Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Orthop Sci ; 2023 Jul 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37517890

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No evidence has been found to support the hypothesis that there is a correlation between hallux valgus (HV) and intermetatarsal (IM) angles in HV with metatarsus adductus (MA) and that IM angle in HV with MA is lower than that in HV without MA. The present study aimed to analyze the radiographic characteristics of HV with MA compared to matched controls and to clarify the differences between HV with MA and without MA. METHODS: Preoperative radiographs of 126 female patients (164 feet) who underwent hallux valgus surgery were reviewed. The HV, IM, and MA angles were measured. The MA was defined as MA angle of 20° or greater. Of all the feet, 37 (22.6%) had HV with MA (MA group). Control A (111 feet) having HV without MA was matched by age, gender, and BMI to MA group; Control B (79 feet) having HV without MA was matched by age, gender, BMI, and HV angle to the sub-MA group (31 feet) having HV with MA. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient between the HV and IM angles in the MA group was considered negligible (r = 0.08, p = 0.63), whereas the correlation coefficient in Control A was considered moderate (r = 0.57, p < 0.00001). The correlation coefficient in the MA group was significantly smaller than in Control A (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the HV angle between the sub-MA group and Control B (p = 0.23), but the IM angle was significantly smaller than in Control B (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: There is no significant correlation between the HV and IM angles in HV with MA, as there is in HV without MA. HV with MA has a significantly smaller IM angle for the HV angle compared to HV without MA.

2.
J Clin Neurosci ; 93: 253-258, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34090764

RESUMEN

Many neurological disorders can present similar symptomatology to degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) or myeloradiculopathy (DCMR). Therefore, to avoid misdiagnosis, it is important to recognise the differential diagnosis, which has been well described in previous literature. Additionally, DCM or DCMR can also coexist with other diseases that overlap some of its clinical manifestations, which may be overlooked before cervical surgery. Nevertheless, few studies have addressed this clinical situation. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of coexisting disease with DCM or DCMR would be typically made when some symptoms persist without improvement after cervical surgery. To inform the patients of this possibility preoperatively and arrive at the early diagnosis during the postoperative period, some knowledge of the possible coexisting diseases would be necessary. In this report, we reviewed 230 patients who underwent surgery for DCM or DCMR in an academic centre to examine the prevalence and kind of underlying disease that was overlooked preoperatively. The coexisting diseases relevant to their baseline symptoms were diagnosed only after cervical surgery in three patients (1.3%) and included amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, lung cancer and polymyalgia rheumatica. The overlapping symptoms were gait difficulty, scapular pain and neck pain, respectively. Surgeons should recognise that the coexisting disease with DCM or DCMR may be overlooked before cervical surgery because of overlapping symptomatology, although its prevalence is not certainly high. Further, when the specific symptom persisted without improvement after surgery for DCM or DCMR, the patient should be comprehensively examined, considering diverse pathological conditions, not only neurological disorders.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Dolor de Cuello , Periodo Posoperatorio , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología
3.
J Exp Neurosci ; 9: 27-35, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25987850

RESUMEN

In the present study, the effects of morphine were examined on tests of spatial memory, object exploration, locomotion, and anxiety in male ICR mice. Administration of morphine (15 or 30 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) induced a significant decrease in Y-maze alternations compared to saline vehicle-treated mice. The reduced Y-maze alternations induced by morphine were completely blocked by naloxone (15 mg/kg) or ß-funaltrexamine (5 mg/kg) but not by norbinaltorphimine (5 mg/kg) or naltrindole (5 mg/kg), suggesting that the morphine-induced spatial memory impairment was mediated predominantly by µ-opioid receptors (MOPs). Significant spatial memory retrieval impairments were observed in the Morris water maze (MWM) in mice treated with morphine (15 mg/kg) or scopolamine (1 mg/kg), but not with naloxone or morphine plus naloxone. Reduced exploratory time was observed in mice after administration of morphine (15 mg/kg), in a novel-object exploration test, without any changes in locomotor activity. No anxiolytic-like behavior was observed in morphine-treated mice in the elevated plus maze. A significant reduction in buried marbles was observed in morphine-treated mice measured in the marble-burying test, which was blocked by naloxone. These observations suggest that morphine induces impairments in spatial short-term memory and retrieval, and reduces exploratory behavior, but that these effects are not because of overall changes in locomotion or anxiety.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...