Dili is rare amongst patients without liver metastases receiving cancer treatment in Iceland: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information on the frequency of idiosyncratic drug-liver injury (DILI) among cancer patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of DILI due to cancer treatment in a population-based setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients diagnosed with genitourinary cancer, breast cancer or metastatic malignant melanoma in 2007-2018 were matched with a database containing laboratory results for all major hospitals in Iceland. Medical chart review was performed for cases with ALT/AST ≥5× upper limit of normal (ULN), ALP ≥2× ULN or bilirubin ≥2× ULN. Patients with liver-, and/or bone metastases and isolated elevations of ALP and patients with other etiologies of liver enzyme elevations were excluded. Cases with a RUCAM score of probable or highly probable were included. RESULTS: Among 4956 patients, 840 patients had liver enzyme elevations. Overall, nine (0.2%) cases of DILI were identified, seven women (78%), median age 59 years (IQR 52-66). Four patients had kidney cancer, four breast cancer and one metastatic prostate cancer. In eight cases, a single agent was implicated: Pazopanib (n = 3), axitinib, docetaxel, gemcitabine, letrozole and paclitaxel. In all cases, the treatment was interrupted or discontinued due to the liver injury. No patient developed jaundice or liver failure and no death was linked to DILI. Time to normalization of liver enzymes was 17 days (IQR 25-120). CONCLUSION: DILI was found to be rare and no cases of severe liver injury occurred. However, approximately 90% of patients switched to another treatment which might have affected prognosis.

Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in the CARD study.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with poor overall survival (OS) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In the CARD study (NCT02485691), cabazitaxel significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and OS versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative androgen-receptor-targeted agent (ARTA). Here, we investigated NLR as a biomarker. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CARD was a multicenter, open-label study that randomized patients with mCRPC to receive cabazitaxel (25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) versus abiraterone (1000 mg/day) or enzalutamide (160 mg/day). The relationships between baseline NLR [< versus ≥ median (3.38)] and rPFS, OS, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, and prostate-specific antigen response to cabazitaxel versus ARTA were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Multivariable Cox regression with stepwise selection of covariates was used to investigate the prognostic association between baseline NLR and OS. RESULTS: The rPFS benefit with cabazitaxel versus ARTA was particularly marked in patients with high NLR {8.5 versus 2.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.67]; P < 0.0001}, compared with low NLR [7.5 versus 5.1 months, respectively; HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.45-1.06); P = 0.0860]. Higher NLR (continuous covariate, per 1 unit increase) independently associated with poor OS [HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.08); P = 0.0003]. For cabazitaxel, there was no OS difference between patients with high versus low NLR (15.3 versus 12.9 months, respectively; P = 0.7465). Patients receiving an ARTA with high NLR, however, had a worse OS versus those with low NLR (9.5 versus 13.3 months, respectively; P = 0.0608). CONCLUSIONS: High baseline NLR predicts poor outcomes with an ARTA in patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative ARTA. Conversely, the activity of cabazitaxel is retained irrespective of NLR.

MRI-derived aortic characteristics after pregnancy: The AMBITYON study.

OBJECTIVES: Pregnancy and pregnancy complications have been associated with increased arterial stiffness even at young age. In this study we assessed the impact of parity on CMR-derived aortic characteristics as early markers of atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in healthy women between 25 and 35 years. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 68 women who participated in the AMBITYON study, a prospective population-based cohort study for assessment of atherosclerotic burden by MRI and traditional CVD risk factors in healthy, young adults. Of these women, 40 (58.8%) were nulliparous, 13 (19.1%) were primiparous and 15 (22.1%) were multiparous. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descending thoracic aortic wall thickness (AWT) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured using 3.0T CMR. RESULTS: AWT measurements were similar between nulliparous women and primi- or multiparous women (1.6 mm ±â€¯0.2 mm vs. 1.6 mm ±â€¯0.2 mm; p = 0.79). Correction for age and systolic blood pressure did not change these results. Applying percentile based cut-off values showed a non-significant increase in AWT in parous women. PWV measurements did not differ between nulliparous women and parous women (4.5 m/s ±â€¯0.7 m/s vs. 4.5 m/s ±â€¯0.8 m/s; p = 0.78). Correction for age and systolic blood pressure did not influence these results. Using percentile based cut-off values, showed an increasing likelihood of higher PWV-values in parous women, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Direct measurement of aortic AWT and PWV by CMR showed no difference between nulliparous and parous women, probably indicating limited effect of pregnancy on arterial stiffness and early markers of atherosclerosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) number: 4742.

A randomised study of tailored toxicity-based dosage of fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for early breast cancer (SBG 2000-1).

STUDY AIM: Retrospective studies have demonstrated a worse outcome in breast cancer patients not developing leukopenia during adjuvant chemotherapy. The SBG 2000-1 is the first randomised trial designed to compare individually dosed chemotherapy without G-CSF support based on grade of toxicity to standard-dosed chemotherapy based on body surface area (BSA). METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer were included and received the first cycle of standard FEC (fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2). Patients with nadir leukopenia grade 0-2 after first cycle were randomised between either 6 additional courses of tailored FEC with increased doses (E 75-90 mg/m2, C 900-1200 mg/m2) or fixed treatment with 6 standard FEC. Patients with grade 3-4 leukopenia were registered and treated with 6 standard FEC. Primary end-point was distant disease-free survival (DDFS). RESULTS: The study enrolled 1535 patients, of which 1052 patients were randomised to tailored FEC (N = 524) or standard FEC (N = 528), whereas 401 patients with leukopenia grade 3-4 continued standard FEC and formed the registered cohort. Dose escalation did not statistically significantly improve 10-year DDFS (79% and 77%, HR 0.87, CI 0.67-1.14, P = 0.32) or OS (82% and 78%, respectively, HR 0.89, CI 0.57-1.16, P = 0.38). Corresponding estimates for the registered group of patients were DDFS 79% and OS 82%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SBG 2000-1 study failed to show a statistically significant improvement of escalated and tailored-dosed chemotherapy compared with standard BSA-based chemotherapy in patients with low haematological toxicity, although all efficacy parameters showed a numerical advantage for tailored treatment.

Case-based review: conservative management of appendicitis--are we delaying the inevitable?

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical presentation for which surgical intervention, an appendicectomy, has remained a largely unchallenged primary treatment modality. Traditionally, it has been felt that the pathophysiological progressive nature of appendicitis ultimately leads to perforation. A number of recent studies, however, suggest that the process of appendiceal inflammation may follow a more remitting nature with evidence indicating spontaneous resolution. It is hypothesised that the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis may therefore be amenable to conservative management with antibiotics. This article aims to highlight some of the issues and challenges relating to the conservative management of acute appendicitis and further demonstrates potential diagnostic and treatment difficulties involved in managing the more unfamiliar condition of recurrent appendicitis.

Adjuvant goserelin and ovarian preservation in chemotherapy treated patients with early breast cancer: results from a randomized trial.

The purpose of this randomized study was to examine if goserelin concomitant to CMF-chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for premenopausal breast cancer, protects the ovaries from premature failure. A total of 285 premenopausal breast cancer patients, in a randomized adjuvant trial (Zoladex in premenopausal patients (ZIPP)), were assigned to a study on ovarian function. Node positive patients were assigned to CMF-(cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy in addition to endocrine therapy. All patients were randomly assigned to receive 2 years of goserelin, goserelin plus tamoxifen, tamoxifen alone or no endocrine treatment. We studied, if menses were affected in the treatment groups, up to 36 months after randomization. One year after completed CMF- and endocrine therapy, 36% of the women in the goserelin group reported menses, compared to 7% in the goserelin plus tamoxifen group, 13% in the tamoxifen group and 10% of the controls. Among women treated with goserelin, there was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of menstruating women, 1 year after completed treatment compared to at 24 months of treatment (P = 0.006), in contrast to all other treatment groups, who were unchanged or more often amenorrheic. In our study, there is some evidence of protective effect of goserelin on ovarian function in CMF treated women. This effect was not observed in the combined tamoxifen and goserelin treatment.

Bone mineral density among premenopausal women with early breast cancer in a randomized trial of adjuvant endocrine therapy.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects on bone mineral density of 2 years of treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist alone or in combination with tamoxifen or tamoxifen alone in premenopausal breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 89 women from two centers in Stockholm participating in a randomized multicenter trial of three different endocrine approaches in the adjuvant setting (Zoladex in Premenopausal Patients Trial). The women were assigned to receive the LHRH agonist goserelin with or without tamoxifen, tamoxifen alone, or no endocrine therapy. The treatment was given for 2 years. We measured total-body bone density before start of treatment and at 12, 24, and 36 months. RESULTS: After 2 years of treatment, there was a significant loss of bone mineral density (mean change, -5%; P <.001) in the women receiving goserelin alone. The combined goserelin and tamoxifen treatment, as well as tamoxifen alone, resulted in a lesser but statistically significant decline in bone mineral density (mean change, -1.4%; P =.02; and -1.5%; P <.001). One year after cessation of treatment, the goserelin group alone showed a partial recovery from bone loss (mean change, 1.5%; P =.02). CONCLUSION: Two years of ovarian ablation from goserelin treatment caused a significant reduction in bone mineral density but there was a partial recovery from the bone loss 1 year after cessation of treatment. The addition of tamoxifen seems to partially counteract the demineralizing effects of goserelin.

The ergonomic analysis of a trauma resuscitation room.

Ergonomics is the practical and scientific study of people in relation to their working environment. We describe its application to the operation of a trauma resuscitation room. We used specifically designed computer software. This methodology enables a unique and objective assessment of the design and operation of a clinical system. It may be particularly applicable to other hospital areas where the efficient interaction of staff, patients and equipment is crucial to the optimal clinical outcome.