Update on sex specific risk factors in cardiovascular disease.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and accounts for roughly 1 in 5 deaths in the United States. Women in particular face significant disparities in their cardiovascular care when compared to men, both in the diagnosis and treatment of CVD. Sex differences exist in the prevalence and effect of cardiovascular risk factors. For example, women with history of traditional cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, tobacco use, and diabetes carry a higher risk of major cardiovascular events and mortality when compared to men. These discrepancies in terms of the relative risk of CVD when traditional risk factors are present appear to explain some, but not all, of the observed differences among men and women. Sex-specific cardiovascular disease research-from identification, risk stratification, and treatment-has received increasing recognition in recent years, highlighting the current underestimated association between CVD and a woman's obstetric and reproductive history. In this comprehensive review, sex-specific risk factors unique to women including adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO), such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm delivery, and newborn size for gestational age, as well as premature menarche, menopause and vasomotor symptoms, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), and infertility will be discussed in full detail and their association with CVD risk. Additional entities including spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), coronary microvascular disease (CMD), systemic autoimmune disorders, and mental and behavioral health will also be discussed in terms of their prevalence among women and their association with CVD. In this comprehensive review, we will also provide clinicians with a guide to address current knowledge gaps including implementation of a sex-specific patient questionnaire to allow for appropriate risk assessment, stratification, and prevention of CVD in women.

Ischemic heart disease in pregnancy: a practical approach to management.

Ischemic heart disease is a crucial issue during pregnancy. The term is composed of both preexisting conditions and acute coronary syndrome in pregnancy, including pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction, which can have a significant effect on maternal and fetal outcomes. This review provides a complete guide to managing ischemic heart disease in pregnant women, emphasizing the importance of multidisciplinary care and individualized treatment strategies. Cardiovascular disease, particularly ischemic heart disease, is now the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Pregnancy introduces unique physiological changes that increase the risk of acute myocardial infarction, with pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction cases often associated with factors, such as advanced maternal age, chronic hypertension, and preexisting cardiovascular conditions. This review distinguishes between preexisting ischemic heart disease and pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction. It will emphasize the various etiologies of pregnancy-associated myocardial infarction, including coronary atherosclerosis and plaque rupture presenting as ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and other nonatherosclerotic causes, including spontaneous coronary artery dissection, vasospasm, and embolism. Our study discusses the practical management of ischemic heart disease in pregnancy, with a focus on preconception counseling, risk assessment, and tailored antenatal planning for women with preexisting ischemic heart disease. Moreover, this document focuses on the challenges of diagnosing cardiovascular disease, especially when presented with nonclassical risk factors and presentation. It provides insight into the appropriate diagnostic testing methods, such as electrocardiogram, cardiac biomarkers, and echocardiography. In addition, the review covers various treatment strategies, from medical management to more invasive procedures, including coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass graft. Special attention is given to medication safety during pregnancy, including anticoagulation, beta-blockers, and antiplatelet agents. The complexities of delivery planning in women with ischemic heart disease are discussed, advocating for a multidisciplinary team-based approach and careful consideration of the timing and mode of delivery. Furthermore, the roles of breastfeeding and postpartum care are explored, emphasizing the long-term benefits and the suitability of various medications during lactation. Lastly, this review provides crucial insights into the management of ischemic heart disease in pregnancy, stressing the need for heightened awareness, prompt diagnosis, and tailored management to optimize maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Clinical and economic evaluation of a proteomic biomarker preterm birth risk predictor: cost-effectiveness modeling of prenatal interventions applied to predicted higher-risk pregnancies within a large and diverse cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Preterm birth occurs in more than 10% of U.S. births and is the leading cause of U.S. neonatal deaths, with estimated annual costs exceeding $25 billion USD. Using real-world data, we modeled the potential clinical and economic utility of a prematurity-reduction program comprising screening in a racially and ethnically diverse population with a validated proteomic biomarker risk predictor, followed by case management with or without pharmacological treatment. METHODS: The ACCORDANT microsimulation model used individual patient data from a prespecified, randomly selected sub-cohort (N = 847) of a multicenter, observational study of U.S. subjects receiving standard obstetric care with masked risk predictor assessment (TREETOP; NCT02787213). All subjects were included in three arms across 500 simulated trials: standard of care (SoC, control); risk predictor/case management comprising increased outreach, education and specialist care (RP-CM, active); and multimodal management (risk predictor/case management with pharmacological treatment) (RP-MM, active). In the active arms, only subjects stratified as higher risk by the predictor were modeled as receiving the intervention, whereas lower-risk subjects received standard care. Higher-risk subjects' gestational ages at birth were shifted based on published efficacies, and dependent outcomes, calibrated using national datasets, were changed accordingly. Subjects otherwise retained their original TREETOP outcomes. Arms were compared using survival analysis for neonatal and maternal hospital length of stay, bootstrap intervals for neonatal cost, and Fisher's exact test for neonatal morbidity/mortality (significance, p < .05). RESULTS: The model predicted improvements for all outcomes. RP-CM decreased neonatal and maternal hospital stay by 19% (p = .029) and 8.5% (p = .001), respectively; neonatal costs' point estimate by 16% (p = .098); and moderate-to-severe neonatal morbidity/mortality by 29% (p = .025). RP-MM strengthened observed reductions and significance. Point estimates of benefit did not differ by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Modeled evaluation of a biomarker-based test-and-treat strategy in a diverse population predicts clinically and economically meaningful improvements in neonatal and maternal outcomes.

Preterm birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks' gestation, is the leading cause of illness and death in newborns. In the United States, more than 10% of infants are born prematurely, and this rate is substantially higher in lower-income, inner-city and Black populations. Prematurity associates with greatly increased risk of short- and long-term medical complications and can generate significant costs throughout the lives of affected children. Annual U.S. health care costs to manage short- and long-term prematurity complications are estimated to exceed $25 billion.Clinical interventions, including case management (increased patient outreach, education and specialist care), pharmacological treatment and their combination can provide benefit to pregnancies at higher risk for preterm birth. Early and sensitive risk detection, however, remains a challenge.We have developed and validated a proteomic biomarker risk predictor for early identification of pregnancies at increased risk of preterm birth. The ACCORDANT study modeled treatments with real-world patient data from a racially and ethnically diverse U.S. population to compare the benefits of risk predictor testing plus clinical intervention for higher-risk pregnancies versus no testing and standard care. Measured outcomes included neonatal and maternal length of hospital stay, associated costs and neonatal morbidity and mortality. The model projected improved outcomes and reduced costs across all subjects, including ethnic and racial minority populations, when predicted higher-risk pregnancies were treated using case management with or without pharmacological treatment. The biomarker risk predictor shows high potential to be a clinically important component of risk stratification for pregnant women, leading to tangible gains in reducing the impact of preterm birth.

Performance of a proteomic preterm delivery predictor in a large independent prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth remains a common and devastating complication of pregnancy. There remains a need for effective and accurate screening methods for preterm birth. Using a proteomic approach, we previously discovered and validated (Proteomic Assessment of Preterm Risk study, NCT01371019) a preterm birth predictor comprising a ratio of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 to sex hormone-binding globulin. OBJECTIVE: To determine the performance of the ratio of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 to sex hormone-binding globulin to predict both spontaneous and medically indicated very preterm births, in an independent cohort distinct from the one in which it was developed. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study (Multicenter Assessment of a Spontaneous Preterm Birth Risk Predictor, NCT02787213) at 18 sites in the United States. Women had blood drawn at 170/7 to 216/7 weeks' gestation. For confirmation, we planned to analyze a randomly selected subgroup of women having blood drawn between 191/7 and 206/7 weeks' gestation, with the results of the remaining study participants blinded for future validation studies. Serum from participants was analyzed by mass spectrometry. Neonatal morbidity and mortality were analyzed using a composite score by a method from the PREGNANT trial (NCT00615550, Hassan et al). Scores of 0-3 reflect increasing numbers of morbidities or length of neonatal intensive care unit stay, and 4 represents perinatal mortality. RESULTS: A total of 5011 women were enrolled, with 847 included in this planned substudy analysis. There were 9 preterm birth cases at <320/7 weeks' gestation and 838 noncases at ≥320/7 weeks' gestation; 21 of 847 infants had neonatal composite morbidity and mortality index scores of ≥3, and 4 of 21 had a score of 4. The ratio of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 to sex hormone-binding globulin ratio was substantially higher in both preterm births at <320/7 weeks' gestation and there were more severe neonatal outcomes. The ratio of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 to sex hormone-binding globulin ratio was significantly predictive of birth at <320/7 weeks' gestation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.87; P=.016). Stratification by body mass index, optimized in the previous validation study (22

Effect of Antibiotic Treatment of Amniotic Fluid Sludge.

BACKGROUND: Amniotic fluid sludge refers to the sonographic presence of echogenic, free-floating aggregates of debris located within the amniotic cavity near the internal cervical os of women with intact membranes. Clinically, it is independently associated with increased obstetric, infectious, and neonatal morbidity, including: short cervix, chorioamnionitis, and an increased risk of preterm birth. It is thought to be infectious in nature and has been described as an intrauterine bacterial biofilm. There is little evidence on the impact of treatment with antibiotics on outcome. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether outpatient antibiotics administered to women with amniotic fluid sludge would reduce preterm birth risk compared to no antibiotic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients diagnosed with amniotic fluid sludge by transvaginal sonography between 15 and 25 weeks' gestation in the outpatient ultrasound unit at a single academic center between 2010 and 2017. Patients were segregated according to whether they were treated with oral antibiotics at the time of diagnosis. Women with multiple gestation, fetal anomalies, preterm rupture of membranes prior to initial diagnosis of amniotic fluid sludge, and active preterm labor placenta previa and/or suspected accreta were excluded from analysis. Primary outcome of preterm birth at less than 37 weeks' gestation was compared by univariate and regression analysis to control for potential co-linear and/or confounding variables. Additional outcomes were compared by univariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were initially identified, and 97 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 51 were treated with oral antibiotics (46 azithromycin and 5 moxifloxacin), and 46 were not treated. The overall incidence of preterm birth at <37 weeks was 49.4 % (48 of 97) and preterm birth <28 weeks was 22.7% (22 of 97). There was no significant difference in preterm birth, either at <37 weeks (P = .47) or <28 weeks (P = .83) between the treated and untreated women. After adjusting for race, body mass index, tobacco use, cervical length, and preterm birth history, antibiotic treatment did not reduce the risk of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; confidence interval, 0.77-1.9). No differences were seen in the incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (P = .94) or median latency from diagnosis to delivery (P = .47). Birthweight (P = .99), sepsis (P = .53), intraventricular hemorrhage (P = .95), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (P = .08) were not affected by antibiotic treatment. Antibiotic treatment did not affect the incidence of either clinical or histologic chorioamnionitis (P = .92 and .14, respectively) or histologic stage 2-3 maternal or fetal inflammation (P = .94 and 0.58, respectively). Sonographic resolution of amniotic fluid sludge on first subsequent scan was seen in 34% of antibiotic-treated women and 43% of untreated women (P = .42). There was no difference in latency from diagnosis to delivery or mean gestational age at delivery according to whether sludge resolved or persisted at the first subsequent scan (P = .14 for each). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic treatment of amniotic fluid sludge is not associated with a reduction in premature birth. Likewise, antibiotic treatment of amniotic fluid sludge was not associated with improvement in other obstetric, neonatal, or pathologic variables. These findings suggest that the presumed infectious nature of sludge and subsequent adverse outcomes are not treated or improved by administration of azithromycin following midtrimester sonographic diagnosis.

Impact of dosing schedule on uptake of neuroprotective magnesium sulfate.

Background: Preterm delivery <32-week gestation is associated with significant neurodevelopmental morbidity ranging from mild delay to profound disability. Several randomized trials have shown that magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) is an effective neuroprotectant, demonstrating reduced rates of cerebral palsy, death, and gross motor dysfunction for the neonate or infant. Dosing was not consistent among the major trials and the onus was placed on institutions by ACOG to develop and implement protocols with respect to MgSO4 as a neuroprotectant. A recent study demonstrated that MgSO4 exposure <12 h prior to delivery was associated with a decrease in CP compared to more remote exposure.Objective: To assess impact of dosing schedule on uptake of neuroprotective MgSO4 in patients delivering <32 weeks gestational age.Study design: A retrospective cohort study of all deliveries occurring <32 weeks' gestation at a single academic center between March-December 2014 and March-December 2015 was conducted. Institutional policy shifted in 2015 from MgSO4 bolus with continuous infusion based on the BEAM trial to a single bolus dose based on the PREMAG trial. Patients with preeclampsia, known fetal anomalies, and/or stillbirth were excluded from this analysis. Patients were identified through query of the Medical University of South Carolina Perinatal Information System (PINS) database with respect to whether or not they had received MgSO4 within 12 h of delivery. Chi-squared analysis was performed to compare the overall rate of MgSO4 exposure and MgSO4 exposure <12 h prior to delivery between groups. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate maternal, obstetric, and neonatal variables among those receiving MgSO4 within 12 h of delivery in each cohort. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to control for co-linear or potential confounding variables.Results: A total of 224 patients were identified, 115 delivered between March-December 2014 and 109 delivered between March-December 2015. With respect to MgSO4 exposure prior to delivery, 27 (23.5%) received MgSO4 in the 2014 cohort compared to 44 (40.4%) in the 2015 cohort (OR: 2.2, p < .01). Of those being exposed within 12 h of delivery, there were 16 (13.9%) maternal exposures in the 2014 cohort versus 28 (26.7%) in the 2015 cohort (OR: 2.15, p = .02). Of the 18 neonates delivered in 2014 there were four cases of grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage versus one case among the 36 neonates (2.7%) born in 2015 (0.04). This finding holds after controlling for race, preterm labor, gestational age, corticosteroid, birthweight, and indomethacin exposure.Conclusions: Dosing of neuroprotective MgSO4 according to PREMAG trial specifications was associated with a significantly greater percentage of patients having received neuroprotective magnesium at any point prior to delivery or within the 12 h prior to delivery when compared to dosing according to BEAM trial specifications.

Hypothyroidism in Pregnancy.

Hypothyroidism in pregnancy is defined as the presence of an elevated thyroid stimulating hormone during gestation, affecting 2% to 3% of the population. Overt hypothyroidism is diagnosed by a decreased FT4, while patients with a normal FT4 are considered to have subclinical disease. Poorly controlled disease is associated with both pregnancy complications and developmental delays in the offspring. Treatment consists of replacement with levothyroxine and regular monitoring. Most pregnant women will require an increase in their dosing from 25% to 30%. While treatment for SCH remains controversial, current recommendations do not support universal screening of low-risk women during pregnancy.

Thyroid Nodules and Thyroid Cancer in Pregnancy.

Thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer discovered during pregnancy can result in significant anxiety for patients may present a challenge for providers. The prevalence of thyroid nodules is reported to vary between 3% and 21%. The estimated overall prevalence of thyroid cancer during pregnancy is 14.4 per 100,000 births. Imaging and possible tissue diagnosis should be considered for palpable thyroid nodules. Benign or stable nodules can usually be observed through pregnancy. Suspicious masses may require surgical treatment, best handled through multidisciplinary care. Clinicians should be aware of the care and management recommendations during the antepartum and postpartum periods.

Parathyroid Diseases.

Although uncommon in pregnancy, parathyroid dysfunction may produce significant perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of hyperparathyroidism is 0.5%. The most common cause of primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy is a single parathyroid adenoma, which is present in nearly 80% of cases. Surgery is the only definitive treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism, with a cure rate that is excellent. The most common etiology of hypoparathyroidism is damage to the parathyroid glands after surgery, with an incidence of 0.2%. Treatment of hypoparathyroidism is usually a high-calcium diet with vitamin D supplementation. Vitamin D deficiency is common, associated with perinatal morbidity and easily corrected.

Case Studies in Thyroid Dysfunction and Pregnancy.

This chapter represents a selection of 8 clinical scenarios that may commonly be encountered. They help summarize some of the literature and teaching points of the previous chapters. They are not meant to represent every possible presentation of thyroid disease, but rather to present common symptoms and findings that may aid a clinician in making a diagnosis or in selecting initial treatment.

The Impact of Delivery in a Rural County on a Cohort of Women Living with HIV Infection and Their Infants.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine if infants born in rural counties had an increased risk of contracting HIV. METHODS: Data were obtained from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control for all women living with HIV delivering from 2004 to 2014. In this retrospective cohort study, maternal and neonatal outcomes from urban and rural counties were compared. Binomial statistical analyses were conducted using Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests, χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with perinatal HIV infection. FINDINGS: Six hundred and sixty-six women living with HIV had 868 pregnancies and delivered 885 infants; 17% (148) were born in rural counties. Eleven infants (1.2%) were diagnosed with perinatal HIV infection. The proportion of women taking antenatal antiretroviral therapy (ART) was similar between rural and urban counties (84% vs 87%; P = .3), but women in urban counties were more likely to have an HIV RNA viral load <40 copies/mL before delivery (32% vs 42%; P = .05). Factors associated with perinatal HIV infection were intra- and postpartum maternal HIV diagnosis (aOR 61.4 [95% CI: 6.7-562.5]; P < .001), parenteral drug use (aOR 7.5 [1.6-34.7]; P = .01), and preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation) (aOR 4.6 [1.2-17.8]; P = .3). CONCLUSIONS: Delivery in a rural county was not associated with an increased risk of perinatal HIV transmission. Women delivering in rural counties taking ART were less likely to have HIV viral suppression, which is a risk factor for perinatal HIV infection.

Development and validation of a spontaneous preterm delivery predictor in asymptomatic women.

BACKGROUND: Preterm delivery remains the leading cause of perinatal mortality. Risk factors and biomarkers have traditionally failed to identify the majority of preterm deliveries. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a mass spectrometry-based serum test to predict spontaneous preterm delivery in asymptomatic pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 5501 pregnant women were enrolled between 17(0/7) and 28(6/7) weeks gestational age in the prospective Proteomic Assessment of Preterm Risk study at 11 sites in the United States between 2011 and 2013. Maternal blood was collected at enrollment and outcomes collected following delivery. Maternal serum was processed by a proteomic workflow, and proteins were quantified by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. The discovery and verification process identified 2 serum proteins, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 (IBP4) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), as predictors of spontaneous preterm delivery. We evaluated a predictor using the log ratio of the measures of IBP4 and SHBG (IBP4/SHBG) in a clinical validation study to classify spontaneous preterm delivery cases (<37(0/7) weeks gestational age) in a nested case-control cohort different from subjects used in discovery and verification. Strict blinding and independent statistical analyses were employed. RESULTS: The predictor had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value of 0.75 and sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.74, respectively. The IBP4/SHBG predictor at this sensitivity and specificity had an odds ratio of 5.04 for spontaneous preterm delivery. Accuracy of the IBP4/SHBG predictor increased using earlier case-vs-control gestational age cutoffs (eg, <35(0/7) vs ≥35(0/7) weeks gestational age). Importantly, higher-risk subjects defined by the IBP4/SHBG predictor score generally gave birth earlier than lower-risk subjects. CONCLUSION: A serum-based molecular predictor identifies asymptomatic pregnant women at risk of spontaneous preterm delivery, which may provide utility in identifying women at risk at an early stage of pregnancy to allow for clinical intervention. This early detection would guide enhanced levels of care and accelerate development of clinical strategies to prevent preterm delivery.

Detection of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity by analysis of cervicovaginal proteins in women with preterm labor and intact membranes.

OBJECTIVE: Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity (MIAC) is common in early preterm labor and is associated with maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity. MIAC is usually occult and is reliably detected only with amniocentesis. We sought to develop a noninvasive test to predict MIAC based on protein biomarkers in cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) in a cohort of women with preterm labor (phase 1) and to validate the test in an independent cohort (phase 2). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study of women with preterm labor who had amniocentesis to screen for MIAC. MIAC was defined by positive culture and/or 16S ribosomal DNA results. Nine candidate CVF proteins were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Logistic regression was used to identify combinations of up to 3 proteins that could accurately classify the phase 1 cohort (N = 108) into those with or without MIAC. The best models, selected by area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve in phase 1, included various combinations of interleukin (IL)-6, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1), alpha fetoprotein, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1. Model performance was then tested in the phase 2 cohort (N = 306). RESULTS: MIAC was present in 15% of cases in phase 1 and 9% in phase 2. A 3-marker CVF model using IL-6 plus CXCL1 plus insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 had AUC 0.87 in phase 1 and 0.78 in phase 2. Two-marker models using IL-6 plus CXCL1 or alpha fetoprotein plus CXCL1 performed similarly in phase 2 (AUC 0.78 and 0.75, respectively), but were not superior to CVF IL-6 alone (AUC 0.80). A cutoff value of CVF IL-6 ≥463 pg/mL (which had 81% sensitivity in phase 1) predicted MIAC in phase 2 with sensitivity 79%, specificity 78%, positive predictive value 38%, and negative predictive value 97%. CONCLUSION: High levels of IL-6 in CVF are strongly associated with MIAC. If developed into a bedside test or rapid laboratory assay, cervicovaginal IL-6 might be useful in selecting patients in whom the probability of MIAC is high enough to warrant amniocentesis or transfer to a higher level of care. Such a test might also guide selection of potential subjects for treatment trials.

Endocrine emergencies.

Several potentially fatal endocrine emergencies in relation to obstetrics and gynecology are discussed in the article. Rates of case fatality vary in different series, but range from 10% to 30%. Rapid recognition, prompt supportive care, and intervention likely maximize maternal and fetal outcomes.

South Carolina Partners for Preterm Birth Prevention: a regional perinatal initiative for the reduction of premature birth in a Medicaid population.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to improve the distribution of preterm deliveries in a Medicaid population through a regional perinatal risk assessment and case management initiative. STUDY DESIGN: An innovative public/private partnership was initiated in the 8 county Lowcountry (LC) perinatal region to reduce preterm birth (PTB) among Medicaid recipient women. Eligible women were identified and underwent telephonic risk assessment, education, and access to a 24 hours, 7 days per week perinatal hotline. Women with predetermined risk factors for PTB were offered patient-centered case management. Medicaid claims and birth certificate data were used to compare obstetric outcomes for 2006 (intervention) and 2004 (control) in both the Lowcountry (LC; program) and Midlands (ML; nonprogram) perinatal regions. RESULTS: There were 6356 Medicaid deliveries in the LC in 2006. Of these, 2111 were referred for telephonic risk assessment; 317 had identifiable PTB risk factors and consented to case management. Compared with 2004, there was a significant improvement in the distribution of preterm birth (P = .05) in the LC region, primarily confined to deliveries less than 28 weeks (1.6% vs 1.1%; P = .029, relative risk [RR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.96). There were also reductions in the frequency (6.7% vs 5.8%; RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-0.98; P = .04) and mean duration (25.0 vs 20.6 days; 95% CI, 1.03-7.77; P = .01) of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. No changes were identified in the ML region. CONCLUSION: A regional initiative of telephonic risk assessment and case management of Medicaid recipient women significantly reduced deliveries less than 28 weeks and NICU care.

Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether the administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision was superior to administration at the time of umbilical cord clamping for the prevention of postcesarean infectious morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Study subjects received cefazolin 15-60 minutes prior to incision and controls received cefazolin at the time of cord clamping. The occurrence of endomyometritis, wound infection, total infectious morbidity, and neonatal complications were compared. RESULTS: There were 357 subjects enrolled. No demographic differences were observed between groups. There were decreased total infectious morbidity in the study group (relative risk [RR] = 0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.87), decreased endometritis (RR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.94). No increase in neonatal sepsis (P = .99), sepsis workups (P = .96), or length of stay (P = .17) was observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of prophylactic cefazolin prior to skin incision resulted in a decrease in both endomyometritis and total postcesarean infectious morbidity, compared with administration at the time of cord clamping. This dosing did not result in increased neonatal septic workups or complications.

Maternal-fetal medicine specialist density is inversely associated with maternal mortality ratios.

OBJECTIVE: Our study's objective was to determine the relationship between state-specific maternal mortality ratios and the density of maternal-fetal medicine specialists. STUDY DESIGN: State maternal mortality ratios from 1994 to 2001 were calculated from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER database. Practitioner distribution data were obtained from professional associations. Demographic information regarding states was gathered from the 2000 US census data. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were conducted with the use of Spearman correlations and Poisson regression, respectively. RESULTS: The median state maternal-mortality ratio was 7.5/100,000 live births. Our study showed that an increase of 5 maternal-fetal specialists per 10,000 live births results in a 27% reduction in the risk of maternal death (relative risk [RR] = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.58-0.93, P = 0.012). This risk reduction was based on a multivariable Poisson regression model that included the following variables and their significant interactions: state-specific percentages of mothers in poverty, mothers without a high school diploma, minority mothers, and teenage mothers. CONCLUSION: The density of maternal-fetal medicine specialists is significantly and inversely associated with maternal mortality ratios, even after controlling for state-level measures of maternal poverty, education, race, age, and their significant interactions.