Enucleación prostática con láser de holmio (HoLEP) mediante cirugía sin ingreso: una alternativa posible y segura / Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) as same-day surgery: A safe and feasible option

Objetivo Estudiar la viabilidad de la enucleación prostática con láser de holmio (HoLEP) en circuito de cirugía mayor ambulatoria. Material y métodos Se realiza un estudio prospectivo observacional en el que se incluyen 25 pacientes intervenidos de HoLEP que han sido dados de alta el mismo día de la cirugía según criterios previamente establecidos. Resultados La edad media de los pacientes intervenidos fue de 65,1 años. El volumen prostático medio fue de 45,8cc. Todos los pacientes fueron dados de alta el día de la cirugía (alta efectiva 100%). El porcentaje de complicaciones en nuestra serie fue del 12%, todas ellas grado I según la Clasificación Clavien Dindo. Ningún paciente precisó reingreso en los 30 días posteriores al procedimiento. El porcentaje de satisfacción con el circuito de cirugía ambulatoria fue del 95%. Conclusiones Tras el análisis inicial de nuestros datos podemos concluir que el HoLEP ambulatorio es una técnica eficaz y segura con bajo riesgo de complicaciones. El circuito de cirugía ambulatoria es el preferido por los pacientes intervenidos de HoLEP (AU)

Objective To study the feasibility of holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) performed as a same-day surgery. Material and methods Prospective observational study including 25 patients submitted to HoLEP. Patients were discharged the same day if they met the established criteria. Results The mean age of the patients was 65.1 years and prostate volume was 45.8cc. All patients were discharged the same day of surgery. The overall complication rate at 30 days was 12% (Clavien I 100%). The rate of re-hospitalization was 0%. Patient satisfaction rate with the day surgery pathway was 95%. Conclusions The initial analysis of our results suggests that outpatient HoLEP is a safe and effective alternative with low rate of complications. According to satisfaction rates, patients prefer the day surgery pathway for the performance of HoLEP (AU)

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) as same-day surgery: A safe and feasible option.

OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) performed as a same-day surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study including 25 patients submitted to HoLEP. Patients were discharged the same day if they met the established criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.1 years and prostate volume was 45.8cc. All patients were discharged the same day of surgery. The overall complication rate at 30 days was 12% (Clavien I 100%). The rate of re-hospitalization was 0%. Patient satisfaction rate with the day surgery pathway was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: The initial analysis of our results suggests that outpatient HoLEP is a safe and effective alternative with low rate of complications. According to satisfaction rates, patients prefer the day surgery pathway for the performance of HoLEP.

Estudio comparativo de la extracción de la pieza de nefrectomía laparoscópica mediante una incisión de tipo Pfannenstiel / Comparative study of intact specimen extraction in laparoscopic nephrectomy by pfannenstiel incision

Objetivos Nuestro objetivo es demostrar que la incisión de Pfannenstiel presenta un perfil más seguro en cuanto a complicaciones postoperatorias frente a otro tipo de incisiones que habitualmente se utilizan para la extracción renal laparoscópica. Material y métodos Estudio retrospectivo y comparativo de 256 pacientes intervenidos de nefrectomía o nefroureterectomía. Dividimos a los pacientes en dos grupos: extracción renal mediante incisión de Pfannenstiel (grupo 1) y extracción renal mediante otro tipo de incisiones (grupo 2). Evaluamos: aparición de eventración y evisceración clínica y subclínica, presencia de infección bacteriana significativa, presencia de dolor, aparición de seroma, hematoma/sangrado, dehiscencia de la herida y parálisis muscular en cada paciente. Resultados Los pacientes del grupo Pfannenstiel presentaron una tasa de complicaciones derivadas de la herida de 11,72% frente a 27,34% en el grupo no-Pfannenstiel, p = 0,002, siendo significativo la menor tasa de dehiscencia (5,5 vs. 12,5%, p = 0,047) y seroma (3,1% vs. 7,8%, p = 0,022). El modelo de regresión logística multivariante mostró que la incisión de Pfannenstiel es un predictor de prevención de complicaciones derivadas de la herida quirúrgica (OR = 0,34, p = 0,005). Conclusiones La elección de una incisión de Pfannenstiel supuso una menor incidencia de dehiscencia y seroma de la herida quirúrgica, permitiendo la extracción de piezas de nefrectomía más voluminosas y con una menor estancia hospitalaria, lo que la convierte en una alternativa válida y segura, con un favorable perfil de complicaciones con respecto a otro tipo de incisiones (AU)

Objectives The aim of our study is to demonstrate that the Pfannenstiel incision is a reliable option in terms of postoperative complications compared to other types of incisions usually performed for kidney extraction after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Materials and methods Retrospective and comparative study of 256 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy. Patients were divided into two groups: specimen extraction by Pfannenstiel incision (group 1) and specimen extraction by way of other incisions (group 2). Incisional hernia, surgical site infection, pain score, seroma, haematoma/bleeding, wound dehiscence and muscle paralysis were analyzed in each patient. Results Patients in Pfannenstiel group presented a rate of wound complications of 11.72% vs 27.34% with other incisions, p = 0.002, it was significantly inferior the rate of wound dehiscence (5.5% vs 12.5%, p = 0.047) and seroma (3.1% vs 7.8%, p = 0.022). Using multivariate logistic regression, Pfannenstiel incision was a significant protective predictor factor for wound complications (OR = 0.34, p = 0.005). Conclusions The Pfannenstiel incision allowed the extraction of bigger kidney masses with less incidence of dehiscence, seroma and in general wound complications. The hospital stay was lower in Pfannenstiel extraction group. These results present this incision as a reliable and safe option in the decision of which incision to select (AU)

Comparative study of intact specimen extraction in laparoscopic nephrectomy by Pfannenstiel incision.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study is to demonstrate that the Pfannenstiel incision is a reliable option in terms of postoperative complications compared to other types of incisions usually performed for kidney extraction after laparoscopic nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective and comparative study of 256 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy or nephroureterectomy. Patients were divided into two groups: specimen extraction by Pfannenstiel incision (group 1) and specimen extraction by way of other incisions (group 2). Incisional hernia, surgical site infection, pain score, seroma, haematoma/bleeding, wound dehiscence and muscle paralysis were analyzed in each patient. RESULTS: Patients in Pfannenstiel group presented a rate of wound complications of 11.72% vs. 27.34% with other incisions, p=0.002, it was significantly inferior the rate of wound dehiscence (5.5% vs. 12.5%, p=0.047) and seroma (3.1% vs. 7.8%, p=0.022). Using multivariate logistic regression, Pfannenstiel incision was a significant protective predictor factor for wound complications (OR=0.34, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The Pfannenstiel incision allowed the extraction of bigger kidney masses with less incidence of dehiscence, seroma and in general wound complications. The hospital stay was lower in Pfannenstiel extraction group. These results present this incision as a reliable and safe option in the decision of which incision to select.