Differential presence of exons (DPE): sequencing liquid biopsy by NGS. A new method for clustering colorectal Cancer patients.

Differential presence of exons (DPE) by next generation sequencing (NGS) is a method of interpretation of whole exome sequencing. This method has been proposed to design a predictive and diagnostic algorithm with clinical value in plasma from patients bearing colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the present study was to determine a common exonic signature to discriminate between different clinical pictures, such as non-metastatic, metastatic and non-disease (healthy), using a sustainable and novel technology in liquid biopsy.Through DPE analysis, we determined the differences in DNA exon levels circulating in plasma between patients bearing CRC vs. healthy, patients bearing CRC metastasis vs. non-metastatic and patients bearing CRC metastasis vs. healthy comparisons. We identified a set of 510 exons (469 up and 41 down) whose differential presence in plasma allowed us to group and classify between the three cohorts. Random forest classification (machine learning) was performed and an estimated out-of-bag (OOB) error rate of 35.9% was obtained and the predictive model had an accuracy of 75% with a confidence interval (CI) of 56.6-88.5.In conclusion, the DPE analysis allowed us to discriminate between different patho-physiological status such as metastatic, non-metastatic and healthy donors. In addition, this analysis allowed us to obtain very significant values with respect to previous published results, since we increased the number of samples in our study. These results suggest that circulating DNA in patient's plasma may be actively released by cells and may be involved in intercellular communication and, therefore, may play a pivotal role in malignant transformation (genometastasis).

Prenatal screening and diagnosis of genetic abnormalities: SEGO, SEQCML, AEDP consensus recommendations.

In this paper, the scientific societies SEGO, SEQCML and AEDP provide a series of consensus-based recommendations for prenatal screening and diagnosis of genetic abnormalities. A set of evaluation indicators are also proposed as a means to improve the quality of the biochemical, ultrasound, and genetic processes involved in prenatal screening and diagnosis of genetic anomalies. Some recommendations are also proposed in relation to invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures, more specifically regarding sample collection and genetic testing. The purpose of this proposal is to unify performance criteria and quality indicators at national level, with audits performed on a regular basis. It is strongly recommended that a national prenatal screening strategy be established and provided with the resources necessary to evaluate the performance of quality indicators and diagnostic procedures under the supervision of health authorities. Protocols should be revised on a regular basis to consider the incorporation of new cost-effective technologies.

Identifying occult maternal malignancies from 1.93 million pregnant women undergoing noninvasive prenatal screening tests.

PURPOSE: Multiple chromosomal aneuploidies may be associated with maternal malignancies and can cause failure of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) tests. However, multiple chromosomal aneuploidies show poor specificity and selectivity for diagnosing maternal malignancies. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective analysis evaluated 639 pregnant women who tested positive for multiple chromosomal aneuploidies on initial NIPS test between January 2016 and December 2017. Women were assessed using genome profiling of copy-number variations, which was translated to cancer risk using a novel bioinformatics algorithm called the cancer detection pipeline (CDP). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of diagnosing maternal malignancies were compared for multiple chromosomal aneuploidies, the CDP model, and the combination of CDP and plasma tumor markers. RESULTS: Of the 639 subjects, 41 maternal malignant cancer cases were diagnosed. Multiple chromosomal aneuploidies predicted maternal malignancies with a PPV of 7.6%. Application of the CDP algorithm to women with multiple chromosomal aneuploidies allowed 34 of the 41 (83%) cancer cases to be identified, while excluding 422 of 501 (84.2%) of the false positive cases. Combining the CDP with plasma tumor marker testing gave PPV of 75.0%. CONCLUSION: The CDP algorithm can diagnose occult maternal malignancies with a reasonable PPV in multiple chromosomal aneuploidies-positive pregnant women in NIPS tests. This performance can be further improved by incorporating findings for plasma tumor markers.

Polµ deficiency induces moderate shortening of P53-/- mouse lifespan and modifies tumor spectrum.

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is the main mechanism for double strand break (DSB) DNA repair. The error-prone DNA polymerase mu (Polµ) is involved in immunoglobulin variable region rearrangement and in general, NHEJ in non-lymphoid cells. Deletion of NHEJ factors in P53-/- mice, which are highly prone to development of T cell lymphoma, generally increases cancer incidence and shifts the tumor spectrum towards aggressive pro-B lymphoma. In contrast, Polµ deletion increased sarcoma incidence, proportionally reducing pro-B lymphoma development on the P53-deficient background. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analyses showed DNA copy number alterations in both P53-/- and Polµ-/-P53-/- lymphomas. Our results also indicate that the increase in sarcoma incidence in Polµ-/-P53-/- mice could be associated with Cdk4 and Kub3 amplification and overexpression. These results identify a role for Polµ in the prevention of sarcomagenesis on a murine P53-deficient background, in contrast to most other NHEJ factors.

Recomendaciones para el uso de microarrays en el diagnóstico prenatal / Recommendations for the use of microarrays in prenatal diagnosis

La tecnología de microarrays, de reciente implantación en el diagnóstico prenatal internacional, se ha convertido en uno de los pilares de este diagnóstico en cuanto a su capacidad de detección y objetividad de resultados. La presente guía comprende una exposición general de la tecnología, incluyendo aspectos técnicos y diagnósticos a tener en cuenta. En concreto, se definen: los distintos tipos de muestras prenatales que se van a utilizar (biopsia de vellosidades coriónicas, líquido amniótico, sangre procedente de cordón umbilical o material procedente de restos abortivos) así como las particularidades de cada una de ellas; qué puntos hay que tener en cuenta de cara a la elaboración de un consentimiento informado y de la emisión de un informe de microarray prenatal, especialmente en el caso de la posible definición de variantes de significado incierto; las limitaciones inherentes a la técnica que deben ser tenidas en cuenta a la hora de recomendar su uso diagnóstico; así como un algoritmo pormenorizado de situaciones clínicas, donde se recomienda el uso de microarrays y su incorporación a la rutina clínica en el contexto de otras pruebas genéticas, incluyendo embarazos con antecedentes familiares o hallazgos sugerentes de un síndrome concreto, translucencia nucal incrementada en el primer trimestre o cardiopatía congénita en el segundo trimestre y hallazgos ecográficos no relacionados con un síndrome conocido o específico. Esta guía ha sido coordinada por la Asociación Española de Diagnóstico Prenatal (AEDP), la Asociación Española de Genética Humana (AEGH) y la Sociedad Española de Genética Clínica y Dismorfología (SEGCyD) (AU)

Microarray technology, recently implemented in international prenatal diagnosis systems, has become one of the main techniques in this field in terms of detection rate and objectivity of the results. This guideline attempts to provide background information on this technology, including technical and diagnostic aspects to be considered. Specifically, this guideline defines: the different prenatal sample types to be used, as well as their characteristics (chorionic villi samples, amniotic fluid, fetal cord blood or miscarriage tissue material); variant reporting policies (including variants of uncertain significance) to be considered in informed consents and prenatal microarray reports; microarray limitations inherent to the technique and which must be taken into account when recommending microarray testing for diagnosis; a detailed clinical algorithm recommending the use of microarray testing and its introduction into routine clinical practice within the context of other genetic tests, including pregnancies in families with a genetic history or specific syndrome suspicion, first trimester increased nuchal translucency or second trimester heart malformation and ultrasound findings not related to a known or specific syndrome. This guideline has been coordinated by the Spanish Association for Prenatal Diagnosis (AEDP, «Asociación Española de Diagnóstico Prenatal»), the Spanish Human Genetics Association (AEGH, «Asociación Española de Genética Humana») and the Spanish Society of Clinical Genetics and Dysmorphology (SEGCyD, «Sociedad Española de Genética Clínica y Dismorfología») (AU)

Recommendations for the use of microarrays in prenatal diagnosis. / Recomendaciones para el uso de microarrays en el diagnóstico prenatal.

Microarray technology, recently implemented in international prenatal diagnosis systems, has become one of the main techniques in this field in terms of detection rate and objectivity of the results. This guideline attempts to provide background information on this technology, including technical and diagnostic aspects to be considered. Specifically, this guideline defines: the different prenatal sample types to be used, as well as their characteristics (chorionic villi samples, amniotic fluid, fetal cord blood or miscarriage tissue material); variant reporting policies (including variants of uncertain significance) to be considered in informed consents and prenatal microarray reports; microarray limitations inherent to the technique and which must be taken into account when recommending microarray testing for diagnosis; a detailed clinical algorithm recommending the use of microarray testing and its introduction into routine clinical practice within the context of other genetic tests, including pregnancies in families with a genetic history or specific syndrome suspicion, first trimester increased nuchal translucency or second trimester heart malformation and ultrasound findings not related to a known or specific syndrome. This guideline has been coordinated by the Spanish Association for Prenatal Diagnosis (AEDP, «Asociación Española de Diagnóstico Prenatal¼), the Spanish Human Genetics Association (AEGH, «Asociación Española de Genética Humana¼) and the Spanish Society of Clinical Genetics and Dysmorphology (SEGCyD, «Sociedad Española de Genética Clínica y Dismorfología¼).

Guidelines for genomic array analysis in acquired haematological neoplastic disorders.

Genetic profiling is important for disease evaluation and prediction of prognosis or responsiveness to therapy in neoplasia. Microarray technologies, including array comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-detecting arrays, have in recent years been introduced into the diagnostic setting for specific types of haematological malignancies and solid tumours. It can be used as a complementary test or depending on the neoplasia investigated, also as a standalone test. However, comprehensive and readable presentation of frequently identified complex genomic profiles remains challenging. To assist diagnostic laboratories, standardization and minimum criteria for clinical interpretation and reporting of acquired genomic abnormalities detected through arrays in neoplastic disorders are presented.

[Genetics applied to clinical practice in neurodevelopmental disorders]. / Genética aplicada a la práctica clínica en trastornos del neurodesarrollo.

The medical literature contains a wide body of evidence supporting genetic involvement in neurodevelopmental disorders. Advances made in genetics and technology have increased the diagnostic cost-effectiveness of current studies from 3-5% to 30-40% in patients with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorders. In this regard, chromosomal microarray studies display greater diagnostic power than conventional techniques (karyotype, subtelomeric analyses, etc.). The latest protocols in the biomedical field of the genetic study of these disorders cite chromosomal microarrays as the first-line analysis, while also recommending other specific studies depending on the patient's clinical features (fragile X syndrome, PTEN mutation, etc.). In the evaluation of other neurodevelopmental disorders (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning disorders, etc.), the number of genetic tests carried out is limited and conditioned by the clinical characteristics or the patient's familial or personal history. Even in these situations, there are no genetic referral or evaluation protocols.

TITLE: Genetica aplicada a la practica clinica en trastornos del neurodesarrollo.Las evidencias geneticas de los trastornos del neurodesarrollo estan ampliamente sustentadas en la literatura medica. Los avances en la genetica y la tecnologia han incrementado la rentabilidad diagnostica de los estudios actuales de un 3-5% a un 30-40% en los pacientes con discapacidad intelectual o trastornos del espectro autista. En este sentido, los estudios por microarrays cromosomicos muestran un mayor poder diagnostico que las tecnicas convencionales (cariotipo, analisis de subtelomeros…). Los protocolos mas recientes en el apartado biomedico del estudio genetico de estos trastornos situan los microarrays cromosomicos como analisis de primera linea, recomendando otros estudios especificos segun las caracteristicas clinicas del paciente (sindrome X fragil, mutacion en PTEN...). En la evaluacion de otros trastornos del neurodesarrollo (trastorno por deficit de atencion/hiperactividad, trastornos del aprendizaje...), la realizacion de pruebas geneticas esta limitada y condicionada a las caracteristicas clinicas o antecedentes familiares o personales del paciente; incluso en estas situaciones, no existen protocolos de evaluacion o derivacion genetica.

Microduplication 10q24.31 in a Spanish girl with scoliosis and myopathy: the critical role of LBX.

LBX1 plays a cardinal role in neuronal and muscular development in animal models. Its function in humans is unknown; it has been reported as a candidate gene for idiopathic scoliosis. Our goal is to document the first clinical case of a microduplication at 10q24.31 (chr10:102927883-103053612, hg19), affecting exclusively LBX1. The patient, a 12-year-old girl, showed attention problems, dyspraxia, idiopathic congenital scoliosis, and marked hypotrophy of paravertebral muscles. Her paternal aunt had a severe and progressive myopathy with a genetic study that revealed the same duplication. We propose to consider genetic studies, particularly of LBX1, in patients with scoliosis and/or hypotrophy-hypoplasia of paravertebral muscles of unknown etiology.

Genética aplicada a la práctica clínica en trastornos del neurodesarrollo / Genetics applied to clinical practice in neurodevelopmental disorders

Las evidencias genéticas de los trastornos del neurodesarrollo están ampliamente sustentadas en la literatura médica. Los avances en la genética y la tecnología han incrementado la rentabilidad diagnóstica de los estudios actuales de un 3-5% a un 30-40% en los pacientes con discapacidad intelectual o trastornos del espectro autista. En este sentido, los estudios por microarrays cromosómicos muestran un mayor poder diagnóstico que las técnicas convencionales (cariotipo, análisis de subtelómeros…). Los protocolos más recientes en el apartado biomédico del estudio genético de estos trastornos sitúan los microarrays cromosómicos como análisis de primera línea, recomendando otros estudios específicos según las características clínicas del paciente (síndrome X frágil, mutación en PTEN...). En la evaluación de otros trastornos del neurodesarrollo (trastorno por déficit de atención/hiperactividad, trastornos del aprendizaje...), la realización de pruebas genéticas está limitada y condicionada a las características clínicas o antecedentes familiares o personales del paciente; incluso en estas situaciones, no existen protocolos de evaluación o derivación genética (AU)

The medical literature contains a wide body of evidence supporting genetic involvement in neurodevelopmental disorders. Advances made in genetics and technology have increased the diagnostic cost-effectiveness of current studies from 3-5% to 30-40% in patients with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorders. In this regard, chromosomal microarray studies display greater diagnostic power than conventional techniques (karyotype, subtelomeric analyses, etc.). The latest protocols in the biomedical field of the genetic study of these disorders cite chromosomal microarrays as the first-line analysis, while also recommending other specific studies depending on the patient’s clinical features (fragile X syndrome, PTEN mutation, etc.). In the evaluation of other neurodevelopmental disorders (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning disorders, etc.), the number of genetic tests carried out is limited and conditioned by the clinical characteristics or the patient’s familial or personal history. Even in these situations, there are no genetic referral or evaluation protocols (AU)

Prenatal detection of TAR syndrome in a fetus with compound inheritance of an RBM8A SNP and a 334­kb deletion: a case report.

Thrombocytopenia­absent radius syndrome (TAR) is a rare genetic disorder that is characterized by the absence of the radius bone in each forearm and a markedly reduced platelet count that results in life­threatening bleeding episodes (thrombocytopenia). Tar syndrome has been associated with a deletion of a segment of 1q21.1 cytoband. The 1q21.1 deletion syndrome phenotype includes Tar and other features such as mental retardation, autism and microcephaly. This study describes a case of a prenatally diagnosed fetus with compound inheritance of a small (334 kb) deletion, as detected by array­comparative genomic hybridization, and a 5' untranslated region (UTR) low­frequency allele (rs139428292) in gene RBM8A as detected by Sanger sequencing. The study describes the first case of prenatal analysis of TAR syndrome in a fetus with compound inheritance of a 334­kb deletion in the 1q21.1 region and a low­frequency 5' UTR single nucleotide polymorphism, and provides confirmation of the causal nature of the RBM8A gene in the diagnosis of TAR syndrome.

Identification of prefoldin amplification (1q23.3-q24.1) in bladder cancer using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) arrays of urinary DNA.

BACKGROUND: Array-CGH represents a comprehensive tool to discover genomic disease alterations that could potentially be applied to body fluids. In this report, we aimed at applying array-CGH to urinary samples to characterize bladder cancer. METHODS: Urinary DNA from bladder cancer patients and controls were hybridized on 44K oligonucleotide arrays. Validation analyses of identified regions and candidates included fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry in an independent set of bladder tumors spotted on custom-made tissue arrays (n = 181). RESULTS: Quality control of array-CGH provided high reproducibility in dilution experiments and when comparing reference pools. The most frequent genomic alterations (minimal recurrent regions) among bladder cancer urinary specimens included gains at 1q and 5p, and losses at 10p and 11p. Supervised hierarchical clustering identified the gain at 1q23.3-q24.1 significantly correlated to stage (p = 0.011), and grade (p = 0.002). The amplification and overexpression of Prefoldin (PFND2), a selected candidate mapping to 1q23.3-q24.1, correlated to increasing stage and tumor grade by means of custom-designed and optimized FISH (p = 0.013 and p = 0.023, respectively), and immunohistochemistry (p ≤0.0005 and p = 0.011, respectively), in an independent set of bladder tumors included in tissue arrays. Moreover, PFND2 overexpression was significantly associated with poor disease-specific survival (p ≤0.0005). PFND2 was amplified and overexpressed in bladder tumors belonging to patients providing urinary specimens where 1q23.3q24.1 amplification was detected by array-CGH. CONCLUSIONS: Genomic profiles of urinary DNA mirrowed bladder tumors. Molecular profiling of urinary DNA using array-CGH contributed to further characterize genomic alterations involved in bladder cancer progression. PFND2 was identified as a tumor stratification and clinical outcome prognostic biomarker for bladder cancer patients.

A 2.84 Mb deletion at 21q22.11 in a patient clinically diagnosed with Marden-Walker syndrome.

We present a girl with the characteristic clinical picture associated with Marden-Walker syndrome (MWS; OMIM 248700), including mask-like face with blepharophimosis, joint contractures, intellectual disability, a multicystic dysplastic kidney and cerebral dysgenesis. The long-term follow-up allowed us to monitor the evolution of the phenotype in this patient, and among the main findings we highlight the following: demyelination of the pyramidal tract demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation and the involvement of the levator muscles of angle of mouth in fixed facial expression with relative integrity of the rest of the facial expression muscles. A 244 k array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was carried out and showed a de novo interstitial deletion of approximately 2.84 Mb affecting only the cytoband 21q22.11 (genome coordinates chr21:31,874,016-34,711,763). We selected 10 of the most recent published cases with either total or partial deletions of cytoband 21q22.11 that provided good characterization of the genomic size or the genes in the deleted regions. We observed that in nine of the 10 cases the deleted regions included the RUNX1 gene in 21q22.12, which is not affected in the current patient's deletion or in that of Patient 3 from Roberson et al. [2011]. After a comparison of shared deleted genes between cases, and correlation of their potential phenotypes, we concluded that the pattern of defects considered for a diagnosis of MWS may represent part of the phenotypic expression of a partial or total deletion of 21q22.11.

Diagnóstico prenatal y array-CGH II: gestaciones de bajo riesgo / Array-CGH in prenatal diagnosis II: low-risk pregnancies

Recientemente, la tecnología conocida como array-CGH se ha establecido como una herramienta diagnóstica de primer orden para el estudio de pacientes con anomalías congénitas, retraso mental no filiado y otras enfermedades neurológicas. Sin embargo, su utilidad como técnica de primer uso en el campo prenatal está actualmente en fase de evaluación, especialmente en embarazos de bajo riesgo. En una población de 530 gestantes con embarazos de bajo riesgo se realizó, simultáneamente, cariotipo convencional y un estudio de array-CGH para el diagnóstico prenatal. Mientras que el cariotipo detectó 3 casos (0,5%) con alteraciones citogéneticas no equilibradas (una de ellas no definida), el array-CGH detectó 8 casos con este tipo de alteraciones (1,5%), identificando el cambio indefinido detectado por cariotipo. Este estudio demuestra positivamente que el array-CGH puede ser una herramienta útil en el diagnóstico prenatal en embarazos de bajo riesgo(AU)

The array-CGH technique has recently been established as a first-tier diagnostic test for studying patients with congenital anomalies, idiopathic mental retardation and other neurological disorders. However, its use in prenatal diagnosis is still being evaluated, especially in low-risk pregnancies. A study was conducted on a population of 530 low-risk pregnancy women using both conventional karyotype and array-CGH for prenatal diagnosis. Whereas conventional karyotype detected 3 foetuses (0.5%) with unbalanced cytogenetic aberrations (one of them was undefined), array-CGH detected 8 foetuses with copy number aberrations (1.5%), and positively identified the undefined cytogenetic aberration detected using karyotype. In conclusion, this study proposes array-CGH as a useful tool in prenatal diagnosis for low-risk pregnancies(AU)

Are ER+PR+ and ER+PR- breast tumors genetically different? A CGH array study.

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a well-known predictor of breast cancer response to endocrine therapy. ER+ progesterone receptor (PR)- breast tumors have a poorer response to endocrine therapy and a more aggressive phenotype than ER+PR+ tumors. A comparative genomic hybridization array technique was used to examine 25 ER+PR+ and 23 ER+PR- tumors. Tissue microarrays composed of 50 ER+PR+ and 50 ER+PR- tumors were developed to validate the comparative genomic hybridization array results. The genes of interest were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The ER+PR- group had a slightly different genomic profile when compared with ER+PR+ tumors. Chromosomes 17 and 20 contained the most overlapping gains, and chromosomes 3, 8, 9, 14, 17, 21, and 22 contained the most overlapping losses when compared with the ER+PR+ group. The gained regions, 17q23.2-q23.3 and 20q13.12, and the lost regions, 3p21.32-p12.3, 9pter-p13.2, 17pter-p12, and 21pter-q21.1, occurred at different alteration frequencies and were statistically significant in the ER+PR- tumors compared with the ER+PR+ tumors. ER+PR- breast tumors have a different genomic profile compared with ER+PR+ tumors. Differentially lost regions in the ER+PR- group included genes with tumor suppressor functions and genes involved in apoptosis, mitosis, angiogenesis, and cell spreading. Differentially gained regions included genes such as MAP3K3, RPS6KB1, and ZNF217. Amplification of these genes could contribute to resistance to apoptosis, increased activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, and the loss of PR in at least some ER+PR- tumors.

Neonatal detection of 5p13.2 duplication and delineation of the phenotype.

A newborn boy with broad forehead, mild microretrognathia, large hands and feet, arachnodactyly and a cortical thumb also had left renal agenesis, dysgenesis of corpus callosum with psychomotor delay. After olignucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) analysis, we detected a 900 kb duplication in cytoband 5p13.2, apperently a first clinical description.

[X-chromosome-linked ichthyosis associated to epilepsy, hyperactivity, autism and mental retardation, due to the Xp22.31 microdeletion]. / Ictiosis ligada al cromosoma X asociada a epilepsia, hiperactividad, autismo y retraso mental, por microdeleción Xp22.31.

X-chromosome-linked ichthyosis is caused by mutation or deletion of the STS gene associated with a deficiency of the enzyme steroid sulphatase, located in the distal part of the short arm of the X chromosome (Xp22.3-pter), close to the pseudo-autosomal region. Depending on its size, it can present as an isolated entity or combined with a syndrome caused by neighbouring genes, thus associating itself with other monogenic diseases as well as other mental disorders. The most relevant findings from the literature review are the importance of the Xp22.3-pter region and the higher incidence of neurological disorders among males (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism and X-linked mental retardation). The role and implication of these genes in the disease are discussed and the authors suggest a possible contribution of the gene PNPLA4, which was originally described as GS2 and codes for calcium-independent phospholipase A2 beta, involved in lipoprotein metabolism, as one of the causes of autism. Improvements have been observed following treatment with citicoline, thanks to the role this nootropic plays in the biosynthesis of structural phospholipids involved in the formation and repair of the neuronal membrane.

Detection of the first gross CDC73 germline deletion in an HPT-JT syndrome family.

Hereditary primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) may develop as a solitary endocrinopathy (FIHP) or as part of multiple endocrine neoplasia Type 1, multiple endocrine neoplasia Type 2A, or hereditary HPT-jaw tumor syndrome. Inactivating germline mutations of the tumor suppressor gene CDC73 account for 14 and 50% of all FIHP and HPT-JT patients, respectively, and have also been found in almost 20% of apparently sporadic parathyroid carcinoma patients. Although more than 60 independent germline mutations have been described, to date no rearrangement affecting the CDC73 locus has been identified. By means of multiplex-PCR we found a large germline deletion affecting the whole gene in a two-generation HPT-JT family. Subsequently array-CGH and specific PCR analysis determined that the mutation spanned ∼ 547 kb, and included four additional genes: TROVE2, GLRX2, B3GALT2, and UCHL5. Although no clear mutation-specific phenotype was found associated to the presence of the mutation, further studies are needed to assess whether the loss of the neighboring genes could modify the phenotype of carriers. There was complete absence of nuclear staining in the two HPT-JT-related tumors available. The finding of the first rearrangement affecting the CDC73 gene warrants screening for this tumor suppressor gene inactivation mechanism not only in high-risk CDC73 point mutation-negative HPT-JT families, but also in FIHP patients.