RESUMEN
Objective: In addition to the well-established advantage that strengthened pelvic musculature increases urethral resistance in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) patients, intra-vaginal electrical stimulation (iVES) has been shown in preclinical studies to improve bladder capacity via the pudendal-hypogastric mechanism. This study investigated whether iVES also benefits bladder storage in SUI patients by focusing on compliance, a viscoelastic parameter critically defining the bladder's storage function, in a clinical study. Moreover, the potential involvement of stimulation-induced neuromodulation in iVES-modified compliance was investigated by comparing the therapeutic outcomes of SUI patients treated with iVES to those who underwent a trans-obturator tape (TOT) implantation surgery, where a mid-urethral sling was implanted without electric stimulation. Patients and methods: Urodynamic and viscoelastic data were collected from 21 SUI patients treated with a regimen combining iVES and biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training (iVES-bPFMT; 20-min iVES and 20-min bPFMT sessions, twice per week, for 3 months). This regimen complied with ethical standards. Data from 21 SUI patients who received TOT implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Mean compliance (Cm), infused volume (Vinf), and threshold pressure (Pthr) from the pressure-flow/volume investigations were assessed. Results: Compared with the pretreatment control, iVES-bPFMT consistently and significantly increased Cm (18/21; 85%, p = 0.017, N = 21) and Vinf (16/21; 76%, p = 0.046; N = 21) but decreased Pthr (16/21; 76%, p = 0.026, N = 21). In contrast, TOT implantation did not result in consistent or significant changes in Cm, Vinf, or Pthr (p = 0.744, p = 0.295, p = 0.651, respectively; all N = 21). Conclusion: Our results provide viscoelastic and thermodynamic evidence supporting an additional benefit of iVES-bPFMT to bladder storage in SUI patients by modifying bladder compliance, possibly due to the potentiated hypogastric tone, which did not occur in TOT-treated SUI patients.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02185235 and NCT05977231.
RESUMEN
Background: Pelvic floor muscle training can effectively improve pelvic floor muscle strength and activities; however, its impact on sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence remains unclear. Aim: The study sought to investigate the impact of pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor muscle and sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study involving women who visited a urogynecologic clinic at a tertiary medical center. Patients with stress urinary incontinence without pelvic organ prolapse underwent pelvic floor muscle training programs that included biofeedback and intravaginal electrostimulation. Other evaluations included pelvic floor manometry, electromyography, and quality-of-life questionnaires, including the short forms of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, Urogenital Distress Inventory, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Outcomes: Clinical characteristics, vaginal squeezing and resting pressure, maximal pelvic floor contraction, duration of sustained contraction, quality-of-life scores, and sexual function were compared between baseline and after the pelvic floor muscle training programs. Results: There were 61 women included in the study. The mean number of treatment sessions was 12.9 ± 6.3, and the mean treatment duration was 66.7 ± 32.1 days. The short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (7.7 ± 3.8 vs 1.8 ± 2.1; P < .001) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (5.9 ± 4.3 vs 1.8 ± 2.0; P < .001) scores significantly improved after the pelvic floor muscle training program. In addition, all pelvic floor muscle activities significantly improved, including maximal vaginal squeezing pressure (58.7 ± 20.1 cmH2O vs 66.0 ± 24.7 cmH2O; P = .022), difference in vaginal resting and maximal squeezing pressure (25.3 ± 14.6 cmH2O vs 35.5 ± 16.0 cmH2O; P < .001), maximal pelvic muscle voluntary contraction (24.9 ± 13.8 µV vs 44.5 ± 18.9 µV; P < .001), and duration of contraction (6.2 ± 5.7 s vs 24.9 ± 14.6 s; P < .001). Nevertheless, the short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire score demonstrated no significant improvement (28.8 ± 9.7 vs 29.2 ± 12.3; P = .752). Clinical Implications: Pelvic floor muscle training programs may not improve sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence. Strengths and Limitations: The strength of this study is that we evaluated sexual function with validated questionnaires. The small sample size and lack of long-term data are the major limitations. Conclusion: Pelvic floor muscle training can improve pelvic floor muscle activities and effectively treat stress urinary incontinence; however, it may not improve sexual function.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to compare the impact on bladder function and symptoms between robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) and transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM) in women with pelvic organ prolapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective controlled study enrolled patients who received RSC or TVM at our hospital between March 2020 and June 2022. We compared preoperative and postoperative bladder function between two groups by using a questionnaire of lower urinary tract symptom (LUTs) for subjective assessment and urodynamic study for objective assessment. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were enrolled, of whom 30 received RSC and 30 received TVM. In LUTs analysis, the RSC group had a higher risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence than the TVM group (33.3% vs. 3.3%, p = .007). Urodynamic studies showed that both groups had a deterioration in maximal urethral closure pressure postoperatively (RSC: 56.9 ± 17.1 vs. 44.2 ± 15.5 cmH2O; and TVM: 61.2 ± 29.4 vs. 47.6 ± 19.7 cmH2O, p < .01 and p = .03, respectively). The incidence of urodynamic stress incontinence was also significantly increased after RSC (33.3% vs. 76.7%, p = .01). The de novo urodynamic stress incontinence rate was 46.7% after RSC, which was not significantly different to the TVM group (26.7%, p = .16). In the TVM group, the incidence of voiding difficulty decreased after surgery (43.3% vs. 10.0%, p < .01), and urodynamic measurements revealed that the prevalence of urine retention decreased (43.3% vs. 16.7%, p < .01). In the RSC group, the incidence of incomplete emptying sensation decreased (36.7% vs. 13.3%, p = .04), and urodynamic measurements showed that none of the patients had bladder outlet obstruction, underactive detrusor, or urine retention after surgery. CONCLUSION: RSC and TVM are both beneficial to improve voiding function in women with pelvic organ prolapse. However, a deterioration in urethral function was observed and the de novo SUI rate was higher in the RSC group than in the TVM group.