[Correction of refractive disorders after surgical treatment of recurrent pterygium (case study)]. / Korrektsiya refraktsionnykh narushenii posle khirurgicheskogo lecheniya retsidiviruyushchego pterigiuma (klinicheskoe nablyudenie).

Lamellar keratoplasty is the most effective and safe method of surgical treatment of recurrent pterygium, providing restoration of the corneal frame and optical properties and a high anti-relapse effect due to the barrier properties of the lamellar graft. However, potential postoperative changes in the regularity of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea (especially in case of advanced stage of fibrovascular tissue growth) do not always allow achieving high functional results of treatment. The article presents a clinical case that demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of excimer laser correction of refractive disorders after surgical treatment of pterygium.

[Comparative assessment of functional outcomes of different endothelial keratoplasty techniques]. / Sravnitel'naya otsenka funktsional'nykh rezul'tatov razlichnykh tekhnologii endotelial'noi keratoplastiki.

PURPOSE: Comparative analysis of the higher-order aberrations (HOA) of the cornea after endothelial keratoplasty (EK) using DSAEK and DMEK techniques; evaluation of the correlation between higher-order corneal aberrations and functional outcomes of the treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 47 patients (59 eyes). The main group consisted of 35 patients (35 eyes) with bullous keratopathy and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy; among them, 19 patients underwent endothelial keratoplasty using the DSAEK technique and 16 - DMEK technique. The control group included 12 patients (24 eyes) of corresponding age without corneal pathology. Standard and special examination tests were performed before, as well as 6 and 12 months after the operation, including computed tomography and aberrometry of the cornea using the Pentacam HR system. Same tests were performed in the control group. RESULTS: The values of the main HOA of the anterior corneal surface: RMS coma (Z3±1, Z5±1), RMS spherical aberration (SA; Z40, Z60) and RMS HOA (Z3-6) 6 months after different EK techniques were statistically significantly higher than in the control group. A statistically significantly lower induction of aberrations of the posterior corneal surface after DMEK technique was revealed. Analysis of the final aberration pattern 6 months after surgery did not reveal any statistically significant differences in the values of the main (RMS coma, RMS SA, RMS HOA) total corneal aberrations after DSAEK and DMEK. A negative correlation was revealed between the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and HOA; however, it was statistically significant only for individual aberration values: RMS HOA (Z3-6) of the posterior corneal aberrations after DMEK (r= -0.634, p=0.049), and RMS coma (Z3±1, Z5±1) of the cornea after DSAEK (r= -0.57, p=0.042). CONCLUSION: Comparative analysis of total corneal HOA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in the main parameters: RMS coma, RMS SA, RMS HOA in patients after DSAEK and DMEK surgeries. Correlation analysis did not reveal any statistically significant effects of most aberrations on the functional outcomes of the treatment.

[Refractive changes after different modifications of endothelial keratoplasty]. / Refraktsionnye izmeneniia posle razlichnykh modifikatsii éndotelial'noi keratoplastiki.

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in clinical refraction after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK), and assess their correlation to the thickness of the transplant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The main study group included 40 patients (40 eyes) after DSAEK and 20 patients (20 eyes) after DMEK, the control group consisted of 20 patients (20 eyes) without any corneal pathologies or history of surgical treatment. In addition to standard examination, patients of the main group had central corneal thickness and transplant thickness regularly measured; they were also monitored by optical coherence tomography (Optovue, U.S.A.), computed tomography and aberrometry of the cornea performed on Pentacam device. The control group had the same examination regimen. RESULTS: Best corrected visual acuity after 6 months was on average 0.2 higher in DMEK patients compared to those who underwent DSAEK; after one year - 0.1 higher. Clinical refraction data shows presence of hypermetropic changes after DSAEK surgery. Induced astigmatism after one year was 0.4 Diopters in DSAEK patients, but did not exceed 0.1 Diopters in DMEK patients. Stabilization of the corneal thickness in DMEK group occurred on the 3-4th month, in DSAEK group - 6-7th month. Certain values of higher-order aberrations (3-6) and root-mean-square deviation (RMS) of the wave-front of anterior corneal surface in DSAEK and DMEK groups were higher than in the control group. Aberrations on the posterior corneal surface in DMEK group were significantly lower than in DSAEK group. There were no statistically significant differences in 'final' RMS higher-order aberrations between DMEK and DSAEK groups.