Clinical trial: healing of NSAID-associated gastric ulcers in patients continuing NSAID therapy - a randomized study comparing ranitidine with esomeprazole.

BACKGROUND: The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) is associated with an increased risk of gastric ulcer (GU) development. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial compared endoscopic healing rates at 4 and 8 weeks after treatment with oral esomeprazole 40 or 20 mg once daily, or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, in patients with 1 baseline GU > or = 5 mm but no GUs or duodenal ulcers >25 mm in diameter who received continued cyclooxygenase-2-selective or non-selective NSAID therapies. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each treatment group who had no GUs at week 8. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty patients were randomized to treatment. At week 8, GU healing rates (95% CI) with esomeprazole 40 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg and ranitidine were 85.7 (79.8-91.7)%, 84.8 (78.8-90.8)% and 76.3 (69.2-83.3)%, respectively; between-group differences were not statistically significant. Week-4 GU healing rates were 70.7 (62.9-78.4)% and 72.5 (65.0-79.9)% with esomeprazole 40 and 20 mg, respectively, and were significantly higher (P < 0.01 for both doses) than those with ranitidine [55.4 (47.1-63.7)%]. CONCLUSION: In patients who require continued NSAID therapy, GU healing rates at 8 weeks numerically favoured esomeprazole but were not significantly different from ranitidine.

Helicobacter pylori eradication as a surrogate marker for the reduction of duodenal ulcer recurrence.

OBJECTIVES: An abundance of data exists documenting the association of H. pylori eradication with the reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence. AIM: To evaluate the validity of using H. pylori eradication as a surrogate marker for the reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence using rigorously controlled studies. METHODS: Three controlled clinical trials were conducted in patients with uncomplicated, active duodenal ulcers. Patients were treated with various combinations of omeprazole and amoxycillin. Ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication were assessed. For patients whose duodenal ulcer healed, duodenal ulcer recurrence was determined over a 6-month period in patients with H. pylori eradication and those remaining positive for H. pylori at least 4 weeks after treatment. To support the data obtained from these clinical trials, a search of the medical literature was conducted to identify additional human clinical trials in which duodenal ulcer recurrence rates were measured and categorized by H. pylori status at least 1 month post-treatment. RESULTS: In 11 controlled trials, the overall 6-18-month duodenal ulcer recurrence rate was 54% among patients remaining positive for H. pylori at least 4 weeks after treatment compared to 6% among patients with H. pylori eradication following treatment. This finding was corroborated by the uncontrolled trials, in which the duodenal ulcer recurrence rate was 64% among patients found to be H. pylori-positive and 6% for patients found to be H. pylori-negative at least 4 weeks after treatment. A time course of duodenal ulcer recurrence rates using pooled data from both controlled and uncontrolled studies demonstrated that duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-negative patients persisted for up to 4 years following treatment. Duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-positive patients increased for the first year, then levelled off. A comparison of the duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for different treatment regimens revealed that eradication regimens based on omeprazole plus antibiotics and bismuth plus antibiotics exhibited similar duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. CONCLUSION: Regardless of treatment regimens, H. pylori eradication produced a consistent and significant reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence. Therefore H. pylori eradication, 4 weeks post-therapy, can be used as a surrogate marker for reduced duodenal ulcer recurrence in investigational clinical trials.

Time of Helicobacter pylori eradication assessment following treatment.

BACKGROUND: The most appropriate time to assess accurately Helicobacter pylori eradication following treatment has been debated, with recommendations ranging from 1 to 3 months. The purpose of this study was to validate the assessment of H. pylori eradication 1 month following treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trials were conducted in patients with endoscopically verified, active duodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection. Patients were treated with various treatment regimens of omeprazole plus amoxicillin. Ulcer healing, H. pylori eradication, and ulcer relapse were examined. Patients underwent repeat endoscopy and biopsy at 1 and 6 months following treatment (or sooner if symptoms returned) to determine the recurrence of ulcers and H. pylori status. To determine the accuracy of measuring H. pylori eradication at 1 month posttreatment, we compared the H. pylori status at 1 month and 6 months following treatment. RESULTS: In a combination of treatment groups and studies, a total of 384 evaluable patients represented data at both time points and were included in the analysis. Of those eradicated at 1 month posttreatment, 94% (141 of 150) remained eradicated at 6 months posttreatment. The proportion of patients with H. pylori eradicated at 1 month posttreatment did not differ significantly from that at 6 months posttreatment for each study. The overall efficiency of the two tests (agreement between tests) was 93% (359 of 384). Agreement between the 1-month and 6-month posttreatment H. pylori assessment was apparent, regardless of the treatment used. CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication measured 1 month following cessation of treatment accurately reflects successful treatment of the infection.

Comparison of single-dose ibuprofen lysine, acetylsalicylic acid, and placebo for moderate-to-severe postoperative dental pain.

In a single-dose, double-blind, parallel-group, single-site study, ibuprofen lysine 200 mg (IBL 200) was compared with acetylsalicylic acid 500 mg (ASA 500) and placebo in 183 patients with moderate-to-severe postoperative dental pain. The relative onset of analgesic response, duration and degree of analgesia, and safety were assessed over a 6-hour postdose period. Analgesic efficacy was assessed by patient self-rating of pain intensity, pain relief, time to meaningful pain relief, global evaluation, and requirement for additional analgesic medication; both IBL 200 and ASA 500 were significantly more effective than placebo. IBL 200 also had a significantly faster onset of action, greater peak and overall analgesic effect, and longer duration of analgesia than ASA 500. All treatments were generally well tolerated.