Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 4(1): 4, 2014 Feb 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24484687

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oil body-associated allergens such as oleosins have been reported for important allergenic foods such as peanut, sesame and hazelnut. Here we investigate whether oil body associated proteins (OAPs) are linked with specific clinical phenotypes and whether they are represented in skin prick test (SPT) reagents. METHODS: A hazelnut OAP fraction was characterized by mass-spectrometry (MS) to identify its major constituents. Polyclonal rabbit antibodies were generated against hazelnut OAPs. The presence of OAPs in commercially available hazelnut SPTs was studied by immunoblot and spiking experiments. OAP-specific IgE antibodies were measured in sera from patients with a convincing history of hazelnut allergy by RAST (n = 91), immunoblot (n = 22) and basophil histamine release (BHR; n = 14). RESULTS: Hazelnut OAPs were analysed by MS and found to be dominated by oleosins at ~14 and ~17 kDa, and a 27 kDa band containing oleosin dimers and unidentified protein. In 36/91 sera specific IgE against hazelnut OAPs was detected, and confirmed to be biologically active by BHR (n = 14). The majority (21/22) recognized the oleosin bands at 17 kDa on immunoblot, of which 11 exclusively. These OAP-specific IgE responses dominated by oleosin were associated with systemic reactions to hazelnut (OR 4.24; p = 0.015) and negative SPT (χ2 6.3, p = 0.012). Immunoblot analysis using OAP-specific rabbit antiserum demonstrated that commercial SPT reagents are virtually devoid of OAPs, sometimes (3/9) resulting in false-negative SPT. Spiking of SPT reagents with OAP restored serum IgE binding of these false-negative patients on immunoblot at mainly 17 kDa. CONCLUSION: Hazelnut allergens found in oil bodies dominated by oleosin are associated with more severe systemic reactions and negative SPT. Defatted diagnostic extracts are virtually devoid of these allergens, resulting in poor sensitivity for detection of IgE antibodies against these clinically relevant molecules.

2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2013: 746507, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24102058

RESUMEN

Allergen component analysis is now available in many laboratories. The aim of this study was to examine the possible association between peanut allergen IgE components and severity of clinical reactions in patients with a history of peanut allergy. Data and sera collected from 192 patients within the Manchester Allergy Research Database and Serum Bank were used in this retrospective study. Sensitization to peanut specific IgE and Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 8 peanut IgE components, as measured by fluoroenzyme immunoassay, was not associated with anaphylaxis. In contrast, sensitization to the lipid-transfer protein Ara h 9 was significantly more prevalent in patients with peanut-associated bronchospasm (26% versus 9% of patients), even after adjusting for potential confounding effects of age, gender, and severity of concomitant chronic atopic diseases. Patients who were sensitized to Ara h 9 were more likely to have ingested rather than just have had skin contact with peanut and have a more rapid onset of symptoms. These results are consistent with observations that sensitization to heat and protease resistant lipid-transfer protein components of hazelnut, grains, and fruit is predictive of anaphylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Espasmo Bronquial/inmunología , Glicoproteínas/inmunología , Inmunización , Proteínas de Plantas/inmunología , Alérgenos/inmunología , Anafilaxia/complicaciones , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Anafilaxia/patología , Espasmo Bronquial/etiología , Espasmo Bronquial/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Masculino , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/patología
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 131(1): 164-71, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23141741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Kiwifruit is a common cause of food allergy. Symptoms range from mild to anaphylactic reactions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to elucidate geographic differences across Europe regarding clinical patterns and sensitization to kiwifruit allergens. Factors associated with the severity of kiwifruit allergy were identified, and the diagnostic performance of specific kiwifruit allergens was investigated. METHODS: This study was part of EuroPrevall, a multicenter European study investigating several aspects of food allergy. Three hundred eleven patients with kiwifruit allergy from 12 countries representing 4 climatic regions were included. Specific IgE to 6 allergens (Act d 1, Act d 2, Act d 5, Act d 8, Act d 9, and Act d 10) and kiwifruit extract were tested by using ImmunoCAP. RESULTS: Patients from Iceland were mainly sensitized to Act d 1 (32%), those from western/central and eastern Europe were mainly sensitized to Act d 8 (pathogenesis-related class 10 protein, 58% and 44%, respectively), and those from southern Europe were mainly sensitized to Act d 9 (profilin, 31%) and Act d 10 (nonspecific lipid transfer protein, 22%). Sensitization to Act d 1 and living in Iceland were independently and significantly associated with severe kiwifruit allergy (odds ratio, 3.98 [P = .003] and 5.60 [P < .001], respectively). Using a panel of 6 kiwifruit allergens in ImmunoCAP increased the diagnostic sensitivity to 65% compared with 20% for skin prick tests and 46% ImmunoCAP using kiwi extract. CONCLUSION: Kiwifruit allergen sensitization patterns differ across Europe. The use of specific kiwifruit allergens improved the diagnostic performance compared with kiwifruit extract. Sensitization to Act d 1 and living in Iceland are strong risk factors for severe kiwifruit allergy.


Asunto(s)
Actinidia/inmunología , Alérgenos/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Actinidia/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/efectos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Niño , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Pruebas Cutáneas , Adulto Joven
4.
Hum Immunol ; 71(4): 372-6, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20096740

RESUMEN

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are important in the initiation of immune responses in both health and disease. How TLR activity alters with age, gender, and also with immunosuppressive agents is still largely unexplored. We studied TLR activity in 49 healthy individuals as well as in 26 patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs. TLR activity did not alter significantly between the ages of 2 and 67 years. However, females had twice the TLR7 ligand-induced interferon-I response of males (OR [95% CI] 2.7 [1.4-5.1]), whereas TLR3 and four activities were not significantly different between the sexes. The T-cell immunosuppressant agents cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and azathioprine, as well as low dose glucocorticosteroids did not significantly alter TLR pathway responses. In contrast, high dose glucocorticosteroids reduced in vivo TLR responses by 70%-90%. We suggest that gender differences in TLR responses may help to explain the female preponderance of some autoimmune disorders. Furthermore, an understanding the effects of immunosuppressive agents on TLR-pathway activity should allow more focused therapy for autoimmune disorders.


Asunto(s)
Células Sanguíneas/efectos de los fármacos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/inmunología , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Receptores Toll-Like/metabolismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Células Sanguíneas/inmunología , Células Sanguíneas/metabolismo , Células Sanguíneas/patología , Células Cultivadas , Niño , Preescolar , Citocinas/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Transducción de Señal/inmunología , Receptores Toll-Like/inmunología
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 121(5): 1210-1218.e4, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18378288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty regarding the prevalence of allergies to plant food. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of allergies to plant food according to the different subjective and objective assessment methods. METHODS: Our systematic search of population-based studies (since 1990) in the literature database MEDLINE focused on fruits, vegetables/legumes, tree nuts, wheat, soy, cereals, and seeds. Prevalence estimates were categorized by food item and method used (food challenges, skin prick test, serum IgE, parent/self-reported symptoms), complemented by appropriate meta-analyses. RESULTS: We included 36 studies with data from a total of over 250,000 children and adults. Only 6 studies included food challenge tests with prevalences ranging from 0.1% to 4.3% each for fruits and tree nuts, 0.1% to 1.4% for vegetables, and < 1% each for wheat, soy, and sesame. The prevalence of sensitization against any specific plant food item assessed by skin prick test was usually < 1%, whereas sensitization assessed by IgE against wheat ranged as high as 3.6% and against soy as high as 2.9%. For fruit and vegetables, prevalences based on perception were generally higher than those based on sensitization, but for wheat and soy in adults, sensitization was higher. Meta-analyses showed significant heterogeneity between studies regardless of food item or age group. CONCLUSION: Population-based prevalence estimates for allergies to plant products determined by the diagnostic gold standard are scarce. There was considerable heterogeneity in the prevalence estimates of sensitization or perceived allergic reactions to plant food.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Plantas/efectos adversos , Plantas/inmunología , Adulto , Niño , Frutas/efectos adversos , Frutas/inmunología , Humanos , Nueces/efectos adversos , Nueces/inmunología , Prevalencia , Verduras/efectos adversos , Verduras/inmunología
6.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 121(3): 632-638.e2, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18207562

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although acute allergic reactions after ingestion of peanuts and tree nuts are common, fatalities are rare. Other than patients with coexisting asthma, it is currently not possible to predict which patients are most likely to develop severe reactions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine which clinical and laboratory parameters best predict the likelihood of severe allergic reactions. METHODS: From 1992 to 2004, we collected detailed information on the clinical severity and allergy test results of 1094 patients with peanut and tree nut allergy attending a regional allergy center. In a subgroup of 122 patients, sera were assayed for activity of enzymes involved in the catabolism of bradykinin. RESULTS: Severe pharyngeal edema was 3.8 (2.1-6.9) times more common in patients with severe rhinitis and 2.6 (1.8-3.7) more common after ingestion of tree nuts compared with peanuts. Patients with serum angiotensin-converting enzyme concentrations <37.0 mmol/L had a 9.6 (1.6-57)-fold risk of severe pharyngeal edema. Life-threatening bronchospasm was most likely in patients with severe asthma (relative risk, 6.8 [4.1-11.3]) and less so in patients with milder asthma (2.7 [1.7-4.0]). Altered levels of consciousness were more likely in patients with severe eczema (3.1 [1.1-8.4]). CONCLUSION: Severity of coexisting atopic diseases predicted which patients attending a tertiary referral clinic were most likely to develop life-threatening allergic reactions to peanuts and tree nuts. Patients with the lowest serum angiotensin-converting enzyme concentrations were more likely to develop life-threatening pharyngeal edema, suggesting that this complication may be partly mediated by bradykinin.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiología , Biomarcadores , Hipersensibilidad a la Nuez/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/complicaciones , Adolescente , Aminopeptidasas/sangre , Asma/complicaciones , Niño , Preescolar , Eccema/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Hipersensibilidad a la Nuez/sangre , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/sangre , Peptidil-Dipeptidasa A/sangre , Pruebas Cutáneas
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 120(3): 638-46, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17628647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the prevalence of food allergy in communities. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of food allergy by performing a meta-analysis according to the method of assessment used. METHODS: The foods assessed were cow's milk, hen's egg, peanut, fish, shellfish, and an overall estimate of food allergy. We summarized the information in 5 categories: self-reported symptoms, specific IgE positive, specific skin prick test positive, symptoms combined with sensitization, and food challenge studies. We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for publications since 1990. The meta-analysis included only original studies. They were stratified by age groups: infant/preschool, school children, and adults. RESULTS: A total of 934 articles were identified, but only 51 were considered appropriate for inclusion. The prevalence of self-reported food allergy was very high compared with objective measures. There was marked heterogeneity between studies regardless of type of assessment or food item considered, and in most analyses this persisted after age stratification. Self-reported prevalence of food allergy varied from 1.2% to 17% for milk, 0.2% to 7% for egg, 0% to 2% for peanuts and fish, 0% to 10% for shellfish, and 3% to 35% for any food. CONCLUSION: There is a marked heterogeneity in the prevalence of food allergy that could be a result of differences in study design or methodology, or differences between populations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: We recommend that measurements be made by using standardized methods, if possible food challenge. We need to be cautious in estimates of prevalence based only on self-reported food allergy.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Animales , Hipersensibilidad al Huevo/epidemiología , Peces/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Pruebas Cutáneas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA