Endovascular treatment for massive haemoptysis due to pulmonary pseudoaneurysm: report of 23 cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment for massive haemoptysis caused by pulmonary pseudoaneurysm (PAP). METHODS: The clinical data, imaging data, and endovascular treatment protocol of 23 patients with massive haemoptysis caused by continuous PAP were retrospectively analysed. The success, complications, postoperative recurrence rate, and influence of the treatment on pulmonary artery pressure were also evaluated. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with a bronchial artery-pulmonary artery (BA-PA) and/or nonbronchial systemic artery-pulmonary artery (NBSA-PA) fistula underwent bronchial artery embolization (BAE) and/or nonbronchial systemic artery embolization (NBSAE) + pulmonary artery embolization (PAE). The pulmonary artery (PA) pressures before and after embolization were 52.11 ± 2.12 (35-69 cmH2O) and 33.58 ± 1.63 (22-44 cmH2O), respectively (P = 0.001). Four patients did not have a BA-PA and/or NBSA-PA fistula. Embolization was performed in two patients with a distal PAP of the pulmonalis lobar arteria. Bare stent-assisted microcoils embolization was performed in the other two patients with a PAP of the main pulmonary lobar arteries. The PA pressures of the four patients before and after treatment were 24.50 ± 1.32 (22-28 cmH2O) and 24.75 ± 1.70 (22-29 cmH2O), respectively (P = 0.850). The technique had a 100% success rate with no serious complications and a postoperative recurrence rate of 30%. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment is safe and effective for massive haemoptysis caused by PAP. BAE and/or NBSAE can effectively reduce pulmonary hypertension in patients with a BA-PA and/or NBSA-PA fistula.

The expression of myosin-regulated light chain interacting protein (MYLIP) in lung cancer and its inhibitory effects on lung carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: This study explored the relationship between myosin-regulated light chain interacting protein (MYLIP) and the prognosis of lung cancer and its effects on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer cells. METHODS: Bioinformatics analyses of databases were conducted to explore the relationship between the expression of MYLIP and the prognosis of lung cancer patients. Real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analyses were used to measure the levels of MYLIP expression. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) and cell cloning experiments were used to determine the effects of MYLIP on cell proliferation. The scratch test and invasion experiments were conducted to assess the effects of MYLIP on the migration and invasion of lung cancer cells. Tumor formation experiments were performed in nude mice to determine the effects of MYLIP on tumor growth. RESULTS: The mRNA and protein expression of MYLIP in cancer tissues from lung cancer patients were significantly lower than that found in normal adjacent tissues (P<0.05). Bioinformatics analysis showed that lung cancer patients with high MYLIP expression had a better prognosis compared to patients with low MYLIP expression. The results of the CCK8 and cell proliferation experiments revealed that the proliferation ability of lung cancer cells overexpressing MYLIP was significantly lower than that of control cells (P<0.05). The scratch experiment and invasion experiments demonstrated that the scratch closure rate and the cell invasion ability of lung cancer cells overexpressing Experiments in nude mice showed that the tumor-forming ability of lung cancer cells with high expression of MYLIP was weaker than that of the control group, and the tumor growth rate and the tumor weight were also lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low levels of MYLIP expression were detected in the cancer tissues of lung cancer patients, and its expression levels were positively correlated with the prognosis of lung cancer. Furthermore, MYLIP had a significant inhibitory effect on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer cells, suggesting that MYLIP may be a tumor suppressor gene for lung cancer. The results may have significant potential for clinical applications.

Integrated treatment for lower-limb stage II thromboangiitis obliterans by interventional therapy and oral administration of Chinese medicine: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

METHODS: Ninety lower-limb stage II or worse TAO patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A (30 cases) treated by intervention and oral administration of Chinese medicine; group B (30 cases) treated by intervention alone; and group C (30 cases) treated only with oral administration of Chinese medicine. Therapeutic effects were observed, including the cure rate; the recurrence rate after one month, three months, six months, nine months, and one year; the ankle brachial indexes; the incidence of complications; and the level of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: Group A had significantly better clinically curative effects, related indexes, and outcomes during the long-term follow-up survey, than that of groups B and C. CONCLUSION: Integrated treatment is more effective for treating lower-limb stage II or worse TAO. OBJECTIVE: To observe if integrated treatment is better than other therapies for lower-limb stage II thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO).

Cryoablation combined with zoledronic acid in comparison with cryoablation and zoledronic acid alone in the treatment of painful bone metastases.

This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of cryoablation, combined with zoledronic acid or alone, in the treatment of bone metastatic pain. A total of 84 patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A (cryoablation plus zoledronic acid), group B (cryoablation) and group C (zoledronic acid). In group A, the overall response [OR = complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] was 85.7% (24/28), the CR was 35.7% (10/28) and the PR was 50.0% (14/28). In group B, the OR was 50.0% (14/28), the CR was 14.3% (4/28) and the PR was 35.7% (10/28). In group C, the OR was 67.9% (19/28), the CR was 21.4% (6/28) and the PR was 46.4% (13/28). The differences in OR, CR and PR among the three groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The mean onset time of pain relief for the cryoablation combined with zoledronic acid treatment group was 1.96±2.26 days, for cryoablation treatment alone was 1.43±1.79 days and for zoledronic acid alone was 11.67±3.14 days; there were statistically significant differences among the three groups (P<0.05). The response duration was 146.68±1.89 days in group A, 71.60±2.94 days in group B and 112.99±1.37 days in group C; the differences among the three groups were statistically significant (P<0.01). In conclusion, cryoablation combined with zoledronic acid is an effective and safe therapeutic strategy for the treatment of bone metastatic pain.

An effective therapy to painful bone metastases: cryoablation combined with zoledronic acid.

Approximately half or more of patients diagnosed with late malignant tumors may suffer from metastatic bone pain, effective palliation of pain becomes an important part of comprehensive therapy for malignant tumors. In this study, we examined the efficacy and safety of the combined regimen of cryoablation and zoledronic acid in patients of bone metastatic pain. A total of 84 subjects were randomly divided into three groups, and underwent treatments of cryoablation plus zoledronic acid, cryoablation alone, zoledronic acid alone between June 2009 and March 2012. Patients responses had been assessed for a total of 6 months by using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-Short Form. The results showed that the mean response of worst and average pain significantly dropped at week 2 (all P < 0.05) in group with cryoablation treatment but at week 4 (all P < 0.05) in group with zoledronic acid treatment. While between week 16 and week 24, zoledronic acid treatments showed more durable response to worst and average pain compared to cryoablation (all P < 0.05). Cryoablation plus zoledronic acid regimen showed significant drop in worst and average pain between week 1 and week 4 compared to zoledronic acid alone (all P < 0.05) and more durable effect on bone metastatic pain between week 12 and week 24 than cryoablation alone (all P < 0.05). Additionally, no serious adverse effects and complication were observed by this combination use. In conclusion, cryoablation combined with zoledronic acid was safe and effective regimen and showed its superiority of fast response and durable effect on painful bone metastases.