

[Establishment of fracture liaison services in Germany]. / Etablierung von Frakturnetzwerken in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis results in fragility fractures that are associated with a high morbidity and mortality as well as an increased risk for subsequent fragility fractures. Thus, the first fragility fracture should be the last. To achieve this goal patients need treatment of osteoporosis according to the prevailing clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVE: This article presents the current clinical care situation of patients with a manifest osteoporosis in Germany and the accompanying risks. As a possible solution the concept of a fracture liaison service (FLS) as a new intersectoral care concept is presented and options for the establishment of FLS in Germany are provided. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search (PubMed) was conducted using key terms. The practical experiences of the authors in the context of establishing an FLS were also considered. RESULTS: Compared to other countries, in Germany only a minority of patients receive treatment for osteoporosis after fragility fractures. To improve the care situation an intersectoral FLS provides a coordinated referral of patients with fragility fractures from inpatient care in hospitals to specialists in private practice. This enables the strict identification and treatment of high-risk patients according to the prevailing clinical guidelines. In Germany, different options exist to structure an FLS under consideration of the local circumstances. CONCLUSION: In Germany, FLS should be established nationwide and according to uniform standards. This would significantly improve the quality of clinical care of patients with manifest osteoporosis.

[Influence of specific osteoporosis drugs on fracture healing]. / Einfluss spezifischer Osteoporosemedikamente auf die Frakturheilung.

BACKGROUND: For the treatment of disturbed fracture healing, drugs could be given in addition to surgical procedures. Specific osteoporosis drugs affect the bone metabolism and are used to treat osteoporosis, particularly after a fragility fracture has occurred. Therefore, their use would be conceivable to improve a disturbed fracture healing. OBJECTIVE: This article presents the available and upcoming specific osteoporosis drugs and investigates whether these substances affect fracture healing in the context of osteoporosis. Furthermore, it is discussed whether disturbed fracture healing can be improved by the use of these substances. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search (PubMed) was conducted using key terms. Preclinical studies, clinical studies, reviews and meta-analyses were considered in order to present the current knowledge in a clinically relevant context. RESULTS: Preclinical and clinical studies show that specific osteoporosis drugs have no relevant negative impact on the healing of fragility fractures. A tendency to improve a disturbed fracture healing was attributed to bone anabolic substances; however, studies are inconsistent and there is no approval for this application. CONCLUSION: Following a fragility fracture, osteoporosis should be diagnosed according to the guidelines and, if necessary, treated with specific osteoporosis drugs, since in principle they do not impair fracture healing but significantly reduce the risk of subsequent fractures. Approval to improve fracture healing requires further investigations.

Say, What Is on Your Mind? Surgeons' Evaluations of Realism and Usability of a Virtual Reality Vertebroplasty Simulator.

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR)-based simulations offer rich opportunities for surgical skill training and assessment of surgical novices and experts. A structured evaluation and validation process of such training and assessment tools is necessary for effective surgical learning environments. OBJECTIVE: To develop and apply a classification system of surgeon-reported experience during operation of a VR vertebroplasty simulator. METHODS: A group of orthopedic, trauma surgeons and neurosurgeons (n = 13) with various levels of expertise performed on a VR vertebroplasty simulator. We established a mixed-methods design using think-aloud protocols, senior surgical expert evaluations, performance metrics, and a post-simulation questionnaire. Verbal content was systematically analyzed using structured qualitative content analysis. We established a category system for classification of surgeons' verbal evaluations during the simulation. Furthermore, we evaluated intraoperative performance metrics and explored potential associations with surgeons' characteristics and simulator evaluation. RESULTS: Overall, 244 comments on realism and usability of the vertebroplasty simulator were collected. This included positive and negative remarks, questions, and specific suggestions for improvement. Further findings included surgeons' approval of the realism and usability of the simulator and the observation that the haptic feedback of the VR patient's anatomy requires further improvement. Surgeon-reported evaluations were not associated with performance decrements. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to apply think-aloud protocols for evaluation of a surgical VR-based simulator. A novel classification approach is introduced that can be used to classify surgeons' verbalized experiences during simulator use. Our lessons learned may be valuable for future research with similar methodological approach.

Investigation and management of osteoporosis in aged trauma patients: a treatment algorithm adapted to the German guidelines for osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis-associated fractures are of increasing importance in trauma surgery. Systematic diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis during a hospital stay, however, remain inadequate. Therefore, a specific algorithm for diagnosing and treating osteoporosis in trauma surgery patients was developed based on the DVO (German Osteology Society) guideline for osteoporosis from 2014. METHODS: In a first step, the individuals' age and risk profile for osteoporosis is identified considering specific fractures indicating osteoporosis and risk factors assessed by a specific questionnaire. In addition, physical activity, risk of falls, dietary habits and the individuals' medication are considered. Basic osteoporosis laboratory tests, a bone densitometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and, if needed, X-rays of the spine are carried out to identify prevalent vertebral body fractures. RESULTS: Based on the treatment algorithm adapted to the new guidelines for osteoporosis in the majority of proximal femoral fractures, treatment of osteoporosis could already be indicated without prior DXA. In case of preexisting glucocorticoid therapy, a history of previous fractures or other risk factors according to the risk questionnaire, the threshold of treatment has to be adjusted given the table of T-scores. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment algorithm for diagnosing and treating osteoporosis in in-patient trauma surgery patients can help identify high-risk patients systematically and efficiently. As a result, osteoporosis-associated fractures or failure of osteosynthesis could be reduced, yet a prospective validation of the algorithm has to be completed.