Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 2024 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39151818

RESUMEN

A single high-sensitivity troponin-T (hs-TnT) measurement may be sufficient to risk-stratify emergency department (ED) patients with possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using the recalibrated History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk Factors, Troponin (rHEART) score. We sought to validate this approach in a multi-ethnic population of US patients and investigate sex-specific differences in performance. We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of adult ED patients with possible ACS at a single, urban, academic hospital. We investigated the diagnostic performance of rHEART for the incidence of type-1 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and other major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days, using both single (19 ng/L) and sex-specific (14 ng/L for females, 22 ng/L for males) 99th percentile hs-TnT thresholds. The 821 patients included were 54% female, 57% Hispanic, and 26% Black. 4.6% patients had MACE, including 2.4% with AMI. Single threshold rHEART ≤ 3 had sensitivity of 94.4% (95% confidence interval, 81-99%) and negative predictive values (NPV) of 99.3% (98-100%) for MACE; sex-specific thresholds performed nearly identically. Sensitivity and NPV for AMI were 90.0% (67-98%) and 99.3% (97-100%). Excluding patients presenting < 3 hours from symptom onset improved sensitivity for MACE and AMI to 97.0% (84-100%) and 94.1% (71-100%). Logistic regression demonstrated odds of MACE increased with higher rHEART scores at a similar rate for males and females. In conclusion, a single initial hs-TnT and rHEART score can be used to risk-stratify male and female ED patients with possible ACS, especially when drawn > 3 hours after symptom onset.

2.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 30(1): 60-67, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37291751

RESUMEN

During the devastating early months of the unfolding COVID-19 pandemic in New York, healthcare systems and clinicians dynamically adapted to drastically changing everyday practice despite having little guidance from formal research evidence in the face of a novel virus. Through new, silo-breaking networks of communication, clinical teams transformed and synthesized provisional recommendations, rudimentary published research findings and numerous other sources of knowledge to address the immediate patient care needs they faced during the pandemic surge. These experiences illustrated underlying social processes that are always at play as clinicians integrate information from various sources, including research and published guidelines, with their own tacit knowledge to develop shared yet personal approaches to practice. In this article, we provide a narrative account of personal experience during the COVID-19 surge. We draw on the concept of mindlines as developed by Gabbay and Le May as a conceptual framework for interpreting that experience from the standpoint of how early information from research and guidelines was drawn on and transformed in the course of day-to-day struggle with the crisis in New York City emergency rooms. Finally, briefly referencing the challenges to conventional models of healthcare knowledge creation and translation through research and guideline production posed by COVID-19 crisis, we offer a provisional perspective on current and future developments.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Atención a la Salud , COVID-19/epidemiología
3.
Am J Cardiol ; 203: 240-247, 2023 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37506670

RESUMEN

Many algorithms for emergency department (ED) evaluation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using high-sensitivity troponin assays rely on the detection of a "delta," the difference in concentration over a predetermined interval, but collecting specimens at specific times can be difficult in the ED. We evaluate the use of troponin "velocity," the rate of change of troponin concentration over a flexible short interval for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 30 days. We conducted a prospective, observational study on a convenience sample of 821 patients who underwent ACS evaluation at a high-volume, urban ED. We determined the diagnostic performance of a novel velocity-based algorithm and compared the performance of 1- and 2-hour algorithms adapted from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) using delta versus velocity. A total of 7 of 332 patients (2.1%) classified as low risk by the velocity-based algorithm experienced a MACE by 30 days compared with 35 of 221 (13.8%) of patients classified as greater than low risk, yielding a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.6% to 93.0%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% (95% CI 95.9% to 98.9%). The ESC-derived algorithms using delta or velocity had NPVs ranging from 98.4% (95% CI 96.4% to 99.3%) to 99.6% (95% CI 97.0% to 99.9%) for 30-day MACEs. The NPV of the novel velocity-based algorithm for MACE at 30 days was borderline, but the substitution of troponin velocity for delta in the framework of the ESC algorithms performed well. In conclusion, specimen collection within strict time intervals may not be necessary for rapid evaluation of ACS with high-sensitivity troponin.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Troponina , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Troponina T , Biomarcadores , Algoritmos
4.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 3(3): e12739, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35571147

RESUMEN

Study Objective: To evaluate whether the introduction of a 1-hour high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-T (hs-TnT) pathway for patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) improves ED patient flow without changing the rate of "missed" major adverse cardiac events (MACE), compared to use of conventional cardiac troponin with an associated 3-hour pathway. Methods: This was a prospective, uncontrolled observational study conducted before and after implementation of a 1-hour hs-TnT pathway at a high-volume urban ED. Patients undergoing evaluation for ACS in the ED were enrolled during their initial visit and clinical outcomes were assessed at 30 and 90 days. Throughput markers were extracted from the electronic medical record and compared. The primary outcome was provider-to-disposition decision time. Results: A total of 1892 patients were enrolled, 1071 patients while using conventional troponin and 821 after introduction of hs-TnT. With the new assay and pathway, median interval between troponin tests decreased from 4.7 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 3.9-5.7 hours) to 2.3 hours (IQR 1.5-3.4 hours) (P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in median provider-to-disposition decision time, which measured 4.7 hours (IQR 2.9-7.2) and 4.8 hours (IQR 3.1-7.1) (P = 0.428) respectively. Total 30-day MACE rate in discharged patients was low in both groups, occurring in only 4/472 (0.85%) encounters in the first cohort and 4/381 (1.0%) encounters in the second. Conclusion: Introduction of a 1-hour hs-TnT ACS evaluation pathway reduced the troponin collection interval but did not reduce provider to disposition time. There was no difference in rate of 30-day MACE in patients discharged from the ED.

5.
Emerg Med J ; 37(11): 700-704, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32912930

RESUMEN

The pandemic of COVID-19 has been particularly severe in the New York City area, which has had one of the highest concentrations of cases in the USA. In March 2020, the EDs of New York-Presbyterian Hospital, a 10-hospital health system in the region, began to experience a rapid surge in patients with COVID-19 symptoms. Emergency physicians were faced with a disease that they knew little about that quickly overwhelmed resources. A significant amount of attention has been placed on the problem of limited supply of ventilators and intensive care beds for critically ill patients in the setting of the ongoing global pandemic. Relatively less has been given to the issue that precedes it: the demand on resources posed by patients who are not yet critically ill but are unwell enough to seek care in the ED. We describe here how at one institution, a cross-campus ED physician working group produced a care pathway to guide clinicians and ensure the fair and effective allocation of resources in the setting of the developing public health crisis. This 'crisis clinical pathway' focused on using clinical evaluation for medical decision making and maximising benefit to patients throughout the system.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Vías Clínicas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Asignación de Recursos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Toma de Decisiones , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Acad Emerg Med ; 18 Suppl 2: S41-7, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21999557

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Exposure to emergency medicine (EM) is a crucial aspect of medical student education, yet one that is historically absent from third-year medical student training. There are limited data describing the existing third-year rotations. The goal of this study is to identify the content and structure of current EM rotations specific to third-year students. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved survey of clerkship characteristics was designed by consensus opinion of clerkship directors (CDs). The survey was distributed to 32 CDs at institutions with known EM clerkships involving third-year students. RESULTS: Twenty-three (72%) CDs responded to the survey. Sixty-five percent have rotations designed specifically for third-year students, of which 33% are required clerkships. Twenty-seven percent of rotations have prerequisite rotations; 37% of rotations include shifts in the pediatric ED. Clinical time averages four 8-hour shifts per week for 4 weeks; all rotations include weekly didactic time specific to third-year students. A wide variety of textbooks are used; some programs employ simulation labs. Two-thirds of the rotations have a required write-up or presentation; 53% include a final exam. Student evaluations are written and verbal. Most rotations receive more support from the EM departments than from the medical schools for physical space, administrative needs, and faculty time. Among those surveyed, students from institutions requiring a third-year EM rotation have a higher rate of application to EM residencies. CONCLUSIONS: There is variability in the content and structure of existing third-year EM rotations, as well as in financial and administrative needs and support. These data can help to inform CDs and departments that are starting or modifying EM third-year rotations, as well as contribute to the development of curricula for such rotations.


Asunto(s)
Prácticas Clínicas/organización & administración , Curriculum , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Selección de Profesión , Evaluación Educacional , Retroalimentación , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA