Discordance in Recommendation Between Next-Generation Sequencing Test Reports and Molecular Tumor Boards in India.

PURPOSE: Accurate understanding of the genomic and transcriptomic data provided by next-generation sequencing (NGS) is essential for the effective utilization of precision oncology. Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) aim to translate the complex data in NGS reports into effective clinical interventions. Often, MTB treatment recommendations differ from those in the NGS reports. In this study, we analyze the discordance between these recommendations and the rationales behind the discordances, in a non-high-income setting, with international input to evaluate the necessity of MTB in clinical practice. METHODS: We collated data from MTB that were virtually hosted in Chennai, India. We included patients with malignancies who had NGS reports on solid tissue or liquid biopsies, and excluded those with incomplete data. MTB forms and NGS reports of each clinical case were analyzed and evaluated for recommendation concordance. Concordance was defined as an agreement between the first recommendation in the MTB forms and the therapeutic recommendations suggested in the NGS report. Discordance was the absence of the said agreement. The rationales for discordance were identified and documented. RESULTS: Seventy MTB reports were analyzed with 49 cases meeting the inclusion criteria. The recommendation discordance was 49% (24 of 49). Discordant recommendations were mainly due to low level of evidence for the drug (75% of cases). CONCLUSION: The discordance between MTB and NGS vendor recommendations highlights the clinical utility of MTB. The educational experiences provided by this initiative are an example of how virtual academic collaborations can enhance patient care and provider education across geographic borders.

Stem cell therapy: A paradigm shift in breast cancer treatment.

As per the latest Globocan statistics, the high prevalence rate of breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries has led to it becoming the most common cancer to be diagnosed, hence posing a major public health challenge. As per this data, more than 11.7% of the estimated new cancer cases in 2020 were due to breast cancer. A small but significant subpopulation of cells with self- renewing ability are present in the tumor stroma and have been given the nomenclature of cancer stem cells (CSCs). These cells display a high degree of plasticity owing to their ability to transition from the slowly cycling quiescent phase to the actively proliferating phenotype. This attribute of CSCs allows them to differentiate into various cell types having diverse functions. Breast CSCs have a pivotal role in development, metastasis, treatment resistance and relapse of breast cancers. This review focuses on the pathways regulating breast CSC maintenance and the current strategies that are being explored for directing the development of novel, targeted, therapeutic approaches for limiting and eradicating this aberrant stem cell population.

EGFR mutation testing on plasma and urine samples: A pilot study evaluating the value of liquid biopsy in lung cancer diagnosis and management.

BACKGROUND: Cell free DNA (cfDNA) shed by cancer cells into blood and body fluids is a potential substrate for molecular testing. While plasma is approved for EGFR mutation testing in certain clinical settings, mutation testing on urine is not well explored in lung cancer. In this study, we assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of EGFR mutation analysis on plasma and urine samples. METHODS: Matched plasma and urine were collected prospectively from TKI-naïve lung adenocarcinoma (ADCA) patients (Group A) with available tumor tissue. Only plasma was collected from TKI-treated, known EGFR mutant ADCA patients developing TKI resistance (Group B). qPCR (tumor tissue) or digital droplet-PCR (urine/plasma) was performed for exon 19 deletions, exon 21 L858R and exon 20 T790M. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients (60 Group A, 21 Group B) were included. In Group A, EGFR mutations were detected in tissue in 34/60 (57%) patients. Mutations were detected in matched plasma in 24 (24/34, 70.5% sensitivity), and in matched urine in 15 (15/25, 60% sensitivity) of the 34 EGFR mutant cases, with no false positives (100% positive predictive value). Plasma and urine mutation results showed moderate agreement (70%) with a combined sensitivity of 88% (22/25). In Group B, new T790M mutations were detected in plasma in 61% (13/21) patients. CONCLUSION: Liquid biopsies show moderate sensitivity (plasma > urine) with 100% positive predictive rates for EGFR mutations. Testing of more than one type of liquid biopsy sample increases sensitivity. In TKI-resistant settings, liquid biopsies can obviate need for invasive biopsies in >60% patients.

To study the role of pre-treatment microRNA (micro ribonucleic acid) expression as a predictor of response to chemoradiation in locally advanced carcinoma cervix.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy is the standard of care in locally advanced carcinoma cervix. There is no prognostic factor at present to predict the outcome of disease in locally advanced carcinoma cervix. AIM: Differential expression of microRNAs can be used as biomarkers to predict clinical response in locally advanced carcinoma cervix patients. METHODS: Thirty-two patients of locally advanced carcinoma cervix with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IB-IVA were enrolled from 2017 to 2018. Expression of microRNA-9 5p, -31 3p, -100 5p, -125a 5p, -125b-5p, and -200a 5p in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) biopsied tissue were analyzed by real time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT qPCR). Pretreatment evaluation was done with clinical examination and MRI pelvis. All patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy. Patients were evaluated for the clinical response after 3 months of treatment, with clinical examination and MRI pelvis scan using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Patients with no residual disease were classified as Complete responders (CR) and with residual or progressive disease were classified as Nonresponders (NR). Results were statistically analyzed using Mann Whiney U test to examine significant difference between the expression of microRNA between complete responders (CR) and nonresponders (NR). RESULTS: microRNA-100 5p was upregulated in complete responders (CR) which showed a trend towards statistical significance (p value = 0.05). CONCLUSION: microRNA-100 5p can serve as a potential molecular biomarker in predicting clinical response to chemoradiation in locally advanced Carcinoma cervix. Its role should be further investigated in a larger study population.

Prognostic role of microRNA 182 and microRNA 18a in locally advanced triple negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The study assessed the epigenetic regulation and the role of microRNA (miR) expression in locally advanced triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) and comparison with the clinico-pathological variables and survival. METHODS: Fifty patients of locally advanced TNBC during the period 2011-2013 were included. Expression level of test microRNA (miR-182 and miR-18a) was determined using Taqman quantitative Real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) from formalin fixed paraffin embedded biopsy blocks. Clinical and demographic information and survival data was retrieved from the Hospital medical records. RESULTS: An improved clinical complete response (cCR) was observed in patients with age ≥ 45 years (80%), premenopausal status (70%), tumor size < 6 cms (80%), nodal status N0-N1 (95%) and grade II-III tumor (80%). A statistically significant correlation was observed on comparison of cCR with menopausal status (p-value 0.020), T category (p-value 0.018) and the clinical nodal status (p-value 0.003). pCR also correlated with clinical nodal status (p-value 0.008). Epigenetically, miR-18a under expression (< 8.84) was most commonly associated with tumor size < 6 cms (76.7%), clinical nodal status N0-N1 (90%), cCR (60%) and pCR (53.3%). A similar trend was observed with miR-182. Statistical significance was observed with T category (p-values 0.003 and 0.004), clinical nodal status (p-values 0.001 and 0.001), clinical response (p-values 0.002 and 0.002) and pathological response (p-values 0.007 and 0.006) with respect to miR-18a and miR-182, respectively. Also, the menopausal status significantly correlated with the miR-182 expression (p-value 0.009). miR-182 overexpression (≥ 6.32) was not observed in any of the postmenopausal patients. A univariate cox proportional hazard regression model also showed statistical interactions (p-values <0.004). CONCLUSION: miR-182 and miR-18a overexpression correlates with worse clinical and pathological tumor characteristics in locally advanced TNBC and hence could be used to predict the outcomes and prognosis in these patients.

Biomarker testing for advanced lung cancer by next-generation sequencing; a valid method to achieve a comprehensive glimpse at mutational landscape

Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) based assay for finding an actionable driver in non-small-cell lung cancer is a less used modality in clinical practice. With a long list of actionable targets, limited tissue, arduous single-gene assays, the alternative of NGS for broad testing in one experiment looks attractive. We report here our experience with NGS for biomarker testing in hundred advanced lung cancer patients. Methods: Predictive biomarker testing was performed using the Ion AmpliSeq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel V2 (30 tumors) and Oncomine™ Solid Tumor DNA and Oncomine™ Solid Tumor Fusion Transcript kit (70 tumors) on IonTorrent sequencing platform. Results: One-seventeen distinct aberrations were detected across 29 genes in eighty-six tumors. The most commonly mutated genes were TP53 (43% cases), EGFR (23% cases) and KRAS (17% cases). Thirty-four patients presented an actionable genetic variant for which targeted therapy is presently available, and fifty-two cases harbored non-actionable variants with the possibility of recruitment in clinical trials. NGS results were validated by individual tests for detecting EGFR mutation, ALK1 rearrangement, ROS1 fusion, and c-MET amplification. Compared to single test, NGS exhibited good agreement for detecting EGFR mutations and ALK1 fusion (sensitivity- 88.89%, specificity- 100%, Kappa-score 0.92 and sensitivity- 80%, specificity- 100%, Kappa-score 0.88; respectively). Further, the response of patients harboring tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitizing EGFR mutations was assessed. The progression-free-survival of EGFR positive patients on TKI therapy, harboring a concomitant mutation in PIK3CAmTOR and/or RAS-RAF-MAPK pathway gene and/or TP53 gene was inferior to those with sole-sensitizing EGFR mutation (2 months vs. 9.5 months, P = 0.015). Conclusions: This is the first study from South Asia looking into the analytical validity of NGS and describing the mutational landscape of lung cancer patients to study the impact of co-mutations on cancer biology and treatment outcome. Our study demonstrates the clinical utility of NGS testing for identifying actionable variants and making treatment decisions in advanced lung cancer

CSF cell-free DNA EGFR testing using DdPCR holds promise over conventional modalities for diagnosing leptomeningeal involvement in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: EGFR mutant NSCLC patients have leptomeningeal (LM) involvement in more than 9% cases. MATERIAL & METHODS: We conducted a study evaluating the diagnostic utility of cfDNA EGFR testing in CSF using DdPCR while comparing it against MRI and CSF cytology. We also looked for known EGFR mutations in the CSF sample. These mutations were also tested in paired plasma samples. We further compared which constituent of CSF (pellet/supernatant) had better yield. RESULTS: 21 patients comprised the study. Of these 17 patients were diagnosed to have LM involvement based on conventional criteria. All modalities had 100 % specificity and positive predictive value. However, MRI and CSF cytology had a poor negative predictive value. cfDNA had the highest sensitivity (92.3 %), negative predictive value (75 %), accuracy (94.1 %), and net comparative benefit. Paired plasma samples were available for 19 patients. Primary EGFR mutation was detectable in the CSF sample in 16/19 patients; however, the plasma sample was positive only in 7/19 patients. 3 samples were negative for primary EGFR mutation in both CSF and plasma. None of the CSF samples showed positivity for T790M mutation which could however be observed in two patients in plasma samples. Both supernatant and pellet were analysed for cfDNA mutation analysis in 18/21 patients. The intraclass correlation coefficient regarding the percentage fraction tumor-derived DNA of cfDNA observed was 0.83(95 % CI 0.29 to 0.95) between both samples. CONCLUSION: EGFR detection in CSF has a potential role in diagnosing LM involvement. T790 M resistance mutations are uncommon in CSF post first and second-generation TKIs. Both supernatant and pellet samples can be used for the extraction of cell-free DNA in CSF.

Genetic Counseling, Testing, and Management of HBOC in India: An Expert Consensus Document from Indian Society of Medical and Pediatric Oncology.

PURPOSE: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is primarily characterized by mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes. There are several barriers to the implementation of genetic testing and counseling in India that may affect clinical decisions. These consensus recommendations were therefore convened as a collaborative effort to improve testing and management of HBOC in India. DESIGN: Recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary group of experts from the Indian Society of Medical and Pediatric Oncology and some invited experts on the basis of graded evidence from the literature and using a formal Delphi process to help reach consensus. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched to source relevant articles. RESULTS: This consensus statement provides practical insight into identifying patients who should undergo genetic counseling and testing on the basis of assessments of family and ancestry and personal history of HBOC. It discusses the need and significance of genetic counselors and medical professionals who have the necessary expertise in genetic counseling and testing. Recommendations elucidate requirements of pretest counseling, including discussions on genetic variants of uncertain significance and risk reduction options. The group of experts recommended single-site mutation testing in families with a known mutation and next-generation sequencing coupled with multiplex ligation probe amplification for the detection of large genomic rearrangements for unknown mutations. Recommendations for surgical and lifestyle-related risk reduction approaches and management using poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors are also detailed. CONCLUSION: With rapid strides being made in the field of genetic testing/counseling in India, more oncologists are expected to include genetic testing/counseling as part of their clinical practice. These consensus recommendations are anticipated to help homogenize genetic testing and management of HBOC in India for improved patient care.

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction offers an improvisation over conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization for ascertaining Her2 status of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (DDPCR) is a recent modality for detecting Her2 expression which is quantitative, cheaper, easier to standardize, and free from interobserver variation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to incorporate DDPCR in the current diagnostic paradigm with clinical benefit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients were tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and DDPCR. With FISH result as gold standard, receiver operating characteristic curves for DDPCR ratio were analyzed to label Her2-negative, equivocal, and positive cases as DDPCR score 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Proportion of patients labeled unequivocally as Her2 positive or negative was defined to have "clinically benefitted" from the test. Drawing parallel to inter-relationships between DDPCR, IHC, and FISH in the test cohort, four diagnostic pathways were defined - (1) initial IHC followed by FISH, (2) initial DDPCR followed by FISH, (3) initial IHC followed by DDPCR followed by FISH, and (4) initial DDPCR followed by IHC followed by FISH. RESULTS: Clinical benefit of DDPCR as an initial test in the test cohort was 57%, while it was 65% if used as a second-line test among those with an initial inconclusive IHC result. Sensitivity analysis in the simulation cohort revealed that if DDPCR cost was ≤0.6 times the cost of IHC, then a three-step pathway with DDPCR upfront would near certainly prove most cost beneficial. If DDPCR cost was >0.6 but ≤2 times the cost of IHC, then a three-step pathway with DDPCR as second-line test had a higher probability to prove most cost beneficial. If DDPCR cost was >2 times the cost of IHC, then conventional pathway had a higher probability to prove most cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Incorporating DDPCR in the current clinical diagnostic paradigm has the potential to improve its cost-effectiveness and benefit.

Predictive biomarkers in nonsmall cell carcinoma and their clinico-pathological association.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Genome-directed therapy is less toxic, prolongs survival and provides a better quality of life. Predictive biomarker testing, therefore, has become a standard of care in advanced lung cancers. The objective of this study was to relate clinical and pathological features, including response to targeted therapy (TT) and progression-free survival (PFS) with positive driver mutation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Archival data of nonsmall cell carcinoma patients with Stage IV disease were retrieved. Those who tested positive for one of the four biomarkers (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK], MET, and ROS) were included. Patient demographics and clinical features were reviewed. Tumor histomorphology was correlated with oncological drivers. Treatment response, PFS, and overall survival were studied in three subcohorts of patients who received computed tomography (CT), CT followed by TT and those who received TT in the first line. RESULTS: A total of 900 patients underwent biomarker evaluation of which 288 tested positive. Frequency of the four biomarkers observed was 26.6% (229/860), 6.6% (51/775), 6.6% (5/75), and 5.1% (3/59) for EGFR, ALK, MET, and ROS-1, respectively. The median PFS for EGFR-mutated cohort was 12 months, whereas it was 21 months for ALK protein overexpressing cases. Patients treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors performed better compared to those who were switched from chemotherapy to TT or those who received chemotherapy alone (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Biomarker testing has improved patient outcome. Genome-directed therapy accords best PFS with an advantage of nearly 10 months over cytotoxic therapy.

Diagnostic ability of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction versus immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 assessment in breast cancer: An Indian perspective.

Background & objectives: Breast cancer is the most common cancer of women. Inferior prognosis in some patients has been attributed to the higher proliferative capability of the tumour. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Ki-67, despite being a simple and cost-effective method, has not become a valid tool to evaluate this biomarker. This is ascribed to variation in pre-analytical and analytical techniques, variable expression, hotspot distribution and inter-and intra-observer inconsistency. This study was aimed at defining the analytical and clinical validity of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as an alternative to IHC evaluation. Methods: This study included a total of 109 patients with invasive breast cancers. Ki-67 IHC visual assessment was compared with the mRNA value determined by RT-qPCR. Concordance between both the methods was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Cohen's kappa value with intraclass correlation were performed. Results: The threshold value for Ki-67 by RT-qPCR obtained by ROC curve was 22.23 per cent, which was used to divide breast cancer cases into high proliferative and low proliferative groups. A significant correlation was observed between both the breast cancer groups formed using RT-qPCR threshold as well as median laboratory value of Ki-67 labelling index by IHC. Interpretation & conclusions: The study results showed a significant correlation between the two methods. While IHC is subject to technical and interpretative variability, RT-qPCR may offer a more objective alternative.

Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis of case-control studies in Indian women.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: India is the world's most biodiverse region and is undergoing a period of dramatic social and economic change. Due to population's explosion, climate change and lax implementation of environmental policies, the incidence of breast cancer is increasing. From population-based cancer registry data, breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in urban registries where it constitutes more than 30% of all cancers in females. We conducted a meta-analysis of all breast cancer case-control studies conducted in India during 1991-2018 to find pooled estimates of odds ratio (OR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and HINARI databases from 1991 to January 2018. This analysis included 24 observational studies out of 34 that reported the case-control distribution of reproductive factors, body mass index (BMI) and type of residence. The analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 (Review Manager, 2017) applying the random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 21,511 patients (9889 cases and 11,622 controls) were analyzed, resulting in statistically significant association between breast cancer and the following reproductive factors: never breastfeed (OR: 3.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.70, 8.01), menopausal age >50 years (OR: 2.88; 95% CI: 1.85, 3.85), menarche age <13 years (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.34, 2.51), null parity (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.21, 2.06), postmenopause (OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.62), and age at the 1st pregnancy >25 years (OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.37, 1.80). Family history (FH) of breast cancer (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 2.89, 9.82), obesity (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.42), and urban residence (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.44) were also found to be significant risk factors. CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis are indicative of significant associations between reproductive factors and breast cancer risk, profoundly so among women experiencing menopause after the age of 50, women who never breastfeed and FH of breast cancer.

Case report of everolimus-induced sustained partial response in metastatic renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma.

Epithelioid variant of angiomyolipoma (EAML) is a newly defined entity and a close mimicker of renal cell carcinoma. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest its aggressive behavior in terms of local recurrence, metastasis and death. The treatment for this subset of patients has posed challenges for the experts. Chemotherapy plays little active role and so molecular profiling to identify genomic alterations amenable to targeted therapies has paved the way. Recently, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors have been utilised both in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings and have shown promising results in terms of survival. We present a case of a metastatic epithelioid angiomyolipoma treated sequentially with imatinib, crizotinib and now maintaining a sustained partial response with everolimus.

Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations and variants of unknown clinical significance associated with breast/ovarian cancer: a report from North India.

BACKGROUND: The spectrum of BRCA mutations that predispose to development of breast/ovarian cancer in Indian population remains unexplored. We report incidence and various types of pathogenic, likely pathogenic and variants of unknown significance (VUS) mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes observed at a tertiary cancer center in North India. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 206 unrelated breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, who met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for genetic testing, were screened for germline BRCA1/BRCA 2 mutations on high-throughput sequencing platform; large genomic rearrangements were assessed by multiple ligation probe assay. Mutations were mined in mutational databases, PubMed, and discerned into classes. Furthermore, the clinicopathological correlation of BRCA mutation status with prognostic markers in breast cancer and tumor histology in ovarian cancer was performed. RESULTS: In total, 45/206 and 17/206 cases showed positivity for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively, whereas 1/206 was positive for a mutation in both the genes. Altogether, 33 distinct BRCA1 mutations were observed, among which 27 were deleterious (12 frameshifts, 8 nonsense, 1 missense, 3 splice-site variants, 2 big deletions and 1 large duplication) and 6 were VUS. Five novel BRCA1 mutations (c.541G>T, c.1681delT, c.2295delG, c.4915C>T and exon 23 deletion) were identified. Seven mutations (c.2214_2215insT, c.2295delG, c.3607C>T,c.4158_4162delCTCTC, c.4571C>A, splicesite_3 (C>T) and exon 21-23 duplication) occurred more than once, whereas 16 distinct BRCA2 mutations were noted - 9 were lethal (6 frameshifts, 2 nonsense and 1 big deletion) and 7 VUS. One unique pathogenic BRCA2 mutation (c.932_933insT) was recognized. Two mutations (c.9976A>T and c.10089A>G) recurred twice. No significant difference in hormone receptor status was observed among BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 carriers and noncarriers. CONCLUSION: We have documented various pathogenic and VUS mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes observed in the cohort. Six novel mutations were identified. The knowledge shared would assist genetic testing in enabling more focused site-specific screening for mutations in biological relatives.

The detection of primary and secondary EGFR mutations using droplet digital PCR in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We share our experience of using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (DdPCR) in liquid biopsy specimens for detecting primary and secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations among patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer who had tissue biopsy initially analyzed for del19, L858R and T790M. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups of patients were chosen: Group 1: patients positive for EGFR mutation (del 19 or L858R) by conventional tissue biopsy that were treatment naïve, Group 2: patients positive for EGFR mutation (del 19 or L858R) by conventional tissue biopsy with acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, documented by radiology, and Group 3: no known EGFR mutation detected on primary tissue biopsy and treatment naive. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients were included in the study. Group 1 had 40 cases, of which 21 (52.5%) and 19 (47.5%) were positive for del19 and L858R mutations, respectively, by tissue biopsy. DdPCR detected primary mutation in all but 5 cases. DdPCR additionally found four patients to have T790M mutation. Group 2 had 73 cases and DdPCR detected T790M mutation in 39 (53.4%) cases. Liquid biopsy also picked the original primary mutation in 56/73 cases. Secondary tissue biopsy for T790M mutation status was performed in 11 patients and while it detected mutation in 2 out of 11 cases, DdPCR detected the same in 7 cases, thus providing significantly superior yield (46% difference, McNemar's test, P value 0.063). Tissue biopsy additionally detected c-MET amplification in a patient who had T790M mutation on liquid biopsy. Group 3 had 20 patients and none were falsely positive for EGFR mutation on liquid biopsy. Overall, DdPCR had a Cohen's kappa of 0.82 (standard error 0.074, 95% CI 0.68-0.97) indicating "very good agreement" with conventional tissue biopsy. CONCLUSION: DdPCR demonstrated 87.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity in detecting primary EGFR mutations in patients who were treatment naïve with overall positive and negative predictive value of 100% and 80%, respectively. DdPCR demonstrated T790M mutation postprogression on TKI therapy in 53.4% patients.

Clinical utility of RT-PCR in assessing HER 2 gene expression versus traditional IHC and FISH in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: IHC and FISH are used for categorizing HER 2 status in breast cancer at the protein and DNA level, respectively. HER 2 expression at the RNA level is quantitative, cheaper, easier to standardize and free from interobserver variation. METHODS: 115 consecutive patients were tested by IHC, FISH and RT-PCR (test cohort). Assuming FISH result to be the response variable, ROC curves for RT-PCR ratio were analyzed to label HER 2 negative, equivocal and positive cases as RT-PCR score 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Inter-relationships between RT-PCR, IHC and FISH were defined. 'Clinical benefit' of a test was defined as proportion of patients labeled unequivocally as HER 2 positive or negative. Population for 1 year was simulated constraint to previous reports of HER 2 positivity and IHC category distribution by a meta-analysis of previous studies that evaluated concordance between IHC and FISH to determine HER 2 status (simulation cohort). Four diagnostic pathways in the simulation cohort were defined-(1) initial IHC, followed by FISH (conventional pathway); (2) initial RT-PCR, followed by FISH; (3) initial IHC, followed by RT-PCR and then by FISH; (4) initial RT-PCR, followed by IHC and then by FISH. The clinical benefit of IHC and RT-PCR in the four pathways was analyzed and sensitivity analysis for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and cost-benefit comapring RT-PCR against IHC, both as first-line tests and among those with IHC score 2 as a reflex second-line test was performed by the Monte Carlo technique. FINDINGS: 115 patients comprised the study population. While none with IHC score of 0 or 1 was FISH positive for HER 2, all cases with IHC score of 3 were FISH positive. 43 cases were assigned IHC score of 2. Thus, 72 patients benefited from the initial IHC testing [clinical benefit 62.6%], with the overall concordance between IHC and FISH being 100% for those with IHC score of 0, 1 and 3 (conclusive IHC categories). For RT-PCR with 100% concordance, 15.7% (115-97 = 18) patients would have benefited from RT-PCR testing if it was used as a first-line test. If RT-PCR would have been used as a second-line test among those with IHC score 2 (n = 43), then only 6 patients would have been assigned a conclusive RT-PCR category (category 1 or 3) translating to a clinical benefit of 14% (6/43) as a second-line test. As a second-line test it had 51% probability to prove more cost-effective than the conventional pathway, provided the cost of RT-PCR was 0.4 times the cost of IHC. Also in a three-step pathway, RT-PCR upfront would have 56% probability of higher cost-benefit provided the cost of RT-PCR was 0.1 times the cost of IHC. CONCLUSION: RT-PCR results were found to be suboptimal to IHC in terms of discriminative ability and clinical benefit; thus, it is unlikely to replace IHC as a first-line test in the near future.

ROS1 rearrangement and response to crizotinib in Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancers has been reported from 1.6% to 2.3%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 105 lung adenocarcinoma patients for ROS1 rearrangement which were negative for EGFR and anaplastic lymphoma kinase. Clinical characteristics of ROS1 rearranged patients and their responses to crizotinib therapy were studied. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients, three cases were positive for ROS1 rearrangement by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. All of them showed heterogeneous pattern. All the 3 ROS1-positive patients were females in their forties and started on crizotinib. All of them responded to treatment. One of them developed resistance after 3 months. Another one showed marked systemic response but central nervous system lesions progressed. The third case is doing well till date with inactive lesions on positron emission tomography scan. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of ROS1 rearrangement is low in non-small cell lung carcinoma, but their diagnosis offers patients an opportunity to receive highly effective targeted therapies.

Novel e8a2 BCR/ABL Fusion Transcript in Case of a Myeloproliferative Neoplasm.

Main objective of this work was to confirm the occurrence of rare BCR-ABL fusion variant involving the a2 region of the ABL gene and e8 of BCR gene in a patient of Myeloproliferative neoplasm positive for t(9;22) translocation but negative for common major and minor breakpoint cluster regions. A patient with elevated white blood cell count was subjected to classical cytogenetics, FISH as well as RT-PCR testing using commercial kits as well as published primers and in house testing protocol. The translocation event in chromosome 9 and 22 could be successfully detected. BCR/ABL dual color, dual fusion probe generated a classical balanced translocation scenario within the nucleus. In RT-PCR we found an unexpectedly large amplification band around 1700 bp, which is consistent with e8a2 transcript. Nine metaphases showed 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)[9] by cytogenetic. A rare e8a2 break point in the BCR-ABL gene in myeloproliferative neoplasm disease detected in India. It also emphasizes the utility of cytogenetic and FISH for primary diagnosis of any neoplasm in blood. Our Patient detected rare BCR-ABL fusion variant e8a2 was on imatinib 400 mg since last 3 months. After 3 months fluorescent in situ analysis and reverse transcriptase pcr analysis showed negative results.

S100P as a Marker for Urothelial Histogenesis: A Critical Review and Comparison With Novel and Traditional Urothelial Immunohistochemical Markers.

S100P, or placental S100, is a member of a large family of S100 proteins and considered to be a promising immunohistochemical marker to support urothelial differentiation. This review synthesizes published data regarding the expression of S100P in urothelial carcinoma across histological grade and variant patterns, and in other malignancies, in an effort to summarize the state of understanding of this marker and evaluate its potential. We provide also a broad comparison of S100P with other contemporary and traditional urothelial markers and outline the potential utility of S100P in various diagnostically challenging scenarios. Taken in context, we recommend that to provide immunohistochemical support for consideration of urothelial differentiation, S100P may be included in a panel of markers (due to its high sensitivity), with better established (GATA3) and more specific (uroplakin 2) markers, for comparison with corresponding markers of other primary sites under consideration, depending on the clinical context. We emphasize that the overall most appropriate panel for any given case depends on the differential diagnosis engendered by the morphology encountered, and the constellation of clinical findings. As always with immunohistochemical panels, expected positive and negative markers for each diagnostic consideration should be included. Finally, since as of date there are no optimally sensitive or specific markers of urothelial differentiation, all final diagnoses relying on immunohistochemical support should be made in the appropriate clinical and histological context.