Vasopressor Administration via Peripheral Intravenous Access for Emergency Department Stabilization in Septic Shock Patients.

Background: Septic shock is commonly treated in the emergency department (ED) with vasopressors. Prior data have shown that vasopressor administration through a peripheral intravenous line (PIV) is feasible. Objectives: To characterize vasopressor administration for patients presenting to an academic ED in septic shock. Materials and methods: Retrospective observational cohort study evaluating initial vasopressor administration for septic shock. ED patients from June 2018 to May 2019 were screened. Exclusion criteria included other shock states, hospital transfers, or heart failure history. Patient demographics, vasopressor data, and length of stay (LOS) were collected. Cases were grouped by initiation site: PIV, ED placed central line (ED-CVL), or tunneled port/indwelling central line (Prior-CVL). Results: Of the 136 patients identified, 69 were included. Vasopressors were initiated via PIV in 49%, ED-CVL in 25%, and prior-CVL in 26%. The time to initiation was 214.8 minutes in PIV and 294.7 minutes in ED-CVL (p = 0.240). Norepinephrine predominated all groups. No extravasation or ischemic complications were identified with PIV vasopressor administration. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 20.6% for PIV, 17.6% for ED-CVL, and 61.1% for prior-CVL. Of 28-day survivors, ICU LOS was 4.44 for PIV and 4.86 for ED-CVL (p = 0.687), while vasopressor days were 2.26 for PIV and 3.14 for ED-CVL (p = 0.050). Conclusion: Vasopressors are being administered via PIVs for ED septic shock patients. Norepinephrine comprised the majority of initial PIV vasopressor administration. There were no documented episodes of extravasation or ischemia. Further studies should look at the duration of PIV administration with potential avoidance of central venous cannulation altogether in appropriate patients. How to cite this article: Kilian S, Surrey A, McCarron W, Mueller K, Wessman BT. Vasopressor Administration via Peripheral Intravenous Access for Emergency Department Stabilization in Septic Shock Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(7):811-815.

Commotio Cordis Resulting from Sibling Rivalry.

A 17-year-old girl with no significant medical, surgical, or family history presented to the emergency department following an episode of sudden cardiac arrest after being punched in the chest by her brother. Bystander CPR was immediately initiated, and she was found to be in ventricular fibrillation by emergency services. The patient had return of spontaneous circulation after one defibrillation event. No other significant injuries were found, and she eventually experienced a complete neurologic recovery and was discharged with no other identified cause for her arrest. The objective of this clinical case report is to highlight this unusual and rare injury to increase awareness and avoid incorrect diagnosis.

Utilization and extravasation of peripheral norepinephrine in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Vasopressors are typically administered through central venous catheters (CVC) due to a historical risk of extravasation with peripheral administration. However, CVC insertion is a time-consuming process that may delay vasopressor administration and is associated with complications. The Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS) Emergency Department (ED) implemented a protocol that recommends peripheral norepinephrine (pNE) be administered through an 18 gauge or larger at or above the antecubital fossa or the external jugular vein with a maximum dose of 20 µg/min. This study characterizes the use and incidence of extravasation in all adult patients who received pNE initiated in the VCUHS ED. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study in adult patients from March 2016 to March 2019. Of the 331 patients that were screened, 177 met inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 60 years and 59% were male. The median APACHE II score was 25 with an overall hospital mortality of 27%. A majority of patients received pNE for distributive shock (63%). Approximately 69% received pNE through an antecubital infusion site. The median total pNE duration was 62 min (IQR 32, 142). Eighty-four percent of patients received a central line. Only 2.3% of patients had confirmed extravasation in addition to another 2.3% where extravasation could not be excluded, for a total rate of 4.5%. None had subsequent extremity injury. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of pNE according to the VCUHS ED protocol resulted in a low extravasation rate.

Feasibility of bystander-administered naloxone delivered by drone to opioid overdose victims.

BACKGROUND: Currently, ≤5% of bystanders witnessing an opioid overdose (OD) in the US administer antidote to the victim. A possible model to mitigate this crisis would be a system that enables 9-1-1 dispatchers to both rapidly deliver naloxone by drone to bystanders at a suspected opioid OD and direct them to administer it while awaiting EMS arrival. METHODS: A simulated 9-1-1 dispatcher directed thirty subjects via 2-way radio to retrieve naloxone nasal spray from atop a drone located outside the simulation building and then administer it using scripted instructions. The primary outcome measure was time from first contact with the dispatcher to administration of the medication. RESULTS: All subjects administered the medication successfully. The mean time interval from 9 -1-1 contact until antidote administration was 122 [95%CI 109-134] sec. There was a significant reduction in time interval if subjects had prior medical training (p = 0.045) or had prior experience with use of a nasal spray device (p = 0.030). Five subjects had difficulty using the nasal spray and four subjects had minor physical impairments, but these barriers did not result in a significant difference in time to administration (p = 0.467, p = 0.30). A significant number of subjects (29/30 [97%], p = 0.044) indicated that they felt confident they could administer intranasal naloxone to an opioid OD victim after participating in the simulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that bystanders can carry out 9-1-1 dispatcher instructions to fetch drone-delivered naloxone and potentially decrease the time interval to intranasal administration which supports further development and testing of a such a system.