RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) typically presents with gait disturbances, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence. Symptomatic improvement generally occurs following shunt placement, but limited evidence exists on the quality of life (QOL) metrics in iNPH. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study of the effect of shunt placement on QOL in iNPH patients, using Quality of Life in Neurologic Disorders (Neuro-QOL) metrics. METHODS: Eligible patients underwent shunt placement after evidence of symptomatic improvement following temporary cerebrospinal fluid diversion via inpatient lumbar drain trial. Patients were administered short- and long-form Neuro-QOL assessments prior to shunt placement and at 6-month and 1-year postoperative timepoints to evaluate lower extremity mobility, cognitive function, and social roles and activities participation. Changes in QOL measures were analyzed using a repeated-measures linear mixed effects model. RESULTS: There were 48 patients with a mean age of 75.4 ± 6.3 years. Average short-form mobility scores improved by 3.9 points (14.6%) at 6-month follow-up and by 6.2 points (23.2%) at 1-year follow-up compared with preoperative baseline (P = 0.027 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Short-form cognition scores increased by 5.2 points (22.4%) at 6 months and 10.9 points (47.0%) at 1 year postoperatively (P = 0.007 and P < 0.0001, respectively). On long-form assessment, social roles and activity participation scores improved by 29.3 points (23.4%) at 6 months and 31.6 points (25.2%) at 1 year after surgery compared to baseline (P = 0.028 and P = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that shunt placement leads to improved QOL in iNPH patients across multiple domains. Significant improvements in mobility, cognition, and social roles and activity participation are realized within the first 6 months and are sustained on 1-year follow-up.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this pilot study was to obtain baseline quantitative pupillometry (QP) measurements before and after catheter-directed cerebral angiography (DCA) to explore the hypothesis that cerebral angiography is an independent predictor of change in pupillary light reflex (PLR) metrics. DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational pilot study of PLR assessments obtained using QP 30 min before and after DCA. All patients had QP measurements performed with the NPi-300 (Neuroptics) pupillometer. SETTING: Recruitment was done at a single-centre, tertiary-care academic hospital and comprehensive stroke centre in Dallas, Texas. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty participants were recruited undergoing elective or emergent angiography. Inclusion criteria were a physician-ordered interventional neuroradiological procedure, at least 18 years of age, no contraindications to PLR assessment with QP, and nursing transport to and from DCA. Patients with a history of eye surgery were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Difference in PLR metric obtained from QP 30 min before and after DCA. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference was noted in the pre and post left eye readings for the minimum pupil size (a.k.a., pupil diameter on maximum constriction). The mean maximum constriction diameter prior to angiogram of 3.2 (1.1) mm was statistically larger than after angiogram (2.9 (1.0) mm; p<0.05); however, this was not considered clinically significant. Comparisons for all other PLR metrics pre and post angiogram demonstrated no significant difference. Using change in NPi pre and post angiogram (Δpre=0.05 (0.77) vs Δpost=0.08 (0.67); p=0.62), we calculated the effect size as 0.042. Hence, detecting a statistically significant difference in NPi, if a difference exists, would require a sample size of ~6000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides supportive data that in an uncomplicated angiogram, even with intervention, there is no effect on the PLR.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Cerebral , Reflejo Pupilar , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiología IntervencionistaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Most critical thinking assessment tools are resource intensive and require significant time and money to administer. Moreover, these tools are not tailored to evaluate critical thinking skills among inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) nurses. This pilot study explores the efficacy of using short videos to evaluate critical thinking for nurses working in an IRF. METHODS: We developed and filmed 3 clinical scenarios representative of common IRF events that require critical thinking on behalf of the nurse. Thirty-one IRF nurses participated in the study and independently scored their own critical thinking skills using a visual analog scale. Using the same scale, nurse managers and assistant managers who worked closely with the nurses also rated the critical thinking ability of each nurse. The nurse then viewed and responded in narrative form to each of the 3 videos. A scoring rubric was used to independently evaluate the critical thinking skills for each nurse based on the nurses' responses. RESULTS: Nurses rated their own critical thinking skills higher than mangers rated them (m = 85.23 vs 62.89). There was high interrater reliability for scoring video 1k (0.65), video 2k (0.90), and video 3k (0.84). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate efficacy for further study of low-cost alternatives to evaluate critical thinking among neuroscience nurses providing IRF care.
Asunto(s)
Pensamiento , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Competencia Clínica/normas , Enfermería en Rehabilitación , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Enfermería en Neurociencias/educación , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/educación , Pacientes Internos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Delirium is associated with worse outcomes, but there is a gap in literature identifying nurse-led interventions to reduce delirium in postoperative (postop) surgical spine patients. Because family presence has been associated with a variety of beneficial effects, we aimed to examine whether family presence in the spine intensive care unit (ICU) during the night after surgery was associated with less confusion or delirium on postop day 1. METHODS: This is a prospective nonrandomized pilot clinical trial with pragmatic sampling. Group designation was assigned by natural history. The family-present group was designated as patients for whom a family member remained present during the first night after surgery. The unaccompanied group was designated as patients who did not have a family member stay the night. Data include the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU, the 4AT (Alertness, Attention, Abbreviated mental test, and Acute change) score, and confusion measured with the orientation item on the Glasgow Coma Scale. Baseline data were collected after admission to the spine ICU and compared with the same data collected in the morning of postop day 1. RESULTS: At baseline, 5 of 16 patients in the family-present group (31.3%) had at least 1 incidence of delirium or confusion. Similarly, 6 of 14 patients in the unaccompanied group (42.9%) had at least 1 incidence of delirium or confusion. There was a clinically relevant, but not statistically significant, reduction in postop day 1 delirium or confusion comparing the family-present (6.3%) and unaccompanied (21.4%) groups ( P = .23). CONCLUSION: Family presence may reduce delirium and confusion for patients after spine surgery. The results support continued research into examining nurse-led interventions to reduce delirium and improve outcomes for this population.
Asunto(s)
Delirio , Delirio del Despertar , Humanos , Delirio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Triage and neurological assessment of the 1.7 million traumatic brain injuries occurring annually is often done by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the emergency department. Subjective assessments, such as the neurological examination that includes evaluation of the pupillary light reflex (PLR), can contain bias. Quantitative pupillometry (QP) standardizes and objectifies the PLR examination. Additional data are needed to determine whether QP can predict neurological changes in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) patient. PURPOSE: This study examines the effectiveness of QP in predicting neurological decline within 24 hours of admission following acute TBI. METHODOLOGY: This prospective, observational, clinical trial used pragmatic sampling to assess PLR in TBI patients using QP within 24 hours of ED admission. Chi-square analysis was used to determine change in patient status, through Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), at baseline and within 24 hours of admission, to the QP. RESULTS: There were 95 participants included in the analysis; of whom 35 experienced neuroworsening, defined by change in GCS of >2 within the first 24 hours of admission. There was a significant association between an abnormal Neurological Pupil index (NPi), defined as NPi of <3, and neuroworsening (p < .0001). The sensitivity (51.43%) and specificity (91.67%) of abnormal NPi in predicting neuroworsening were varied. CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between abnormal NPi and neuroworsening in the sample of TBI patients with high specificity and moderate sensitivity. IMPLICATIONS: NPi may be an early indicator of neurological changes within 24 hours of ED admission in patients with TBI.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Lesiones Encefálicas , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Reflejo , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Escala de Coma de GlasgowRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Autonomic dysreflexia (AD) is associated with spinal cord injury, manifesting in symptoms of high blood pressure, bradycardia, headache, diaphoresis, and anxiety. Nurses often manage these symptoms; thus, nursing knowledge of AD is crucial. The purpose of this study was to improve AD nursing knowledge while exploring differences between simulation and didactic learning in nurse education. DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective pilot study used two types of learning (simulation vs. didactic) to determine if one was superior to the other regarding nursing knowledge of AD. Nurses were given a pretest, randomized to simulation or didactic learning, and then given a posttest 3 months later. RESULTS: Thirty nurses were enrolled in this study. Seventy-seven percent of nurses held a BSN degree with an average of 15.75 years in nursing. The mean knowledge scores for AD at baseline for the control (13.9 [2.4]) and intervention (15.5 [2.9]) groups were not statistically different ( p = .1118). The mean knowledge scores for AD after either didactic- or simulation-based education for the control (15.5 [4.4]) and intervention (16.5 [3.4]) groups were not statistically different ( p = .5204). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Autonomic dysreflexia is a critical clinical diagnosis that requires prompt nursing intervention to prevent threatening consequences. This study focused on how different methods of education best benefited AD knowledge acquisition and how simulation versus didactic learning impacts overall nursing education. CONCLUSIONS: As a whole, providing nurses with AD education was helpful in improving their understanding of the syndrome. However, our data suggest that both didactic and simulation are equally effective methods to increase AD knowledge.
Asunto(s)
Disreflexia Autónoma , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Disreflexia Autónoma/complicaciones , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
Nurses play a vital role in the care of neurocritical patients. Fever is a common and dangerous occurrence, and there is a substantial lack of consistency in how to maintain normothermia in these patients. We present five cases in which patients were confirmed to have neurogenic fever (NF) and the documented interventions. In all five cases, temperature and interventions were not documented consistently, making it difficult to assess how nurses acted to avoid hyperthermia in these patients. Additional research is needed to determine interventions, processes, procedures, and documentation of NF in neurocritical patients.
Asunto(s)
Hipotermia Inducida , Humanos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Fiebre/etiología , Fiebre/terapia , TemperaturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In critical care units, the neurologic examination (neuro exam) is used to detect changes in neurologic function. Serial neuro exams are a hallmark of monitoring in neuroscience ICUs. But less is known about neuro exams that are performed in non-neuroscience ICUs. This knowledge gap likely contributes to the insufficient guidance on what constitutes an adequate neuro exam for patients admitted to a non-neuroscience ICU. PURPOSE: The study purpose was to explore existing practices for documenting neuro exams in ICUs that don't routinely admit patients with a primary neurologic injury. METHODS: A single-center, prospective, observational study examined documented neuro exams performed in medical, surgical, and cardiovascular ICUs. A comprehensive neuro exam assesses seven domains that can be divided into 20 components. In this study, each component was scored as present (documentation was found) or absent (documentation was not found); a domain was scored as present if one or more of its components had been documented. RESULTS: There were 1,482 assessments documented on 120 patients over a one-week period. A majority of patients were male (56%), White (71%), non-Hispanic (77%), and over 60 years of age (50%). Overall, assessments of the domains of consciousness, injury severity, and cranial nerve function were documented 80% of the time or more. Assessments of the domains of pain, motor function, and sensory function were documented less than 60% of the time, and that of speech less than 5% of the time. Statistically significant differences in documentation were found between the medical, surgical, and cardiovascular ICUs for the domains of speech, cranial nerve function, and pain. There were no significant differences in documentation frequency between day and night shift nurses. Documentation practices were significantly different for RNs versus providers. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the frequency and specific components of neuro exam documentation vary significantly across nurses, providers, and ICUs. These findings are relevant for nurses and providers and may help to improve guidance for neurologic assessment of patients in non-neurologic ICUs. Further studies exploring variance in documentation practices and their implications for courses of treatment and patient outcomes are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Examen Neurológico , DolorRESUMEN
Background: Asymmetric pupil reactivity or size can be early clinical indicators of midbrain compression due to supratentorial ischemic stroke or primary intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH). Radiographic midline shift is associated with worse functional outcomes and life-saving interventions. Better understanding of quantitative pupil characteristics would be a non-invasive, safe, and cost-effective way to improve identification of life-threatening mass effect and resource utilization of emergent radiographic imaging. We aimed to better characterize the association between midline shift at various anatomic levels and quantitative pupil characteristics. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of brain CT images within 75 min of a quantitative pupil observation from patients admitted to Neuro-ICUs between 2016 and 2020 with large (>1/3 of the middle cerebral artery territory) acute supratentorial ischemic stroke or primary IPH > 30 mm3. For each image, we measured midline shift at the septum pellucidum (MLS-SP), pineal gland shift (PGS), the ratio of the ipsilateral to contralateral midbrain width (IMW/CMW), and other exploratory markers of radiographic shift/compression. Pupil reactivity was measured using an automated infrared pupillometer (NeurOptics®, Inc.), specifically the proprietary algorithm for Neurological Pupil Index® (NPi). We used rank-normalization and linear mixed-effects models, stratified by diagnosis and hemorrhagic conversion, to test associations of radiographic markers of shift and asymmetric pupil reactivity (Diff NPi), adjusting for age, lesion volume, Glasgow Coma Scale, and osmotic medications. Results: Of 53 patients with 74 CT images, 26 (49.1%) were female, and median age was 67 years. MLS-SP and PGS were greater in patients with IPH, compared to patients with ischemic stroke (6.2 v. 4.0 mm, 5.6 v. 3.4 mm, respectively). We found no significant associations between pupil reactivity and the radiographic markers of shift when adjusting for confounders. However, we found potentially relevant relationships between MLS-SP and Diff NPi in our IPH cohort (ß = 0.11, SE 0.04, P = 0.01), and PGS and Diff NPi in the ischemic stroke cohort (ß = 0.16, SE 0.09, P = 0.07). Conclusion: We found the relationship between midline shift and asymmetric pupil reactivity may differ between IPH and ischemic stroke. Our study may serve as necessary preliminary data to guide further prospective investigation into how clinical manifestations of radiographic midline shift differ by diagnosis and proximity to the midbrain.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Hypertension (HTN) affects over one third of adults in the United States. Blood pressure (BP) management and patient education are provided by physicians, advanced practice clinicians, pharmacists, and nurses. In the traditional medical/clinic model, physicians have provided and directed HTN care. However, advanced practice nurses and pharmacists are also well trained and positioned to manage HTN. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of an HTN clinic, led by a nurse practitioner (NP) and PharmD, specifically analyzing if targeted HTN can be achieved in this setting. Registry data were used to analyze the initial and the most recent visit BP levels in patients who were seen in an NP/PharmD-led HTN clinic. Measures of central tendency and differences between initial and most recent visit were also compared. A total of 46 patients were included in this analysis. Data showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the first visit (144/86) and the most recent visit (138/84) BP ( p = .26), but that there was a clinical trend in decreasing BP as well as narrowing of BP ranges and interquartile ranges between visit. The NP/PharmD-led clinic is feasible and can help lower BP and narrow ranges toward targeted BP.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Enfermeras Practicantes , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Farmacéuticos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Automated infrared pupillometry (AIP) and the Neurological Pupil index (NPi) provide an objective means of assessing and trending the pupillary light reflex (PLR) across a broad spectrum of neurological diseases. NPi quantifies the PLR and ranges from 0 to 5; in healthy individuals, the NPi of both eyes is expected to be ≥ 3.0 and symmetric. AIP values demonstrate emerging value as a prognostic tool with predictive properties that could allow practitioners to anticipate neurological deterioration and recovery. The presence of an NPi differential (a difference ≥ 0.7 between the left and right eye) is a potential sign of neurological abnormality. METHODS: We explored NPi differential by considering the modified Rankin Score at discharge (DC mRS) among patients admitted to neuroscience intensive care units (NSICU) of 4 U.S. and 1 Japanese hospitals and for two cohorts of brain injuries: stroke (including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, and aneurysm, 1,200 total patients) and 185 traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients for a total of more than 54,000 pupillary measurements. RESULTS: Stroke patients with at least 1 occurrence of an NPi differential during their NSICU stay have higher DC mRS scores (3.9) compared to those without an NPi differential (2.7; P < .001). Patients with TBI and at least 1 occurrence of an NPi differential during their NSICU stay have higher discharge modified Rankin Scale scores (4.1) compared to those without an NPi differential (2.9; P < .001). When patients experience both abnormalities, abnormal (NPi < 3.0) and an NPi differential, the latter has an anticipatory relationship with respect to the former (P < .001 for z-score skewness analysis). Finally, our analysis confirmed ≥ 0.7 as the optimal cutoff value for the NPi differential (AUC = 0.71, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The NPi differential is an important factor that clinicians should consider when managing critically ill neurological injured patients admitted to the neurocritical care units. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02804438 , Date of Registration: June 17, 2016.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Pupila , Reflejo Pupilar , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicacionesRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Pupillometry allows for a standardized assessment of the pupillary light reflex. Acute hydrocephalus (HCP) is a common complication in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). HCP may affect the pupillary light reflex because of increased intracranial pressure or dilation of the rostral aqueduct. The association between the pupillary light reflex and HCP in aSAH patients has not been clearly established. The objective of this study is to analyze the correlation between the Neurological Pupil index (NPi) and the degree of HCP in aSAH patients. METHODS: The Establishing Normative Data for Pupillometer Assessments in Neuroscience Intensive Care Registry is a prospectively collected database of pupillometry readings in patients admitted to 4 different neurological intensive care units. Patients in the registry with aSAH who had pupillometry assessments within 6 hours of a brain computed tomography were studied. The degree of HCP was quantified using the HCP score, and the relationship between the NPi and HCP was analyzed after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were analyzed (mean age, 54 ± 15 years; 53.2% male; mean HCP score, 5.3 ± 3.8). Thirty-eight patients had HCP. Mean NPi for the right eye was 4.02 (±1.2), and that for the left eye was 3.7 (±1.5). After adjusting for age, sex, race, and sedation, there was no significant correlation between HCP and NPi (right eye: r = 0.12, P = .44; left eye: r = 0.04, P = .8). CONCLUSION: In patients with aSAH, NPi was not correlated with HCP score. A small sample size could be a limitation of this study. Additional studies are needed to characterize the clinical significance of pupillometry in the evaluation of patients with aSAH and HCP.
Asunto(s)
Hidrocefalia , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Adulto , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/diagnóstico por imagen , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pupila , Reflejo Pupilar , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lumbar drain (LD) trials are used to temporarily divert CSF in order to predict clinical improvement prior to definitive CSF diversion in patients with a diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. New technology has improved clinical detection of subtle pupillary changes that may occur during CSF diversion trials. The aim of this study was to determine whether pupillary light response as recorded by automated pupillometry could be used to predict response during lumbar drain trials. METHODS: The authors prospectively gathered quantitative pupillometry data on admission and following each CSF diversion in a cohort of 30 consecutive patients with a presumptive diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus admitted to a university hospital for elective LD trial between January 1, 2020 and March 30, 2021. The value of pupillometry in predicting success of lumbar drainage in alleviating symptoms was correlated to clinical improvement during lumbar drainage. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients undergoing a 4-day LD trial, 16 (55.2%) demonstrated clinical improvement. Pre-drainage pupillometry values did not differ between patients who had clinical improvement or no clinical improvement. Constriction velocity improved compared to baseline in patients who had a successful lumbar drain trial (LD +). There was a non-significant trend towards improved constriction velocity and improved dilation velocity found in patients even after the first aliquot drainage. DISCUSSION: Baseline pupillary function by automated pupillometry did not predict clinical improvement during lumbar drain trials. Improvement in constriction and dilation velocity may be useful to monitor at the outset, after the initial drainage, and at completion of lumbar drain trials.
Asunto(s)
Hidrocéfalo Normotenso , Hidrocefalia , Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo , Estudios de Cohortes , Drenaje , Humanos , Hidrocéfalo Normotenso/diagnóstico , Hidrocéfalo Normotenso/cirugía , Derivación VentriculoperitonealRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Single-Center Review of Data at a Level 1 Trauma Center. OBJECTIVE: Compare deformity correction and surgical outcomes of percutaneous instrumentation and open fusion in traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: In our retrospective study, all patients undergoing elective spine surgery for TL fractures at a Level 1 trauma center between 2000 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients who underwent percutaneous fixation were given the option of hardware removal after the fracture had healed. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients were included in the study, with 109 treated with an open fusion, and 76 with percutaneous fixation. Twenty-five patients in the latter group had the instrumentation removed after the fracture had healed. None of them required reoperation. In the open fusion group 54.1% of patients required a decompressive laminectomy. Percutaneous fixation patients had a shorter operative time (98.3 min vs 214 min, p < 0.0001), shorter length of stay (9.8 days vs 13.5 days, p = 0.04), and less blood loss (68.4 cc vs 691 cc, p < 0.001). They also had a better correction of their traumatic kyphosis after surgery (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous fixation is a valuable option for the treatment of TL fractures in cases without evidence of neural compression. It is still unclear whether hardware removal helps prevent adjacent segment degeneration. Percutaneous fixation could allow for better reduction of the fracture with improvement of postoperative alignment.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Tornillos Pediculares , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Tornillos Óseos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: External ventricular drains (EVDs) provide a temporary egress for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with symptomatic hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Before EVD removal, a wean trial, which involves clamping the EVD, is typically attempted to ensure that CSF self-regulation is achieved. Automated infrared pupillometry (AIP) has been shown to detect early neurologic decline. We sought to explore the use of AIP to detect early EVD clamping trial failure. METHODS: This prospective observational pilot study enrolled aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients before an EVD clamp trial. On initiating the clamp trial, nurses included hourly AIP assessment in documentation. Clamp trial outcome was based on neurologic examination and neuroimaging. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) models were constructed to explore computed tomography (CT) versus AIP as predictors of clamp trial outcome. RESULTS: Among the 30 subjects enrolled, there were 38 clamping trials and 22 successful EVD removals. CT scan as a predictor of clamp trial was found to have a sensitivity of 68.8% and specificity of 89.5% (PPV = 84.6%, NPV = 77.3%). AIP assessment as a predictor of wean trial outcome was found to have a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 100% (PPV = 100%, NPV = 63.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The pilot study data support that Neurological Pupil index <3 is a potential indicator of early clamp trial failure, but a CT scan has a higher sensitivity and NPV for predicting successful EVD removal. This finding suggests the benefits of including AIP assessments during clamping trials.
Asunto(s)
Hidrocefalia , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/etiología , Hidrocefalia/cirugía , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Pupila , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/cirugíaRESUMEN
The pupillary evaluation is an essential part of the neurological examination. Research suggests that the traditional examination of the pupil with a handheld flashlight has limited interrater reliability. Automated pupillometers were developed to provide an objective scoring of various pupillary parameters. The NPi-200 pupillometer is used for quantitative pupillary examinations, the NPi-300 was launched in July 2021 with enhanced features. The purpose of this study is to compare results from the NPi-200 to the NPi-300 to ensure that data are translatable across both platforms. This study examines the inter-device reliability of the NPi-200 compared to the NPi-300 in two cohorts: 20 patients at risk for cerebral edema and 50 healthy controls. Paired assessments of the devices were made from all participants. Each assessment included bilateral PLR readings within a 5-minute interval. Data showed high agreement between the two devices for the Neurological Pupil Index (NPi) reading (k = 0.94; CI: 0.91-0.99) and for pupil diameter assessment (k = 0.91; CI: 0.87-0.96). There is a very high level of agreement between the NPi-200 and NPi-300 among healthy controls and critically ill patients. Clinicians and researchers can interpret the results from either device equally.
Asunto(s)
Edema Encefálico , Pupila , Humanos , Examen Neurológico , Reflejo Pupilar , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Nursing care is widely recognized to be a vital element in stroke care delivery. However, no publications examining clinical education and optimal workflow practices as predictors of acute ischemic stroke care metrics exist. This study aimed to explore the impact of a nurse-led workflow to improve patient care that included telestroke encounters in the emergency department. METHODS: A nonrandomized prospective pre- and postintervention unit-level feasibility study design was used to explore how implementing nurse-driven acute stroke care affects the efficiency and quality of telestroke encounters in the emergency department. Nurses and providers in the emergency department received education/training, and then the Nursing-Driven Acute Ischemic Stroke Care protocol was implemented. RESULTS: There were 180 acute ischemic stroke encounters (40.3%) in the control phase and 267 (59.7%) in the postintervention phase with similar demographic characteristics. Comparing the control with intervention times directly affected by the nurse-driven protocol, there was a significant reduction in median door-to-provider times (5 [interquartile range 12] vs 2 [interquartile range 9] minutes, P < .001) and in median door-to-computed tomography scan times (9 [interquartile range 18] vs 5 [interquartile range 11] minutes, P < .001); however, the metrics potentially affected by extraneous variables outside of the nurse-driven protocol demonstrated longer median door-to-ready times (21 [interquartile range 24] vs 25 [interquartile range 25] minutes, P < .001). Door-to-specialist and door-to-needle times were not significantly different. DISCUSSION: In this sample, implementation of the nurse-driven acute stroke care protocol is associated with improved nurse-sensitive stroke time metrics but did not translate to faster delivery of thrombolytic agents for acute ischemic stroke, emphasizing the importance of well-outlined workflows and standardized stroke code protocols at every point in acute ischemic stroke care.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Telemedicina , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/enfermería , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia Trombolítica , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The Bispectral (BIS) monitor is a validated, noninvasive monitor placed over the forehead to titrate sedation in patients under general anesthesia in the operating room. In the neurocritical care unit, there is limited room on the forehead because of incisions, injuries, and other monitoring devices. This is a pilot study to determine whether a BIS nasal montage correlates to the standard frontal-temporal data in this patient population. METHODS: This prospective nonandomized pilot study enrolled 10 critically ill, intubated, and sedated adult patients admitted to the neurocritical care unit. Each patient had a BIS monitor placed over the standard frontal-temporal location and over the alternative nasal dorsum with simultaneous data collected for 24 hours. RESULTS: In the frontal-temporal location, the mean (SD) BIS score was 50.9 (15.0), average minimum BIS score was 47.0 (15.0), and average maximum BIS score was 58.4 (16.7). In the nasal dorsum location, the mean BIS score was 54.8 (21.6), average minimum BIS score was 52.8 (20.9), and average maximum BIS score was 58.0 (22.2). Baseline nonparametric tests showed nonsignificant P values for all variables except for Signal Quality Index. Generalized linear model analysis demonstrated significant differences between the 2 monitor locations (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot study do not support using a BIS nasal montage as an alternative for patients in the neurocritical care unit.
Asunto(s)
Monitores de Conciencia , Electroencefalografía , Adulto , Sedación Consciente , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of decisional regret among older adults undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Among older adults (≥65âyears old), ASD is a leading cause of disability, with a population prevalence of 60% to 70%. While surgery is beneficial and results in functional improvement, in over 20% of older adults outcomes from surgery are less desirable. METHODS: Older adults with ASD who underwent spinal surgery at a quaternary medical center from January 1, 2016 to March 1, 2019, were enrolled in this study. Patients were categorized into medium/high or low-decisional regret cohorts based on their responses to the Ottawa decision regret questionnaire. Decisional regret assessments were completed 24âmonths after surgery. The primary outcome measure was prevalence of decisional regret after surgery. Factors associated with high decisional regret were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients (mean age, 69.5 yrs) met the study inclusion criteria. Overall, 80% agreed that having surgery was the right decision for them, and 77% would make the same choice in future. A total of 21% regretted the choice that they made, and 21% responded that surgery caused them harm. Comparing patient cohorts reporting medium/high- versus low-decisional regret, there were no differences in baseline demographics, comorbidities, invasiveness of surgery, length of stay, discharge disposition, or extent of functional improvement 12-months after surgery. After adjusting for sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, invasiveness of surgery, and presence of a postoperative complication, older adults with preoperative depression had a 4.0 fold increased odds of high-decisional regret (Pâ =â0.04). Change in health related quality of life measures were similar between all groups at 12-months after surgery. CONCLUSION: While the majority of older adults were appropriately counseled and satisfied with their decision, one-in-five older adults regret their decision to undergo surgery. Preoperative depression was associated with medium/high decisional regret on multivariate analysis.Level of Evidence: 4.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Emociones , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: To understand patients' and spine surgeons' perspectives about decision-making around surgery for adult spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgery for correction of adult spinal deformity is often beneficial; however, in over 20% of older adults (≥â65 yrs of age), outcomes from surgery are less desirable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted semistructured, in-depth interviews with six patients and five spine surgeons. Two investigators independently coded the transcripts using constant comparative method, as well as an integrative, team-based approach to identify themes. RESULTS: Patients themes: 1) patients felt surgery was their only choice because they were running out of time to undergo invasive procedures; 2) patients mentally committed to surgery prior to the initial encounter with their surgeon and contextualized the desired benefits while minimizing the potential risks; 3) patients felt that the current decision support tools were ineffective in preparing them for surgery; and 4) patients felt that pain management was the most difficult part of recovery from surgery. Surgeons themes: 1) surgeons varied substantially in their interpretations of shared decision-making; 2) surgeons did not consider patients' chronological age as a major contraindication to undergoing surgery; 3) there is a goal mismatch between patients and surgeons in the desired outcomes from surgery, where patients prioritize complete pain relief whereas surgeons prioritize concrete functional improvement; and 4) surgeons felt that patient expectations from surgery were often established prior to their initial surgery visit, and frequently required recalibration. CONCLUSION: Older adult patients viewed the decision to have surgery as time-sensitive, whereas spine surgeons expressed the need for recalibrating patient expectations and balancing the risks and benefits when considering surgery. These findings highlight the need for improved understanding of both sides of shared decision-making which should involve the needs and priorities of older adults to help convey patient-specific risks and choice awareness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.