Establishment and validation of a nomogram for predicting potential lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Identifying lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) metastasis in low rectal cancer is crucial before treatment. Several risk factors and prediction models for LPN metastasis have been reported. However, there is no useful tool to accurately predict LPN metastasis. Therefore, we aimed to construct a nomogram for predicting LPN metastasis in rectal cancer. METHODS: We analyzed the risk factors for potential LPN metastasis by logistic regression analysis in 705 patients who underwent primary resection of low rectal cancer. We included patients at 49 institutes of the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery between June 2010 and February 2012. Clinicopathological factors and magnetic resonance imaging findings were evaluated. The nomogram performance was assessed using the c-index and calibration plots, and the nomogram was validated using an external cohort. RESULTS: In the univariable logistic regression analysis, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, tumor location, clinical T stage, tumor size, circumferential resection margin (CRM), extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), and the short and long axes of LPN and perirectal lymph node (PRLN) were nominated as risk factors for potential LPN metastasis. We identified a combination of the short axis of LPN, tumor location, EMVI, and short axis of PRLN as optimal for predicting potential LPN metastasis and developed a nomogram using these factors. This model had a c-index of 0.74 and was moderately calibrated and well-validated. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to construct a well-validated nomogram for predicting potential LPN metastasis in rectal cancer, and its performance was high.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Five-Year Survival Outcomes in a Large, Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence pertaining to long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer and to investigate the recurrence pattern. DESIGN: This was a prospective analysis of a registered cohort. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 69 institutions across Japan. PATIENTS: A total of 1500 patients with clinical stage II-III rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection between January 2010 and December 2011 were included. After propensity score matching, all eligible patients, including the matched patients registered in 2014, were prospectively followed up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five-year relapse-free survival was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 5.6 years. Among the 964 matched patients, the 5-year relapse-free survival was 65.1% in the open group versus 63.5% in the laparoscopic group (HR 1.04; p = 0.71). Distant recurrences at rare sites, which were more frequently observed in the laparoscopic group, were significantly less salvaged (adjusted OR 0.74; p = 0.045). Postrecurrence 5-year overall survival was significantly better for patients who underwent salvage surgery than for those who did not; 55.3% vs 29.5% for patients with initial local recurrence ( p = 0.03) and 64.4% vs 30.7% for patients with distant recurrence alone ( p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Potential heterogeneity and influence of unknown confounding. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year follow-up data demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer was safely performed in terms of long-term prognosis. In addition, salvage surgery for recurrent lesions was associated with prolonged postrecurrence survival, both in patients with local and distant recurrence. However, recurrence at rare sites may require further investigation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B793 . CIRUGA LAPAROSCPICA VERSUS CIRUGA ABIERTA EN CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO RESULTADOS DE SUPERVIVENCIA A CINCO AOS EN UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE DE GRAN MAGNITUD, MULTICNTRICO Y DE PAREAMIENTO POR PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN: ANTECEDENTES:Existe una escasez de pruebas relacionadas con los resultados de supervivencia a largo plazo de la cirugía laparoscópica versus abierta para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar los resultados de supervivencia a largo plazo de la cirugía laparoscópica para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado e investigar el patrón de recurrencia.DISEÑO:Fue un análisis prospectivo de una cohorte registrada.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en 69 instituciones en todo Japón.PACIENTES:Se incluyó un total de 1500 pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio clínico II-III ubicados por debajo de la reflección peritoneal, entre enero del 2010 y diciembre del 2011. Después del pareamiento por puntaje de propensión, se realizó un seguimiento prospectivo de todos los pacientes elegibles, incluidos los pacientes emparejados registrados en 2014.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:La supervivencia sin recaídas a cinco años fue el resultado primario.RESULTADOS:El período de seguimiento medio fue de 5,6 años. Entre los 964 pacientes emparejados, la supervivencia libre de recaída a 5 años fue del 65,1% en el grupo abierto frente al 63,5% en el grupo laparoscópico (cociente de riesgo 1,04; p = 0,71). Las recurrencias a distancia en sitios raros, que se observaron con mayor frecuencia en el grupo laparoscópico, tuvieron menor sobrevida (razón de posibilidades ajustada 0,74; p = 0,045). La supervivencia general a los 5 años después de la recidiva fue significativamente menor en los pacientes sometidos a una cirugía de rescate; 55,3% frente al 29,5% para los pacientes con recidiva local inicial ( p = 0,03) y 64,4% frente al 30,7% para los pacientes con recidiva a distancia sola ( p < 0,001).LIMITACIONES:Potencial heterogeneidad e influencia de factores de confusión desconocidos.CONCLUSIONES:El seguimiento a cinco años demostró que la cirugía laparoscópica para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado es segura en términos de pronóstico a largo plazo. Además, la cirugía de rescate de las lesiones recurrentes se asoció con una mayor supervivencia posrecurrencia, tanto en pacientes con recurrencia local como a distancia. Sin embargo, la recurrencia en sitios raros puede requerir una mayor investigación. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B793 . (Traducción- Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Laparoscopic surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome using real-time stereotactic navigation.

INTRODUCTION: In median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS), a hyperplastic MAL causes compression and stenosis of the celiac artery (CA). The treatment involves releasing the external pressure on this artery by dissecting the ligament. However, it is difficult to identify the artery because of its deep anatomical location. Stereotactic navigation provides real-time information regarding the surgical instrument's location on computed tomography (CT) images. We utilized this system to overcome the difficulty of anatomical identification. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We present a case of aneurysm rupture caused by MALS, which was treated with laparoscopic MAL dissection with real-time stereotactic navigation. Surgery was performed in a hybrid operating room with three-dimensional C-arm CT (Artis Zeego, Siemens) and an installed Curve navigation system (BrainLab). Preoperative CT images were aligned with intraoperative C-arm CT-like images and the surgical instrument position was projected onto preoperative CT images. After the left gastric artery isolation, the fibrous tissue surrounding the left gastric artery was dissected toward the CA while confirming the location of the CA and aortic wall using the navigation system. The CA's diameter was dilated from 1.8 to 2.6 mm with intraoperative angiography. DISCUSSION: This is the first report of laparoscopic MAL dissection using real-time stereotactic navigation. Although navigation setting was time-intensive, this system helped us understand the anatomical structures and in safely and precisely dissecting the MAL.

Prognostic Impact of Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection on the Survival of Patients in Low Rectal Cancer Subgroups Based on Lymph Node Size.

BACKGROUND: Lateral pelvic node (LPN) dissection (LPND) is considered a promising technique for treating low rectal cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of its prognostic value. Using centrally reviewed preoperative pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) images, this study aimed to find the patient population who has benefited from LPND. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MR images of patients from 69 institutes with stage II-III low rectal cancer were reviewed by experienced radiologists. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and short-term outcomes were measured. RESULTS: In total, 731 preoperative MR images were reviewed (excluding patients with short-axis LPN ≥ 10 mm). Of these, 322 underwent total mesorectum excision (TME) without LPND (non-LPND group), and 409 underwent TME with LPND (LPND group). Preoperative treatment was performed for 40% and 25% of patients in the non-LPND and LPND groups, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher in the LPND group (44.5%) than in the non-LPND group (33.2%; P = 0.002). Among patients with LPNs < 5 mm, OS and RFS curves were not significantly different between the groups. Among patients with LPNs ≥ 5 mm, the LPND group had significantly higher 5-year OS and RFS than the non-LPND group (OS: 81.9% versus 67.3%; RFS: 69.4% versus 51.6%). On multivariate analysis of LPN ≥ 5 mm cases, LPND was independently associated with RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high incidence of postoperative complications, this study showed the prognostic impact of LPND on low rectal cancer patients with LPNs (≥ 5 mm, < 10 mm short axis) measured by experienced radiologists. Trial registration UMIN-ID: UMIN000013919.

Stereotactic Navigation for Rectal Surgery: Comparison of 3-Dimensional C-Arm-Based Registration to Paired-Point Registration.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic navigation enables surgeons to use the preoperative CT or MRI images as a real-time "navigation map." Although stereotactic navigation has been established in neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery, whether this technology is applicable to GI tract surgery remains challenging because of tissue deformation and organ motion. A critical component of this technology is the registration that links the patient's actual body to the preoperative imaging data. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the applicability of stereotactic navigation in rectal surgery, focusing on the registration method. DESIGN: This study was based on a prospective case series. SETTING: The study was conducted in a single university hospital. PATIENTS: Four patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal surgery were included. INTERVENTIONS: Paired-point registration was performed for 2 cases, whereas 3-dimensional C-arm-based registration was performed for the other 2 cases. In addition, 3-dimensional C-arm-based registration was performed twice during the operation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Navigation accuracy was evaluated by measuring target registration error at 8 anatomical landmarks. RESULTS: Target registration error of the 3-dimensional C-arm-based registration group was significantly smaller than that of the paired-point registration group (median, 19.5 mm vs 54.1 mm; p < 0.001). In particular, the error of Z-axis (cranial-to-caudal direction) was significantly smaller in 3-dimensional C-arm-based registration (median, 12.4 mm vs 48.8 mm; p < 0.001). In one case in the 3-dimensional C-arm-based registration group, target registration error of the second registration became significantly smaller than that of the first registration (p = 0.008). LIMITATIONS: This was an observational study with small sample size. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional C-arm-based registration could be performed with the patient in a lithotomy position with head down and lateral tilt without being affected by positional changes. Three-dimensional C-arm-based registration resulted in significantly higher navigation accuracy than paired-point registration, and its accuracy could be further improved by intraoperative re-registration.

[A Case of Long-Term Survival of a Patient with Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastasis and Portal Vein Thrombus after Multidisciplinary Treatment].

A 77-year-old man was diagnosed with gastric cancer with synchronous single liver metastasis and portal vein thrombus. His HER2 immunohistochemistry tumor score was 3+; therefore, we administered trastuzumab plus capecitabine plus cisplatin. After 2 courses of chemotherapy, we observed disappearance of the portal vein thrombus and tumor reduction as a partial response, according to the RECIST guidelines. We performed distal gastrectomy and right lobectomy; the therapeutic grades of the primary and metastatic tumors were 1a and 2, respectively. We administered postoperative chemotherapy, and no recurrent lesions have appeared 2 years after surgery. Multidisciplinary treatment for gastric cancer with liver metastasis might be a feasible and useful strategy.