Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Shock ; 61(4): 585-591, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38315508

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Background : Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) present a surgical emergency of increasing incidence, which is often misdiagnosed and associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. A retrospective multicenter (11 hospitals) cohort study was initiated to identify the early predictors of misdiagnosis, mortality, and morbidity (skin defect size and amputation). Methods : Patients of all ages who presented with symptoms and were admitted for acute treatment of NSTIs between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Generalized estimating equation analysis was used to identify early predictors (available before or during the first debridement surgery), with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results : The median age of the cohort (N = 216) was 59.5 (interquartile range = 23.6) years, of which 138 patients (63.9%) were male. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections most frequently originated in the legs (31.0%) and anogenital area (30.5%). More than half of the patients (n = 114, 54.3%) were initially misdiagnosed. Thirty-day mortality was 22.9%. Amputation of an extremity was performed in 26 patients (12.5%). Misdiagnosis was more likely in patients with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (ß = 0.20, P = 0.001), and less likely when symptoms started in the anogenital area (ß = -1.20, P = 0.003). Besides the established risk factors for mortality (septic shock and age), misdiagnosis was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (ß = 1.03, P = 0.01). The strongest predictors of the final skin defect size were septic shock (ß = 2.88, P < 0.001) and a skin-sparing approach to debridement (ß = -1.79, P = 0.002). Conclusion : Recognition of the disease is essential for the survival of patients affected by NSTI, as is adequate treatment of septic shock. The application of a skin-sparing approach to surgical debridement may decrease morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Fascitis Necrotizante , Choque Séptico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios de Cohortes , Fascitis Necrotizante/diagnóstico , Fascitis Necrotizante/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años
2.
J Burn Care Res ; 44(6): 1405-1412, 2023 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37227902

RESUMEN

Patients with extensive and complex wounds due to Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections (NSTI) may be referred to a burn center. This study describes the characteristics, outcomes, as well as diagnostic challenges of these patients. Patients admitted to three hospitals with a burn center for the treatment of NSTI in a 5-year period were included. Eighty patients (median age 54 years, 60% male) were identified, of whom 30 (38%) were referred by other centers, usually after survival of the initial septic phase. Those referred from other centers, compared to those primarily admitted to the study hospitals, were more likely to have group A streptococcal involvement (62% vs 35%, p = .02), larger wounds (median 7% vs 2% total body surface area, p < .001), and a longer length of stay (median 49 vs 22 days, p < .001). Despite a high incidence of septic shock (50%), the mortality rate was low (12%) for those primarily admitted. Approximately half (53%) of the patients were initially misdiagnosed upon presentation, which was associated with delay to first surgery (16 hours vs 4 hours, p < .001). Those initially misdiagnosed had more (severe) comorbidities, and less frequently reported pain or blue livid discoloration of the skin. This study underlines the burn centers' function as referral centers for extensively affected patients with NSTI. Besides the unique wound and reconstructive expertise, the low mortality rate indicates these centers provide adequate acute care as well. A major remaining challenge remains recognition of the disease upon presentation. Future studies in which factors associated with misdiagnosis are explored are needed.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Choque Séptico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Unidades de Quemados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Choque Séptico/complicaciones
3.
Qual Life Res ; 32(7): 2013-2024, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36840905

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) are potentially lethal infections marked by local tissue destruction and systemic sepsis, which require aggressive treatment. Survivors often face a long recovery trajectory. This study was initiated to increase understanding of the long-term impact of NSTI on health related quality of life (HRQoL), and how care may be improved. METHODS: Thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data from 25 NSTI-survivors obtained through two focus groups (n = 14) and semi-structured interviews (n = 11). RESULTS: The median age of the participants was 49 years, 14 were female. The median time since diagnosis was 5 years. Initial misdiagnosis was common, causing delay to treatment. Survivors experienced long-term physical consequences (scarring, cognitive impairment, fatigue, sleeping problems, recurrent infections), psychological consequences (traumatic stress symptoms, fear of relapse, adjusting to an altered appearance, sexual issues) and social and relational consequences (changes in social contacts, a lack of understanding). The disease also had a major psychological impact on family members, as well as major financial impact in some. There was a strong desire to reflect on 'mistakes' in case of initial misdiagnosis. To improve care, patient and family centered care, smooth transitions after discharge, and the availability of understandable information were deemed important. CONCLUSION: This study reveals that NSTI have a large impact on physical and psychosocial wellbeing of survivors and their relatives. Except for a few differences (misdiagnosis, fear for re-infection and actual re-infection), the patient experience of patients with NSTI is largely similar to those of burn survivors. Thus, questionnaires to assess HRQoL in burn survivors may be used in future NSTI studies.


Asunto(s)
Fascitis Necrotizante , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/psicología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia , Fascitis Necrotizante/diagnóstico , Fascitis Necrotizante/psicología , Fascitis Necrotizante/terapia , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Reinfección , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Surg Res ; 284: 101-105, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563450

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pectoral fascia (PF) removal during mastectomy still seems to be the standard procedure. However, preservation of the PF might improve postoperative and cosmetic outcomes, without compromising oncological safety. Here, we report on a national survey among Dutch plastic surgeons and oncological breast surgeons to evaluate their techniques and opinions regarding the PF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey based study was performed in the Netherlands, in which both plastic surgeons and oncological breast surgeons were included, each receiving a different version of the survey. The surveys were distributed to 460 and 150 e-mail addresses, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 68 responses were included from more than half of all Dutch medical centers. The results of this study indicate that circa one in five plastic surgeons and breast surgeons routinely preserve the PF during mastectomies and even more surgeons preserve the PF in specific cases. The surgical techniques and opinions regarding PF preservation widely differ between surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the PF does occur in a substantial part of the Dutch medical centers and techniques and opinions are contradictory. Future studies on this topic should clarify the effect of PF preservation on oncological safety, complication rates, postoperative pain, cosmetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Humanos , Femenino , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Mastectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fascia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos
5.
Int J Med Inform ; 167: 104878, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36194993

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections (NSTI) are severe infections with high mortality affecting a heterogeneous patient population. There is a need for a clinical decision support system which predicts outcomes and provides treatment recommendations early in the disease course. METHODS: To identify relevant clinical needs, interviews with eight medical professionals (surgeons, intensivists, general practitioner, emergency department physician) were conducted. This resulted in 24 unique questions. Mortality was selected as first endpoint to develop a machine learning (Random Forest) based prediction model. For this purpose, data from the prospective, international INFECT cohort (N = 409) was used. RESULTS: Applying a feature selection procedure based on an unsupervised algorithm (Boruta) to the  > 1000 variables available in INFECT, including baseline, and both NSTI specific and NSTI non-specific clinical data yielded sixteen predictive parameters available on or prior to the first day on the intensive care unit (ICU). Using these sixteen variables 30-day mortality could be accurately predicted (AUC = 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.96). Except for age, all variables were related to sepsis (e.g. lactate, urine production, systole). No NSTI-specific variables were identified. Predictions significantly outperformed the SOFA score(p < 0.001, AUC = 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.84) and exceeded but did not significantly differ from the SAPS II score (p = 0.07, AUC = 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.92). The developed model proved to be stable with AUC  > 0.8 in case of high rates of missing data (50% missing) or when only using very early (<1 h) available variables. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that mortality can be accurately predicted using a machine learning model. It lays the foundation for a more extensive, multi-endpoint clinical decision support system in which ultimately other outcomes and clinical questions (risk for septic shock, AKI, causative microbe) will be included.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Lactatos , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/terapia
6.
World J Surg ; 46(5): 1051-1058, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35187588

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) affect long-term quality of life in survivors. Different approaches to debridement may influence quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess the current practice of the debridement of NSTI in the Netherlands. METHODS: An animated, interactive online survey was distributed among general surgeons and plastic surgeons in the Netherlands. Two NSTI-cases were presented, followed by questions regarding the preferred surgical approach. Case one described a woman with a swollen, red leg, with signs of sepsis and without visible necrosis. Case two described an immunocompromised man with septic shock syndrome and extensive necrosis. RESULTS: In total 232 responses were included (143 general surgeons, 89 plastic surgeons). In case one, 32% chose to preserve all skin, while 17% chose to resect all skin above the affected fascia, including normal-looking skin. In case two, all participants resected necrotic skin, and most (88%) also blue discolored skin. While 32% did not resect more than blue discolored and necrotic skin, 35% also resected red-colored skin, and 21% all skin overlying the affected fascia, including normal colored skin. Respondents working in a hospital with a burn center tended to preserve more skin, whereas plastic surgeons chose more often for skin resection compared to general surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: By using a novel approach to a survey, the authors demonstrate the existence of extensive practice variety regarding the approach to debridement of NSTI among Dutch general and plastic surgeons. Consensus is needed, followed by targeted education of surgeons.


Asunto(s)
Choque Séptico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos , Desbridamiento , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
J Surg Res ; 264: 296-308, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33845413

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing debridement (SSd) was introduced as an alternative to en bloc debridement (EBd) to decrease morbidity caused by scars in patients surviving Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTI). An overview of potential advantages and disadvantages is needed. The aim of this review was to assess (1) whether SSd is noninferior to EBd regarding general outcomes, that is, mortality, length of stay (LOS), complications, and (2) if SSd does indeed result in decreased skin defects. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. All human studies describing patients treated with SSd were included, when at least of evidence level consecutive case series. Studies describing up to 20 patients were pooled to improve readability and prevent overemphasis of findings from single small studies. RESULTS: Ten studies, one cohort study and nine case series, all classified as poor based on Chambers criteria for case series, were included. Compared to patients treated with EBd, patients treated with SSd had no increased mortality rate, LOS or complication rate. SSd-treated patients had a high rate (75%) of total delayed primary closure (DPC) in the pooled case series. CONCLUSION: The current available evidence is of insufficient quality to conclude whether SSd is noninferior to EBd for all assessed outcomes. There are suggestions that SSd may result in a decreased need for skin transplants, which could potentially improve the (health related) quality of life in survivors. Experienced surgical teams could cautiously implement SSd under close monitoring, ideally with uniform outcome registry.


Asunto(s)
Desbridamiento/métodos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Tejido Subcutáneo/patología , Desbridamiento/efectos adversos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Necrosis/cirugía , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Piel/patología , Trasplante de Piel/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Tejido Subcutáneo/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 8(3): e2700, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32537356

RESUMEN

Excision of the pectoral fascia (PF) is routinely performed in oncological mastectomies. Preservation of the PF may, however, decrease postoperative complication rates for bleeding, infections, and seroma. It may also improve reconstructive outcomes by better prosthesis coverage, thereby reducing implant extrusion rates and improving cosmetic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis principles was performed. Studies describing PF preservation were searched in 3 databases. All studies including more than 10 patients were included. The main outcomes were oncological safety (local recurrence, regional and distant metastases, and mortality rates), complication rates (bleeding, infections, seroma), loss of the prosthesis after reconstructive surgery, and cosmetic outcomes following reconstruction. RESULTS: Five studies were included. Three reported on 2 different randomized controlled trials (n = 73, and n = 244), and 2 studies were retrospective case series (n = 203 and n = 256). PF preservation did not affect oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrences, regional and distant metastases, or mortality rates. One study described a significantly lower incidence of seroma in the PF preservation group. No differences were found for bleeding complications and infections. No objective data were provided for reconstructive complications or cosmetic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The literature on PF preservation is scarce. Based on the current evidence, PF preservation seems oncologically safe while potentially reducing postoperative complication rates. It is expected that reconstructive outcomes will benefit from PF preservation, but these studies lack evidence on this topic. Future studies should provide insight into all aspects of PF preservation.

9.
J Surg Res ; 245: 516-522, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31450039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) is a rare but severe infection with a high mortality rate of 12%-20%. Diagnosing is challenging and often delayed. Treatment consists of surgical debridement of all necrotic tissue and administration of antibiotics. Despite adequate treatment, survivors are often left with extensive wounds, resulting in mutilating scars and functional deficits. Both the disease and the subsequent scars can negatively influence the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study was performed to contribute to the knowledge about HRQoL in patients after NSTI. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients treated for NSTI in a tertiary center in the Netherlands. Patient and treatment characteristics were collected and patients were asked to fill in a Short Form 36 questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a diagnosis of NSTI were identified. Twenty-eight (61%) were male and mean age was 57 y. Thirty-nine patients (80%) survived. Thirty-one (84%) of the survivors returned the questionnaire after a median follow-up of 4.1 y (interquartile range [IQR], 2.4-5.9 y). Statistically significantly decreased scores when compared to the Dutch reference values were observed for the Short Form 36 domains, physical functioning, role-physical functioning, general health, and the combined Physical Component Score. No differences were observed for the other five domains or for the Mental Component Score. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that NSTI negatively affects HRQoL as reported by the patient, especially on the physical domains. To learn more about HRQoL in patients after NSTI, studies in larger groups with a more disease-specific questionnaire should be performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, prognostic and epidemiological.


Asunto(s)
Fascitis Necrotizante/cirugía , Gangrena de Fournier/cirugía , Gangrena Gaseosa/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Adulto , Desbridamiento/efectos adversos , Fascitis Necrotizante/complicaciones , Fascitis Necrotizante/psicología , Femenino , Gangrena de Fournier/complicaciones , Gangrena de Fournier/psicología , Gangrena Gaseosa/complicaciones , Gangrena Gaseosa/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/efectos adversos , Países Bajos , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/complicaciones , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Aesthet Surg J ; 38(3): 279-288, 2018 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29117298

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Body contouring surgery (BCS) is becoming increasing popular for aesthetic and reconstructive purposes, particularly among patients with massive weight loss (MWL). However, data on quality of life (QoL) following the surgery are limited, especially long-term QoL. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the effect of BCS on QoL and the durability of this effect over time. METHODS: QoL was measured with the Body-QoL® instrument at 3 time points among consecutively treated patients: the day before BCS, 1 to 9 months postoperatively (short term), and 1 to 2.7 years postoperatively (long term). Total Body-QoL scores were compiled, as were scores for the instrument's main domains: body satisfaction, sex life, self-esteem and social performance, and physical symptoms. Scores were examined for the entire study population and separately for the cosmetic and MWL cohorts. RESULTS: Fifty-seven of the 112 patients participated in the short-term assessment and 84 in the long-term assessment. Total Body-QoL scores increased significantly (P < 0.0001), from 44.0 ± 14.1 preoperatively to 85.5 ± 17.5 short-term postoperatively and to 84.4 ± 12.7 long-term postoperatively. Scores for the 2 postoperative assessments did not differ significantly. Similar results were observed for scores on each separate domain. Although preoperative scores were lower for the MWL cohort than the cosmetic cohort (33.9 ± 15.6 vs 46.1 ± 12.8; P = 0.0002), they improved substantially after BCS, approaching scores for the cosmetic cohort. CONCLUSIONS: QoL increases significantly after BCS. This favorable outcome remained stable throughout long-term follow-up and was true for the cosmetic and MWL cohorts.


Asunto(s)
Contorneado Corporal/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Autoimagen , Pérdida de Peso , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
11.
Rev. chil. cir ; 69(3): 215-222, jun. 2017. graf, tab
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-844363

RESUMEN

Introducción: La calidad de vida es uno de los resultados en cirugía de contorno corporal más importantes. La evidencia sobre la calidad de vida de estos pacientes a largo plazo es escasa. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si la calidad de vida obtenida en el postoperatorio temprano posterior a la cirugía de contorno corporal se mantiene a largo plazo. Métodos: Se diseñó un estudio de cohorte prospectiva compuesta por pacientes postoperados de cirugía de contorno corporal con más de un año de seguimiento. La calidad de vida fue medida con el instrumento Body-Qol®. Se compararon los puntajes preoperatorios, postoperatorios tempranos y postoperatorios tardíos. Se realizó el análisis estadístico con las pruebas de Kruskal-Wallis y Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Resultados: La cohorte se compuso de 112 pacientes con un seguimiento a largo plazo del 75%. En toda la cohorte la calidad de vida mejoró entre el preoperatorio (43,9 ± 14,1 puntos) y ambas mediciones postoperatorias (85,2 ± 16,8 postoperatorio temprano y 83,6 ± 13,5 postoperatorio tardío), siendo estadísticamente significativo (p < 0,0001). Entre el postoperatorio temprano y tardío no existió diferencia (p = 0,112). El análisis por dominios demostró la misma tendencia. Los pacientes con pérdida masiva de peso tuvieron puntajes preoperatorios menores, pero igualaron a la población estética en ambas mediciones postoperatorias. Conclusiones: La calidad de vida mejora significativamente posterior a la cirugía de contorno corporal de forma temprana, y esta mejoría es estable en el tiempo. Esto se observa tanto en los pacientes estéticos como en los posteriores a la pérdida masiva de peso.


Introduction: One of the most important outcomes in patients undergoing body-contouring surgery is quality of life. Data on long-term quality of life is deficient. The main purpose of this study is to determine if short-term QoL after body contouring surgery maintains in the long-term follow up. Methods: A cohort study was designed; patients with at least one-year follow-up from the surgery were included. Quality of life was measured with the Body-Qol© instrument. All patients answered the preoperative Body-Qol© and at least one measurement after one year of follow-up from body contouring surgery. The preoperative scores, short-term scores and long-term follow-up scores were compared. The statistical analysis was made with Kruskal-Wallis y Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Results: The cohort was integrated by 112 patients; the long-term follow-up was of 75%. Quality of life improved between the preoperative measure (43.9 ± 14.1 points) and both short-term and long-term measures (85.2 ± 16.8 early postoperative y 83.6 ± 13.5 late postoperative), which was statistically significant (P< .0001). There was no difference between the short-term and long-term measures (P = .112). The domain analysis demonstrated the same tendency. Massive weight loss patients had lower preoperative scores but improved more after BCS, reaching almost cosmetic values. Conclusions: Quality of life improves soon after surgery and is stable over time. This was observed for both massive weight loss and cosmetic patients.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Corporal , Técnicas Cosméticas , Calidad de Vida , Pérdida de Peso , Abdominoplastia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Autoimagen , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...