Does the Association Between Psychosocial Factors and Opioid Use After Elective Spine Surgery Differ by Sex in Older Adults?

Purpose: Psychosocial disorders have been linked to chronic postoperative opioid use and the development of postoperative pain. The potential interaction between sex and psychosocial factors with respect to opioid use after elective spine surgery in the elderly has not yet been evaluated. Our aim was to assess whether any observed association of anxiety or depression indicators with opioid consumption in the first 72 hours after elective spine surgery varies by sex in adults ≥65 years. Patients and Methods: Secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of 647 elective spine surgeries performed at Brigham and Women's Hospital, July 1, 2015-March 15, 2017, in patients ≥65. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test whether history of anxiety, anxiolytic use, history of depression, and antidepressant use were associated with opioid consumption 0-24, 24-48, and 48-72 post surgery, and whether these potential associations differed by sex. Results: History of anxiety, anxiolytic use, history of depression, and antidepressant use were more common among women (51.3% of the sample). During the first 24 hours after surgery, men with a preoperative history of anxiety consumed an adjusted mean of 19.5 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (99.6% CI: 8.1, 31.0) more than men without a history of anxiety; women with a history of anxiety only consumed an adjusted mean 2.9 MME (99.6% CI: -3.1, 8.9) more than women without a history of anxiety (P value for interaction between sex and history of anxiety <0.001). No other interactions were detected between sex and psychosocial factors with respect to opioid use after surgery. Conclusion: Secondary analysis of this retrospective cohort study found minimal evidence that the association between psychosocial factors and opioid consumption after elective spine surgery differs by sex in adults ≥65.

Effects of varying remifentanil concentrations on Analgesia Nociception Index® under propofol: an observational study.

Analgesia Nociception Index monitor provides a measurement of the nociception and anti-nociception balance based on heart-rate variability. The aim was to assess the ability of Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) to detect standard noxious stimulation during anesthesia at different opioid concentrations in comparison to hemodynamic and Bispectral Index parameters. Sixteen patients undergoing general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. Standardized tetanic electrical stimulation was applied without any other concurrent stimuli, while different effect site concentrations of remifentanil were increased step-by-step (0.5, 1.5, 3.0, 5 and 7 ng/ml). For each tetanic stimulus, values of the different variables 60 s before and 120 s following the stimulus were analyzed. ANI values decreased significantly 120 s after the stimulus when compared to the mean ANI 60 s before the stimulus (P < 0.01). At lower remifentanil concentrations (0.5 ng/ml), all variables except electromyogram from the Bispectral Index significantly changed after the stimulus but in the higher concentrations (5.0 and 7.0 ng/ml) there was not a significant change. The other variables did not change significantly after the noxious stimulation. ANI was the only variable that positively correlated with the different remifentanil concentrations (R = 0.959, P = 0.01). Our study showed that there was a significant decrease in Analgesia Nociception Index after a tetanic stimulation while hemodynamic and BIS parameters did not change, suggesting that the Analgesia Nociception Index may perform better than traditional hemodynamic parameters at reflecting noxious stimulation. Analgesia Nociception Index significantly changed at lower, but not at higher, remifentanil concentrations.

Association Among Preoperative Cognitive Performance, Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation, and Postoperative Delirium in Older Portuguese Patients.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium is common among older patients and preoperative identification of high-risk patients is widely recommended. The aim of this study was to assess whether preoperative cognitive performance using brief screening tools or regional cerebral oxygen saturation (Scto2) was associated with the development of postoperative delirium in older Portuguese patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study where preoperative cognitive screening tools (Mini-Cog, Mini-Mental State Examination, verbal fluency) and Scto2 (INVOS 5100C; Medtronic, Ireland) were assessed in 238 patients ≥65 years old undergoing elective surgery between July 2017 and May 2019 at a tertiary academic center in Portugal. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium detected by the 3D-Confusion Assessment Method. Data were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Delirium was identified in 53 patients (22%); 162 patients (68%) had completed only 4 years of education. On multivariable analysis, probable cognitive impairment tested by the Mini-Cog (odds ratio [OR] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-3.53; corrected P value >.999), by the Mini-Mental State Examination (OR = 2.75; 95% CI, 1.23-6.13; corrected P value = .052), and by the animal verbal fluency test (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.49-3.16; corrected P value >.999) were not significantly associated with the development of postoperative delirium. In contrast, lower preoperative Scto2 (OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14; corrected P value = .024 for each point decrease in Scto2) was associated with postoperative delirium. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find enough evidence to suggest that poor preoperative cognitive performance was significantly associated with the development of postoperative delirium in an older Portuguese surgical population with an overall low level of formal education, but rather that preoperative Scto2 may be helpful in identifying patients at risk for delirium.

Brief Preoperative Screening for Frailty and Cognitive Impairment Predicts Delirium after Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Frailty and cognitive impairment are associated with postoperative delirium, but are rarely assessed preoperatively. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that preoperative screening for frailty or cognitive impairment identifies patients at risk for postoperative delirium (primary outcome). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the authors administered frailty and cognitive screening instruments to 229 patients greater than or equal to 70 yr old presenting for elective spine surgery. Screening for frailty (five-item FRAIL scale [measuring fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and weight loss]) and cognition (Mini-Cog, Animal Verbal Fluency) were performed at the time of the preoperative evaluation. Demographic data, perioperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were gathered. Delirium was the primary outcome detected by either the Confusion Assessment Method, assessed daily from postoperative day 1 to 3 or until discharge, if patient was discharged sooner, or comprehensive chart review. Secondary outcomes were all other-cause complications, discharge not to home, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: The cohort was 75 [73 to 79 yr] years of age, 124 of 219 (57%) were male. Many scored positive for prefrailty (117 of 218; 54%), frailty (53 of 218; 24%), and cognitive impairment (50 to 82 of 219; 23 to 37%). Fifty-five patients (25%) developed delirium postoperatively. On multivariable analysis, frailty (scores 3 to 5 [odds ratio, 6.6; 95% CI, 1.96 to 21.9; P = 0.002]) versus robust (score 0) on the FRAIL scale, lower animal fluency scores (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.51; P = 0.036) for each point decrease in the number of animals named, and more invasive surgical procedures (odds ratio, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.31 to 5.50; P = 0.007) versus less invasive procedures were associated with postoperative delirium. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for frailty and cognitive impairment preoperatively using the FRAIL scale and the Animal Verbal Fluency test in older elective spine surgery patients identifies those at high risk for the development of postoperative delirium.

Retrospective Analysis of Perioperative Variables Associated With Postoperative Delirium and Other Adverse Outcomes in Older Patients After Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to identify perioperative variables predictive of the development of delirium in older surgical patients after spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data on patients 65 years of age and above having spine surgery between July 1, 2015 and March 15, 2017. The primary outcome was the development of postoperative delirium. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Among the 716 patients included in this study 127 (18%) developed postoperative delirium. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of postoperative delirium included older age (odds ratio [OR]=1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.09; P=0.048), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status >2 (OR=1.89 [95% CI, 1.04-3.59]; P=0.042), metabolic equivalents of task <4 (OR=1.84 [95% CI, 1.10-3.07]; P=0.019), depression (OR=2.01 [95% CI, 1.21-3.32]; P=0.006), nonelective surgery (OR=4.81 [95% CI, 1.75-12.79]; P=0.002), invasive surgical procedures (OR=1.97 [95% CI, 1.10-3.69]; P=0.028) and higher mean pain scores on postoperative day 1 (OR=1.28 [95% CI, 1.11-1.48]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative delirium is a common complication in older patients after spine surgery, and there are several perioperative risk factors associated with its development.

Adverse postoperative cognitive disorders: a national survey of portuguese anesthesiologists / Distúrbios cognitivos adversos no pós-operatório: uma pesquisa nacional de anestesiologistas portugueses

Abstract Background and objectives Postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction are some of the most common complications in older surgical patients and are associated with adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate portuguese anesthesiologists' perspectives and knowledge about adverse postoperative cognitive disorders, and routine clinical practice when caring for older surgical patients. Methods We used a prospective online survey with questions using a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree), or yes/no/don't know answer types. Potential participants were portuguese anesthesiologists working in hospitals affiliated with the portuguese national health system and private hospitals. Results We analyzed 234 surveys (17.7% of total potential respondents). The majority believed that the risk of cognitive side effects should be considered when choosing the type of anesthesia (87.6%) and that preoperative cognitive function should be routinely assessed (78.6%). When caring for an agitated and confused patient postoperatively, 62.4% would first administer an analgesic and 11.1% an anxiolytic. Protocols to screen and manage postoperative cognitive disorders are rarely used. Nearly all respondents believe that postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction are neglected areas in anesthesiology. Conclusions Overall, participants perceive postoperative cognitive disorders as important adverse outcomes following surgery and anesthesia are aware of the main risk factors for their development but may lack information on prevention and management of postoperative delirium. The majority of hospitals do not have protocols regarding preoperative cognitive assessment, diagnosis, management or follow-up of patients with delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos O delírio pós-operatório e a disfunção cognitiva pós-operatória são algumas das complicações mais comuns em pacientes cirúrgicos mais idosos e estão associados a desfechos adversos. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as perspectivas e conhecimentos de anestesiologistas portugueses sobre distúrbios cognitivos pós-operatórios e a prática clínica de rotina ao cuidar de pacientes cirúrgicos idosos. Métodos Pesquisa prospectiva on-line com perguntas usando uma escala Likert de 1-5 (discordo completamente-concordo completamente), ou respostas como sim/não/não sei. Os potenciais participantes eram anestesiologistas portugueses que trabalhavam em hospitais afiliados ao sistema nacional de saúde português e hospitais privados. Resultados Analisamos 234 resultados (17,7% do total dos potenciais respondentes). A maioria acreditava que o risco de efeitos colaterais cognitivos deveria ser considerado ao escolher o tipo de anestesia (87,6%) e que a função cognitiva pré-operatória deveria ser rotineiramente avaliada (78,6%). Ao cuidar de um paciente agitado e confuso no pós-operatório, 62,4% administraram primeiro um analgésico e 11,1% um ansiolítico. Protocolos para detectar e tratar distúrbios cognitivos pós-operatórios são raramente usados. Quase todos os entrevistados acreditam que o delírio pós-operatório e a disfunção cognitiva pós-operatória são áreas negligenciadas na anestesiologia. Conclusões Em geral, os participantes percebem os distúrbios cognitivos pós-operatórios como importantes resultados adversos após a cirurgia e anestesia, estão cientes dos principais fatores de risco para seu desenvolvimento, mas podem não ter informações sobre como prevenir e tratar o delírio pós-operatório. A maioria dos hospitais não possui protocolos de avaliação cognitiva pré-operatória, diagnóstico, tratamento ou acompanhamento de pacientes com delírio e disfunção cognitiva no pós-operatório.

[Adverse postoperative cognitive disorders: a national survey of portuguese anesthesiologists]. / Distúrbios cognitivos adversos no pós­operatório: uma pesquisa nacional de anestesiologistas portugueses.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction are some of the most common complications in older surgical patients and are associated with adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate portuguese anesthesiologists' perspectives and knowledge about adverse postoperative cognitive disorders, and routine clinical practice when caring for older surgical patients. METHODS: We used a prospective online survey with questions using a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (completely disagree to completely agree), or yes/no/don't know answer types. Potential participants were portuguese anesthesiologists working in hospitals affiliated with the portuguese national health system and private hospitals. RESULTS: We analyzed 234 surveys (17.7% of total potential respondents). The majority believed that the risk of cognitive side effects should be considered when choosing the type of anesthesia (87.6%) and that preoperative cognitive function should be routinely assessed (78.6%). When caring for an agitated and confused patient postoperatively, 62.4% would first administer an analgesic and 11.1% an anxiolytic. Protocols to screen and manage postoperative cognitive disorders are rarely used. Nearly all respondents believe that postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction are neglected areas in anesthesiology. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, participants perceive postoperative cognitive disorders as important adverse outcomes following surgery and anesthesia are aware of the main risk factors for their development but may lack information on prevention and management of postoperative delirium. The majority of hospitals do not have protocols regarding preoperative cognitive assessment, diagnosis, management or follow-up of patients with delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction.