Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 212(3): W45-W54, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30673334

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical, pathologic, and multimodality cross-sectional imaging features of a cohort of 94 patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study of 94 patients with pathologically verified DSRCT was conducted at a tertiary cancer center between 2001 and 2013. Epidemiologic, clinical, pathologic, and imaging findings were recorded. Tumor size, location, and shape and the distribution pattern of metastases at presentation were analyzed. RESULTS: DSRCT most often occurred in young patients (median age, 21.5 years; range, 5-53 years), showing a marked predominance in male patients (86 male patients vs eight female patients). Eighty nine-patients (95%) were white (defined in this study as white or Hispanic), four were African American, and one was of Asian descent. Most patients had symptoms, with abdominal pain noted as the most common symptom. At initial presentation, 85 patients (90%) had multifocal disease, nodular disease, diffuse omental and peritoneal disease, or a combination of these conditions. Thirty-eight patients (40%) had diaphragmatic involvement. Thirty-two patients (34%) had liver metastases, and 49 patients (52%) had retroperitoneal involvement in the form of implants, tumoral extension, or nodal involvement. With regard to thoracic findings, 33 patients (35%) had nodal disease, 17 (18%) had pleural effusions, and only two (2%) had lung metastases at presentation. Twelve patients (13%) had calcified lesions. CONCLUSION: DSRCT is a rare, multifocal peritoneal malignancy with frequently disseminated abdominal disease at presentation. In the abdomen, disease most commonly involves the omentum and peritoneum, followed by the retroperitoneum. The liver is the most common solid visceral metastatic site. A substantial number of patients have diaphragmatic involvement. In the thorax, nodal and pleural involvement is more common than lung involvement.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumor Desmoplásico de Células Pequeñas Redondas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Abdominales/patología , Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Tumor Desmoplásico de Células Pequeñas Redondas/patología , Tumor Desmoplásico de Células Pequeñas Redondas/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales
2.
Hernia ; 23(5): 987-994, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430273

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Increasingly, radiologic imaging is obtained as part of the pathway in diagnosing ventral hernias. Often, radiologists receive incomplete or incorrect clinical information from clinicians. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine if clinical exam findings alter radiological interpretation of ventral hernias on CT. METHODS: This is a single-institution double-blind, randomized trial. All patients with a recent abdominal/pelvic CT scan seen in various surgical clinics were enrolled. A surgeon blinded to the CT scan findings performed a standardized physical examination and assessed for the presence of a ventral hernia. Seven independent radiologists blinded to the study design reviewed the scans. Each radiologist received one of three types of clinical exam data per CT: accurate (correct), inaccurate (purposely incorrect), or none. Allocation was random and stratified by the presence of clinical hernia. The primary outcome was the proportion of radiologic hernias detected, analyzed by chi square. RESULTS: 115 patients were enrolled for a total of 805 CT scan reads. The proportion of hernias detected differed by up to 25% depending on if accurate, no, or inaccurate clinical information was provided. Inaccurate clinical data in patients with no hernia on physical exam led to a significant difference in the radiologic hernia detection rate (54.3% versus 35.7%, p = 0.007). No clinical data in patients with a hernia on physical exam led to a lower radiologic hernia detection rate (75.0% versus 93.8%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence and accuracy of clinical information provided to radiologists impacts the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias in up to 25% of cases. Standardization of both clinical and radiologic examinations for hernias and their reporting are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, Number NCT03121131, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03121131.


Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos/prevención & control , Hernia Ventral , Radiografía Abdominal/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Hernia Ventral/diagnóstico , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Examen Físico/métodos , Examen Físico/normas , Radiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA