Racial disparities in survival of early onset colon cancer (Age<50): A matched NCDB analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early-onset colon cancer (EOCC) has increasing incidence and disproportionately affects African-Americans. This analysis aims to compare EOCC survival among Black and White patients after matching relevant socio-demographic factors and stage. METHODS: The 2004-2017 NCDB database was queried for Black and White patients, age<50, who underwent colectomy for adenocarcinoma. A one-to-one match on race was performed based on sociodemographic factors and disease stage (I-IV). Five-year survival differences were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: 5322 Black-White matched pairs were analyzed. Compared to White patients, Black patients averaged more days to surgery (19 â€‹± â€‹68 vs 16 days â€‹± â€‹32, p â€‹< â€‹0.001) and to chemotherapy (63 â€‹± â€‹8 vs. 57 â€‹± â€‹39, p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Black stage III patients were 20% less likely to receive chemotherapy (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p â€‹= â€‹0.0006), and had a 17% increased rate of death (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.0-1.3, p â€‹= â€‹0.01) after adjusting for sex, comorbidity score, tumor location and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with stage 3 EOCC are less likely to receive chemotherapy and have worse survival. Further evaluation is warranted to identify potential factors driving these observed.

Assessing the Quality of Online Health Information and Trend Data for Colorectal Malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: Patients often refer to the internet to learn about different health conditions. This study aims to assess the landscape of online health information on malignant colorectal conditions, focusing on the popularity, quantity, and quality of internet resources pertaining to these conditions. This information can be used as a guide for surgeons to supplement patient information at the time of surgical evaluation and to help design optimal online health information. METHODS: The terms "colon cancer," "rectal cancer," "anal cancer," and "colorectal cancer" were searched using the Google search engine. The number of search results or "hits" obtained per search term was recorded and the first 50 websites for each search term were reviewed. Included websites did not have a password requirement, were in English, and were free. Quality assessments were performed using the DISCERN instrument, and mean DISCERN scores were compared using analysis of variance. The popularity of each search term was determined using Google Trends, which generates a relative search volume score. RESULTS: A total of 431 million hits were obtained for the term "colon cancer," 72.5 million for "rectal cancer," 244 million for "anal cancer," and 194 million for "colorectal cancer." Mean DISCERN scores for reviewed websites ranged between 39.7 and 40.6, and were thus within the "fair" category. There were no significant differences in mean DISCERN scores across search terms (P = 0.5). Colon cancer had the highest relative search volume score (61.8), followed by colorectal cancer (43.4/100), rectal cancer (42.5/100), and anal cancer (41.7/100). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a large amount of online information on malignant colorectal conditions, the quality of the available information is inadequate. Clinician guidance to resources aimed at higher quality from guidance of the DISCERN tool may be of value for patient education.

Prospective Evaluation of a Tiered Opioid Prescribing Guideline for Inpatient Colorectal Operations.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to prospectively validate an institutional prescribing guideline based on previously defined opioid consumption patterns following inpatient colorectal operations. BACKGROUND: In light of the opioid epidemic, reducing excess prescription quantities is key while still tailoring to patient needs. METHODS: This is a cohort study of elective colorectal operations (colectomies, proctectomies, and ostomy reversals) at a single tertiary care medical center. Opioid prescribing and consumption patterns [quantified as Equianalgesic 5 mg Oxycodone Pills (EOP)] were compared before and after adoption of a tiered opioid prescribing guideline. Tiers were divided based on opioid consumption in the 24 hours before discharge: Tier 1 (0 EOP), Tier 2 (0.1-3 EOP), and Tier 3 (>3 EOP). Our guideline recommended maximum prescriptions of 0 EOP for Tier 1, 12 EOP for Tier 2, and 30 EOP for Tier 3. Results: The study included 100 patients before and 101 after guideline adoption. Demographic and operative characteristics were similar between cohorts. Guideline adherence was 85%. Overall, there was a 41%reduction in mean prescription quantity and 53% reduction in excess pills per prescription. No change in opioid consumption or refill rates was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of a tiered opioid prescribing guideline significantly reduced opioid prescription quantity with no change in consumption or refill rates. Standardization of discharge prescriptions based on patient consumption in the 24 hours before discharge may be an important step toward minimizing excess prescribing.

Efficacy and satisfaction of asynchronous TeleHealth care compared to in-person visits following colorectal surgical resection.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of remote visits following abdominal colorectal surgery has not been studied in relation to efficacy, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction. This study aims to assess reliability and satisfaction with a web-based questionnaire for post-operative visits following abdominal colorectal surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective single-arm cohort study at single-tertiary care center during admission for abdominal colorectal surgery. Using a web-based patient portal, patients completed a questionnaire 48 h prior to their scheduled in-person follow-up visits and submitted photographs of their incisions. Surgeons reviewed patient-entered data and responded within 24 h. Following the subsequent in-person visit, surgeons completed questionnaires to compare the accuracy of the web-based vs. in-person evaluations. Lastly, patients and surgeons completed separate satisfaction surveys after the in-person visits. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were enrolled, of which 30 (90.9%) successfully completed the web questionnaire. Providers reported the online questionnaire to be concordant with the in-person visit in 90% of cases. Of the patients who completed the study, only half found the survey alone to be acceptable for follow-up. Patients spent significantly less time completing the online questionnaire (≤ 10 min) than in-person visits, including travel time (75 min, IQR 50-100). Only 12 patients (40%) uploaded photographs of their incisions. During in-person visits, management changes were employed in four patients (13.3%), of which 3 required treatment of superficial surgical site infections (10%). CONCLUSION: This asynchronous web-based visit format was acceptable to colorectal surgeons but was only embraced by half of patients, despite considerable time savings. While patients preferred in-person visits, there may be opportunities to expand TeleHealth acceptance that focus on patient selection and education. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT05084131.

S184: preoperative sarcopenia is associated with worse short-term outcomes following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition and deconditioning impact postoperative morbidity and mortality. Computed tomography (CT) body composition variables are used as markers of nutritional status and sarcopenia. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of sarcopenia, using CT variables, on postoperative outcomes following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer. METHODS: This was an institutional retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive rectal cancer patients who underwent TaTME between April 2014 and May 2020. Psoas muscle index (PMI) was calculated from diagnostic CT scans. Based on previous studies, patients in the lowest PMI tertile by gender were considered sarcopenic. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Readmission rates and postoperative complications were compared between groups. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to determine the association between sarcopenia and 30-day postoperative complications. RESULTS: 85 patients were analyzed, of which 63% were male, with a median age of 59 (IQR: 51-65), and median BMI of 28 (IQR: 24-32). Of the entire cohort, 34% (n = 29) were sarcopenic (median PMI 5.39 IQR: 4.49-6.71). No significant difference in baseline characteristics between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic patients were observed. 55% of sarcopenic patients experienced a complication within 30 days compared to 24% of nonsarcopenic patients (p = 0.01). 41% of sarcopenic patients required hospital readmission within 30 days compared to 17% of their nonsarcopenic counterparts (p = 0.014). Sarcopenic patients also experienced significantly higher rates of post-operative small bowel obstruction (10% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). Multivariable analyses identified that sarcopenic patients have a fourfold increase in odds of experiencing a 30-day postoperative complication (OR: 4.44, 95%CI: 1.6-12.4, p < 0.05) after adjusting for gender. CONCLUSION: Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with increased 30-day postoperative complications following TaTME for rectal cancer. Postoperative complications can have serious oncologic implications by delaying adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, preoperative recognition of sarcopenia prior to undergoing TaTME for rectal cancer may provide an opportunity for early intervention with prehabilitation programs.

Oncologic Outcomes After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recent series have raised concerns about the oncologic outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer. There is a paucity of large data sets from the United States to contribute to the ongoing international discourse. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the rate of local recurrence and other oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of patients undergoing transanal total mesorectal excision for primary rectal cancer from January 2014 to December 2019. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single academic tertiary care medical center in the United States. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients aged ≥18 years undergoing surgical resection for primary rectal cancer were selected. INTERVENTION: The transanal total mesorectal excision procedures were performed utilizing a 2-team approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were pathologic quality, local and distant recurrence, treatment-related complications, and overall- and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Seventy-nine consecutive patients were included. The median age was 58 years (interquartile range, 50-64), and median BMI was 28 kg/m2 (interquartile range, 24.6-32.4). The mesorectum was complete in 69 patients (87.3%), nearly complete in 9 (11.4%), and incomplete in 1 (1.3%). There was circumferential resection margin involvement (<1 mm) in 4 patients (5.1%), and no patients had a positive distal margin (<1 mm) or intraoperative rectal perforation. Composite optimal pathology was achieved in 94.9% of specimens. Median follow-up was 29 months (range, 6-68). There were no local recurrences. Distant metastases were found in 10 (13.5%) patients and diagnosed after a median of 14 months (range, 0.6-53). Disease-free survival was 91.2% at 2 years, and overall survival was 94.7% at 2 years. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, a single center, and relatively short follow-up period were limitations of this study. CONCLUSION: The oncologic outcomes of this cohort support the use of transanal total mesorectal excision in the surgical management of mid to low rectal cancer at centers with appropriate expertise. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B723. RESULTADOS ONCOLGICOS DESPUS DE LA EXCISIN TOTAL DEL MESORRECTO POR VA TRANSANAL EN CASOS DE CNCER RECTAL: ANTECEDENTES:Estudios recientes han suscitado preocupación sobre los resultados oncológicos de la excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal en casos de cáncer de recto medio y bajo. Existe una gran escasez de conjuntos de datos en los Estados Unidos, para contribuir en el actual discurso internacional sobre el tema.OBJETIVO:Investigar la tasa de recurrencia local y otros resultados oncológicos en pacientes sometidos a una excisión total del mesorrecto por vía transanal por adenocarcinomas de recto.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes sometidos a excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal en casos de cáncer de recto primario desde enero de 2014 hasta diciembre de 2019.AJUSTE:Centro médico Universitario de atención terciaria único en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Aquellos pacientes consecutivos de ≥ 18 años de edad, sometidos a resección quirúrgica por cáncer de recto primario.INTERVENCIÓN:Los procedimientos de excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal se realizaron utilizando un enfoque de dos equipos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los resultados primarios fueron la calidad anatomo-patológica de las piezas, la recidiva local y a distancia, las complicaciones relacionadas con el tratamiento y la sobrevida global específica para el cáncer.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 79 pacientes consecutivos. La mediana de edades fue de 58 años (IQR, 50-64) y la mediana del índice de masa corporal fue de 28 kg / m (IQR, 24,6-32,4). El mesorrecto se encontraba completo en 69 pacientes (87,3%), casi completo en 9 (11,4%) e incompleto en 1 (1,3%). Hubo afectación de CRM (<1 mm) en 4 pacientes (5,1%) y ningún paciente tuvo un margen distal positivo (<1 mm) o perforación rectal intraoperatoria. La histopatología óptima compuesta se logró en el 94,9% de las muestras. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 29 meses (rango 6-68). No se presentaron recurrencias locales. Se encontraron metástasis a distancia en 10 (13,5%) pacientes y se diagnosticaron después de una mediana de 14 meses (rango 0,6-53). La sobrevida libre de enfermedad fue del 91,2% a los 2 años y la sobrevida global fue del 94,7% a los 2 años.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, unicéntrico y período de seguimiento relativamente corto.CONCLUSIÓN:Los resultados oncológicos de este estudio de cohortes, apoyan la realización de excisión total del mesorecto por vía transanal para el tratamiento quirúrgico del cáncer de recto medio y bajo, en centros con la experiencia adecuada. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B723. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

Use of medical chaperones by colon and rectal surgeons in outpatient practice.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency and motivations for medical chaperone use during anorectal exams by colon and rectal surgeons in the outpatient setting. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study examined factors impacting chaperone use via an anonymous online survey distributed via the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons email list. Routine chaperone use was defined as ≥ 90%. RESULTS: Of 1,380 emailed board-certified colon and rectal surgeons, 402 (29.1%) completed the survey in November 2019. Median years in practice was 14, and 72.3% were male. Overall, 65.2% reported routine use of chaperones during anorectal exams. Over half (56.3%) felt chaperones should be mandatory and were more likely to report routine use than those who did not (85.7 vs. 39.1%; p < 0.001). Only 23.7% reported that their institutions had formal chaperone policies. The most common reason for use was medicolegal (91.8%), and the most common barrier was chaperone availability (56.7%). When chaperones were used, 42% did not document use in the medical record. On multivariable analysis, increased odds of routine chaperone use were independently associated with: being ≤ 10 years in practice, routine chaperone use during fellowship, and chaperones being routinely available. CONCLUSION: Half of surgeons felt that chaperones should be mandatory, suggesting lack of consensus among the cohort. Despite expressing legal concerns, one-third did not use chaperones and nearly half who used chaperones did not document their use. Efforts to improve chaperone availability, documentation of chaperone use, and knowledge of policies are necessary.

Development of a Practice Guideline for Discharge Opioid Prescribing After Major Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Better alignment of opioid prescription quantities with patient need could help reduce excessive prescribing. OBJECTIVE: The study sought to develop an institutional prescribing guideline based on defined opioid consumption patterns after inpatient colorectal operations. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent elective major colorectal procedures between July 2018 and January 2019 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study measured prescription and consumption quantities measured as equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills. RESULTS: Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on consumption in the 24-hour period before discharge: tier 1 consumed 0 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills (n = 53), tier 2 consumed 0.1 to 3.0 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills (n = 25), and tier 3 consumed >3.0 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills (n = 22). Average prescription quantity was 17.5 ± 10.5 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills (range, 0-78). Patients consumed a mean of 6.7 ± 10.9 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills after discharge and had 10.8 ± 10.2 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pill excess, whereas 51% of patients consumed no pills. Opioid consumption was significantly different between each tier (p < 0.001). A prescribing guideline was developed to satisfy the majority of patients: 0 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills if tier 1, 12 pills if tier 2, and 30 pills if tier 3. Tiered guideline adoption could reduce prescribed pills by 45% and excess pills per prescription by 73%. Patient history of IBD was independently associated with increased odds of exceeding the guideline (adjusted OR = 7.2 (95% CI, 1.6-32.6)). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its single-center, retrospective design and that outpatient opioid consumption was self-reported. CONCLUSIONS: Following hospital discharge after major colorectal surgery, more than half of patients consumed no opioid pills, and 62% of prescribed opioids were in excess. Outpatient opioid consumption was highly associated with inpatient opioid use in the 24 hours before discharge. Prospective validation of this prescribing guideline is needed, but adoption could reduce excessive prescribing. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B575. DESARROLLO DE UNA GUA PRCTICA PARA LA PRESCRIPCIN DE OPIOIDES AL EGRESO DESPUS DE UNA CIRUGA COLORRECTAL MAYOR: ANTECEDENTES:Una mejor alineación de las cantidades de prescripción de opioides con las necesidades del paciente podría ayudar a reducir la prescripción excesiva.OBJETIVO:El estudio buscó desarrollar una guía institucional de prescripción basada en patrones definidos de consumo de opioides luego de cirugías colorrectales hospitalarias.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un solo centro de atención terciaria.PACIENTES:Pacientes que se sometieron a procedimientos colorrectales mayores electivos entre julio de 2018 y enero de 2019.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El estudio midió las cantidades de prescripción y consumo medidas como píldoras de 5 mg de oxicodona equianalgésica (EOP).RESULTADOS:Los pacientes se clasificaron en tres grupos según el consumo en el período de 24 horas antes del egreso: el nivel 1 consumió 0 EOP (n = 53), el nivel 2 consumió 0,1-3 EOP (n = 25) y el nivel 3 consumió más de 3 EOP (n = 22). La cantidad promedio de prescripción fue 17,5 (± 10,5) EOP (rango: 0-78). Los pacientes consumieron una media de 6,7 (± 10,9) EOP posterior al egreso y tuvieron un exceso de 10,8 (± 10,2) EOP, mientras que el 51% de los pacientes no consumieron píldoras. El consumo de opioides fue significativamente diferente entre cada nivel (p <0,001). Se desarrolló una guía de prescripción para satisfacer a la mayoría de los pacientes: 0 EOP del nivel 1, 12 EOP del nivel 2 y 30 EOP del nivel 3. La adquisición de una guía escalonada podría reducir las píldoras recetadas en un 45% y el exceso de píldoras por receta en un 73%. El historial del paciente de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal se asoció de forma independiente con un aumento de las probabilidades de superar la guía (ORa 7,2; IC del 95%: 1,6-32,6).LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo de un solo centro y por el consumo de opioides del paciente ambulatorio el cual fue autoinformado.CONCLUSIONES:Tras el egreso hospitalario de una cirugía colorrectal mayor, más de la mitad de los pacientes no consumieron pastillas opioides y el 62% de los opioides prescritos estaban en exceso. El consumo de opioides como paciente ambulatorio estuvo altamente asociado con el uso de opioides como paciente hospitalizado en las 24 horas previas al egreso. Se necesita una validación prospectiva de esta guía de prescripción, pero la adopción podría reducir la prescripción excesiva. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B575.

Total Transperineal Laparoscopic Proctectomy for the Treatment of Crohn's Proctitis.

INTRODUCTION: Completion proctectomy is traditionally performed using a combination of abdominal and perineal approaches. Access to and exposure of the pelvis through the abdominal cavity can be limited in patients with prior surgery or inflammatory conditions. We describe a novel technique for a total transperineal approach for proctectomy for Crohn's proctitis, avoiding technical challenges, risks, and recovery associated with abdominal surgery. TECHNIQUE: We utilized the skills and expertise acquired from our experience with transanal total mesorectal excision to perform a total transperineal laparoscopic proctectomy in a male patient with medically refractory proctitis. He previously underwent an anterior resection, drainage of a chronic presacral abscess, omental pedicle flap transposition to the pelvis, and end colostomy for severe Crohn's colitis. The total transperineal laparoscopic proctectomy approach avoids the need for abdominal access, including the risks associated with abdominal entry, adhesiolysis, pelvic access and visualization, and wound-related issues. Following an initial intersphincteric perineal dissection, the GelPOINT Path minimal access platform is utilized to perform a total transperineal proctectomy. RESULTS: The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged to home 2 days after surgery. At 1-month postoperative follow-up, the patient is recovering well with complete healing of the perineal wound. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and technical steps of a minimally invasive completion proctectomy for fistulizing Crohn's proctitis by using a total transperineal approach. This approach allowed us to utilize direct, inline, high-definition visualization to access and safely operate in the distal aspects of a narrow, scarred, and fibrotic pelvis while avoiding the need for any abdominal access. Advanced experience with redo pelvic and minimally invasive transanal surgery is critical. See Video at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B664.

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: An Effective Approach for Patients Who Require Redo Pelvic Surgery for Anastomotic Failure.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks cause significant patient morbidity that may require redo pelvic surgery. Transanal minimally invasive surgery facilitates direct access to the pelvis with increased visualization and maneuverability for technically difficult redo surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of transanal minimally invasive surgery in redo proctectomy for anastomotic complications. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a single tertiary-care institution. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients undergoing transanal minimally invasive redo proctectomy were included. INTERVENTIONS: Transanal minimally invasive redo proctectomy was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was intraoperative feasibility. The secondary end points were safety, perioperative morbidity, and symptom resolution. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent redo proctectomy via transanal minimally invasive surgery for anastomotic defect (n = 6) or stricture (n = 1). Median time from initial to redo operation was 27 months (range, 13-67). Redo proctectomy included redo low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis and diverting loop ileostomy (n = 4), completion proctectomy with end colostomy (n = 2), and pouch resection with end ileostomy (n = 1). Six patients had an open abdominal approach. There were no conversions for the anal approach. Median operative time was 6.4 hours (range, 4.0-7.1). All 4 planned redo coloanal anastomoses were successfully created. Hospital length of stay was a median of 8 days (interquartile range, 6-9). Intraoperative complications included 2 patients with carbon dioxide emboli, which resolved with supportive care; there was no adjacent organ injury. Three patients were readmitted within 30 days. There were no postoperative anastomotic leaks, and all 4 patients with diverted ileostomies underwent reversal at a median of 4 months (interquartile range, 4-6). All symptoms prompting redo surgery remain resolved at a median follow-up of 20 months. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size and its single-institution focus. CONCLUSION: For those with expertise in transanal surgery, transanal minimally invasive surgery is a safe and effective option for patients with anastomotic failure requiring redo proctectomy because it provides direct access to and visualization of the pelvis.

Twitter Use Among Departments of Surgery With General Surgery Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patterns of Twitter use by surgery departments with residency programs and understand relevant motivations and concerns. The primary outcome was to quantify account prevalence and activity. The secondary outcomes were to identify reasons for use and perceived benefits and concerns. DESIGN SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study was performed on Twitter accounts of departments of surgery with Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education accredited general surgery residencies. An anonymous survey was distributed to all programs with accounts. Data acquisition was completed in August 2019 and analysis was completed in February 2020. RESULTS: Among the 319 departments of surgery, only 80 (25%) had department of surgery Twitter accounts. Mean account age was 3.5 years (range: 0-9.8), with the highest account creation in 2017 (n = 23, 29%). Median total tweets per account was 314 (range 3-21,893), and median number of followers was 454 (range 18-22,353). Having a Twitter account was associated with program type: 66/123 (54%) university-based, 1/9 (11%) military, 13/124 (11%) community/university-affiliated, and 0/63 (0%) community (p < 0.01). Survey response rate was 40% (n = 32). Only 59% had formal posting guidelines. Daily logins (78%) and daily tweeting (53%) were common. The most frequent perceived benefits were "highlighting new research and major events" (97%), "increasing visibility within the academic community" (91%), and "improving resident engagement" (75%). The most common concerns were "professionalism" (72%), "privacy" (63%), and "time commitment" (53%). CONCLUSIONS: Though only a quarter of departments of general surgery had Twitter accounts, they were felt to be key for improving academic reach. Formal posting guidelines existed for 59% of survey respondents, although concerns about privacy and content were common. An underutilized tool for surgery departments to promote academic achievements, Twitter use represents a potential opportunity to engage the surgical community more broadly.

Opioid Consumption Patterns After Anorectal Operations: Development of an Institutional Prescribing Guideline.

BACKGROUND: Closer scrutiny of prescription patterns following surgery could contribute to the national effort to combat the opioid epidemic. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to define opioid consumption patterns following anorectal operations for development of an institutional prescribing guideline. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a single tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing outpatient anorectal surgery between July 2018 and January 2019 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study measured prescription and consumption quantities measured as equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills. RESULTS: There were 174 operations categorized into 4 operation categories: 72 hemorrhoid excisions, 55 fistulas-in-ano operations, 8 anal condyloma fulgurations, and 39 miscellaneous operations (14 sphincterotomies, 16 anal biopsies/skin tag excisions, and 9 transanal rectal lesion excisions). Prescription quantity was varied (range, 3-80 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills). Overall, 39% of patients consumed no pills, 18% consumed all, and 5% required refills. Of total pills prescribed, 63% of were unconsumed. Consumption was significantly different by operation category (average 13.6 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills after hemorrhoidectomies, 6.3 after fistula-in-ano operations, 5.8 after condyloma fulguration, and 2.9 after miscellaneous operations; p < 0.001). Home opioid requirements would be met for 80% of patients using the following guideline: 27 equianalgesic oxycodone 5-mg pills after hemorrhoidectomies, 13 after fistula-in-ano operations, 20 after anal condyloma fulguration, and 4 after miscellaneous operations. Guideline adoption would result in a 41% reduction in excess pills per prescription. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective, single-center design and because opioid consumption was self-reported. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescribing patterns and consumption are widely variable after anorectal operations and appear to be highly dependent on the operation category. It is noteworthy that 63% of opioids prescribed after anorectal operations were unused by the patient and may pose a significant public health risk. Based on the usage patterns observed in this study, prospective studies should be performed to optimize opioid prescribing. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B374. PATRONES DE CONSUMO DE OPIOIDES DESPUÉS DE OPERACIONES ANORRECTALES: DESARROLLO DE UNA GUÍA PARA PRESCRIPCIÓN INSTITUCIONAL: Una revisión enfocada de los patrones de prescripción después de la cirugía podría contribuir al esfuerzo nacional para combatir la epidemia de opioides.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo definir los patrones de consumo de opioides después de las operaciones anorrectales para el desarrollo de una guía para prescripción institucional.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.El estudio se realizó en un solo centro de atención de tercer nivel.pacientes de cirugía anorrectal ambulatoria entre julio de 2018 y enero de 2019.El estudio valoro el numero de recetas medicas y consumo de píldoras equianalgésicas de oxicodona de 5 mg.174 operaciones se clasificaron en cuatro categorías: 72 extirpaciones de hemorroides, 55 operaciones de fistula anal, 8 fulguraciones de condilomas anales y 39 operaciones misceláneas (14 esfinterotomías, 16 biopsias anales / extirpaciones de lesiones de piel y 9 escisiones de lesiones rectales por vía transanal). La cantidad de medicamentos recetados fue variada (rango: 3-80 pastillas de oxicodona equianalgésica de 5 mg). En general, el 39% de los pacientes no consumió píldoras, el 18% consumió todo y el 5% requirió equianalgesica adicional. Del total de píldoras recetadas, el 63% no se consumió. El consumo fue significativamente diferente según la categoría de la operación (promedio de 13,6 píldoras de oxicodona equianalgésica de 5 mg después de las hemorroidectomías, 6,3 después de las operaciones de fístula en el ano, 5,8 después de la fulguración del condiloma y 2,9 después de las operaciones misceláneas, p <0,001). Los requisitos de opioides en el hogar se cumplirían para el 80% de los pacientes con las siguientes pautas: 27 píldoras de oxicodona equianalgésicas de 5 mg después de las hemorroidectomías, 13 después de las operaciones de fístula anal, 20 después de la fulguración del condiloma anal y 4 después de operaciones misceláneas. La adopción de la guía daría como resultado una reducción del 41% en el exceso de píldoras por receta.El estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo de un solo centro y el consumo de opioides fue autoinformado.Los patrones de prescripción de opioides y el consumo son variables después de las operaciones anorrectales y parecen ser altamente dependientes de la categoría de la operación. En particular, el 63% de los opioides recetados después de las operaciones anorrectales no fueron utilizados por el paciente y pueden representar un riesgo significativo para la salud pública. Según los patrones de uso observados en este estudio, se deben realizar estudios prospectivos para optimizar la prescripción de opioides. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B374.

Not All Discharge Settings Are Created Equal: Thirty-Day Readmission Risk after Elective Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Discharge to nonhome settings after colorectal resection may increase risk of hospital readmission. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various discharge dispositions on 30-day readmission after adjusting for confounding demographic and clinical factors. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Data were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium (2011-2015). PATIENTS: Adults who underwent elective colorectal resection were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day hospital readmission risk was measured. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population (n = 97,455) was 58 years; half were men and 78% were white. Seventy percent were discharged home routinely (home without service), 24% to home with organized health services, 5% to skilled nursing facility, 1% to rehabilitation facility, and <1% to long-term care hospital. Overall rate of readmission was 12%; 9% from home without service, 16% from home with organized home health services, 19% from skilled nursing facility, 34% from rehabilitation facility, and 22% from long-term care hospital (p < 0.001). Patients with an intensive care unit stay, more postoperative complications, and longer hospitalization stay were more likely to be discharged to home with organized home health services or to a facility (p < 0.001). Discharge to home with organized home health services, skilled nursing facility, or rehabilitation facility increased multivariable-adjusted readmission risk by 30% (OR = 1.3 (95% CI, 1.3-1.6)), 60% (OR = 1.6 (95% CI, 1.5-1.8)), or 200% (OR = 3.0 (95% CI, 2.5-3.6)). Discharge to long-term care hospital was not associated with higher adjusted readmission risk (OR = 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9-1.6)), despite this group having the highest comorbidity and postoperative complications. Among patients readmitted within 30 days, median time to readmission was significantly different among home without service (n = 7), home with organized home health services (n = 8), skilled nursing facility (n = 8), rehabilitation facility (n = 9), and long-term care hospital (n = 12; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge to home with organized home health services, skilled nursing facility, or rehabilitation facility, but not long-term care hospital, is associated with increased adjusted risk of readmission compared with routine home discharge. Potential targets to decrease readmission include improving transition of care at discharge, improving quality of care after discharge, and improving facility resources. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B272. NO TODAS LAS CONFIGURACIONES DE ALTA SON IGUALES: RIESGOS DE READMISIÓN A 30 DÍAS DESPUÉS DE CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL ELECTIVA: El alta hospitalaria hacia el domicilio luego de una resección colorrectal puede aumentar el riesgo de readmisión.Determinar el impacto de varias configuraciones diferentes de alta en la readmisión a 30 días luego de ajustar factores demográficos y clínicos.Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo.Los datos se obtuvieron del Consorcio del Sistema de Salud Universitaria (2011-2015).Todos aquellos adultos que se sometieron a una resección colorrectal electiva.Los riesgos de readmisión hospitalaria a 30 días.La edad media de la población estudiada (n = 97,455) fué de 58 años; la mitad eran hombres y un 78% eran blancos. El 70% fueron dados de alta de manera rutinaria (a domicilio sin servicios complementarios), 24% alta a domicilio con servicios de salud organizados, 5% alta hacia un centro con cuidados de enfermería especializada, 1% alta hacia un centro de rehabilitación y <1% alta hacia un hospital con atención a largo plazo. La tasa global de readmisión fué del 12%; nueve por ciento desde domicilios sin servicios complementarios, 16% desde domicilios con servicios de salud organizados, 19% desde un centro de enfermería especializada, 34% desde el centro de rehabilitación y 22% desde un hospital con atención a largo plazo (p <0.001). Los pacientes con estadías en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, con más complicaciones postoperatorias y con una hospitalización prolongada tenían más probabilidades de ser dados de alta hacia un domicilio con servicios de salud organizados o hacia un centro de rehabilitación (p <0,001). El alta hospitalaria con servicios organizados de atención médica domiciliaria, centros de enfermería especializada o centros de rehabilitación aumentaron el riesgo de readmisión ajustada de múltiples variables en un 30% (OR 1.3, IC 95% 1.3-1.6), 60% (OR 1.6, IC 95% 1.5-1.8), o 200% (OR 3.0, IC 95% 2.5-3.6), respectivamente. El alta hospitalaria a largo plazo no fué asociada con un mayor riesgo de readmisión ajustada (OR 1.2, IC 95% 0.9-1.6), no obstante que este grupo fué el que tuvo las mayores comorbilidades y complicaciones postoperatorias. Entre los pacientes readmitidos dentro de los 30 días, la mediana del tiempo hasta el reingreso fue significativamente diferente entre el domicilio sin servicios complementarios (7), domicilio con servicios de salud organizados (8), el centro de cuidados de enfermería especializada (8), centros de rehabilitación (9) y hospitales con atención a largo plazo (12) (p <0,001).Naturaleza retrospectiva del presente estudio.El alta hospitalaria con servicios de salud domiciliarios organizados, hacia centros de enfermería especializada o hacia centros de rehabilitación se asocian con un mayor riesgo ajustado de readmisión en comparación con el alta domiciliaria de rutina y los hospitales con atención a largo plazo. Los objetivos potenciales para disminuir la readmisión incluyen mejorar la transición de la atención al momento del alta, mejorar la calidad de la atención después del alta y mejorar las diferentes facilidades para los pacientes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B272.

Creation and Institutional Validation of a Readmission Risk Calculator for Elective Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Readmissions reflect adverse patient outcomes, and clinicians currently lack accurate models to predict readmission risk. OBJECTIVE: We sought to create a readmission risk calculator for use in the postoperative setting after elective colon and rectal surgery. DESIGN: Patients were identified from 2012-2014 American College of Surgery-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. A model was created with 60% of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sample using multivariable logistic regression to stratify patients into low/medium- and high-risk categories. The model was validated with the remaining 40% of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sample and 2016-2018 institutional data. SETTINGS: The study included both national and institutional data. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent elective abdominal colon or rectal resection were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included reasons for and time interval to readmission. RESULTS: The model discrimination (c-statistic) was 0.76 ((95% CI, 0.75-0.76); p < 0.0001) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program model creation cohort (n = 50,508), 0.70 ((95% CI, 0.69-0.70); p < 0.0001) in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program validation cohort (n = 33,714), and 0.62 ((95% CI, 0.54-0.70); p = 0.04) in the institutional cohort (n = 400). High risk was designated as ≥8.7% readmission risk. Readmission rates in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and institutional data were 10.7% and 8.8% overall; of patients predicted to be high risk, observed readmission rate was 22.1% in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 12.4% in the institutional cohorts. Overall median interval from surgery to readmission was 14 days in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and 11 days institutionally. The most common reasons for readmission were organ space infection, bowel obstruction/paralytic ileus, and dehydration in both the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and institutional data. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective observational review. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who undergo elective colon and rectal surgery, use of a readmission risk calculator developed for postoperative use can identify high-risk patients for potential amelioration of modifiable risk factors, more intensive outpatient follow-up, or planned readmission. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B284. CREACIÓN Y VALIDACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL DE UNA CALCULADORA DE RIESGO DE REINGRESO PARA CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL ELECTIVE: Los reingresos reflejan resultados adversos de los pacientes y los médicos actualmente carecen de modelos precisos para predecir el riesgo de reingreso.Intentamos crear una calculadora de riesgo de readmisión para su uso en el entorno postoperatorio después de una cirugía electiva de colon y recto.Los pacientes que se sometieron a una resección electiva del colon abdominal o rectal se identificaron a partir de los datos del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica (ACS-NSQIP) del Colegio Americano de Cirugia Nacional 2012-2014. Se creó un modelo con el 60% de la muestra NSQIP utilizando regresión logística multivariable para estratificar a los pacientes en categorías de riesgo bajo / medio y alto. El modelo fue validado con el 40% restante de la muestra NSQIP y datos institucionales 2016-2018.El estudio incluyó datos tanto nacionales como institucionales.El resultado primario fue el reingreso dentro de los 30 días de la cirugía. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron razones e intervalo de tiempo para el reingreso.La discriminación del modelo (estadística c) fue de 0,76 (IC del 95%: 0,75-0,76, p < 0,0001) en la cohorte de creación del modelo NSQIP (n = 50,508), 0,70 (IC del 95%: 0,69-0,70, p < 0,0001) en la cohorte de validación NSQIP (n = 33,714), y 0,62 (IC del 95%: 0,54-0,70, p = 0,04) en la cohorte institucional (n = 400). Alto riesgo se designó como > 8,7% de riesgo de readmisión. Las tasas de readmisión en NSQIP y los datos institucionales fueron del 10,7% y del 8,8% en general; de pacientes con riesgo alto, la tasa de reingreso observada fue del 22.1% en el NSQIP y del 12.4% en las cohortes institucionales. El intervalo medio general desde la cirugía hasta el reingreso fue de 14 días en NSQIP y 11 días institucionalmente. Las razones más comunes para el reingreso fueron infección del espacio orgánico, obstrucción intestinal / íleo paralítico y deshidratación tanto en NSQIP como en datos institucionales.Esta fue una revisión observacional retrospectiva.Para los pacientes que se someten a cirugía electiva de colon y recto, el uso de una calculadora de riesgo de reingreso desarrollada para el uso postoperatorio puede identificar a los pacientes de alto riesgo para una posible mejora de los factores de riesgo modificables, un seguimiento ambulatorio más intensivo o un reingreso planificado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B284. (Traducción-Dr Yesenia Rojas-Khalil).

Data Accuracy and Predictors of High Ratings of Colon and Rectal Surgeons on an Online Physician Rating Website.

BACKGROUND: Online physician rating Web sites are used by over half of consumers to select doctors. No studies have examined physician rating Web sites for colon and rectal surgeons. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and rating patterns of colon and rectal surgeons on the largest physician rating Web site. DESIGN: Physician characteristics and ratings were collected from a randomly selected sample of 500 from 3043 Healthgrades "colon and rectal surgery specialists." Board certifications were verified with the American Board of Surgery and American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery Web sites. SETTINGS: Data acquisition was completed on July 18, 2018. PATIENTS: Patients were not directly studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was to assess the accuracy of Healthgrades in reporting American Board of Surgery and American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery certification. The secondary outcome was to identify factors associated with high star ratings. RESULTS: A total of 48 (9.6%) of the 500 sampled were incorrectly identified as practicing US surgeons and excluded from subsequent analysis. Healthgrades showed 80.1% agreement with verified board certifications for American Board of Surgery and 85.4% for American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery. The mean star rating was 4.2 of 5.0 (SD = 0.9), and 77 (21.6%) had 5-star ratings. In a multivariable logistic model (p < 0.001), 5-star rating was associated with 1 to 9 years (OR = 2.76; p = 0.04) or >40 years in practice (OR = 3.35; p = 0.04) and fewer reviews (OR = 0.88; p < 0.001). There were no significant associations with surgeon sex, age, geographic region, or board certification. LIMITATIONS: Data were limited to a single physician rating Web site. CONCLUSIONS: In the modern age of healthcare consumerism, physician rating Web sites should be used with caution given inaccuracies. More accurate online resources are needed to inform patient decisions in the selection of specialized colon and rectal surgical care. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B91. PRECISIÓN DE DATOS Y PREDICTORES DE ALTAS CALIFICACIONES DE CIRUJANOS DE COLON Y RECTO EN UN SITIO WEB DE CALIFICACIÓN MÉDICA EN LÍNEA: Más de la mitad de los consumidores utilizan los sitios web de calificación de médicos en línea para seleccionar médicos. Ningún estudio ha examinado los sitios web de calificación de médicos para cirujanos de colon y recto.Evaluar la precisión y los patrones de calificación de los cirujanos de colon y recto en el sitio web más grande de calificación de médicos.Las características y calificaciones de los médicos se obtuvieron de una muestra seleccionada al azar de 500 de 3,043 "especialistas en cirugía de colon y recto" de Healthgrades. Las certificaciones del Consejo se verificaron en los sitios web del Consejo Americano de Cirugía y del Consejo Americano de Cirugía de Colon y Recto.La adquisición de datos se completó el 18 de julio de 2018.Los pacientes no fueron estudiados directamente.El resultado primario fue evaluar la precisión de Healthgrades al informar la certificación por el Consejo Americano de Cirugía y por el Consejo Americano de Cirugía de Colon y Recto. El resultado secundario fue identificar factores asociados con altas calificaciones en estrellas.Un total de 48 (9.6%) de la muestra de 500 fueron identificados incorrectamente como cirujanos practicantes de EE. UU. y excluidos del análisis subsecuente. Healthgrades mostró un 80.1% de concordancia con las certificaciones verificadas del Consejo Americano de Cirugía y el 85.4% con el Consejo Americano de Cirugía de Colon y Recto. La calificación promedio de estrellas fue 4.2 / 5 (SD 0.9), y 77 (21.6%) tuvieron calificaciones de 5 estrellas. En un modelo logístico multivariable (p <0.001), la calificación de 5 estrellas se asoció con 1-9 años (OR 2.76, p = 0.04) o más de 40 años en la práctica (OR 3.35, p = 0.04) y menos evaluaciones (OR 0.88, p <0.001). No hubo asociaciones significativas con el género, edad, región geográfica o certificación por los Consejos del cirujano.Los datos se limitaron a un solo sitio web de calificación de médicos.En la era moderna del consumismo en atención médica, los sitios web de calificación de los médicos deben usarse con precaución debido a imprecisiones. Se necesitan recursos en línea más precisos para que las decisiones de los pacientes sean informadas en la selección de atención quirúrgica especializada de colon y recto. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B91. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva-Velazco).

The utility of the delphi method in defining anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Almost a decade after international guidelines defining anastomotic leak (AL) were published, the definition of AL remains inconsistent. METHODS: A 3-round modified Delphi study was conducted among a national panel of 8 surgeon experts to assess consensus related to the definition of AL following colorectal resection. Consensus was defined when a scenario was rated as very important or absolutely essential by at least 85% of the experts in round 3. RESULTS: Seven of fifteen (47%) clinical and radiological scenarios of AL achieved consensus. 80% of clinical scenarios reached consensus. 30% of radiological scenarios reached consensus including CT demonstrating air bubbles around the anastomosis. No consensus was achieved in 70% of radiological scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus on the definition of AL is difficult to reach, in relation to international guidelines; which implies that further refinement of the definition of AL is needed to compare patient outcomes.

Impact of Preoperative Care for Rectal Adenocarcinoma on Pathologic Specimen Quality and Postoperative Morbidity: A NSQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive and multidisciplinary care are critical in rectal cancer treatment. We sought to determine if completeness of preoperative care was associated with pathologic specimen quality and postoperative morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent elective low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection were identified from the 2016-2017 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database. The 3 preoperative NSQIP variables (colonoscopy, stoma marking, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation) were used to divide patients into 2 cohorts: complete vs incomplete preoperative care. The primary outcome was a composite higher pathologic specimen quality score (>12 lymph nodes, negative circumferential, and negative distal margins). The secondary outcome was 30-day morbidity. Preoperative characteristics were compared with ANOVAs and chi-square tests. Outcomes measures were evaluated with logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 1,125 patients: 591 (52.5%) complete and 534 (47.5%) incomplete. The complete group was younger, had more women, lower-third rectal tumors, clinical stage III disease, and neoadjuvant treatment. The complete group had higher odds of better pathologic specimen quality after adjusting for age, sex, tumor location, stage, and neoadjuvant therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.75, p = 0.001). The complete group had decreased rates of transfusions (odds ratio [OR] 0.47, p < 0.001), postoperative ileus (OR 0.67, p = 0.01), sepsis (OR 0.32, p = 0.01), and readmissions (OR 0.60, p = 0.003). Other complications did not statistically differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Complete preoperative care in rectal adenocarcinoma is associated with higher pathologic specimen quality and reduced postoperative morbidity. This highlights the importance of adherence to guideline-directed care.

Distribution of Elective Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Cases for Ulcerative Colitis: a Study Utilizing the University Health System Consortium Database.

BACKGROUND: Trends and distribution of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) procedures for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are unknown. We examined the frequency, distribution, and volume-outcome relationship for this relatively infrequent procedure using a large national data source. METHODS: Data were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) for patients with a primary diagnosis of UC admitted electively and who underwent surgical intervention between 2012 and 2015. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population (n = 6875) was 43 years and 57% were men. Among these, one-third (n = 2307) underwent an IPAA, while 24% (n = 1160) underwent total abdominal colectomy, 16% (n = 1134) underwent proctectomy, and 2% (n = 108) underwent total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy. The frequency of IPAA cases among all elective surgical cases was relatively stable at 33-35% over the study period. A total of 131 hospitals, out of 279 hospitals participating in the UHC (47%), performed IPAA. UHC contains all inpatient data on more than 140 (> 90%) academic medical centers in the US and their affiliates. Most hospitals (101) performed < 5 cases annually. The median number of IPAA cases performed annually was 1.8 [IQR 0.8 - 4.3]. The top 10 hospitals performed one-half (48%) of IPAA cases, but only 18% of another type of complex pelvic dissection cases such as low anterior resection. Short-term postoperative complications after IPAA, however, were similar regardless of IPAA volume. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-half of IPAA cases were performed at only 10 hospitals out of the 131 hospitals performing IPAA in the study. IPAA procedures are infrequently performed by most academic medical centers in the US. The redistribution of IPAA procedures, likely a result of previously established referral patterns and centralization, has a potential impact on the training of future colorectal fellows as well as access to care.

Getting to the bottom of treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).

BACKGROUND: Many approaches to treat rectal prolapse exists, yet little is known regarding their safety in the elderly. METHOD: NSQIP (2008-2014) was queried to identify patients ≥ 70 years who underwent open rectopexy (OR), laparoscopic rectopexy (LR) and perineal rectosigmoidectomy (PR). Patients were selected using NSQIP's estimated probability of morbidity of ≥50th percentile. Outcomes were 30-day mortality and a composite: mortality, septic shock and organ space abscess and fascial dehiscence. RESULTS: Overall, 1361 patients underwent OR(18%), LR(15%) and PR(67%) with no difference in outcomes among 3 approaches. After adjustment of other factors, the composite was associated with PR [OR 2.5, CI 1.1, 5.7] and not with older age [OR 1.3, (CI) 0.7, 2.4]. From 2008 to 2014, LR increased from 11% to 19%; and PR decreased from 75% to 72%. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 surgical approaches carry low morbidity among the sick, elderly. PR remains the predominant approach nationally. A paradigm shift accepting the safety of abdominal approaches is needed. There should also be less focus on age in the decision-making process of surgical treatment.

Impact of the "Weekend Effect" for Hospital Discharges on Readmissions After Elective Colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmissions after elective colectomy are costly and potentially preventable. It is unknown whether hospital discharge on a weekend impacts readmission risk. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use a national database to determine whether discharge on a weekend versus weekday impacts the risk of readmission, and to determine what discharge-related factors impact this risk. DESIGN: This investigation is a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Data were derived from the University HealthSystem Consortium, PATIENTS:: Adults who underwent elective colectomy from 2011 to 2015 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the 30-day hospital readmission rate. RESULTS: Of the 76,031 patients who survived the index hospitalization, the mean age of the study population was 58 years; half were men and more than 75% were white. Overall, 20,829 (27%) were discharged on the weekend, and the remaining 55,202 (73%) were discharged on weekdays. The overall 30-day readmission rate was 10.5%; 8.9% for those discharged on the weekend vs 11.1% for those discharged during the weekday (unadjusted OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.83). The adjusted readmission risk was lower for patients discharged home without services (routine, without organized home health service) on a weekend compared with on a weekday (adjusted OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.93; readmission rates, 7.4% vs 8.9%, p < 0.001); however, the combination of weekend discharge and the need for home services increased readmission risk (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.25-1.55; readmission rate, 16.2% vs 8.9%, p < 0.001). Although patients discharged to rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities were at an increased risk of readmission compared with those discharged to home, there was no additive increase in risk of readmission for weekend discharge. LIMITATIONS: Data did not capture readmission beyond 30 days or to nonindex hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Patients discharged on a weekend following elective colectomy were at increased risk of readmission compared with patients discharged on a weekday if they required organized home health services. Further prospective studies are needed to identify areas of intervention to improve the discharge infrastructure. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A799.