Impact of Gift Giving During General Surgery Resident Match Interviewing Since Initiation of Virtual Interviews.

OBJECTIVE: Following the transition to virtual interviews in 2021, interviewees began receiving gifts as a recruitment strategy in lieu of the preinterview dinner. This study characterizes quantity, type, and frequency of gift receipt in relation to program perception and ranking. DESIGN: An anonymous survey study was conducted. Variables included demographics, interview modality, gift type, frequency of gift receipt, monetary value, and changes in program perception and ranking. Descriptive analyses and Pearson's chi-square testing were performed. SETTING: Single institution with a medium to large general surgery program size. PARTICIPANTS: All general surgery residents at the single institution without exclusion. RESULTS: About 25 residents responded (60% response). Two respondents (8%) participated in both in-person (IPIs) and virtual interviews (VIs). About 72% (n = 18) participated in VIs, 36% (n = 9) IPIs. About 68% matched in 2021 or later. Overall, 76% received a gift during interviews. 100% of IPIs received a gift, while 67% of VIs received a gift. 88.9% of IPIs received a meal. VIs received: meal shared (28.6%), meal not shared (14.3%), food-specific gift card (28.6%), other food items (21.4%), or other (7.1%). About 66.7% of IPIs (n = 6) reported 76% to100% of programs offered a meal, whereas no VIs reported 76% to 100% of programs offering (p = 0.0002). VIs were less likely to have a shared meal experience (p = 0.017). About 55.5% of IPIs and VIs received nonfood gifts. Residents' perception of a program's interest, resources, and ranking of the program were not significantly different based on gifting. CONCLUSION: Virtual interviews introduced heterogeneity in the receipt of gifts. The impact of a variable gifting experience is uncertain but raises concern for a potential new source of bias in the recruitment process.

Can Anal Cytology Be a Tool in Following Patients Treated for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus?

BACKGROUND: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is associated with human papillomavirus infection and preceded by high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Following successful treatment, the standard of care is to surveille for local recurrence with both anoscopy and digital rectal examination. While high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) has been shown to identify HSIL during the surveillance period, it requires specialized training and resources.1 The burden of these resources may be reduced by conducting surveillance with anal cytology. We studied 2 questions: (1) Can anal cytology identify HSIL in patients after successful treatment of SCCA? (2) Can HSIL be found with anal cytology after completion of chemoradiation for SCCA? METHODS: Patient charts were queried for diagnosis of SCCA. Patients were excluded if they were not successfully treated for cure or if patients had not been seen in the surveillance period of 5 years following treatment. Descriptive statistics were elucidated. RESULTS: 104 patient charts met inclusion criteria. 81 were surveilled using standard of care, while 23 were followed with standard of care plus anal cytology. 5 patients followed with cytology demonstrated HSIL. 2/5 were found via cytology, 1/5 via HRA, and 2/5 patients via exam under anesthesia and biopsy. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated that HSIL was identified cytologically in the surveillance period. There may be utility in using anal cytology to identify HSIL in patients during this period in lieu of the specialized resources required for HRA. This may allow dysplasia to be treated with excision and fulguration prior to redevelopment of SCCA.