A 29-Year-Old Patient With Patau Syndrome: A Case Report on Medical Management.

Patau syndrome (trisomy 13) is a chromosomal abnormality with multiple malformations due to an additional copy of chromosome 13. This genetic condition has a systemic impact on the development of the human body, which can result in, but is not limited to, microphthalmia, microcephaly, low-set ears, cleft palate, cardiac abnormalities, and abdominal wall defects. It is associated with severe physical and intellectual disabilities and a limited lifespan. Here, we present a 29-year-old female with a high suspicion of the mosaic form of Patau syndrome. She decided to opt for an elective robotic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (RAVH) due to worsening menorrhagia and recurrent miscarriages. In addition, the importance of medical interventions from surgery to anesthesia is discussed, with their role in improving the quality of life of the patient.

Retrospective analysis of operative time and time to discharge for laparoscopic vs robotic approaches to appendectomy and cholecystectomy.

Robotic-assisted appendectomies and cholecystectomies are believed to increase cost compared to the gold standard laparoscopic approach. Two equally qualified surgeons performed both approaches over 2 years to evaluate intraoperative duration, time to discharge, conversion to open procedure, and readmission within 30 days. 110 laparoscopic, 81 robotic-assisted appendectomies; and 105 laparoscopic and 165 robotic-assisted cholecystectomies were performed. Intraoperative time; laparoscopic appendectomy was 1.402 vs 1.3615 h for robotic-assisted (P value = 0.304); laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 1.692 vs 1.634 h for robotic-assisted (P value = 0.196). Time to discharge, was 38.26 for laparoscopic vs 28.349 h for robotic-assisted appendectomy (P value = 0.010), and 35.95 for laparoscopic vs 28.46 h for robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (P value = 0.002). Intraoperative conversion to open; only laparoscopic procedures were converted, one appendectomy and nine cholecystectomies. None in the robotic-assisted procedures. Readmissions, none in the appendectomy group and three in the cholecystectomy group. One laparoscopic and two robotic-assisted cholecystectomy patients were readmitted. Intraoperative times for robotic appendectomy and cholecystectomy were not longer than laparoscopic approach. Robotic approach shortened the time to discharge and the likelihood for conversion to open procedure.